pqzj Agenda Item # Page # CHAIR AND MEMBERS BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING ON MONDAY, JULY 18,2011: 7:40 p.

Similar documents
THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby enacts as follows:

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement, 80 Bell Estate Road (Thornbeck-Bell House)

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

Church and Gloucester Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

City of Kingston Report to Municipal Heritage Committee Report Number MHC

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE27.20, adopted as amended, by City of Toronto Council on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO

Municipality of Chatham-Kent. Legislative Services. Planning Services

Demolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue

Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - College Street Properties

SUBJECT: Designation of 1309 Appleby Line, The Charles Fothergill House and Farm

CHAIR AND MEMBERS THE BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING ON JUNE 13,2011 D.N. STANLAKE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Corporate Report. 2. That the Interim Control By-law prohibit within the Low Density Residential Suburban Neighbourhood (R1) zone, the following:

Lot 1 KAP Lot 1. Lot 1. Lot 4. ot 5

Toronto and East York Community Council. Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

This location map is for information purposes only. The exact boundaries of the property are not shown.

Historic Yonge Street - Study Area Designation By-Law

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

Location map, showing the Main Block (#1) and the links to the West (#2) and East (#3) Wings that are included in the Reasons for Designation.

COBOURG HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

DECEMBER 10, Any additional items not listed on the agenda would be identified for approval.

xx-2012 A by-law to designate a property as being of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest

Downtown Incentive Programs

REASONS FOR LISTING: 306 AND 308 LONSDALE ROAD. #306 Lonsdale #308 Lonsdale. 306 and 308 Lonsdale Road Apartments

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Committee of Adjustment Public Hearing Wednesday, April 22, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall - 5:00 p.m. Agenda

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: May 5, 2015

Heritage Evaluation 51A, 53, 53A, 63, 65, 67 Mutual Street

51-65 Quebec Avenue and High Park Avenue Residential Rental Demolition Application Final Report

Downtown Revitalization Incentive Policy

Donna S. VanderClock, Town Manager Town of Weston Steven Cecil AIA ASLA

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALGARY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

Heritage Impact Statement

97 Walmer Road and Spadina Road Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications Final Report

Report to: Development Services Committee February 12, 2018

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Town Centre Community Improvement Plan

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

and King Street West Part Lot Control Exemption Application Final Report

BUILT BOUNDARY CIP REDEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION FORM

CITY OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NO. To Amend Zoning By-law Respecting Downtown Zones

8 Lester B. Pearson Street, Kleinburg

Historic Preservation Ordinance Draft- 6/3/16 Page 1

LOCATION OF LISTED BUILDINGS

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

A Walking Tour of Heritage Burlington Art Gallery of Burlington Neighbourhood Walking Tour

307 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Commission Report

Removal of a Designated Heritage Property under the Ontario Heritage Act 314 Jarvis Street

5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

EVALUATION REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Development & Builders Association Comments on the Implementation Tools 2009 Affordable Housing Discussion Paper

Richardson s Bakery. Description of Historic Place. Heritage Value of Historic Place

AGENDA - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Monday, August 10, 2009

Report of: DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SECTION HEAD. 19 Cassiobury Park Avenue PARK

Committee of Adjustment Agenda

IMPACT OF INFILL PROGRAM ON NEIGHBOURHOODS TASK FORCE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 30, :00 p.m. CHARLIE WARD ROOM, BRANTFORD CITY HALL

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Policy & Research, City Planning Division

FURTHER THAT Consent B-19/16 be subject to the following conditions:

50 and 52 Neptune Drive Rezoning Preliminary Report

TO: CHAIR AND MEMBERS - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

The Bonus Zoning policy will be applied in conjunction with the Implementation policies contained within the Official Plan.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

Staff Report. November 16, 2016 Page 1 of 6

MUNICIPAL HERITAGE REGISTRY MACGREGOR/ALBERT HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PART V ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

RECTORY GROVE & RECTORY GARDENS

Queen Street East HCD Study: Riverside BIA Stakeholder Meeting. Heritage Preservation Services, Economic Development & GBCA February 26, 2014

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 415, DEVELOPMENT OF LAND. Chapter 415 DEVELOPMENT OF LAND. ARTICLE I Development Charges

I 1-1. Staff Comment Form. Heritage Impact Assessment 7764 Churchville Road (Robert Hall House)

DATE: April 26, 2017 REPORT NO. CD Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment

Report Date: March 25, 2011 Contact: Michael Flanigan Contact No.: RTS No.: 9150 VanRIMS No.: Meeting Date: April 19, 2011

RT-3 District Schedule

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Affordable Homes Service Plan 2016/17 and 2017/18

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

Descriptive sheet. Municipal Address 394 Besserer Street Building name 394 Besserer Street Legal description Lot: Block: Plan:

CITY OF SUBIACO PLANNING POLICY 3.15

COUNCIL MEETMI 5 JUL f 5 08

Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION

SPECIAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES Wednesday February 17, :00 p.m. Town Council Chambers Page 1

Loveland Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Rezoning Development Permit Development Variance Permit

Mayor Darrell R. Mussatto and Members of Council ENHANCED NOTICE AND ASSISTANCE OPTIONS FOR TENANT DISPLACEMENT

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

Development Approvals

Planning Rationale. 224 Cooper Street

Our Focus: Your Future A HERITAGE PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PROGRAM FOR THE TOWN OF FORT ERIE

Guide: Queen s Park Heritage Conservation Area

REPORT. Chair & Members of Community Affairs Committee John McMulkin, Planner Development Review REPORT TO: REPORT FROM:

Tel: Fax:

Transcription:

pqzj Agenda tem # Page # TO: FROM: SUBJECT CHAR AND MEMBERS BULT AND NATURAL ENVRONMENT COMMTTEE PUBLC PARTCPATON MEETNG ON MONDAY, JULY 18,2011: 7:40 p.m J. M. FLEMNG DRECTOR, LAND USE PLANNNG AND CTY PLANNER DEMOLTON APPLCATON s. COPP 13-45 VORK STREFT 1 RECOMMENDATON ] That, on the recommendation of the Director, Land Use Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, that the municipal Council BE REQUESTED to issue a notice of intent to designate under Section 29 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act the property at 13-15 York Street as a property of cultural heritage value and interest for the reasons attached; further, that the Chief Building Officer BE ADVSED that no demolition permit be issued pending the outcome of the designation process; it being noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage has been consulted on this matter and is in agreement with these recommendations. PREVOUS REPORTS PERTNENT TO THS MATTER None BACKGROUND An application to demolish the structure at 13-15 York Street was received on May 11, 201 1 This property is listed as a Priority 2 structure on the City's hentory of Heritage Resources which reference its construction date, c. 1874 and its architectural style, showing Georgian influences. As a property identified on the municipal register of heritage properties, the Ontario Heritage Act requires a demolition application to be approved by municipal Council after a minimum of 60 days notice of the owner's intention to demolish accompanied by such information as the Council may require. Where a Council has established a municipal heritage advisory committee, Council shall consult with its heritage committee with respect to a proposed demolition. t should be noted that the applicant has also indicated the desire to demolish the adjacent structure to the east, a building not listed as a heritage property. (Appendix 1- Location Map) At this time, no redevelopment of either site is proposed, although references have been made to the use of both sites for non-public, short term parking uses. Under Section 29 ( ), Ontario Heritage Act, Council may, by by-law, designate a property within the municipality to be of cultural heritage value or interest if, the property meets the prescribed criteria for determining whether the property is of cultural heritage value or interest and if the designation is made in accordance with the process outlined in the Act. Such a notice of intent to designate a property voids any permit that allowed for the alteration or demolition of the property. At its' meeting on June 08, 201 1, the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) discussed the demolition application for the property at 13-15 York Street and recommended to municipal Council that Council issue a notice of its intent to designate the property under Section 29 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act and, further, prepared a draft statement of significance with respect to the requested designation.(appendix - 3 Draft Statement of Significance) 1

13-15 York -u The building at 13-15 York is a two storey, semi-detached building clad in white brick. The building is currently vacant and has until recently provided rental accommodation. t is zoned DA 2 D350 hl h3. The building shows some signs of its age but appears to be in reasonable condition. At the time of the preparation of this report, no building condition report had been provided. The rear of the building shows both early and later additions. (Appendix 2 - Photos) t has been previously identified as a heritage property by virtue of its listing in the City's lnventory of Heritage Resources as a Priority 2 resource. The nventory describes Priority 2 structures as: buildings that may merit designation under Palt V (Section 29) of the Ontario Heritage Act. They have significant architectural and/or historical value and may be worthy of protection by whatever incentives may be provided through zoning considerations, bonusing or financial advantages. The interior of the building has been renovated to accommodate its residential use. Much of its interior architectural features may have been removed or covered. t is the opinion of the LACH that the building should be designated for its cultural heritage value and interest as it satisfies a number of the criteria established in Regulation 9/06 of the Heritage Act. t retains architectural features typical of Georgian style buildings; it has at least one significant historic association and it has contextual value in relation to the streetscape to the west and the north. (Appendix 3: Draft Statement of Significance) Additional research is still needed to determine whether the building is older than the 1872 date ascribed to it in the nventory. n terms of its stylistic characteristics, it may date to the 1850s or 1860s making it more unique. t should be noted that the contextual values to which the LACH Draft Statement make reference relate to the relationship of this building to the building at the municipal addresses of 7, 9 and 11 York Street, a building or buildings described as being in the High Victorian style built in 1862. Together, this portion of the block, some of the structures further to the west across Thames Street, and specific buildings on the north side of York Street reflect the historical approach to the downtown from the west on York /Stanley Street. This block has been identified as the westernmost segment (Block 36) of the proposed downtown heritage conservation district now under study by consultants. The historic character of these structures takes on additional significance as the structure at 7, 9 and 11 York once served as one of London's first hospital structures dating to 1862. The creation of a downtown heritage conservation district will designate all structures within the district under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act. t will not prevent demolition applications but will allow Council to address such applications on an individual basis with regard to the heritage character of the area. At present, consultants are preparing Conservation Guidelines to be included in the proposed District Plan. The Guidelines and Plan will require approval by Council as a by-law following consultation with the public and the LACH. Options With respect to the application for demolition, Council has several options available to it: Approve the demolition as requested by the applicant, noting Council's policy that sites created through the demolition of Priority 1 and 2 heritage structures shall not be used for temporary surface parking lots.(appendix 4) Deny the demolition at this time noting that the matter can come forward in the future if it is part of a site redevelopment proposal. t may also be noted that Council may wish to consider the demolition of this property within the context of a downtown heritage conservation district should such a District be established. Defer the issuance of a demolition application by providing a notice of its intention to designate the building under the Ontario Heritage Act. Such notice would void any demolition permit issued until the matter of designation is determined. An owner may object to the proposed designation, triggering a hearing by the Conservation Review Board which will then return a finding in terms of a recommendation for Council's consideration. f Council then confirms the designation, then the owner may still request, the demolition of a designated property. Council has the authority to deny such an application subject to appeal by the owner to the OMB. 2

Agenda tem # Page # r--lr-l Recommendations Given the desire to develop a downtown heritage conservation district and the identification of this property and its immediate neighbour to the west as being historically significant within such a district and given the LACH recommendation, it is recommended that Council issue a notice of its intention to designate this property under Section 29 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. f Council chooses not to issue a notice of intent to designate this property but to recommend to the Chief Building Officer that a demolition permit be issued, it is also recommended that a comment be made such that, following Council s 1995 guideline, no temporary surface parking lot be created where the Priority 2 property has been removed. Further, in the event that a downtown heritage conservation district is not established or if its final boundaries are revised in such a manner as to remove these properties from the proposed District, it is recommended that the LACH be requested to give consideration to determine if the designation of the listed properties at 7, 9 and 11 York, 5 York, 24 York and 36 York would be appropriate. HERTAGE PLANNER CTY PLANNNG AND J. M. FLEMNG,MCP, RPP DRECTOR, LAND USE PLANNNG AND CTY PLANNER June 29,2011 dml Attach: Appendix 1 - Location Map - 13-15 York Appendix 2 - Photos Appendix 3 - Draft Statement of Significance -13-15 York Street Appendix 4 - Municipal Guidelines with Respect to Surface Parking Lots in the Downtown Y:\Shared\policy\HERTAGE\Demolition\l3-15 York\Report to BNEC July 18 201 1.docx 3

blp Agenda tem # Page # Appendix 1 : Location Map - 13-1 5 York Appendix 2: Photos - 13-15 York 4

Agenda tem Page # 44 5

Page # Appendix 3: Draft Statement of Significance - 13-15 York Street Leaal DescriDtion 13-15 York Street is a two-storey white brick double-house located on the south side of York Street east of Thames Street and listed as Plan Nil, Lot 25, SW York in the City of London. There is evidence that the building was originally identified at the municipal address of 7 York Street. Statement of Cultural Heritaae nterest or Valug 13-15 York Street is recommended for designation under Section 29 (), Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of cultural heritage value. The building exhibits strong Georgian style architectural influences and may be dated to 1874 or earlier. The building has been primarily residential until late in the twentieth century. An early resident was Thomas Stevens, first noted circa 1880 as a plumber and brass worker who went on to found the Empire Manufacturing Company (EMCO), in 1903. Now Emco- Wheaton, the industry has been significant in London's economic development. DescriDtion of Cultural Heritaae Attributes The exterior architectural elements of this Georgian influenced double-house worthy preservation include: i Uncoursed rubble stone foundation Low pitched gable roof with central chimney Bilateral symmetry on the front fa$ade The first storey contains a single window (replaced but using original opening) and door with simple transom and side lights (replaced but using the original opening) duplicated on the eastern and western house sections The upper storey contains two single windows (replaced but using original openings) duplicated on the eastern and western halves of the front elevation Wooden window sills on all windows are visually supported by double width protruding brickwork under either side Brick voussoirs cap the openings for each window and door The features of the front fapde are framed by brick pilasters on either end and in the centre which are complimented by a protruding brickwork course separating the upper and lower storeys and a simple. unadorned brickwork frieze under the roofline above the second storey The exterior pilasters exhibit corbelling near the roofline There are visible tie bars between the upper and lower storeys when viewed from the western side providing stability for a building that was perhaps originally located on marshy land Behind the main building is a small extension which is visible in early insurance maps but has probably been replaced over the years nterior Elements of note include: Uncoursed rubble stone is highly visible in the unfinished basement area Contextual Elements Together with 7-11 York, 13-15 York forms a 19th century anchor for the corner of Thames Street and York Street as one enters downtown London from the west and shows early residential influences before approaching the warehousing and commercial buildings further to the east. 6

Agenda El tem # Page # L(qd Appendix 4: Council Guidelines with Respect To Temporary Parking Lots in the Downtown June 6, 1995, l hereby certify that the Municipal Council, at its session held on June 5, 1995 resolved: 4. That, on the recommendation of the Director of Planning and Development, the following actions be taken with respect to temporary parking lots in the downtown: (a) surface parking lots no longer be permitted as temporary uses in the downtown area where they involve the removal of existing buildings except under the following circumstances; (i) (ii) (iii) Building permits have been issued for redevelopment; and/or The applicant or the Civic Administration are able to establish to the satisfaction of the Municipal Council that there is a shortage of parking in the immediate area or in the downtown as a whole; and/or The building is unsafe for occupancy as defined by the Building Code Act; (b) no temporary parking lots be permitted on lots where buildings to be demolished are listed as Priority 1 or Priority 2 structures in the City of London nventory of Heritage Resources; (c) new temporary parking lots on vacant land only be permitted through a zoning by-law amendment application for a temporary use and be subject to the site plan approval process; (d) procedures be reviewed and implemented to improve the aesthetics of existing surface parking lots in the Downtown; and (e) the Civic Administration be directed to monitor parking requirements in the downtown area and to undertake a review of this policy on or before June 198, or sooner if a deficiency of parking arises. (59.16.4.95) (AS AMENDED) (4/13/PC) K.W. Sadler City Clerk 7