We would be in agreement to the variance if:

Similar documents
2 ZONING AMENDMENT BYLAW NO BIATECKI ROAD 3-5 a. Being a Bylaw to change the zoning designation of Parcel Identification Number: :

Board of Variance Minutes

# KnowPlace Pets Munshaw Lane Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Public Hearing Rezoning of 5264 Sherbourne Dr. Wednesday, April 26, :19:31 AM

Kirkwood at Arrondale Homeowners Association Rules and Regulations Adopted

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY

GEM PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICY

NORTH HORSHAM PARISH COUNCIL ALLOTMENT RULES

In the case of Lot 206, DL 587, SDYD, Plan 466, located at 3550 Valleyview Road, agri-tourism accommodation is a permitted use.

Advisory Planning Commission Minutes Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 7:00 p.m Wishart Road Council Chambers

7.58 AC Waterfront Land

BERKELEYPARKS RESIDENTIAL PARK RULES PARK RULES FOR HOLWAY HOUSE PARK

North Table Mountain Village Homeowners Association

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

Chris & Pam King RV Park - Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change/Conditional Use Permit

For sale 38.5 ACRE Aquaculture facility

Leeds City Council Parks and Countryside. Allotment Rules

Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Robert Davis

AMENDED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

For sale 47.6± acre country getaway Palm city, FL

Public Open House Osoyoos October 15 th. Bed & Breakfast and Vacation Rental Operations

Watson Property Fall 1992 PART I -- QUESTION 1

ROUTT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA COMMUNICATION FORM

MINUTES MANHATTAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS City Commission Room, City Hall 1101 Poyntz Avenue Wednesday, July 9, :00 PM

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR REDHAWK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

City of Kingston Planning Committee Meeting Number Addendum Thursday, February 5, :30 p.m., Council Chamber, City Hall

ALLOTMENT TENANCY AGREEMENT 1 st October 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

STRATA PROPERTY ACT [SBC 1998] CHAPTER 43 STRATA PLAN BCS1682 BYLAWS CASCADE HEIGHTS

LAKE COUNTY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DESIGN ANALYSIS APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Case Manager: Melving Isaac, Planner

COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON AND FOR THE WOODS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION

Shawnee Woods Subdivision

Request Conditional Use Permit (Bulk Storage Yard) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Robert Davis

DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS ROSITA HILLS, LTD

ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 17 Article 5: AG Agricultural District

Chapter CITY PARKS

FRANKTOWN ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RULES AND REGULATIONS. CREATED: January 28, 2009 ADOPTED: February 11, 2009 EFFECTIVE: March 23, 2009

TAHOE-SIERRA MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC. P. O. BOX 1581 TRUCKEE, CA (530) Fax DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE RESTRICTIONS

Leeds City Council Parks and Countryside. Allotment Rules

DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR WOLF CREEK RANCHES

STRATA CORPORATION VAS By-laws

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ADDENDUM AGENDA

ALC Bylaw Reviews. A Guide for Local Governments

Timber Trails Homeowners Associations PREAMBLE

LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:

The Westwood Park site rules

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS OF CHESHIRE FOREST PHASE 1-A

Contact the Planning and Development Division at or access relevant background material available at

PROTECTIVE COVENANTS Sage Port Filing #2 and #6A Effective January 30, 2001

hereunder and will be provided by the owner at his expense. Minimum interference with pedestrian and equestrian movements will be observed.

LAUREL RIDGE. COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Inc.

LANCASTER AT WESTIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

5.0 Specific Use Regulations

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO ELECTORAL AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE TUESDAY, JUNE 14, :30 PM. (RDN Board Chambers) A D D E N D U M

Badby Parish. Housing Needs Survey Report

Rules & Regulations (Established 11/2016)

PROTECTIVE COVENANTS Filings 1-4

Public Notice. Subject Property. January 24, Subject Property: 3919 Lakeside Rd

ARTICLE 7. SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS

City of La Puente E. Main Street, La Puente, CA Telephone (626) Fax (

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

First of all, how can the City proceed with annexing and zoning when the surrounding landowners have filed a lawsuit against the county?

Local Planning and Zoning Practices Related to Equestrian Facilities

Catherine Dreher; Gerry Prinster; Kevin DeSain; David Bauer; and Vicki LaRose

Polk County Board of Adjustment October 3, 2014

LEASE AGREEMENT. Meadow View Apartments

9 September 12, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Rules and Regulations

Dispute Resolution Services

Self Help Nuisance Abatement in Baltimore City

BELMONT LAND USE OFFICE

ZONE TITLE: RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RMD)

APC REPORT. Peter Bernacki, Richard Mickle, and Melinda Bell

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Center Road Traverse City, MI (Township Hall) February 27, :30 pm - amended time

RESTRICTIONS CEDAR HILLS LAKE SUBDIVISION

REPORTS ON TITLE. 2. Meet with the clients, in advance of the closing, to show them the title, explain the title to them;

VILLAGE OF KEREMEOS AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CHAMBER 702-4TH STREET Monday, March 6, 2017, 6:00 p.m.

CHAPTER VII R-2 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006

NORTH CENTRAL/295 INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE PARK LINCOLN, RHODE ISLAND

Chairman J. Girvan called the Hearing to Order at 9:00 am.

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 15, 2015

Independence Township Planning Commission. Richard K. Carlisle, AICP. DATE: November 30, Millstone Golden, LLC Special Land Use

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

RESTRICTIVE AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR GLENN LAUREL SECTION NINE

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals September 19, 2018

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS BY THE OWNERS OF "THE COLONY"

Community Development Department Frequently Asked Questions

5.2 GENERAL MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS

When do I need a building permit?

RULES AND REGULATIONS NEVADA TRAILS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

HOLDING/ DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY

Fields of Shorewood HOA Rules & Regulations

VPOA RULES AND REGULATIONS

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

LAND AT CUMREW, HEADS NOOK BRAMPTON, CUMBRIA

Transcription:

RDOS Regular Board Meeting Agenda Item 6.1.1.2 From: Edwin Huffman [mailto:yzfrider@persona.ca] Sent: January-19-12 8:08 PM To: Malcolm McNaughton Subject: 15 great iphotos Hello Mr. McNaughton, I am contacting you in response to correspondence sent to my wife and me from the RDOS regarding Development Variance Permit Application - 33207 Highway97 Lot 2, District Lot 2450S, SDYD, Plan 11526 Except Plan 30429 dated January 6, 2012 ( Aujla property). My name is Ed Huffman and my wife is Vickie Huffman and we are adjacent property owners and our property is to the north of the area proposed for the variance. My wife and I are long time residents of the area. We have owned this particular property since 1987 and we understand the need for farmers to conduct agricultural operations however we do have a few concerns about the proposed development. I have attached some current photos of the subject property adjacent to ours. Unfortunately as you can see from the photos I have enclosed ( taken Jan.18/12 ), the area immeditately adjacent to residences is poorly kept and is also used as a camping area for seasonal workers which has created ongoing problems for years. We have personally experienced;excessive noise, garbage being thrown onto our property, workers from the property trespassing on our property, we have had pets chased and killed by dogs from the property which were allowed to run at large and have had to call animal control on several occasions. We have also had to call police on two occasion relating to drunken residents from this neighbouring property blatantly trespassing and interfering with the quiet enjoyment our property. I have spoken with the operator on several occasions over the years and conveyed my concern regarding their lack of regard toward their neighbours but that seems to have had little effect. This being said, if the property owner is willing to use this situation to the benefit of their neighbours as well as themselves then we think this proposal ( as far as the variance relating to our property is concerned ) could be good for everyone. We would be in agreement to the variance if: 1. The property owner has a solid wooden fence of the greatest allowable height, built ( professionally ) along the property line common to us to the north of their current plant. In addtion, planting of shrubs, ie, pyramid cedars along their side of this fence which is to the north of their plant, with the intent of creating a solid shrub buffer and maintaining that buffer in addition to the fencing. 2. The buildings erected not have windows on the side of the building adjacent to neighbouring residential property owners that extend above the height of the maximum allowable height of fencing. 3. The property owner agrees to keep the area between all buildings and our property line to the north, clear and vacant including but not limited to, employee camping, old equipment, used vehicles, dogs or dog kennels etc.

4. The property owner agrees to maintain an area for seasonal employee camping/ accommodation in an area of the property substantially separated and not adjacent to neighbouring residential properties. ( property owner to identify this area ). 5. The property owner complete the above items 1 & 4 prior to beginning construction of any buildings relating to the variance. 6. The continuing performance of these items be enforceable by the RDOS by whatever means at their disposal and in a manner that will enable meaningful enforcement. Despite the above mentioned past difficulties, it is not our intention to overly burden the applicant but we hope that utilizing this current situation can create a better neighbourhood environment for all parties. If the applicant is not interested in addressing any of these concerns then we don't see any reason for a variance to be issued as there is plenty of room on the property to put up buildings with without encroaching on current setback regulations. Thanks very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Ed and Vickie Huffman 33239, Highway 97 south Oliver B.C. Phone: 250 689 7831 IMG_1780.JPG

IMG_1781.JPG IMG_1782.JPG IMG_1783.JPG

IMG_1784.JPG IMG_1785.JPG

IMG_1786.JPG IMG_1787.JPG IMG_1788.JPG

IMG_1789.JPG IMG_1790.JPG IMG_1791.JPG

IMG_1792.JPG IMG_1793.JPG