RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO THE CITY'S

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TULARE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL SURFACE WATER RATE RESOLUTION

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

RESOLUTION NO xx

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

Chapter 10 LAND AND PLANNING GROWTH MANAGEMENT

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE FACT SHEET

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

The City Council makes the following findings:

ORDINANCE NO

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Information for Town Council Meeting on: July 12, 2017

CASTROVILLE COMMUNITY PLAN - FINANCING COMMUNITY PLAN IMPROVEMENTS

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

ORDINANCE NO. 7,562 N.S. AMENDING BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION FEE

Agenda Item No. 6G August 11, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager. Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

TOWN OF WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

CITY OF MARGATE, FLORIDA PRELIMINARY RATE RESOLUTION

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

RESOLUTION 14- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA:

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4678

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

June 6, Proposed FY Annual Automatic Adjustment for the Affordable Housing Unit Base Fee

Councilmember Heilman, Mayor Pro Tempore Meister, and Mayor Horvath. Councilmember Duran. Councilmember D'Amico. None.

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

FIRE FACILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FINAL DRAFT JUNE 24, 2014

ORDINANCE NO

FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916)

ORDINANCE NO

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Resolution No : 2017/18 Community Development Fee Schedule

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER 4.46 AND SECTION OF CHAPTER 4

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

X3066. WHEREAS, the Staff Recommended Budget was received in the office of the Board of County Commissioners by March 21, 2017;

CITY OF PAIMDALE REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE CITY MANAGER. DATE: January 9, 2013

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND AMENDING CHAPTER 6A OF THE WOODLAND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. This matter came before the Marion County Board of

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. (,.J Key Words: Southwest Dixon, General Plan, Specific Plan Rezone Meeting Date: May 18, 2016

Development Impact Fee Study

AMENDED UNIFORM COLLECTION AGREEMENT. THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT entered into this 8th. subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

DA TE: September 8, Date

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE 2018-19 PARKLAND IN LIEU FEE SCHEDULE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 ( DEVELOPMENT ) CHAPTER 35 ( PARK AND RECREATIONAL LAND ) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public parks, recreation and open space facilities within the City of Santa Clara; and, WHEREAS, the 2010-2035 General Plan includes a goal that new parks, open space and recreation be provided with new development so that existing facilities are not overburdened; and, WHEREAS, on July 15, 2014, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1928, which added Chapter 17.35 to the City Code that requires new residential development to provide adequate community and neighborhood park land for active recreational uses, and/or under certain conditions to pay a fee in lieu of parkland dedication; and, WHEREAS, on February 24, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1937, which made minor amendments to Chapter 17.35 related to credits for private open space and the applicability of the Chapter to duplexes; and, WHEREAS, the City has received the annual professional appraisal used to determine the fair market value of property in the City based on a survey of land values and sales records with a valuation date of December 31, 2017, and the valuation report was made available to the public for review and comment as posted on the City website on March 9, 2017, and no comments were received by March 23, 2017; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2018, the City Council, pursuant to Chapter 17.35.040 (b)(1), reviewed the appraisal report and now wishes to use the applicable values for calculating the fees due in lieu of parkland dedication incorporated into the City s Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule; and, Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 1 of 7

WHEREAS, on April 11 and April 18, 2018, a notice of a public hearing on the proposed fee schedule was published in the Santa Clara Weekly, a newspaper of general circulation; and, WHEREAS, on April 24, 2018, the City Council held a noticed public hearing to consider the City s Proposed Municipal Fee Schedule including Fees due in lieu of parkland dedication at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to comment; and, WHEREAS, the fees established by this resolution are derived from, are based upon, and do not exceed the costs of providing capital park and recreation land and facilities necessitated by the new residential development for which fees are levied. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS: 1. Findings and Purpose. That the City Council hereby finds and declares that A. New residential subdivisions and new non-subdivided residential projects generate impacts and demands for public services, facilities, and neighborhood and community parkland, and have a significant effect on the use and availability of park and recreation space and facilities, and that the limited open space and recreation amenities provided by these residential developments are insufficient to meet the needs. B. It is the City s intent and desire (General Plan: 5.9.1-G3, -G4; 5.9.1-P14, -P18, - P20) to require that such developments contribute their fair share of land, facilities, or amenities or contribute public costs toward the purchase, development and/or improvement of park and recreational facilities. C. The imposition of impact fees is one of the customary methods of ensuring that development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities necessary to accommodate such development in order to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare. D. The provisions of this Resolution are enacted pursuant to the Charter, the City of Santa Clara General Plan and sections 66000-66025, 66477, and 66479 of the California Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 2 of 7

Government Code (the Mitigation Fee Act and the Quimby Act ), as may be applicable. E. The report entitled Public Facilities Impact Fee Study ( Nexus Study ) dated June 25, 2014, prepared by Willdan Financial Services, Inc. and reviewed by Council in June 2014, set forth a reasonable methodology and analysis for the determination of the impact of development on the need for and costs for additional capital parks and recreation facilities improvements in the City; and, the costs for the existing inventory of City parks development disclosed in the Facility Condition Assessment Report ( Kitchell 2017 ) dated February 21, 2018, prepared by Kitchell CEM and reviewed by Council on April 24, 2018, set forth a reasonable methodology and analysis for the determination of the current value of the existing inventory of improved City parkland. F. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66016, the City made data available regarding the costs, or estimated costs, to provide services and proposed parkland dedication standards for the public facility impact fees by posting the draft appraisal report and addenda prepared by the Schmidt-Prescott Group dated February 22, 2018 ( Appraisal Report ) on the City s website on March 9, 2018, which is at least fourteen (14) days before the Council public hearing on April 24, 2018. G. After careful consideration, including review of documentary evidence and additional information submitted in the administrative review process, the City Council finds the imposition of impact fees to finance major public park and recreational land acquisition, development and rehabilitation, as revised by using the land values set forth in the Appraisal Report, is in the public interest and general welfare of the City and its residents, is equitable, and does not impose an undue burden on new development. 2. Calculation of Fees. A. That the Nexus Study calculates the parks fees that would fund the fair share cost to new development for additional capital parks and recreational facilities and improvements. The Nexus Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 3 of 7

Study is based on the General Plan planning horizon of 2010-2035 and estimates the future residential population needs for parkland and recreational facilities. The Nexus Study determines a fair share of future planned public facilities using the system plan method to assure that new development doesn t pay for existing service deficiencies. The Nexus Study also uses the existing inventory method to calculate the maximum parks fee. This method assumes no existing service deficiencies and sets the fee that will fund the expansion of park facilities at the same standard that currently serves existing residents. The Nexus Study provides a reasonable methodology to determine the impacts and costs of new residential development. The City may adopt development impact fees up to the legally justified amounts in the Nexus Study (100% cost recovery). B. Pursuant to Santa Clara City Code Chapter 17.35, the maximum amount of the fees due in lieu of required parkland dedication shall be determined by the fair market value of the amount of land that would otherwise be required to be dedicated and using the average per acre land value for property in the City of Santa Clara for each of the three existing ZIP Codes in the City (95050, 95051, 95054), for each of the Dwelling Unit Categories (Single Family, Multi-family) on an annual basis in a Council resolution. C. An independent real estate appraisal firm, The Schmidt-Prescott Group, was retained to provide a Fair Market Value opinion (valuation date of December 31, 2017) conforming to Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and using the City s supplemental instructions for an average acre of land (hypothetical, rectangular, useable site) for property in each of the three existing City of Santa Clara Zip Codes 95050, 95051, 95054. The data set included all property types: Single Family (low and very low density), High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Commercial/Retail, Industrial, Lots and Land. Excluded were transactions considered not arms-length, having encumbered or clouded title, environmentally impaired sites, or more than three (3) years old. An inflation factor was computed and applied to comparable sales over one year old based on reasonable and rational considerations such as sales and rental trends or other Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 4 of 7

appropriate methods. The weighted average of each property type was based on the percentage of land area in the sales transactions. D. Based on the findings of the Appraisal Report, the average per acre land value for each ZIP Code area as of December 31, 2017, is: $3.738 million per acre ($85.81/sf) in 95050; $3.993 million per acre ( $91.67/sf) in 95051; and, $4.035 million per acre ( $92.63/sf) in 95054. If a developer objects to this determination of fair market value, the developer may elect to have the value established by appraisal, in conformance with City Code Section 17.35.040(b)(2). E. Parkland Dedication Standard. In calculation of parkland dedication or fees due in lieu thereof, new residential developments subject to the Mitigation Fee Act will use the existing parkland ratio of 2.53 acres per thousand residents; and, new residential subdivisions subject to the Quimby Act will use the City parkland standard of 3.0 acres of property for each one thousand residents for public park and recreational facilities. F. Dwelling Unit Categories and Density. In calculation of parkland dedication or fees due in lieu thereof, the types of dwelling units and average density factors (2010 Census) are: (1) Multiple Family Dwelling equals 2.24 persons per household; and, (2) Single-Family Dwelling equals 2.90 persons per household. G. Value of Existing Parkland Improvements. In calculation of fees due in lieu of parkland dedication, the Nexus Study (Table 6 Parkland Unit Costs) used the existing value of parkland improvements for the City parks inventory as of 2014. Based on the findings of the Kitchell 2017 report, the park inventory remained the same from 2014 to 2017, 251.53 acres. The valuation of improvements of that inventory of 251.53 acres as of December 31, 2017 is $403,043,173 and the value of vehicles and equipment is $2,198,000, which yields a grand total of $405,241,173. Per acre, the Improvements and Special Use Facilities Cost is therefore $1,611,105. Using this per-acre cost, Table 8 of the Nexus Study (Cost per Capita Existing Level of Service) is updated as follows: In the right-most column (entitled Improvements/Impact Fee ), the Parkland Investment (per acre) Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 5 of 7

Improvements updated value is $1,611,105; the existing level of service (acres per 1,000 residents) is unchanged at 2.53; the total cost per 1,000 capita is $4,076,096; and the resulting cost per resident to be used in the calculation of fees is $4,076. H. In conformance with City Code Section 17.35.050, in subdivisions of over fifty (50) parcels of land, in condominium developments of more than fifty (50) dwelling units, and in residential developments not involving a subdivision, a combination of land dedication and fee payment may be required. Developments of fifty (50) or less parcels or units will be required to pay an in-lieu fee. I. In conformance with City Code Section 17.35.070, developers will submit a written request with the project application for any eligible credits to be requested against the amount of parkland dedication or the amount of the in-lieu fee. The developer will work with the Director of Parks & Recreation on the proposed credits and project s park, recreation and green space conditions. The Approving Authority must make findings that the on-site parks and recreation amenities meet the Code s standards and/or affordable housing needs for receipt of credit. 3. Schedule of Fees. A. Pursuant to Ordinances Nos. 1928 and 1937, fees subject to the Quimby Act and the Mitigation Fee Act are provided in Table A, Table B, and Table C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Fee Policy. On October 14, 2014, Council adopted Resolution No. 14-8174 that set fees due in lieu of parkland dedication at 100% cost recovery for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-15 based on land valuation from calendar year 2013. In FY2015-16, fees remained unchanged due to the recent adoption of the ordinance and fees. On June 7, 2016 Council reviewed and adopted supplemental valuation instructions for use in the calculation of the fees. On August 23, 2016 Council adopted Resolution No. 16-8358 that set fees due in lieu of parkland dedication at 100% of cost recovery based upon land valuation date of December 31, 2015 for FY2016-2017. On May 8, 2017, Council adopted Resolution No. 17-8427 that set fees due in lieu of parkland dedication at 100% of cost recovery based upon land valuation date of December 31, 2016 for FY2017-18. For FY2018-19, fees prepared for Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 6 of 7

Council review are set at 100% cost recovery, and are based upon the updated City s existing park improvements valuation and the updated land appraisal valuation date of December 31, 2017. C. Implementation Schedule. For development projects subject to the Quimby Act, the proposed fees will become effective immediately and will be imposed on development projects with applications deemed complete on or after July 1, 2018. For development projects subject to the Mitigation Fee Act, the proposed fees will become effective 60 days after the effective date of this resolution, and will be imposed on development projects with applications deemed complete on or after July 1, 2018. For development project applications deemed complete prior to this date, the existing fees will apply as adopted in FY2017-18 (Resolution No. 17-8427). 4. Effective date. This resolution shall become effective immediately. I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE DAY OF, 2018, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS: COUNCILORS: COUNCILORS: COUNCILORS: ATTEST: JENNIFER YAMAGUMA ACTING CITY CLERK CITY OF SANTA CLARA Attachments incorporated by reference: 1. Attachment A. Table A Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95050 2. Attachment B. Table B Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95051 3. Attachment C. Table C Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95054 C:\Users\GSaporito\Desktop\Resolution - Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication FY2018-19 05-08-2018v2 - AA 20180410 (2).doc Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 7 of 7

Attachment A. Table A Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95050 Applicable Fee Type Calculation Quimby MFA $/Acre (valuation 12-31-2017) A $3,738,000 $3,738,000 Park Acres/1000 Pop. LOS Standard B 3 2.53 Total Cost per 1,000 C = A x B $11,214,000 $9,457,140 Cost per capita D = C/1000 $11,214 $9,457 Density Single Family (2010 Census) D x 2.9 $32,521 $27,426 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.90 $11,820 $11,820 Admin Charge 0.02 $887 $785 Total Single Family (SF) Dwelling Fee $45,228 $40,031 Density Multi Family (2010 Census) D x 2.24 $25,119 $21,184 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.24 $9,130 $9,130 Admin Charge 0.02 $685 $606 Total Multi Family (MF) Dwelling Fee $34,934 $30,920 Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 1 of 1

Attachment B. Table B Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95051 Applicable Fee Type Calculation Quimby MFA $/Acre (valuation 12-31-2017) A $3,993,000 $3,993,000 Park Acres/1000 Pop. LOS Standard B 3 2.53 Total Cost per 1,000 C = A x B $11,979,000 $10,102,290 Cost per capita D = C/1000 $11,979 $10,102 Density Single Family (2010 Census) D x 2.9 $34,739 $29,297 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.90 $11,820 $11,820 Admin Charge 0.02 $931 $822 Total Single Family (SF) Dwelling Fee $47,490 $41,939 Density Multi Family (2010 Census) D x 2.24 $26,833 $22,629 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.24 $9,130 $9,130 Admin Charge 0.02 $719 $635 Total Multi Family (MF) Dwelling Fee $36,682 $32,394 Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 1 of 1

Attachment C. Table C Parkland Dedication In Lieu Fee Schedule - FY2018-19 95054 Applicable Fee Type Calculation Quimby MFA $/Acre (valuation 12-31-2017) A $4,035,000 $4,035,000 Park Acres/1000 Pop. LOS Standard B 3 2.53 Total Cost per 1,000 C = A x B $12,105,000 $10,208,550 Cost per capita D = C/1000 $12,105 $10,209 Density Single Family (2010 Census) D x 2.9 $35,105 $29,605 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.90 $11,820 $11,820 Admin Charge 0.02 $938 $829 Total Single Family (SF) Dwelling Fee $47,863 $42,254 Density Multi Family (2010 Census) D x 2.24 $27,115 $22,867 Improvements (Kitchell Report) $4076 x 2.24 $9,130 $9,130 Admin Charge 0.02 $725 $640 Total Multi Family (MF) Dwelling Fee $36,970 $32,637 Resolution/Fees Due In Lieu of Parkland Dedication for New Residential Development 2018-19 Page 1 of 1