Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Similar documents
Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Planning & Zoning Commission

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

MARION COUNTY GROWTH SERVICES

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

ORDINANCE NO L02, D. Wormser/L.R. Roberts/Et. Al Page 1 of 9 Adoption Ordinance

Application to Amend the Bay County Zoning Map (Please type or print clearly)

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE

Marion County Planning & Zoning Commission

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Dennis & Donna Blanchard, Agent. Dennis & Donna Blanchard/Disbrow Builders, Inc.

2016 FUTURE LAND USE ATLAS AMENDMENT APPLICATION. Palm Beach County Planning Division 2300 North Jog Road, WPB, FL 33411, (561)

PUTNAM COUNTYCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

MARION COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2035

APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

Gadsden County Planning Commission Agenda Report

Marion County Planning & Zoning Commission

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

City File ZM th Street North St. Petersburg, FL Central Avenue, Suite 1600 St. Petersburg, FL 33701

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 10A

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 9D

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

CITY OF DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA. Zoning Map Change Report. RR Existing Zoning. Rural Rural Density Residential Site Characteristics

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

April 19, Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Plans shall be drawn at a readable scale, signed, and sealed by a Florida Registered Engineer. The application package shall include:

GADSDEN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

French, Bruce. The applicant is requesting a zone change from Suburban to Rural Service Center.

LARGE- AND SMALL-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION PACKET

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Lee. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 22, 2016

COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department

1. Future Land Use FLU6.6.8 Land uses within the Rural Service Area portion of the Wekiva Study Area shall be limited to very low and low intensity

Expiration of Transportation Certificate of Concurrency for Application for Minor or Major Development; Approval

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-09 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION

Larimer County Planning Dept. Procedural Guide for 1041 PERMITS

Cobb County Community Development Agency Zoning Division 1150 Powder Springs St. Marietta, Georgia 30064

Letter of Intent May 2017 (Revised November 2017)

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

ORANGE BLOSSOM GARDENS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.

Location Map S U M M A RY A N X G M P Z O N I TEM #2. Subject Site

City of Sanibel. Planning Department STAFF REPORT

FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8

Instructions and Application Procedures Plan Amendments

THE GROVE GOLF CLUB PLAT

STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-06 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

ARTICLE XXI GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Unlimited. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

Site Plan Application

31, Township 29 South, Range 25 East, Polk County, Florida, as depicted by the Land Use Plan attached

CITY OF BELLEVIEW PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA

City of Davenport Comprehensive Plan Support. Polk County, Florida. Data and Analysis. For Informational Purposes. Gateway to the Ridge

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

INTRODUCTION Future Land Use Element

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

Kitsap County Department of Community Development

EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX D HOUSING ELEMENT

APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Gonzalez. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

Chapter 7 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

U-HAUL OF ORLANDO AN NEXATION

MEMORANDUM! AGENDA ITEM #IV.C

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

Nassau County Department of Planning & Economic Opportunity Nassau Place Yulee, Florida 32097

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. February 19, 2010 Regional Planning Council Meeting

PUBLIC HEARING: August 11, 2015 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

(b) The location of principal and accessory buildings on the lot and the relationship of each structure to the other.

Planning Commission Application Summary

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-13 An Zou Property Town Council Meeting November 21, 2013

Community Development

Transcription:

Marion County Board of County Commissioners Date: 6/4/217 P&Z: 9/25/217 BCC Transmittal: 1/17/217 BCC Adopt: TBD Amendment No: 217-L6 Type of Application Large-Scale Comp Plan Amendment Request: Change FLUMS Future Land Use Designation From: Rural Land To: Employment Center Concurrent Zoning Case: NONE Parcel #/Acreage: 412-35- ±5 acres 412-6- ±14.26 acres Owner: Deltona Corp. Applicant: Steve Gray Location: NE of SW 27 th Ave, W of I-75. Existing Use: Native Mixed and Upland Pine Forest Staff Recommendation Denial Northern parcel, 412-6- ±14.26 acres. Due to proximity to Greenway and lack of commitment to use and buffer Approval Southern parcel, with conditions requiring central water and sewer on 412-35-, ±5 acres P&Z Recommendation: TO CONTINUE UNTIL SEPT. WILL RENOTIFY RECOMMENDATIONS & HEARINGS HELD FOR THIS AMENDMENT Action Staff Recommendation P&Z Recommendation BCC Transmittal BCC Adoption Result DENIAL (North) APPROVAL (South) TO CONTINUE TBD TBD Notice of Public Hearing Property Owners within 3 feet of the subject property: 7 LOCATION PROJECT INFORMATION Request: Rural Land to Employment Center on combined ±19.26 acres. Gross Development Potential: Residential Non-Residential 23 DU 1.7 M ft 2 Water/Sewer: Marion County Marion Regional Utility Service Area. Environmental: Environmental sensitivity for habitat or threatened or endangered species will be addressed with development review. Transportation: Traffic analysis will be required prior to development however it should be noted that the road serving the property is unpaved and privately maintained. The parcel is located approximately nine-tenths of a mile north of SW HWY 484, on the west side Interstate 75 (no access) and directly south of the Florida Greenway. It is outside of the Urban Growth Boundary and in the Secondary Springs Protection Zone. Project Planner 1 P age

Kimberleigh Dinkins, Sr. Planner CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION Code Enforcement Actions On-site: None. Photographs: View of subject property facing west. View above properties. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION UGB Rural Land (1 du/1 ac) Low Residential ( - 1 du/ac) Medium Residential (1-4 du/ac) High Residential (4-8 du/ac) Urban Residential (8-16 du/ac) Rural Activity Center ( - 2 du/ac; FAR.35) Rural Community ( - 3 du/ac; FAR.7) Commercial ( - 6 du/ac; FAR 1.) Employment Center ( - 12 du/ac; FAR 2.) Commerce District (N/A; FAR 2.) Public (N/A; FAR 1.) Preservation (N/A; N/A) Municipality PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION 2 P age

PROPOSED ZONING (No change proposed) PLANNING DIVISION ANALYSIS FLUM AMENDMENT BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is heavily forested, native vegetation. The current land use is Rural Land and zoning is A-1 (General Agriculture). Employment Center Land Use is contiguous to the south which is under the same ownership. All surrounding properties are vacant, native upland forest. The proposed use is all uses allowed in Employment Center and there is no concurrent zoning application. In the vicinity, there are approximately 2+ acres of vacant Employment Center designated lands. Staff is concerned about lack of infrastructure in the vicinity, and that there is a surplus of Employment Center designated land to the south and west that has yet to be developed. The request increases the overall size of the Deltona Corp holdings in the area for marketing. The northern most parcel is adjacent to the Greenway and without knowing the intensity of the proposed use and its buffering to the greenway staff is recommending denial of the northern parcel 412-6-. Uses in the Employment Center are not generally compatible with Rural Land, Recreational and Preservation uses to the north without sufficient restrictions and buffering. ADJACENT PROPERTY CHARACTERISITICS Direction FLUM Designation Zoning Existing Use per MCPA Property Code N W Rural Land A-1 (General Agriculture) Timberland E Rural Land A-1 (General Agriculture) Timberland W Employment Center A-1 (General Agriculture) Timberland S E Employment Center M-1 (Light Manufacturing) Timberland N Employment A-1 (General Agriculture) Timberland E Center/Rural M-1 (Light Manufacturing) S Land/I-75 ROW Timberland W N Rural Land A-1 (General Agriculture) Mobile Home S Employment Center A-1 (General Agriculture) Timberland 3 P age

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT The Employment Center Future Land Use is intended to provide regional services for a mix of business, enterprise, research and development, light to moderate commercial and industrial activities, and residential uses. There is no proposed immediate use. Staff is recommending DENIAL of the request on northern parcel 412-6- based on the fact that the application did not provide sufficient information or justification to meet the Review Criteria, namely compatibility with the recreation and conservation use in the area, in Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Policy 5.1.2 Review Criteria, as follows: Policy 5.1.2: Review Criteria - Changes to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Before approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA), Zoning Change (ZC), or Special Use Permit (SUP) the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed modification is suitable, and the County shall review, and make a determination that the proposed modification is compatible with existing and planned development on the site and in the immediate vicinity, and shall evaluate its overall consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and LDC and potential impacts on, but not limited to the following: 1. Market demand and necessity for the change; 2. Availability and potential need for improvements to public or private facilities and services; 3. Allocation and distribution of land uses and the creation of mixed use areas; 4. Environmentally sensitive areas, natural and historic resources, and other resources in the County; 5. Agricultural activities and rural character of the area; 7. Prevention of urban sprawl, as defined by Ch. 163, F.S.; 8. Consistency with the UGB; 9. Consistency with planning principles and regulations in the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and LDC; 1. Compatibility with current uses and land uses in the surrounding area; 11. Water Supply and Alternative Water Supply needs; and 12. Concurrency requirements. PUBLIC FACILTIES AND SERVICES Environmental: An Environmental Assessment for Listed Species, along with stormwater and floodplain analysis is required for all development proposals which will address how these will be managed consistent with local, state, and federal requirements. However, no environmental analysis has been submitted. The site is predominantly Arredondo sand, with a vegetation consisting of planted and/or native pine, making it potentially suitable for animal species adapted to pine forest communities. There are no flood zones, ponds or wetlands based on FEMA Flood mapping or the National Wetlands Inventory, however there is a small flood prone area on the northern parcel. School Facilities: The maximum potential residential units are expected to result in an additional 36 elementary students, 18 middle school students and 21 high school students. While localized overcrowding may exist, the proposed land use change should not adversely impact Marion County Public Schools in the near term. Districtwide, adequate capacity exists at all three levels of schools. 4 P age

Public Safety: The County s Marion Oaks Fire Station and Sheriff s Marion Oaks District Office are located less than three mile south of the site at 12 Marion Oaks Lane and 294 Marion Oaks Lane, respectively. There are no public fire hydrants located in the vicinity. Public safety service response times will vary based on whether the response units are at the stations or on the road, and service may also be provided by other surrounding facilities under inter-local service delivery options. Final conformance with all public safety needs will be coordinated with any site development proposals as part of the development review processes. Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer: The site is in Marion County s Marion Oaks Utility Service Area. Water & Sanitary Sewer Capacity - Maximum Demand in Gallons Per Day (GPD) Utility Service LOS Standard Existing FLU Proposed FLU Net Change 2 unit 23 units +23 units ac 19 ac 1.7M SF Residential (# of Units) Non-Residential (acres) Water (PWE Policy 1.1.1) Residential (15 GPD/person per unit*) Non-Residential (2,75 gpd/acre) Sewer (SSE Policy 1.1.1) Residential (11 GPD/person per unit*) Non-Residential (2, gpd/acre) 72 GPD GPD 82,8 GPD 52,25 GPD 528 GPD 6,72 GPD GPD 38, GPD *2.4 persons/unit Sources: Marion County Growth Services & Florida Statistical Abstract 26-13. +82,8 GPD +52,25 GPD +6,192 GPD +38, GPD Connections to utility services may be required at the time of development, depending on the number of fixtures and projected water and wastewater demand. General capacity analysis indicates the existing facilities will not require expansion should the site be developed at the maximum density. However, existing water and sewer services are over one half mile away from the site, meaning that some developments may not meet the threshold for central water and sewer and would be authorized to utilize onsite wells and wastewater treatment systems. Also, sewer facilities are only available along 484, without Right of Way or easements for expansion to the north. Staff recommendation of approval for the southern parcel is based on central water and sewer being required for development of the site for Employment Center uses. Stormwater/Drainage: The site does not include formally designated 1- Year Flood Plain, however it does contain areas prone to flooding based on Marion County s Watershed Management Plan. All proposed development is required to hold stormwater on-site, up to and including a 1-year storm event, along with other site specific conditions in compliance with the County s Land Development Regulations in order to address stormwater quality and quantity controls. Recreation: Recreation facilities on the southern parcel are not expected to be impacted by the proposed amendment. Common open space is required under the PUD zoning classification and Marion County has ample Federal, State, and County owned lands available for recreational activity that exceeds the currently established LOS standard. Solid Waste: LOS is 6.2 pounds per person per day (Solid Waste Element, Policy 1.1.2). This amendment does not adversely impact the County s LOS for solid waste as the County has identified and arranged for short-term and long- 5 P age

term disposal needs. The County continues to use the Baseline Landfill until 22 when it is projected to close. A long-term contract reserving capacity with a private landfill in Sumter County is in place for use when determined necessary by the County. Further, the County continues to pursue recycling opportunities and other avenues to address solid waste needs based on existing and projected conditions. Transportation: Amendment 17-L6 was analyzed using the Marion County Impact Fee Schedule as based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition. The proposed ±19 acres of Employment Center, with a maximum gross 23 DUs, or 1.7M ft 2 of commercial/industrial space has the potential to generate approximately 2,455 daily trips (or 7,166 daily trips for commercial use) and 211 or 32,171 PM peak hour trips (See Amendment Trip Generation Table). SW 27 th Ave was not analyzed for traffic counts based on the TPO 216 Traffic Counts and a Traffic Impact Analysis was not provided with the application request. As previously mentioned, there is no paved access to the subject properties. Access would presumably be provided from SW 27 th Ave, through Marion Oaks Trail. However, Marion Oaks Trail terminates west of the site at SW 29 th Ave. Rd. If approved, and through subsequent application processes, development proposals associated with this application will be subject to review and approval under the County s Land Development Code including concurrency review processes. AMENDMENT TRIP GENERATION Scenario Land Use Acres Potential Max Development Existing Medium Density 19.26 23 DU Daily Trips* PM PK HR. Trips* 2,45 28 Proposed Employment Center 19.26 Commercial 27,14 123,86 Residential 462 DU 3,68 311 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Growth Services recommends APPROVAL of CPA 17-L6 PID 412-6- for the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment on the following basis: 1. The granting of the amendment will not adversely affect the public interest. 2. The proposed amendment is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and the Marion County Comprehensive Plan Growth Services recommends DENIAL of CPA 17-L6 PID 412-35- for the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment on the following basis: 1. The granting of the amendment will adversely affect the public interest. 2. The proposed amendment is not compatible with land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed amendment is not consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and the Marion County Comprehensive Plan PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION May 31, 217: 6 P age

The Planning & Zoning Commission recommends TO ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE THE ITEM UNTIL SEPTEMBER of CPA 17-L6 for the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment on the following basis: 1. The granting of the amendment will adversely affect the public interest. 2. The proposed amendment is not compatible with land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed amendment is not consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and the Marion County Comprehensive Plan BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TRANSMITTAL June 2, 217: The Board of County Commissioners acted to [ ] the transmittal of CPA 17-L6 for the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for expedited agency review on the following basis: REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS: PEND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPTION TBD: The Board of County Commissioners [ ] Future Land Use Map Amendment CPA 17-L6 on the following basis: 7 P age

17-L6 Aerial 75 Subject Property SW 27TH AVE B I7 5 WN MARION O 75 SW 28TH AVE URT RD S W 28TH CO Subject Property A KS T R L 25 5 1, Feet

Existing Land Use Designation 17-L6 87 87 87 87 65 64 94 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 94 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 99 99 Subject Property 2 99 99 56 99 Subject Property 58 65 99 65 63 63 64 8 1 1 1 94 1 1 1 1 1 58 53 1 64 63 Use per MC Property Appraiser 1 Single Family Res 5-69/99 Agricultural /1/4/7 Vacant 71 Church 2 Mobile Home 6-7/11-39 Commercial 41-49 Industrial 83-98 Public 82 Recreation 3-5/8 Multi-Family 77 Club/Lodge/Union Hall Legend OWNER: AGENT: PARCEL(S): 1 inch = 66 feet THE DELTONA CORPORATION STEVEN H. GRAY 412-35- 412-6- The information shown hereon is compiled from the best available sources and for use by the County offices only. This data should not be used for surveying or land transfer of any type. All Amendments Rural Land (1 du/1 ac) Urban Residential (8-16 du/ac) Employment Center ( - 12 du/ac; FAR 2.) Policy 1.2 _ Low Residential ( - 1 du/ac) Medium Residential (1-4 du/ac) High Residential (4-8 du/ac) Rural Activity Center ( - 2 du/ac; FAR.35) Rural Community ( - 3 du/ac; FAR.7) Commercial ( - 6 du/ac; FAR 1.) Commerce District (N/A; FAR 2.) Public (N/A; FAR 1.) Preservation (N/A; N/A) Municipality