I intend to present the following materials tomorrow at Ballot Simplification Committee on behalf of the Mayor s Office.

Similar documents
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE City of Emeryville

MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BERKELEY TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO FINANCE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS

BALLOT MEASURE SUBMITTAL FORM. Jurisdiction Name: San Leandro Unified School District Election Date: 8 November 2016

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No. AO

PINNACLE PROPERTIES ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING REGULATIONS

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Auditing Affordable Housing Programs October 3, 2018

Memo. DATE: 20 September 2018 City Planning Commission John Rahaim, Director of Planning RE: HOUSING BALANCE REPORT No. 7 1 July June 2018

BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents

HOUSING WORK GROUP 2014

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure Ballot Procedure

San Francisco 2015 Affordable Housing General Obligation Bond CGOBOC Report March 2018

Copyright 2019 Dominion Voting Inc. All Rights Reserved REGULAR ELECTION MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE APRIL 2, OFFICIAL BALLOT

City of San Antonio. Neighborhood Improvements Bond Program Development Community Committee Meeting. October 20, 2016

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

The City shall support a suitable mix of housing by: [9J (3)(c)(5)]

EXHIBIT A FULL TEXT OF BOND PROPOSITION HILMAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CLASSROOM SAFETY, RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION MEASURE

San Diego Housing Commission Finance Plan Update as of September Real Estate Department San Diego Housing Commission November 15, 2011

APPENDIX D FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME Voice ext. 2 Fax

[Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project]

ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

San Francisco 2015 Affordable Housing General Obligation Bond CGOBOC Report September 2017

CRE Residents Ballot Workshop

CHAPTER 23A: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103. Loan to San Diego Youth and Community Services for Transitional Housing (Council District 3)

CALIFORNIA TAX DISCLOSURE REPORT

1 H. 4702, 190th Gen. Ct (Mass. 2018). 2 H. 4297, 190th Gen. Ct (Mass. 2018).

housing parameters overview of comments, responses and revisions BALBOA RESERVOIR COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Steven J. Pinkerton, Housing and Redevelopment Director

Financing Open Space and Watershed Acquisition in California

Santa Cruz Elementary School District Bond Measure

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

Village of Palm Springs

Housing/ Displacement Subcommittee Presentation. Community Working Group September 24, 2015

DATE: TO: FROM: Honorable John Rahaim HOUSING RE: SUMMARY. series and. Balance. units and. 21,570 net. calculations. Memo

Housing New York. How to Achieve Affordability in Urban Centers. October 7, 2015

P r e s e n t a t i o n B y : L i b b y S e i f e l, S e i f e l C o n s u l t i n g

A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy City Council Presentation August 15, 2017

Recommendation to Place Alameda Clean Water, Pothole Repair, Disaster Preparedness Bond On June 2018 Ballot. February 20, 2018

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

2. 22,531 (net new housing) + 11,140 (units that have received approvals) = 33,671

Minnesota Housing Capital Investment Overview

Vacancies at the Clinton Towers Mitchell-Lama Housing Development New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development

SUBJECT: INTERIM APARTMENT RENT ORDINANCE RELATED TO TEMPORARY ALLOWABLE RENT INCREASES AND COST PASS- THROUGH PROVISIONS

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

UCSF Acquisition of Mission Bay Blocks 33-34

Community Working Group Meeting. September 24, :00 pm 8:30 pm

Frequently Asked Questions

INFORMATION. The following twelve nominated items did not receive enough votes to move forward to the Council Priority List and have been dropped:

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY

The Union Iron Works/Pier 70 Initiative

Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts. CDD ORIENTATION CLASS December 14, 2015

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title ) Table A

CONDITIONAL GRANT COMMITMENT AND SITE LEASE FOR REHABILITATION OF VERMONT HOUSE

Executive Summary Planning Code Text & Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: APRIL 2, 2015

City of Watsonville Community Development Department M E M O R A N D U M

October Housing Affordability in Colorado. federal resources

NOVA SCOTIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BUSINESS PLAN

Community Preservation Act Answers To Frequently Asked Questions

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Closeout Checklist

Thinking Big about Richmond s Housing Goals. RPA Housing Action Team City Council Study Session

Oak Glen Apartments. A Briefing to the Housing Committee. Housing/Community Services Department April 6, 2015

Town of Limon Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 HOUSING. Limon Housing Authority Affordable Housing

Mission 2015 Interim Controls

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

LITHUANIAN HOUSING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. valius serbenta housing energy efficiency agency

New Police Facility Community Presentation. September 23, 2017

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Fighting Gentrification & Displacement with Housing Acquisition

1) Describe Actions taken during the last year to foster and maintain affordable housing.

Oxford Central School District Referendum Fact Sheet

information sheet Arms Length Management Organisations Tenant Participation Advisory Service

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EXECUTIVE OFFICE

Post Redevelopment Economic Development and Financing

N.C. Housing Finance Agency

Assemblymember Sullivan Assembly Office January MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE ALASKA ORDINANCE NO. AO

PART 1 - Rules and Regulations Governing the Building Homes Rhode Island Program

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #SmallSites

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014

Legislation Introduced at Roll Call. Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Palmdale Redevelopment Successor Agency

Office Development Annual Limit Program Status Update

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY


Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development. Housing Preferences and Lottery Procedures Manual

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW. September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee

ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION FOR UPCOMING BALLOT MEASURES

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

[Administrative Code- San Francisco Special Tax Financing Law- Central SoMa]

H o u s i n g N e e d i n E a s t K i n g C o u n t y

PUBLIC NOTICE TO HUNTERDON COUNTY VOTERS NOTICE OF GENERAL ELECTION

Contents Introductory Section... 3 Financial Section... 6 Required Information... 9

Transcription:

From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Elliott, Jason (MYR) Doe, Publications (REG) Housing Bond Thursday, July 30, 2015 4:06:06 PM Mayors Office Suggested Edits to Housing Bond.docx Housing Bond - Marked Up.docx Good afternoon: I intend to present the following materials tomorrow at Ballot Simplification Committee on behalf of the Mayor s Office. See you tomorrow! jason Jason Elliott Deputy Chief of Staff Office of Mayor Edwin M. Lee (415) 554-5105

The Way It Is Now: It is City policy to support 30,000 new housing units by 2020, with at least one-third of those permanently affordable to low and moderate-income households, and over 50% within financial reach of middle class San Franciscans. State law requires that the City's General Plan describe San Francisco's housing needs, set goals for providing housing and develop programs to meet those goals. Some of those programs help develop housing affordable to low- and moderate- income households, and help persons with low and moderate incomes buy their first homes. When the City provides money to fund housing opportunities affordable to low- and moderate-income householdsfor these programs, larger amounts of money are frequently made available from other public and private sources. The City pays for its part of these programs with money from property taxes, hotel taxes and other local sourcesthe Housing Trust Fund, which replaced affordable housing funding from the Redevelopment Agency. The City expects that money from these sources will not be enough to meet its future low- and moderate- income housing goals, specifically for low-income households such as seniors, disabled persons, low-income working families, and veterans, who experience the largest affordability gaps. The City s use of general obligation bond proceeds is monitored by the Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee. The members of this committee are appointed by the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors (Board), the Controller, and the Civil Grand Jury. The Proposal: Proposition A is an ordinance that would allow the City to borrow up to $310 million by issuing general obligation bonds. The City would use this money to build, buy, improve, and rehabilitate affordable housing in San Francisco. The City could use the funds to: finance the development, construction, preservation and rehabilitation of affordable rental housing near established transit corridors or within priority development areas; acquire, rehabilitate, and preserve existing rental housing to prevent losing rental housing stock and displacing long-time City residents; repair and reconstruct dilapidated public housing developments or provide infrastructure improvements that allow for the repair or improvement of public housing sites; fund middle-income rental housing units; and assist City residents, including educatorsteachers, in acquiring their first home in the City; and, acquire, rehabilitate, preserve, construct and/or develop affordable housing in the Mission Area Plan. Proposition A would allow an increase in the property tax to pay for the bonds, if needed. The City has long-standing financial policies that limit the amount of debt that it can issue. Under this policy, G.O. bonds do not increase voters long-term property tax rates. Therefore new G.O. bonds are typically used as existing approved and issued debt is

retired and/or the property tax base grows.it would permit landlords to pass through up to 50% of any resulting property tax increase to tenants Proposition A also would require the Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to review the spending of bond funds. One-tenth of one percent (0.1%) of the bond funds would pay for the committee s audit and oversight functions. Approval of this measure requires two-thirds of the votes cast. A "YES" Vote Means: If you vote yes, you want the City to issue $310 million in general obligation bonds on projects designed to buy, build, or renovate affordable housing, including public housing; fund middle-income rental housing units; and assist City residents in acquiring their first home in the City. A "NO" Vote Means: If you vote no, you do not want the City to issue these bonds.

The Way It Is Now: It is City policy to support 30,000 new housing units by 2020, with at least one-third of those permanently affordable to low and moderate-income households, and over 50% within financial reach of middle class San Franciscans. When the City provides money to fund housing opportunities affordable to low- and moderate- income households, larger amounts of money are frequently made available from other public and private sources. The City pays for its part of these programs with money from the Housing Trust Fund, which replaced affordable housing funding from the Redevelopment Agency. The City expects that money from these sources will not be enough to meet its future low- and moderate- income housing goals, specifically for low-income households such as seniors, disabled persons, low-income working families, and veterans, who experience the largest affordability gaps. The City s use of general obligation bond proceeds is monitored by the Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee. The members of this committee are appointed by the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors (Board), the Controller, and the Civil Grand Jury. The Proposal: Proposition A is an ordinance that would allow the City to borrow up to $310 million by issuing general obligation bonds. The City would use this money to build, buy, improve, and rehabilitate affordable housing in San Francisco. The City could use the funds to: finance the development, construction, preservation and rehabilitation of affordable rental housing near established transit corridors or within priority development areas; acquire, rehabilitate, and preserve existing rental housing to prevent losing rental housing stock and displacing long-time City residents; repair and reconstruct dilapidated public housing developments or provide infrastructure improvements that allow for the repair or improvement of public housing sites; fund middle-income rental housing units; assist City residents, including teachers, in acquiring their first home in the City; and, acquire, rehabilitate, preserve, construct and/or develop affordable housing in the Mission Area Plan. Proposition A would allow an increase in the property tax to pay for the bonds, if needed. The City has long-standing financial policies that limit the amount of debt that it can issue. Under this policy, G.O. bonds do not increase voters long-term property tax rates. Therefore new G.O. bonds are typically used as existing approved and issued debt is retired and/or the property tax base grows. Proposition A also would require the Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to review the spending of bond funds. One-tenth of one percent (0.1%) of the bond funds would pay for the committee s audit and oversight functions. Approval of this measure requires two-thirds of the votes cast. A "YES" Vote Means: If you vote yes, you want the City to issue $310 million in general obligation bonds on projects designed to buy, build, or renovate affordable

housing, including public housing; fund middle-income rental housing units; and assist City residents in acquiring their first home in the City. A "NO" Vote Means: If you vote no, you do not want the City to issue these bonds.