CLOTHESLINE REGULATION ~ NO LONGER "NOT IN YOUR BACKYARD"

Similar documents
A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda

Belmead Neighbourhood Structure Plan

Inspection Reports. Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Introduction. and the. A Joint Project.

The student will explain and compare the responsibilities of renting versus buying a home.

LICENCES AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS. By Douglas S. Christie, B.A., LL.B.

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

A Guide to MEES: the new Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards. It s business. But it s personal. mishcon.com

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Change. By Blake Hegeman and Andrew Kantor

Staff Report Summary Item #10

Present: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Millette, JJ., and Russell, S.J. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, ET AL.

The Basic Commercial Real Estate Transaction From Start to Finish

Director, Community Planning, South District

Key Housing Terms. Living off-campus involves learning new vocabulary! Here are some of the words and phrases that you might hear in your search.

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes November 3, 2014 Page 1

Consumer Protection Act

Advice SU READY TO RENT GUIDE

You own your unit or apartment as well as sharing ownership and responsibility for common property.

Instructions for APPLICATION FOR CONSENT

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

ABANDONED OR UNSAFE BUILDINGS IOWA STATUTES TRANSLATED DEFINITIONS

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

MINUTES ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS BOARD. April 3, 2013

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair Regular Session SUBJECT

Sincerity Among Landlords & Tenants

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

INTRODUCTION...2 THE CALLS...3 INFORMATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION...3 TWO KEY PROPERTY QUESTIONS...4

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

ONE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Introduction to Property Management SECTION

Omnibus Zoning Amendment (FILE # D ) Proposals

Summary of Greenfield Housing Code Development Standards

Edmonton Subdivision and Development Appeal Board

Reasons For Rejecting The LIDL Site Plan March 29, 2017

You can search for cases tried in Alberta Court of Queen s Bench pertaining to residential tenancy -

THE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OFFICE

DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR MT. HOLLY PRESERVE

You can complete and submit this form electronically via the Planning Portal by visiting

Foreclosure Funds, Presidential Powers, Non-Owners at Meetings, and Attorney-Client Privilege NEW NEIGHBORHOODS

Hello Plat Review, I have a question.

Be energy efficient in your rented property - A guide for tenants

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LAW BERKSHIRE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 18, 2018 (REVISED JANUARY 25, 2018)

INTRODUCTION ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS -- GENERAL PURPOSE STATEMENT APPLICABILITY... 3

we apply for the necessary searches you make your mortgage application (if applicable)

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

BOUNDARIES & SQUATTER S RIGHTS

Iran Divestment Act Certification Frequently Asked Questions

ENDING A TENANCY WHO, WHY, WHEN, and HOW

Due Diligence Guidelines!

Toronto Issues Survey

Overriding Preference for Ground- Related Housing by GTA Millennials and Other Recent and Prospective Buyers

PUD Ordinance - Cascade Lakes Plat #10 of 1995

City of Kenora Application for Letter of Comfort The Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Mt. Pleasant Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Cedar Cottage Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

The application is being presented to the planning committee as Brentwood Borough Council is the applicant.

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

RESTRICTIONS PLAT RESTRICTIONS

You can complete and submit this form electronically via the Planning Portal by visiting

Shared Ownership. Buyers Guide

BCS Strata Management: Professionalising the Industry

CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW To adopt a new City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 519, Infill Construction, Public Notice.

Cannabis Guide for Municipalities

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 45(12), subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")

Instructions for members who are announcing a pledge

GI-096 September Harmonized Sales Tax: Provincial Transitional New Housing Rebates for Housing in Ontario and British Columbia

CASE LAW UPDATE, JUNE 2009

Measuring GLA Mixing ANSI Standards with Local Custom

(Chapter 277, Laws of 2018; SSB 6175)

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PRIVATE RENTED HOUSING (SCOTLAND) BILL STAGE 1 REPORT

Regulatory Proposals for Private Home Sharing and B&Bs

City of Stevenson Planning Department

OPINION OF SENIOR COUNSEL FOR GLASGOW ADVICE AGENCY (HOUSING BENEFIT AMENDMENTS

Easy Legals Avoiding the costly mistakes most people make when buying a property including buyer s checklist

LAND REGISTRY DEEDS CUSTOMER INFORMATION GUIDE

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS. Buyer's and Seller's Guide to the California Residential Purchase Agreement

Chapter DENSITY AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS

Analysis: The New Condominium Rules

Solar Leasing: The Truth Behind the Hype

RENTING AN APARTMENT. Information and tips for you who live in accommodation with right of tenancy

TOP 10 COMMON LAW DRAINAGE PROBLEMS BETWEEN RURAL NEIGHBOURS H. W. Fraser, P.Eng. and S. Vander Veen, P.Eng.

CITY OF VICTORIA BOARD OF VARIANCE MINUTES JANUARY 11, 2018

SPECIAL GENERAL COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, February 27, 2018 Immediately following the General Committee Meeting Town Council Chambers Page 1

The Division of Responsibility within a Condominium Corporation

WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO LIVE?

Gary Locke, Plans Administrator Eric Fink, Asst. Law Director Jennifer Barone, Development Engineer Sheila Uzl, Transcriptionist

Clean and Green LEBANON COUNTY UNDERSTANDING THE PROGRAM

PLANNING REPORT. Lot 5, SDR Lot 6 and 7 Concession 3 Township of Normanby Municipality of West Grey County of Grey

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

AFFIDAVIT FENCE OFFICE OF THE JACKSON TOWNSHIP ZONING DEPARTMENT P. O. BOX 517 GROVE CITY, OH 43123

CRE Residents Ballot Workshop

Leasing guidance for schools

BLAIR COUNTY. UNDERSTANDING THE Clean and Green PROGRAM. COUNTY OF BLAIR Blair County Courthouse 423 Allegheny Street Hollidaysburg, PA

Chapter 4 An Economic Theory of Property

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD ARB APPLICATION for Exterior Modifications / Alterations

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

Denmark: Rødovre, Sibeliusparken

Eldridge Housing Code Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

CLOTHESLINE REGULATION ~ NO LONGER "NOT IN YOUR BACKYARD" On April 18, 2008, the Ontario government announced it had fulfilled its promise made earlier in the year to impose a ban on the ban against clotheslines. The day prior, Ontario Regulation 97/08 hereinafter, the Clothesline Regulation had come into effect on the day it was filed. BACKGROUND For many years, municipalities and developers have imposed restrictions on properties to prohibit the use of clotheslines. The reasons behind this may vary, but for the most part come down to aesthetics: many people just don t like the look of backyards and balconies covered in their neighbours laundry. Today, however, environmental concern has prompted interest in returning to lifestyle choices and practices that many of our parents and grandparents would have considered, as the Japanese would say, atarimae natural, or, more literally, right on the mark. In response to these shifting values, the government of Ontario enacted, in 2006, section 3 of the Ontario Energy Conservation Leadership Act, 2006 (ECLA), which permits the government, by regulation, to designate certain goods, services and technologies in order to [remove] barriers and to promote opportunities for energy conservation. The effects of a regulation made under section 3 are: a. to render any restriction imposed at law that would otherwise prevent or restrict the use of such designated goods, services or technologies, inoperative; and b. to permit the use of such designated goods, services and technologies in such circumstances as may be prescribed, despite any restriction imposed at law that would otherwise prevent or restrict their use, including a restriction established by a municipal by-law, a condominium by-law, 1 an encumbrance 1 Note that this does not mean that restrictions in condominium documents other than the by-laws are not affected by such regulations. We pointed out to the government, when this section was drafted, that the reference to condominium by-laws could be misleading since, generally, such restrictions would not be found in a by-law as they are not their proper subject matter. It is more appropriate and more likely that such restrictions would be included in the condominium declaration or rules. The point is moot, however, since the reference to condominium by-laws is only by way of example. Provisions in a declaration or rule should also be captured by the catch-all expression, any restriction imposed at law.

Clifton Kok LLP About Condo Page 2 on real property or an agreement. However, restrictions imposed by other legislative enactments (statutes and regulations made by the government of Ontario or higher authority) are not affected. The Clothesline Regulation is made pursuant to this section of the ECLA. INTENDED & ACTUAL EFFECTS The Clothesline Regulation is the government s first section 3 regulation since the ECLA came into effect. The concept behind it is simple. It is based on the belief that if a person hangs only 25% of his or her laundry out to dry, rather than use electric clothes dryers, that person should save about $30 per year in electricity bills, and society will enjoy the corresponding benefits of reduced energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. 2 (This memo does not examine the validity of those claims.) The intended effect of the Clothesline Regulation is to render inoperative any legal impediment to the use of almost any: clothesline, clothestree, anything having the same purpose as a clothesline or clothestree (and no other purpose), and equipment necessary to install and use the same. It is important to understand that not every restricted use of a clothesline, etc., is affected by this regulation. As set out in the Clothesline Regulation, the only circumstances affected are those where: 1. the property where the equipment is installed includes a house or building used exclusively for residential purposes and where the person installing the same lives; 2. the equipment is installed in a manner that ensures there are no impediments to safety, including (but not limited to) impediments to access or egress from the house or building on the property; 3. the equipment is installed adjacent to a rear or side wall of the house or building so that it can be used by someone: a. standing directly on the ground; b. standing on a deck or other fixed platform that is (1) accessible from the ground floor of the house of building and (2) is not higher than the floor level of the ground floor; 2 As stated in the government and media releases; e.g., see news releases posted on CTV.ca (search, for example, clothesline regulation Ontario ).

Clifton Kok LLP About Condo Page 3 c. standing on a step-stool (or similar device) that is placed directly on the ground or directly on a deck or other fixed platform meeting the foregoing criteria; and 4. the equipment is installed in an area where the person has an exclusive right of use by virtue of their residency. 3 It appears from the manner in which the regulation is worded that all of these criteria must be met in order for the regulation to affect an existing prohibition against clothesline use. Accordingly, the Clothesline Regulation does not affect restrictions against clotheslines, etc., in any other circumstances, including the following: 1. where the property contains only a building used for non residential purposes, or for mixed residential and non-residential purposes; 2. where the person using the equipment is not a resident; 3. where the equipment cannot be installed without creating unsafe conditions, or without blocking ingress/egress routes to and from the homes on the property; 4. where the equipment cannot be installed so as to be accessible from the ground or from a deck or other fixed platform accessible from and level to the ground floor of a building; or 5. where the person does not have exclusive use (by virtue of residency) of the area in which the clothesline is installed. It should be noted that what the Clothesline Regulation does not do is require anybody to use clotheslines, clothestrees or any similar device. All that the regulation seeks to do is lift prohibitions against such uses (in those circumstances where it applies). Surely the government hopes to encourage such use, but anyone who really doesn t want their underclothes hung for the world to see is, so far, not compelled to do so. APPLICATION TO CONDOMINIUMS One article located on CTV.ca 4 concludes with the remark that, 3 Note that the use of exclusive use here is different from its use in the Condominium Act, 1998. Under the Condominium Act, 1998, a part of the common elements of a condominium is only considered an exclusive use area if such designation is set out in the proper manner in both the declaration and description of the condominium. Thus there can be parts of the common elements that a unit owner uses exclusively such as the windows and doors to his or her unit but that are not actually their exclusive use areas. However, under the Clothesline Regulation, exclusive use is determined by virtue of residency. Therefore, even where rear yards, for example, are not specifically designated as exclusive use areas pursuant to the Condominium Act, 1998, they may be considered exclusive use areas for the purposes of the Clothesline Regulation. 4 Ontario premier lifts outdoor-clothesline ban April 18, 2008, 6:49 PM ET; found at http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/articlenews/story/ctvnews/20080418/clotheslines_ban_080418/20080418?hub= CTVNewsAt11

Clifton Kok LLP About Condo Page 4 The new regulation applies to detached and semi-detached homes and most row houses. High-rise condominiums and apartments will not be affected for now While essentially accurate, that comment is not quite correct. In this writer s view, there are situations in high-rise condominiums and apartments where the Clothesline Regulation could have effect. There are also many situations even in detached, semidetached and row houses where it may not. The fact is, the Clothesline Regulation says nothing about the types of home to which it applies, but describes (as set out above in this memorandum) only the kinds of circumstances in which it will apply. So, the question we ve been being asked a lot lately does the regulation apply to condominiums? can only be correctly answered in one way: yes and no. In other words, it does apply to condominiums generally, but not to all condominiums specifically. It is also possible that the regulation will apply to some units within a condominium and not to others. To determine whether the Clothesline Regulation applies to your condominium, or your unit, requires determining whether your condominium or unit satisfies the conditions necessary for it to apply. Obviously, therefore, whether the Clothesline Regulation applies cannot be determined in the abstract, but a few examples might assist: A. CONDO X contains row houses used exclusively for residential purposes. Each row house is a unit and provides exclusive access to a rear yard that is partially enclosed (although not designated exclusive use areas in the condominium documents). The ground level rear door of each unit opens directly onto a deck in the rear yard which is at the same height as the ground level of the home. There is room for a clothesline or clothestree to be erected that is easily accessible from the deck or using a step-stool placed on the ground and does not block access to the rear door, or escape from the rear yard, or otherwise hinder safe movement through or about the rear yard. The Clothesline Regulation would apply. Restrictions against clotheslines, etc., are rendered inoperative. B. CONDO Y contains row houses. The ground level of each unit is for commercial use only, and the upper levels are residential. Each unit has exclusive use of a fully enclosed rear or side yard in which a clothesline or clothestree can be safely installed without blocking any access route in or out of the unit. Since the buildings/homes are not exclusively for residential use, the Clothesline Regulation will not apply and restrictions against clotheslines, etc., remain operative. C. CONDO Z is a high-rise residential condominium. Upper floor units have exclusive access to balconies. Ground floor units have patios that are level with the ground floor and designated as exclusive use areas. Partial privacy

Clifton Kok LLP About Condo Page 5 fences or trees exist that could be used to connect a clothesline from the exterior wall of the unit so that the patio door from the unit is not blocked. No unsafe condition would be created by the clothesline being connected in this manner and location. The Clothesline Regulation would apply to permit clotheslines use by residents of the ground floor units only. These are examples of possible situations only. Even if your situation seems similar to these, I would recommend carefully reviewing the provisions of the Clothesline Regulation to determine whether or how it might apply to your condominium. The advice of legal counsel is generally advisable when seeking to interpret and apply statutes. CONCLUSION It is fairly certain the Clothesline Regulation is only the first in what is likely to become a series of increasingly far-reaching and, likely, controversial section 3 regulations under the ECLA. For what it is worth, in this writer s opinion the Clothesline Regulation seems to be good start, and, in particular, a good example of environmental legislation the way it should be done. While its subject matter is not so monumental, it appears to do two things right: 1. it advances the interests of those concerned about the environment by removing unnecessary restrictions against an environmentally sound and beneficial practice; and 2. it considers and seeks to protect the interests of those who might be harmed by such practice. Whether or not this assessment of the regulation is accurate, and whether or not future regulations made pursuant to section 3 of the ECLA will be similarly well crafted are matters that are yet to come out in the wash, so to speak. Michael H. Clifton (April 2008)