PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014

Similar documents
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of February 7, 2012

A New Zoning Code for a 21st Century Los Angeles

SHAPING NEW BUILDINGS

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

3.1 Existing Built Form

CAN TRADITIONAL ZONING ACHIEVE OUR GOALS FOR DOWNTOWN ANN ARBOR?

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Code Update Process For: Downtown Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB)

Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

Plan Dutch Village Road

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

Article 1 UNIVERSITY PARK ZONING DRAFT. LEGEND See inside front cover. August 31, 2018 DRAFT 4.0 ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

10-16 Wellesley Street West, 5-7 St. Nicholas Street and 586 Yonge Street Zoning Amendment Refusal Report

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Section Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District

ORDINANCE NO. 16- WHEREAS, said Code included Title 12, which is the City s Land Use Ordinance; and

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

TOcore: Updating Tall Building Setbacks in the Downtown City-initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments Final Report

The Planning Commission. DATE: July 19, 2016

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

ADUs ELSEWHERE TORONTO

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:

Side Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing

Decatur, Georgia Unified Development Ordinance. Effective February 1, 2015

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

Ann Arbor Downtown Premium Prioritization

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures.

Central Business District Core Ordinance

Redline Document Conventions

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

PEDESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT. November 6, 2013 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department

Air Rights Reference Guide

November 17, 2004/Calendar No. 22

SCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY

DRAFT STANDARDS PUBLIC DRAFT

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Homeowners Guide to Accessory Dwelling Units

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Natural Light & Ventilation. Sources. Regulation 45 (1) & 45 (2) A Public road with right of way. A Courtyard or Open Space within the site.

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

LeBreton Flats Redevelopment Development Summary Chart (First Subdivision)

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 200 Article 20: Schedule of Regulations

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

SCHEDULE 31 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

To Download the Guidelines Document:

200 St. Clair Ave W - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

Wilson Bridge Corridor Zoning. Department of Planning & Building

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

DRAFT MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION July 9, 2018

Denver Zoning Code Text Amendment #3 Slot Home Text Amendment PLANNING BOARD REVIEW REDLINE DRAFT 3/13/18

SANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Land Use and Zoning Changes for Land Development Code Update

PUBLIC DRAFT May 2017 Zoning Districts Use Regulations Definitions (partial)

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

Accessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015

30% 10 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 16 FT 35 FT 35 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 2 35 FT PERMITTED PERMITTED NOT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MAY NOT EXCEED THE.

Application for OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.3, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 26, 27 and 28, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW -2018

TOcore: Updating Tall Building Setbacks in the Downtown City-initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments Supplementary Report

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

TOWN OF NEW SHOREHAM ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW APPLICATION PROCEDURE

Sec Table of height, bulk, density and area by land use.

8.1 Single Detached (RSI/A-H, J-K; RS2/A-H, J-K

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

ANDERSON HALL PUD TEXT AMENDMENT PRESENTED BY STEVEN D. HARDIN, ESQ.

FRONT YARD MP 35 FT 35 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 2 35 FT 30% NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED

CONCEPTS WEST PALM BEACH MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1.0

The summary of zoning regulations for each site is provided in the same order (and using the same names for each site) as the RFEI.

City of Thorold Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2140(97)

10 St Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ORDINANCE NO BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

Transcription:

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014 SUBJECT: Amendments to Chapter 55 ( Ordinance) regarding Building and Requirements in the Main Street Character PROPOSED CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION The Ann Arbor City Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Mayor and City Council approve the amendments to Chapter 55, Ordinance, Section 5:10.20A regarding building height and massing standards for the Main Street character overlay zoning district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the petition be approved because the change responds to Council Resolutions R-13-078 and R-14-025, and will further the goals of the Downtown Plan and the Master Plan Land Use Element with regard to protecting the livability of residential neighborhoods adjacent to the downtown. BACKGROUND A city-initiated rezoning of 425 South Main Street (see Z14-015) from D1 Downtown Core base zoning district to D2 Downtown Interface base zoning district, if approved, would create the first instance of a parcel zoned D2 in the Main Street character overlay district. There currently are no building massing standards for D2 in this character overlay district; the proposed amendments would establish maximum height and minimum side and rear setback standards. The Ordinance Revisions Committee (ORC) met four times in February and March 2014 to discuss several zoning map and ordinance changes to the Main Street character overlay district, as directed by City Council and Planning Commission, generally implementing recommended changes identified in the October 2013 Downtown Evaluation Report. In creating the building height and massing standards for the proposed D2 zoning in the Main Street character overlay district, the ORC evaluated several approaches to limit the visual and shading impact on the residential district directly to the east of the site. Staff suggested an approach based on research done by the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Toronto has a 45- degree setback requirement because at their latitude, this is the angle needed for sunlight to reach the sidewalk during the seasons and times of day when people are most likely to be out walking. Ann Arbor s latitude (42 N) is within one degree of Toronto s (43 N). The proposed amendments create side and rear setback requirements for any D2 property that is located within 25 of a residential zoning district. This setback would be applied from the top of the fourth story; the Main Street character overlay district has a maximum 4-story streetwall height that essentially forms the base of the building. Above the fourth story, each additional story would have to be set back a distance equal to its height from the edge of the

Building and Requirements - Main Street Character Page 2 story below. The tower portion of the building could either be designed in stair-step fashion or could be uniformly set back. While no side or rear setback is proposed for the base of a building under these amendments, it should be noted that there is a 16-foot wide public alley separating the 425 South Main Street parcel from the adjacent residentially zoned land. This alley will create a defacto 16-foot setback for the base of any building on this site. The attached diagram was prepared for the ORC to help visualize the proposed side and rear setback. A digitally-prepared graphic will replace the hand-drawn version in the Ordinance. The ORC discussed at length the Council resolution recommendation for a 60 foot height limit to be established for the new D2 district in the Main Street character overlay district. As noted in the Downtown Evaluation Report, this site is very near the traditional heart of downtown where taller buildings are appropriate, but is in a transition zone and must bridge the gap between the core and the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Directly across Main Street to the west is the Ashley Mews PUD, which includes a 110 foot tall building. The D1/Main Street zoning district has a maximum height limit of 180 and the adjacent R4C Multiple-Family Dwelling district has a maximum height of 30. The ORC ultimately recommended a 100-foot maximum height limit for the D2 zoning in the Main Street character overlay district. While taller than the recommended 60, it recognizes the established building pattern to the west, and the height will be mitigated by the proposed upper level side and rear setback requirement. This height limit represents dimension that roughly in the middle of the 180-foot D1 height limit and the 30-foot R4C height limit. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Amendments are proposed to establish a maximum building height and side and rear setback standards for the Main Street character overlay zoning district. Also proposed are formatting changes to make the existing language in the Building Standards chart clearer. Proposed text to be added is shown with underline, proposed text to be deleted is shown with strikethrough. Shading has been added for ease of the reader and will not be included in the Ordinance.

Building and Requirements - Main Street Character Page 3 Ta 5:10.20A Downtown Character s Building Standards (Additional Regulations for the D1 and D2 s) South University State Street Liberty/Divi sion East Huron 1 East Huron 2 Streetwall Max. Min. Offset at Top of Streetwall Required Average Max. Building D1 3 stories 2 stories 5 150 3 stories 2 stories 5 180 3 stories 2 stories 5 180 3 stories 2 stories 150 4 stories 2 stories 5 180 Midtown 4 stories 2 stories 5 180 D2 Articulation Maximum Building Module Length (Horizontal Dimension) Side and Rear Setback Minimum Distance from Lot Line Abutting R 60 45 For D1, a minimum 30 foot setback. For D2, a minimum 40 foot setback. This setback shall be measured from the rear and side exterior walls of the building to any R zoning district boundary on the same block as the building... 60 40 (in D2 only) 5 foot setback side and rear lot line abutting R zoning district Rear or side exterior wall of the tower shall be located no further than 150 from the East Huron property line. Rear or side exterior wall of the base and the tower shall be located no closer than 30 to a lot line abutting a residential zoning district. In no case shall the required setback reduce the width or depth of a lot suita for building to less than 25.

Building and Requirements - Main Street Character Page 4 Ta 5:10.20A Downtown Character s Building Standards (Additional Regulations for the D1 and D2 s) Streetwall Offset at Top of Streetwall Main Street 4 stories 2 stories 5 180 Kerrytown 3 stories 2 stories 5 First Street 3 stories 2 stories 5 Max. Building 100 Articulation Side and Rear Setback From any lot line within 25 of any R zoning district, each story above the fourth story shall have a side and/or rear setback at least equal to the height of that story, applied from the edge of the story below. See diagram. 60 40 10 foot setback side lot line 20 foot setback rear lot line 60 66 15 foot setback side lot line 20 foot setback rear lot line 10 foot offset side lot line The schedule of, height, open space and building coverage requirements in the D1 and D2 base zoning districts is provided here for reference. No amendments are proposed. D1 Ta 5:10.19B. Schedule of Area,, Open Space and Coverage Requirements: D1 and D2 Downtown s Maximum Usa Floor Area in Percentage of Lot Area (FAR) Normal (without premiums) 400% of lot With Premiums (Sections 5:64-5:65) 700% of lot 900% of lot with afforda housing premiums In Feet Minimum In Stories 24 2 See (1) The minimum height requirement shall apply only to new principal use buildings constructed after the effective date of this ordinance (December 26, 2009); otherwise none. (2) The usa floor of the second story must be a minimum of 75% of the first story usa floor. Max. Building Character Standards (Ta 5:10.20A) Max. Building Coverage Min. Open Space Min. Gross Lot Size

Building and Requirements - Main Street Character Page 5 Ta 5:10.19B. Schedule of Area,, Open Space and Coverage Requirements: D1 and D2 Downtown s D2 200% of lot 400% of lot 24 2 See (1) The minimum height requirement shall apply only to new principal use buildings constructed after the effective date of this ordinance (December 26, 2009); otherwise none. (2) The usa floor of the second story must be a minimum of 75% of the first story usa floor. Character Standards (Ta 5:10.20A) 80% of lot 10% of lot HISTORY AND PLANNING BACKGROUND The circumstances and events leading up to the city-initiated rezoning of 425 South Main Street are addressed in that petition s staff report see Planning staff report, May 6, 2014, file number Z14-015. Prepared by Alexis DiLeo Reviewed by Wendy Rampson Attachments: 45-degree Side/Rear Setback Illustration c: Andrew Klein, Representative for K.R.G Investments City Attorney s Office File No. Z14-015