Rapid City Planning Commission

Similar documents
Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Planned Development Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Planned Development Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report April 21, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report June 9, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report April 21, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Annexation Project Report

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION OF THE RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Guide to Replats. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8. Step 9. Step 10

Residential Major Subdivision Review Checklist

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

Residential Minor Subdivision Review Checklist

Guide to Minor Developments

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

Board of Adjustment Variance Process Guide

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

Taylor Lot Coverage Variance Petition No. PLNBOA North I Street Public Hearing: November 7, 2012

Guide to Preliminary Plans

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

Secondary Dwelling Unit

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

1. Allow a workable, interrelated mix of diverse land uses;

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Merrimac PLNSUB Planned Development 38 West Merrimac November 9, Request. Staff Recommendation

CVA Robert and Renate Bearden

MCPC MONONGALIA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 243 High Street, Rm 110, Morgantown, WV Phone Fax

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

To: Stillwater Town Board Reference: Horst Variance Request Stillwater Township, Minnesota Copies To: Town Board Kathy Schmoekel, Town Clerk

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 7, 2017 STAFF REPORT

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

TULSA PARK ESTATES SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 6

MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C

STAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Staff Report. Site Plan Review. SP June 19, 2018


PUBLIC NOTICE 11/13/ /3/ /3/ /1/2014. Date of Notification: Application Received: Application Complete:

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

ARTICLE 67. PD 67. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

ZONING VARIANCES ADMINISTRATIVE

In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

Ordinance No SECTION SIX: Chapter of the City of Zanesville' s Planning and Zoning Code is amended to read as follows:

ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006

LONG RANGE PLANNING ISSUE PAPER NO Updating the Standards of CDC Section (Infill)

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

Urban Planning and Land Use

RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION LEVY COUNTY, FLORIDA

ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. QUEST ASSISTED LIVING CONDITIONAL USE PLNPCM West 800 North Hearing date: October 14, 2009

ZONING COMPATIBILITY & WORKSHEET

VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

All items include discussion and possible action to approve, modify, deny, or continue unless marked otherwise.

MINUTES OF THE RAPID CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT March 22, 2017

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

PLNPCM : Attached Garage Regulations for Residential Districts ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Administrative Staff Report

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

CITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER

Transcription:

Rapid City Planning Commission Major Amendment to a Planned Development Project Report June 8, 2017 Item #5 Applicant Request(s) Case # 17PD020 Major Amendment to a Planned Development to allow an oversized garage Companion Case(s) Development Review Team Recommendation(s) The Development Review Team recommends that the Major Amendment to a Planned Development Overlay be approved with the stipulation(s) noted below. Project Summary Brief The applicant has submitted a Major Amendment to a Planned Development Overlay to allow an over-sized garage. In particular, the applicant is proposing to construct a three-stall detached garage measuring 30 feet by 40 feet or 1,200 square feet in size. There are two existing attached garages located on the property measuring 1,150 square feet in size. The maximum allowed storage/garage area allowed in the Low Density Residential District is 1,500 square feet. The proposed detached garage would bring the total size of storage/garage space to 2,350 square feet or 850 square feet over the maximum allowed area. The applicant has stated that the proposed garage is not intended for commercial use or as a second dwelling. Applicant Information Development Review Team Contacts Applicant: Cory and Jolene Graper Planner: Fletcher Lacock Property Owner: Cory and Jolene Graper Engineer: Nicole Lecy Architect: Fire District: Tim Behlings Engineer: School District: Surveyor: Water/Sewer: Nicole Lecy Other: Scull Construction Service, Inc. DOT: Stacy Bartlett Subject Property Information Address/Location 1364 Alta Vista Drive Neighborhood U.S. Highway 16 Subdivision Terracita Highlights Subdivision Land Area 0.5 acres (21,780 square feet) Existing Buildings Single-family dwelling with attached garages Topography Drops in elevation from the north to the southwest Access Alta Vista Drive Water Provider Rapid City Sewer Provider Rapid City Electric/Gas Provider Black Hills Power / MDU Floodplain

Subject Property and Adjacent Property Designations Existing Zoning Comprehensive Existing Land Use(s) Plan Subject Property LDR II - PD LDN Single-family dwelling Adjacent North LDR II - PD LDN Single-family dwelling Adjacent South GA LDN Void of structural development Adjacent East LDR II - PD LDN Single-family dwelling Adjacent West LDR II - PD LDN Void of structural development Zoning Map Existing Land Uses

Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Parks or Transportation Plan

Relevant Case History Case/File# Date Request Action PD651 09/16/1985 Planned Residential Development City Council approved 99PD014 06/21/1999 Major Amendment to Planned Development to reduce setbacks and to allow sidewalk on one side of Alta Vista Drive City Council approved Relevant Zoning District Regulations Low Density Residential District Required Proposed Lot Area 6,500 square feet 21,780 square feet Lot Width Minimum 50 feet at the front building line Maximum Building Heights 2.5 stories, 35 feet / 15 feet for accessory structures Approximately 130 feet Proposed detached garage 14 feet 9 inches Maximum Density 30% 24.5% Minimum Building Setback: Front Exception previously granted to allow 15 foot setback to dwelling and 18 feet to garage Rear 25 feet to primary structure / 5 feet to accessory structures Approximately 67 feet 15 feet to proposed detached garage Side 8 feet / 12 feet 27 feet to the east and 19 feet to the west Street Side Minimum Landscape Requirements: # of landscape points # of landscape islands Minimum Parking Requirements: # of parking spaces 2 6 # of ADA spaces Signage Pursuant to RCMC No signage proposed Fencing Pursuant to RCMC No fencing proposed Planning Commission Criteria and Findings for Approval or Denial Pursuant to Section 17.50.050(F)5 of the Rapid City Municipal Code the Planning Commission shall consider the following criteria for a Major Amendment to a Planned Development: Criteria 1. There are certain conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in question because of its size, shape, or topography: 2. The application of these regulations to this particular piece of property would create a practical difficulty or undue hardship: Findings The property is approximately 0.5 acres in size and is zoned Low Density Residential District with a Planned Development. The south side of the property drops away steeply into a ravine. The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,200 square foot detached garage. There are two existing attached garages measuring a total of 1,150 square feet in size. The maximum allowed storage space is 1,500 square feet. The total storage space will measure 2,350 square feet in size. The proposed garage will exceed the maximum allowed by 850 square feet. The property is zoned Low Density Residential District with a Planned Development. A single-family dwelling and a detached garage are permitted uses in the district. An over-sized garage is identified as a conditional use. The maximum allowed size of private garages in the Low

3. Exceptions to the underlying zoning district, if granted, would not cause undue hardship to the public good or impair the purposes and intent of these regulations: 4. A literal interpretation of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights that others in the same district are allowed: 5. Any adverse impacts will be reasonably mitigated: 6. The requested exception to the underlying zoning district standards is an alternative or innovative practice that reasonably achieves the objective of the existing standard sought to be modified: Density Residential District is 1,500 square feet of storage space. The applicant is proposing a total of 2,350 square feet. The applicant is not requesting any Exceptions from the land area regulations of the Low Density Residential District. The literal interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance would not deprive the applicant of rights that others in the same district are allowed. Based on the topography of the site it appears that a retaining wall may need to be constructed for the proposed detached garage. The applicant should be aware that retaining walls over four feet in height will require engineer stamped structural design plans. Slope stability and erosion control must also be considered and addressed as needed. If the proposed development requires more than 300 cubic yards of earth moving, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be submitted for review and approval. If water or sewer services are proposed to the detached garage, the site plan must be revised to show the location of services. The submitted site plan does not accurately reflect the existing development on the property. To ensure that the proposed detached garage does meet all land area regulations, upon submittal of a Building Permit, a surveyed site plan must be submitted for review and approval showing existing development and the location of the proposed detached garage. The property is approximately 0.5 acres in size and an over-sized garage is identified as a conditional use in the Low Density Residential District. The property is located at the end of a cul-de-sac. Property to the south is undeveloped and consists of steep terrain. The proposed detached garage will be located behind the existing dwelling and will face to the north. The applicant is not requesting any Exceptions to the area regulations of the Low Density Residential District. Staff has also reviewed the proposed use with respect to Chapter 17.54.030(E) of the Rapid City Municipal Code and has noted the following issues: The applicant is requesting to allow an oversized garage on the subject property which is identified as a conditional use in the Low Density Residential District. In particular, the applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage measuring 30 feet by 40 feet in size. The maximum allowed square footage for private accessory buildings and storage is 1,500 square feet. With the existing attached garages and the proposed detached garage, the total area of private storage space will be 2,350 square feet in size. The applicant has stated that the proposed structure will be used for parking and storage. The proposed structure will not be used for commercial purposes. The size of the lot and the topography of the property will serve as a buffer from adjacent properties. The applicant has indicated that the proposed garage will match the existing dwelling in materials and color. For the above reasons, staff recommends that the requested over-sized garage be approved. Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Policy Guidance for Approval or Denial In considering an application for approval or denial the Planning Commission finds that the application either complies or does not comply with the following values, principles,

goals, and policies within the Rapid City Comprehensive Plan: Comprehensive Plan Conformance Core Values Chapters A Balanced Pattern of Growth A Vibrant, Livable Community LC-3.1C Compatible Infill and Redevelopment: The proposed over-sized garage is located on a 0.5 acre property zoned Low Density Residential District. The location of the proposed detached garage behind the dwelling will provide a buffer from adjacent properties. A Safe, Healthy, Inclusive, and Skilled Community Efficient Transportation and Infrastructure Systems Economic Stability and Growth Outstanding Recreational and Cultural Opportunities Responsive, Accessible, and Effective Governance GOV-2.1A Public Input Opportunities: The proposed Major Amendment to a Planned Development requires that public notice be advertized in the newspaper and that mailings are sent to property owners within 250 feet of the proposed development. The requested Final Planned Development Overlay is before the Planning Commission for review and approval. The public has an opportunity to provide input at this meeting. Comprehensive Plan Conformance Growth and Reinvestment Chapter Future Land Use Plan Designation(s): Low Density Neighborhood Design Standards: SDP-N4 Garage Placement: The applicant is proposing to construct the detached garage to the rear of the existing dwelling which supports the goal of de-emphasizing the visual prominence of garages. Comprehensive Plan Conformance Neighborhood Area Policies Chapter Neighborhood: U.S. Highway 16 Neighborhood Goal/Policy: The location of the proposed detached garage may require a retaining wall. The applicant should be aware that retaining walls over four feet in height will require engineer stamped structural design plans. Findings Staff has reviewed the Major Amendment to a Planned Development to allow an oversized

garage pursuant to Chapter 17.50.050(F)5, Chapter 17.10, and Chapter 17.54.030 of the Rapid City Municipal Code and the goals, policies, and objectives of the adopted Comprehensive Plan. It appears that the requested Major Amendment to a Planned Development to allow an oversized garage will have a minimal impact on adjacent properties and will serve to ensure that the existing and proposed development on the property maintains the characteristics of the neighborhood and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Recommendation and Stipulations of Approval Staff recommends that the Major Amendment to a Planned Development to allow an oversized garage be approved with the following stipulations: 1. An Exception is hereby granted to allow an oversized garage of 2,350 square feet in lieu of the maximum 1,500 square feet; 2. Upon submittal of a Building Permit, a surveyed site plan of the existing and proposed structures shall be submitted; and, 3. The Major Amendment to a Planned Development shall allow an oversized garage. The proposed structure shall not be used for commercial purposes or as a second residence. In addition, the garage shall not be used as a rental unit. Any change in use that is a permitted use in the Low Density Residential District shall require a Building Permit. Any change in use that is a Conditional Use in the Low Density Residential District shall require the review and approval of a Major Amendment to the Planned Development.

Rapid City Community Planning & Development Services Development Review Advisories Disclosure: The Development Review Team has created this list of Advisories as a courtesy for your specific application. This is not a complete list. All City, District, State, and Federal requirements must be continually met. Applicant Request(s) Case # 17PD020 Major Amendment to a Planned Development to allow an over-sized garage Companion Case(s) # ADVISORIES: Please read carefully! 1. A Building Permit shall be obtained prior to any construction. A certificate of completion shall be obtained prior to initiation of the use; 2. An Erosion and sediment Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval if more than 300 cubic yards of earth are to be moved; 3. Engineer stamped structural design plans shall be submitted for any retaining wall over four feet in height; 4. All requirements of the Infrastructure Design Criteria Manual and the Rapid City Standard Specifications shall be met; 5. All requirements of the currently adopted Building Code shall be met; and, 6. All requirements of the International Fire Code shall be met.