Rapid City Planning Commission

Similar documents
Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Planned Development Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Planned Development Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report April 21, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report April 21, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report June 9, 2016

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Rapid City Planning Commission Annexation Project Report

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION OF THE RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Board of Adjustment Variance Process Guide

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

ZONING VARIANCES ADMINISTRATIVE

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

CVA Robert and Renate Bearden

Guide to Replats. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Step 5. Step 6. Step 7. Step 8. Step 9. Step 10

Article 5. Nonconformities

Initial Project Review

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

CITY OF CASCADE LOCKS PLANNING COMMISSION ORDER VARIANCE WINDSONG TERRACE LLC

Planning Commission Report

Jacobs Landing Rehabilitation Plan

Board of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: April 4, 2013

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No (S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

Eric Feldt, Planner II, CFM Community Development Department

Variance Application To The Zoning Board of Appeals

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Ordinance No SECTION SIX: Chapter of the City of Zanesville' s Planning and Zoning Code is amended to read as follows:

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI Phone: (616) Website:

Taylor Lot Coverage Variance Petition No. PLNBOA North I Street Public Hearing: November 7, 2012

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

City of Independence

CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Section 1 Purposes. 6. Section 2 Statutory Authorization. 7.

Staff Report. Variance

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

Urban Planning and Land Use

31, Township 29 South, Range 25 East, Polk County, Florida, as depicted by the Land Use Plan attached

ZONING VARIANCES - ADMINISTRATIVE

RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

STAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO

MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015

Request Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4 (d) of the Subdivision Regulation which requires that a lot must have direct access to a public street.

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

ORDINANCE NO

PUBLIC HEARING: October 14, 2014 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

Certified Survey Map (CSM) Submittal Updated: 6/29/18

ARTICLE 5. R-6 Residential- Duplex, Single Family Detached and Townhouse District

Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

1. Allow a workable, interrelated mix of diverse land uses;

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DERBY ZONING REGULATIONS AUGUST 12, 2008

Please be advised that the Town does not enforce private covenants or deed restrictions. I. SUBJECT ADDRESS: Zoning District. Palm Beach County:

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

Accessory Dwelling Units

this page left intentionally blank DENVER ZONING CODE

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

Bulk Requirements (For other supplementary location and bulk regulations, see Article VII.)

To: Stillwater Town Board Reference: Horst Variance Request Stillwater Township, Minnesota Copies To: Town Board Kathy Schmoekel, Town Clerk

AMENDED AGENDA BLUFFDALE CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. January 24, 2017

CASE # LUP Commission District: # 3

PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION

7 November 12, 2015 Public Hearing

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for December 15, 2010 Agenda Item C2

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

ORDINANCE NO

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Transcription:

Rapid City Planning Commission Final Planned Development Overlay Project Report October 6, 2016 Item #9 Applicant Request(s) Case # 16PD043 Final Planned Development Overlay to allow a single-family residential development with exceptions Companion Case(s) Development Review Team Recommendation(s) The Development Review Team recommends approval with stipulations as noted below. Project Summary Brief The applicant has submitted a Final Planned Development Overlay to allow a single-family residential development with Exceptions. The property is zoned Park Forest District and is developed with an existing single-family dwelling and a detached garage. The applicant is requesting the following Exceptions: to reduce the minimum required lot size from 3 acres to 0.36 acres, to reduce the minimum required rear yard setback from 50 feet to 19 feet, and to waive the requirement that the property abut a public street for a minimum of 50 feet. The applicant has submitted this application to ensure that a single-family dwelling could be constructed on the property if the current structures were to be damaged beyond repair. Applicant Information Development Review Team Contacts Applicant: Sandra Berendes Planner: Fletcher Lacock Property Owner: Sandra Berendes Engineer: Dan Kools Architect: Fire District: Tim Behlings Engineer: School District: Surveyor: Water/Sewer: Dan Kools Other: Andrew Scull DOT: Stacy Bartlett Address/Location Neighborhood Subdivision Land Area Existing Buildings Topography Access Water / Sewer Electric/Gas Provider Floodplain Subject Property Information 210 Columbus Street Downtown / Skyline Drive Original Town of Rapid City 16,000 square feet Approximately 1,385 square feet Slopes from the north to the south Alley access Rapid City Black Hills Power / MDU

Subject Property and Adjacent Property Designations Existing Zoning Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use(s) Subject Property PF FC Single-family dwelling Adjacent North HDR UN Single-family dwelling Adjacent South PF FC Void of structural development Adjacent East PF FC Void of structural development Adjacent West LDR-II UN Single-family dwelling Zoning Map Existing Land Uses

Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Parks or Transportation Plan

Relevant Case History Case/File# Date Request Action Relevant Zoning District Regulations Park Forest District Required Proposed Lot Area 3 acres Requesting an Exception to reduce the minimum lot size to 0.52 acres Lot Width Abut a street for a minimum distance of 50 feet Requesting an Exception to waive the requirement to abut a street for a distance not less than 50 feet Maximum Building Heights 2.5 stories or 35 feet Existing one-story dwelling Maximum Density 25% 8.6% Minimum Building Setback: Front 20 feet 33 feet Rear 50 feet to dwelling / 20 feet to accessory structure Side 30 feet to dwelling / 40 feet to accessory structure Requesting an Exception to reduce the rear yard setback to a dwelling to 19 feet 62 feet to the west and 72 feet to the east Street Side Minimum Landscape Requirements: # of landscape points # of landscape islands Minimum Parking Requirements: # of parking spaces 2 2 # of ADA spaces Signage 1 square foot No signage proposed Fencing None proposed Planning Commission Criteria and Findings for Approval or Denial Pursuant to Section 17.50.050(F)5 of the Rapid City Municipal Code the Planning Commission shall consider the following criteria for an Final Planned Development Overlay: Criteria 1. There are certain conditions pertaining to the particular piece of property in question because of its size, shape, or topography: 2. The application of these regulations to this particular piece of property would create a practical difficulty or undue Findings The property is comprised of approximately 0.36 acres of land zoned Park Forest District. The property developed with an existing single-family dwelling approximately 910 square feet in size and a detached garage approximately 476 square feet in size. The existing development is accessed from an alley which leads to 1 st Street and 3 rd Street and is addressed as Columbus Street. The existing property does not meet the minimum required lot size of 3 acres or the requirement to abut a public street for a distance of 50 feet. In addition, the rear yard setback to the existing dwelling is 19 feet whereas the minimum required rear yard setback in the Park Forest District is 50 feet. As such, the applicant is requesting Exceptions to bring the existing development on the property into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The property is currently zoned Park Forest District and is developed with a single-family dwelling and a detached garage. A single-family dwelling and detached garage are permitted uses in the Park Forest District.

hardship: 3. Exceptions to the underlying zoning district, if granted, would not cause undue hardship to the public good or impair the purposes and intent of these regulations: 4. A literal interpretation of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights that others in the same district are allowed: 5. Any adverse impacts will be reasonably mitigated: 6. The requested exception to the underlying zoning district standards is an alternative or innovative practice that reasonably achieves the objective of the existing standard sought to be modified: As noted above, the applicant is requesting Exceptions to reduce the minimum required rear yard setback from 50 feet to 19 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot size from 3 acres to 0.36 acres in the Park Forest District, and to waive the requirement to abut a public street for a minimum distance of 50 feet. The property is currently developed with a single-family dwelling and a detached garage. The minimum required lot size of 3 acres is intended to allow residential development while preserving natural beauty and open character. The property is located at the base of a large hillside with steep slopes. An existing alley provides the primary access to the property. The subject property is on the north edge of an area identified in the adopted Comprehensive Plan as suitable for Forest Conservation. Property to the south is comprised of steep slopes and is undeveloped. The property is also located on the southern edge of the area identified as Downtown / Mixed-use in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Properties to the north are developed with single-family dwellings. By submitting this Final Planned Development Overlay for review and approval, the applicant is securing existing design standards should a residence be rebuilt on the property in the future. For the above reasons, staff recommends that the Exceptions to reduce the minimum lot size, to reduce the minimum required rear yard setback, and to waive the requirement to abut a public street for a minimum distance of 50 feet be approved. The property is zoned Park Forest District. A single-family dwelling with a detached garage is a permitted use in the Park Forest District. The existing water and sewer service lines are nonconforming. Water and sewer mains are located within 3 rd Street right-of-way located west of the property. The applicant should be aware that if the water and sewer service lines should fail the mains would need to be extended along the alley to serve the property and bring the services into compliance with City standards. The property is currently zoned Park Forest District and is developed with a single-family dwelling and a detached garage. The applicant is requesting the above mentioned Exceptions to bring the property into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Property is located at the base of a steep hillside and property to the south is currently undeveloped. In addition, the existing property is accessed from an alley. The requested Final Planned Development would allow the existing development to continue while preserving the open character of the area. Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Policy Guidance for Approval or Denial In considering an application for approval or denial the Planning Commission finds that the application either complies or does not comply with the following values, principles, goals, and policies within the Rapid City Comprehensive Plan:

Comprehensive Plan Conformance Core Values Chapters A Balanced Pattern of Growth A Vibrant, Livable Community LC-3.1A Retain and Enhance Existing Housing Stock: Granting the requested Exceptions supports the goal of retaining existing housing. A Safe, Healthy, Inclusive, and Skilled Community Efficient Transportation and Infrastructure Systems T1-2.1A Major Street Plan Integration: The existing primary access to the property is from an alley located between 1 st Street and 3 rd Street. Staff recommends that the Exception to waive the requirement to abut a public street for a minimum distance of 50 feet be granted. Economic Stability and Growth Outstanding Recreational and Cultural Opportunities Responsive, Accessible, and Effective Governance GOV-2.1A Public Input Opportunities: The proposed Final Planned Development Overlay requires that public notice be advertized in the newspaper and that mailings are sent to property owners within 250 feet of the proposed development. The requested Major Amendment to a Planned Development is before the Planning Commission for review and approval. The public has an opportunity to provide input at this meeting. Comprehensive Plan Conformance Growth and Reinvestment Chapter Future Land Use Plan Designation(s): Forest Conservation Design Standards: GDP-FC1 Preservation of Natural Features: The property is currently zoned Park Forest District which requires a minimum lot size of 3 acres. The existing lot is approximately 0.36 acres or 16,000 square feet in size. The minimum lot size for a single-family dwelling in other residential districts is 6,500 square feet. The existing lot exceeds this size and still supports the intent of preserving the open character of the area. Comprehensive Plan Conformance Neighborhood Area Policies Chapter Neighborhood: Downtown / Skyline Drive Neighborhood Goal/Policy: DSD- Natural Features: The intent of the Final Planned Development Overlay is to NA1.1G bring the existing single-family dwelling into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is located at the base of a steep hillside with no structural development to the south of the property. The Final Planned Development will ensure that the existing residential use is allowed as well as

preserve the open character of the area. Findings Staff has reviewed the Final Planned Development Overlay to allow a single-family residential development with exceptions pursuant to Chapter 17.50.050(F)5 of the Rapid City Municipal Code and the goals, policies, and objectives of the adopted Comprehensive Plan. The requested Exceptions are for an existing single-family dwelling on property zoned Park Forest District. Planning Commission Recommendation and Stipulations of Approval Staff recommends that the Final Planned Development Overlay to allow a single-family residential development with exceptions be approved with the following stipulations: 1. An Exception is hereby granted to reduce the minimum required lot size from 3 acres to 0.36 acres; 2. An Exception is hereby granted to reduce the minimum required rear yard setback from 50 feet to 19 feet; 3. An Exception is hereby granted to waive the requirement that the property abut a public street for a minimum distance of 50 feet; and, 5. This Final Planned Development Overlay shall a single-family residential development. Permitted uses within the Park Forest District in compliance with the Parking Ordinance shall be allowed with a Building Permit. Any conditional use shall require the review and approval of a Major Amendment to the Planned Development.

Rapid City Community Planning & Development Services Development Review Advisories Disclosure: The Development Review Team has created this list of Advisories as a courtesy for your specific application. This is not a complete list. All City, District, State, and Federal requirements must be continually met. Applicant Request(s) Case # 16PD043 Final Planned Development Overlay to allow a single-family residential development with exceptions Companion Case(s) # ADVISORIES: Please read carefully! 1. All requirements of the currently adopted Building Code shall be met; 2. All provisions of the underlying zoning districts shall be met unless otherwise specifically authorized as a stipulation of this Final Planned Development Overlay or a subsequent Major Amendment to the Planned Development; 3. All applicable provisions of the adopted International Fire Code shall continually be met.