CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Similar documents
CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO A ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA;

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF LABELLE ORDINANCE BROWARD AVE LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94

FORT MYERS, FLORIDA GATEWAY 54 ACRES MIXED USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM. Index

RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 84-71, Special Exception. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing

ORDINANCE NO. O-5-10

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

PROVIDING FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN LAND FROM A-1 (SUBURBAN

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ORDINANCE NO. 208 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA:

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

Multi-family dwellings (including assisted living facilities), Public buildings, facility or land; and,

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF FORT MYERS BEACH

ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

within the City of Bonita Springs Land Development

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

Permitted uses. Adult congregate living facility. Ambulance service. Animal clinics (outpatient care only and no overnight boarding)

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town of Jupiter ( Town ) has adopted a Comprehensive Plan

ORDINANCE NO

AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. Bryan Cobb, City Manager FROM: DATE: September 21, 2015

31, Township 29 South, Range 25 East, Polk County, Florida, as depicted by the Land Use Plan attached

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION. ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT December 06, 2012

RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY OF THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Salem Township Zoning Ordinance Page 50-1 ARTICLE 50.0: PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

RESOLUTION NO. Z-R-93-3 RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION CB93-22 CLASS B CONDITIONAL USE PETITION OF AMERIGROW RECYCLING, INC.

RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER VAR Gulf Beach Road pool

Letter of Intent May 2017 (Revised November 2017)

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION OF THE RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS

Section Intent

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

Special Exception Use Order Application

ORDINANCE NO (PROPOSED)

a. It is the intent of these regulations to encourage the preservation of natural resources and facilitate orderly growth in the County.

Plan nt Plan Filing and

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

CCC XXX Rural Neighborhood Conservation (NC)

"ARTICLE - VINE STREET TRANSITIONAL (VST) DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

Carol A. Roberts, Vice Chair Department of Planning, Zoning & Building

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA:

RESOLUTION NO. ZR

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Surrey, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley does ordain as follows:

CITY OF COCOA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING BOARD BRIEFING Meeting Date: April 3, 2017 Agenda Item: C.1

PUD 42 - Warner Ranch PUD - Amend. 2 Item No. 4B ZONING ZON

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 1, 2018 Ordinance 24, 2018 / *Ordinance 25, 2018

II. What Type of Development Requires Site Plan Review? There are five situations where a site plan review is required:

Condominium Unit Requirements.

mandatory injunction to remove any previous violation hereof.

ARTICLE 13 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

This the 25th day of November, Amy T. Harvey Acting Town Clerk

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

ORANGE BLOSSOM GARDENS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.

RESOLUTION NO. R

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH ROYALTON, OHIO

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012

CITY OF APALACHICOLA ORDINANCE

PART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A. INTENT

NORMAN, OKLAHOMA OWNER: RCB BANK APPLICATION FOR 2025 PLAN CHANGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT. 12 December 2011 Revised 5 January 2012

City of Colleyville City Council Agenda Briefing

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES SECTION DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL

ARTICLE 504. PD 504.

CHAPTER34 PRUD - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT

TOWNSHIP OF MENDHAM Ord. No

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA:

OTY OF SURREY. BY-LAWN A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No "

SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF MADISON. Ordinance 2017-

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 8/5/2010

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

Transcription:

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 06-05 A ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA; APPROVING A REQUEST BY NAPITA HOLDINGS, LLC IN REFERENCE TO BONITA ROAD LOCKUP CPD; TO REZONE 3.67+/- ACRES FROM COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD); TO ALLOW 4,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND 93,500 SQUARE FEET OF MINI-WAREHOUSE; ON LAND LOCATED AT 11301 BONITA BEACH ROAD, BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA, (STRAP NO. 01-48-25-B1-00002.0040), ON 3.67 +/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Napita Holdings, LLC in ref to Bonita Road Lockup CPD has filed an application for Rezone 3.67+/- acres from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to CPD to allow 4,000 square feet of office and 93,500 square feet of mini-warehouse. WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 11301 Bonita Beach Road, Bonita Springs, Florida, and is described more particularly as: See Schedule A WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was advertised and heard on February 3, 2006 by the City of Bonita Springs Board for Land Use Hearings and Adjustments and Zoning Board of Appeals ( Zoning Board ) on Case DCI 2005-00067 who gave full consideration to the evidence available and recommended approval (5-1 Pastore dissenting); and gave full and complete consideration of the record, consisting of the Staff Recommendation, the Zoning Board, the documents on file with the City and the testimony of all interested parties. The January 18, 2006 Staff Report prepared by Lee County Development Services Division and evidence submitted at the Zoning Board hearing is on file with the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Bonita Springs, Lee County, Florida: SECTION ONE: APPROVAL OF REQUEST City Council of Bonita Springs hereby approves the rezoning with the following conditions and deviations: A. Conditions 1. The development of this project must be consistent with the one-page Master Concept Plan entitled "Beach Road Lockup CPD" stamped received January 31, 2006, last revised November 18, 2005, except as modified by the Page 1 of 6

conditions below. If changes to the Master Concept Plan are subsequently pursued, appropriate approvals will be necessary. The maximum intensity of use permitted in this planned development is for 93,500 square feet of mini-warehouse and 4,000 square feet of commercial. 2. The following limits apply to the project and uses: a. Schedule of Uses Accessory Uses and Structures Administrative Office Banks and financial establishments: Group I Business services: Groups I Entrance Gates Essential services Excavation, Water Retention Fences, walls Medical Offices Signs (in accordance with Chapter 30) Storage: Indoor only Open - limited as an accessory use to the use of Warehouse: Mini-warehouse and limited to the storage of car, boats, and recreational vehicles which do not exceed a height of 14 feet. Warehouse: Mini-warehouse b. Site Development Regulations Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions: Area Width Depth Minimum Building Setbacks: Bonita Beach Road Side Rear Water Body Maximum Height 3.67 acres 250 feet 300 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 25 feet 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 40% Minimum Open Space 1.66 acres Page 2 of 6

3. Prior to local development order approval, the development order plans must delineate: a. a minimum of a 10-foot width between the finished lake shoreline and the pavement edge with no greater than a 3:1 sloping; and b. a finished lake shoreline with a 4:1 slope to create a littoral shelf along the entire length of the lake within the development boundaries; and c. a littoral planting plan with native herbaceous wetland plants calculated on one plant per linear foot of shoreline and installed in clusters; and d. a planting plan for the dry detention area that includes native wetland plants (minimum 1-gallon container size) providing a fifty percent coverage at time of installation. 4. Hours of operation are limited from 6:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. 5. The western border must include a 25-foot Type F buffer rather than the 25-foot Type E buffer without wall proposed on the master concept plan. Indigenous preservation is not required. A 15-foot strip is depicted on the master concept plan. The intent of the buffer is better addressed through meeting as much of the Type F required plantings as possible by relocating sabal palms onsite in a double staggered row. 6. A Type D planting equivalent must be provided along the lake perimeter from the southern most point and ending at the northern most portion of lake that is horizontal with and/or adjacent to the Bonita Beach Road right-of-way. The hedge rows must be installed at a minimum of 48" and maintained at 60". The trees must be canopy types such as oaks or slash pines or a combination. 7. Approval of this zoning request does not address mitigation of the project's vehicular or pedestrian traffic impacts. Additional conditions consistent with the Bonita Springs LDC may be required to obtain a local development order. 8. The Developer must comply with Lee County concurrency requirements (all conditions required by the Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code) in order to obtain a development order. Page 3 of 6

9. This development must comply with all of the requirements of the LDC at the time of local development order approval, except as may be granted by deviations approved as part of this planned development. 10. In support of deviation 5 for the (1) Storage: Indoor only and (2) Warehouse: Mini-warehouse uses, the applicant must provide a minimum of one (1) parking space per 10,000 square feet of gross floor area. Should City Council make a determination, at a meeting where the current Owner of record is given notice that this parking is not meeting the operational requirements, the Owner must provide additional parking as provided on the Master Concept Plan and consistent with the Land Development Code for the use. At any time in the future, should the use of the property change from Storage: Indoor only and Warehouse: Miniwarehouse, off-street parking must comply with the Land Development Code. 11. If agreed to by the Developer and parties in Circuit Court Case No. 06-CA-2106 or the court determines that legal access must run through the Development to accommodate access for the adjacent property currently owned by the Martins (strap nos. 01-48-25-B1-00002.0000 and 01-48-25-B1-00002.0030), then this Zoning Ordinance may be amended administratively without further public hearing for the purpose of a accommodating access. B. Deviations Deviation 1 is granted from 3-416(D)(6) requiring a solid wall or combination berm and solid wall not less than eight feet in height be constructed not less than 25 feet from the property line, to permit a wall 15 feet from the property line. Deviation 2 is granted from 3-416(D)(6) requiring a solid wall or combination berm and solid wall not less than 8 feet in height be constructed not less than 25 feet from the property line, to permit no wall or combination berm and wall along the eastern boundary occupied by a lake. Deviation 3 is granted from 3-416(D)(6) requiring a solid wall or combination berm and solid wall not less than 8 feet in height be constructed not less than 25 feet from the property line, to permit a 25-foot Type E buffer without wall or combination berm and wall, as conditioned in Condition 5. Page 4 of 6

Deviation 4 is granted from 3-329(E)(1)(A)(III) requiring a 50-foot setback to any private property line for a water retention setback, to permit a zero foot setback for the lake. Deviation 5 is granted from 3-710(B), to 34-2020(3)(G) requiring one parking space per 25 storage units with a minimum of five spaces, to permit one parking space per 10,000 square feet of storage subject to condition 10. Deviation 6 was a request from 34-2194(b) requiring a 25-foot building setback to a water body, to permit a 10-foot building setback for the southeast corner of the commercial building and was withdrawn. Deviation 7 is granted from 3-328(A) requiring a 20-foot wide lake maintenance access easement, to permit a 10-foot wide lake maintenance access easement at the southeast corner of the commercial building and was withdrawn. Deviation 8 is granted from 3-329(E)(1)(a)(ii) requiring a 50-foot setback to any existing collector or arterial street for a water retention excavation, to permit a 29-foot setback as measured from to the top of the bank for the existing lake. Findings and Conclusions: Based upon an analysis of the application and the standards for approval of planned development rezonings, Bonita Springs City Council makes the following findings and conclusions: 1. The applicant has proven entitlement to rezone to CPD by demonstrating compliance with the Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Code, and other applicable codes and regulations. 2. The requested CPD zoning, as conditioned: a) meets or exceeds all performance and locational standards set forth for the potential uses allowed by the request; b) is consistent with the densities, intensities and general uses set forth in the Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan; c) is compatible with existing or planned uses in the surrounding area; and d) will not adversely affect environmentally critical areas or natural resources. Page 5 of 6

3. Approval of the request will not place an undue burden upon existing transportation or planned infrastructure facilities and the site will be served by streets with the capacity to carry traffic generated by the development. 4. Urban services, as defined in the Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan, are available and adequate to serve the proposed land use. 5. The proposed mix of uses, as conditioned, are appropriate at the subject location. 6. The recommended conditions to the concept plan and other applicable regulations provide sufficient safeguards to the public interest. 7. The recommended conditions are reasonably related to the impacts on the public s interest created by or expected from the proposed development. 8. The deviations granted, as conditioned: a) enhance the objectives of the planned development; and b) preserve and promote the general intent of the LDC to protect the public health, safety and welfare. SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of adoption. DULY PASSED AND ENACTED by the Council of the City of Bonita Springs, Lee County, Florida, this 26 th day of June, 2006. AUTHENTICATION: Mayor City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Vote: Arend AYE McCourt AYE Ferreira AYE Nelson AYE Grantt AYE Simons AYE Joyce AYE Page 6 of 6

Date filed with City Clerk: Page 7 of 6