ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

Similar documents
An act to add Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section ) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to housing.

MEETING February 13, Machin Avenue Novato, CA / FAX 415/

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915

Page 1 of 17. Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 28, 2017 (Continued from February 28, 2017)

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 73. Introduced by Assembly Members Chiu and Caballero (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin, Santiago, and Ting) December 16, 2016

AB 346 (DALY) REDEVELOPMENT: HOUSING SUCCESSOR: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND JOINT AUTHOR ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROUGH

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 199

LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL 1069 (WIECKOWSKI) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

SENATE BILL No. 35. December 5, 2016

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SB 827 (WIENER) TRANSIT-RICH HOUSING BONUS, RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED COUNCILMEMBER JOHN D'AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

Referred to Committee on Taxation

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

Guide to the California Density Bonus Law

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

California State Laws Relating to Solar Permits

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

ORDINANCE NO

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

Item 10 November 16, 2016

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

SB 1818 Q & A. CCAPA s Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Changes to Density Bonus Law

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR

UNDERSTANDING THE 2017 HOUSING BILLS Bay Area Planning Directors Association

ASSEMBLY, No. 266 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

DISCUSSION DRAFT 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

4.13 Population and Housing

ORDINANCE NO

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS FORM

State Policy Options for Promoting Affordable Housing

House Joint Resolution 1

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to amend the Coastal Transportation Corridor Specific Plan.

State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY

URBAN INFILL HOUSING OPTIONS

THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY

CITY OF PENSACOLA AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE PLAN

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014

TRANSPORTATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES

American Planning Association's Smart Codes: Model Land-Development Regulations 4.4 MODEL AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS ORDINANCE

Article 12.5 Exemptions for Agricultural Housing, Affordable Housing, and Residential Infill Projects

SB 827 Proposed Height Limits by Proximity to Transit and Right-of-Way Width

Housing Assistance Incentives Program

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Contents Introductory Section... 3 Financial Section... 6 Required Information... 9

ASSEMBLY, No. 912 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/20/2016 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar

DRAFT Value Capture Ordinance May 25, 2017 CPC CA ORDINANCE NO.

ANNEXATION. The Handbook for Georgia Mayors and Councilmembers 1

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 310 SUMMARY

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 4, 2007

THE LONG BEACH COMMUNITY INVESTMENT COMPANY

Attachment 3. California Government Code Excerpts Emergency Shelter Program

IS YOUR CITY READY FOR SENATE BILL 35? Amara Morrison 1111 Broadway, 24 th Floor Oakland, CA

A Closer Look at California's New Housing Production Laws

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

Guide to the California Density Bonus Law

City of Merced Page 1

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and Katy Wisinski, Assistant City Attorney

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Housing Element (H) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

AN ORDINANCE BY COUNCILMEMBERS ANDRE DICKENS, KWANZA HALL, AND CLETA WINSLOW

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

City of Merced Page 1

CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, 2016 NEW BUSINESS REVIEW AND UPDATE THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS LAW MAYOR LAUREN MEISTER

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 608

Unpermitted Dwelling Unit (UDU) Inter-Agency Referral Form

Hennepin County Department of. Housing, Community Works and Transit. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING

Density Bonus Law Overview. January 5 th, 2016

CITY OF IRVINE HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR

AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL 828 (WIENER) LAND USE: HOUSING ELEMENT

Twin Cities Region Equitable Development Principles & Scorecard

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

5.I iii ******#* FROM: 2. Provide comments to staff and recommend edits to the Resolution, as necessary, and adopt the Resolution as amended; or

ORDINANCE NO

Rough Proportionality and the City of Austin. Prepared for the Austin Bar Association 2016 Land Development Seminar (9/30/16)

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

ORDINANCE NO

THE CALIFORNIA SOLAR RIGHTS ACT

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORT FOR: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

SENATE BILL 274 CHAPTER. Tax Increment Financing and Special Taxing Districts Transit Oriented Development

Transcription:

AMENDED IN SENATE JULY, 0 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE, 0 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE, 0 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY, 0 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 0, 0 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL, 0 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH, 0 california legislature 0 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 0 Introduced by Assembly Member Skinner (Coauthor: Senator Berryhill) (Coauthor: Assembly Member Bill Berryhill) February, 0 An act to add Article (commencing with Section 00) to Chapter of Division of Title of the Government Code, relating to local government. legislative counsel s digest AB 0, as amended, Skinner. Local government: parking spaces: minimum requirements. The Planning and Zoning Law requires specified regional transportation planning agencies to prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system, and requires the regional transportation plan to include, among other things, a sustainable communities strategy,

AB 0 for the purpose of using local planning to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This bill, commencing on January, 0, would prohibit a city or county from requiring a minimum number of off-street parking spaces in transit-intensive areas, as defined, greater than parking spaces per,000 square feet in nonresidential projects of 0,000 square feet or less on a single property, one parking space per unit in non-income-restricted residential projects, and specified portions, as applicable, of a parking space per unit for certain affordable housing projects, except as specified. The bill would also make a statement of legislative findings regarding the application of its provisions to charter cities. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 0 0 SECTION. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Sustainable Minimum Parking Requirements Act of 0. SEC.. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: () The state, cities, and counties have invested billions of dollars in transit infrastructure. Land use policies that reduce the cost and complexity of transit-oriented development help ensure a return on that investment. () Consistent with Senate Bill and Assembly Bill, it is state policy to promote transit-oriented infill development. () Existing minimum off-street parking requirements throughout the state are based on low-density and segregated single land uses. () Parking is costly to build and maintain and can substantially increase the cost of constructing and operating infill projects. () The high cost of the land and improvements required to provide parking significantly increases the cost of transit-oriented development, making lower cost and affordable housing development financially infeasible and hindering economic development strategies. () Increasing public transportation options and developing more walkable and bikeable neighborhoods reduce the demand for parking.

AB 0 0 0 0 0 () Excessive governmental parking requirements for infill and transit-oriented development reduce the viability of transit development by limiting the number of households and workers near transit, increasing walking distances, and degrading the pedestrian environment. () Reducing excessive minimum parking requirements for infill and transit-oriented development and allowing builders and the market to decide how much parking is needed may do all of the following: (A) Ensure sufficient but not excessive amounts of parking are provided. (B) Reduce the cost of development and increase the number of transit-accessible and affordable housing units. (C) Increase density in areas with the most housing demand, and improve the viability of developing alternate modes of transportation, such as public transit, ridesharing, biking, and walking. (D) Reduce green house gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled by removing an incentive to drive. (b) It is the intent of the Legislature to reduce unnecessary government regulation and to reduce the cost of development by eliminating excessive minimum parking requirements for infill and transit-oriented development. (c) The Legislature further finds and declares that the need to address infill development and excessive parking requirements is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair, as that term is used in Section of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this act shall apply to all cities, including charter cities. SEC.. Article (commencing with Section 00) is added to Chapter of Division of Title of the Government Code, to read: Article. Sustainable Minimum Parking Requirements Act of 0 00. (a) Commencing on January, 0, in transit-intensive areas, a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, shall not require projects to provide a minimum number of off-street parking spaces greater than the following:

AB 0 0 0 0 0 () Two parking spaces per thousand square feet of nonresidential projects of 0,000 square feet or less on a single property. () One parking space per unit for non-income-restricted residential projects. () Three-quarters parking spaces per unit for projects that include both income-restricted and non-income-restricted units, and which meet the standards in subdivision (b) of Section. () One-half parking spaces per unit for units that are restricted by a recorded covenant or a deed that lasts at least years to rents or prices affordable to persons and families making less than 0 percent of the area median income. (b) This section shall not be construed as setting a maximum number of spaces a project may provide. (c) This section shall not be construed to limit any local agency s authority to regulate parking impacts from development through exactions, fees, conditions of approval, or other valid exercise of its police power beyond the specific limitations provided in subdivision (a). (d) This section shall not apply to any property that meets any of the following criteria: () The property and immediately adjoining properties are restricted to development or redevelopment at a floor area ratio of below 0.. () The property includes a parcel or parcels whose dwelling units are subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of low or moderate income, or are subject to other forms of rent or price control imposed through a public entity s valid exercise of its police power, that will be destroyed or removed, unless any proposed development on the property is to include an equal number of bedrooms that shall be made available at affordable housing costs to, and will be occupied by, persons and families in the same or lower income category (extremely low, very low, or low) in the same proportion as the units occupied or last occupied by extremely low, very low, or low-income households in the property. Rental replacement units provided pursuant to this paragraph shall be made available at affordable housing costs for at least years, or at the remaining term of the existing recorded covenants or deed restrictions that require maintenance of

AB 0 0 0 0 0 affordable housing costs, which are consistent with the parties meeting their contractual obligations. Ownership replacement units provided pursuant to this paragraph shall be made available at affordable housing costs for at least years. () The property includes a parcel where the owner withdrew residential rental units pursuant to Chapter. (commencing with Section 00) of Division of Title, from rental or lease, or offering for rental or lease, pursuant to paragraph () of subdivision (a) of Section 00.. () The property includes a parcel or parcels subject to a specific plan, station area plan, zoning ordinance, or other form of local land-use control that provides for minimum off-street parking requirements for residential, commercial, and mixed-use new construction and reuse projects that are lower than the minimum off-street parking requirements in the same jurisdiction for the same uses outside the transit-intensive area. (e) For purposes of this section, transit-intensive area means an area that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or within one-quarter mile of the center line of a high-quality transit corridor. A major transit stop is For the purposes of this section major transit stop has the same meaning as defined in Section 0. of the Public Resources Code. For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with a fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than minutes during peak commute hours. A property shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or within one-quarter mile of the center line of a high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the property together have no more than percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or within one-quarter mile of the center line of a corridor, and if not more than 0 percent of the residential units or 00 units, whichever is less, in any proposed project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or within one-quarter mile of the center line of a corridor. (f) Consistent with subdivision (g), a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, that is otherwise subject to this section, shall not be required to apply the minimum off-street parking requirements in subdivision (a) in a transit-intensive area in place of those set forth in its zoning code if it makes at least one of the following written findings, specific to that transit-intensive area, based upon objective criteria and evidence in the record that:

AB 0 0 0 0 () The transit-intensive area does not currently have or cannot reasonably expect to have sufficient walkability to justify reduced off-street parking requirements. () The transit-intensive area does not currently have or cannot reasonably expect to have a sufficient level of transit service or bike access to provide for viable alternatives to the car for a significant proportion of the trips generated by new development. () The minimum parking requirements set forth in this act would reduce the number of low-income housing units produced in that transit-intensive area through density bonus programs such as the program set forth in Sections to, inclusive. () The transit-intensive area in question will be adversely affected by a reduction in minimum off-street parking requirements. (g) Any action by a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, pursuant to subdivision (f) to exempt transit-intensive areas from the minimum parking requirements set forth in subdivision (a) and maintain the minimum parking requirements set forth in its local code shall be in the form of a resolution adopted by the legislative body of a city, county, or city and county. (h) Multiple transit-intensive areas may be exempted from the requirements of subdivision (a) by a single resolution, provided that the resolution includes at least one of the findings set forth in subdivision (f) applied to each transit-intensive area to be exempted. (i) () Before January, 0, a city, county, or city and county may evaluate and approve projects pursuant to the minimum parking requirements under this section. () After January, 0, but before the adoption of a resolution pursuant to subdivision (g), development projects shall not be subject to minimum off-street parking requirements higher than those set forth in subdivision (a). (j) This section shall not apply to any city, county, or city and county that has no transit-intensive areas within its jurisdiction. O