NO CA SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBIN DUCKETT, ET. AL.

Similar documents
NO CA SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBIN DUCKETT, ET. AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA SUSAN WESTEDT APPELLEE APPELLANT S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLEES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. DON MITCHELL REALTY/ : JACKIE COLE Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 2, 2016 Session

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs.

Appeal from summary judgment in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge. Reversed and remanded.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * APPEAL FROM ST. BERNARD 34TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT NO , DIVISION C Honorable Wayne Cresap, Judge * * * * * *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:10-cv MO Document 123 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1439

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d TRIAL COURT CASE NO MARIA T.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Roberto M. Pineiro, Judge.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

H 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No v UNREPORTED

H 7816 AS AMENDED S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. IN THE MATTER OF TAGGART v GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, et al.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Daniel M. Schwarz of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Title: Ronald J. Schultz, Citrus County Property Appraiser. Jun 03, 1994 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. vs. DCA CASE NO. 1D08-515

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2007 Session

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

JH:SRF:JMG:brf AGENDA DRAFT 4/06/2016 ESCROW AGREEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellees, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 02 CV 1606

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 21 May 2013

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

Town of Pittston Ordinance Regarding Tax Acquired Property

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 331

JOINT BRIEF OF APPELLEES, DESOTO COUNTY, MS, TAX COLLECTOR OF DESOTO COUNTY, MS, and TAX ASSESSOR OF DESOTO COUNTY,MS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No. Appellees. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION BY APPELLANTS

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 31, 2008 DION S OF TEXAS, INC.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator NIA H. GILL District 34 (Essex and Passaic)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COMMENTS OF THE HOUSING UMBRELLA GROUP OF FLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

TAX ACQUIRED PROPERTY Policy

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

LONG TERM ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS

NO CA-1634 ORLEANS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT

TOWN OF WINTHROP POLICY FOR TAX ACQUIRED PROPERTY (Adopted April 4, 2016) ARTICLE 2. Pre-Foreclosure Evaluation of Liened Property

The NYSAuctions.com Team

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Case No. 1:17-cv FB Case No. 1:17-cv FB. Appellant, -against-

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

Hoiska v. Town of East Montpelier ( ) 2014 VT 80. [Filed 18-Jul-2014]

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

SCHEDULE 7 SITES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. AUTHORITY S OBLIGATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS... 1

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

ESCROW AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEFEASANCE OF PORTIONS OF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CIRCUIT CLERK AMENDED BILL OF EXCEPTIONS

Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC vs. CASE NO. 2D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

WELLS SANITARY DISTRICT POLICY FOR DISPOSITION OF SEWER LIEN FORECLOSURE ACQUIRED PROPERTY

DEED RESTRICTION AGREEMENT

vs. LOUIS CARUANA, et al.,

DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS. by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C.

ADAMS V. BLUMENSHINE, 1922-NMSC-010, 27 N.M. 643, 204 P. 66 (S. Ct. 1922) ADAMS et al. vs. BLUMENSHINE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 18, 2004 Session

NO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE O F MICHIGAN COURT O F APPEALS. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO, LLC, f/k/a RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CORPORATION, April 21, 2011

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. Next Assignments. In re Edry

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

BARBARA REGUA NO CA-0832 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL FLORENCE SAUCIER, FRED SAUCIER AND JANET MALONE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Relation Back of Exercise of Option Are There Exceptions? By John C. Murray i

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Submitted on Briefs September 12, 2005

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-91 (Lower Tribunal Case Nos. 3D08-944; )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 25, 2000 Session

Transcription:

E-Filed Document Jan 12 2015 17:19:24 2014-CA-00209-COA Pages: 7 NO. 2014-CA-00209 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HIGH SIERRA TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC AND GJ TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLANTS VS. ROBIN DUCKETT, ET. AL. APPELLEES REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS HIGH SIERRA TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC AND GJ TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC Jon J. Mims (MSB No. 100341) Rawlings & MacInnis, P.A. P.O. Box 1789 Madison, Mississippi 39130-1789 (601) 898-1180 Attorney for Appellants

NO. 2014-CA-00209 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HIGH SIERRA TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC AND GJ TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLANTS VS. ROBIN DUCKETT, ET. AL. APPELLEES TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i TABLE OF STATUTES AND CASES... ii ARGUMENT... 2 I. THE LOWER COURT RECOGNIZED THAT ANY INTEREST OF THE DALEYS ARISED AFTER MATURITY AND THAT THEIR INTEREST WAS THE RESULT OF PUTTING HIGH SIERRA AND GJ IN A TRICK BAG... 2 II. TO THE EXTENT THE DALEYS ARE FOUND TO HAVE STANDING, GJ AND SIERRA MAINTAIN THEIR TAX LIENS... 3 CONCLUSION... 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 5 i

TABLE OF STATUTES AND CASES Statutory Authority Page Miss. Code Ann. 27-45-3, et. seq.... 3 Miss. Code Ann. 27-45-27, et. seq.... 3 State Cases Dominex, Inc. v. Key, 456 So.2d 1047, 1053 (Ala. 1984)... 2-3 Lawrence v. Rankin, 870 So.2d 673 (Miss. App. 2004)... 3 Moore v. Marathon Asset Management, LLC, 973 So.2d 1017, 1022 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008)... 3 ii

ARGUMENT I. THE LOWER COURT RECOGNIZED THAT ANY INTEREST OF THE DALEYS ARISED AFTER MATURITY AND THAT THEIR INTEREST WAS THE RESULT OF PUTTING HIGH SIERRA AND GJ IN A TRICK BAG Robert M. Daley and Jeremiah Daley (the Daleys ) confusingly suggest that Moore v. Marathon Asset Management, LLC, 973 So.2d 1017, 1022 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) is similar in that both Moore and the Daleys obtained an interest from a party who held a colorable interest prior to the expiration of the redemption period. Their interpretation misses the entire point. Moore was an innocent bona fide purchaser at a foreclosure and obtained his interest prior to the redemption period. This Court made it a point to state that Moore gained an interest in the disputed property prior to the expiration of the redemption period. This is opposed to the Daleys trick bag situation wherein the Daleys knew the properties had already matured to High Sierra and had attempted to buy the properties post-maturity from High Sierra Tax Sale Properties, LLC and GJ Tax Sale Properties, LLC ( High Sierra and GJ ) before seeking to obtain a deed from Duckett. Clearly Moore suffered an adverse affect but the same cannot be said about the Daleys. The trick bag was their attempt to benefit from the tax sales without having suffered any adverse effect. (T. 5, Lines 8-20). For all those reasons set forth in High Sierra and GJ s principal brief, the Daleys do not meet standing requirements sufficient to challenge the validity of the tax sale. Also significant is the fact that the alleged Quitclaim Deed from Robin Duckett to Robert M. Daley and Jeremia R. Daly fails to address any alleged right of redemption. There is no record that Robin Duckett had any knowledge of any right of redemption because the alleged deed did not pass any such right. In Alabama, for example, a statutory redemption right is not conveyed unless express language conveying such a right of redemption is set forth in the deed. Dominex, Inc. v. Key, 456 So.2d 1047, 1053 (Ala. 1984). The Supreme Court of Alabama has 2

also held that the statutory right of redemption is a privilege and is not deemed an interest in the property. Id. In addition to protections afforded by our standing laws, a similar interpretation in Mississippi would protect the Mississippi redemption statutes from the kind of trick the Daleys have attempted here. III. TO THE EXTENT THE DALEYS ARE FOUND TO HAVE STANDING, GJ AND HIGH SIERRA MAINTAIN THEIR TAX LIENS GJ and High Sierra never declined their respective tax liens and the Daleys have not sought to extinguish or pay the tax liens. The liens are automatic pursuant to statute and continue until paid. Further, GJ and High Sierra continued to pay amounts to prevent subsequent maturities. To redeem and extinguish the unpaid tax liens, the Daleys would have to pay pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. 27-45-3. See, Lawrence v. Rankin, 870 So.2d 673 (Miss. App. 2004). See also Miss. Code Ann. 27-45-27. Further, the alleged co-tenant was subject to default and default was not set aside as to the co-tenant Roger Baugh. General appropriate relief was requested and repayment of taxes is ordinarily the appropriate relief to grant when tax sales are voided. See, Lawrence v. Rankin, 870 So.2d 673 (Miss. App. 2004). Otherwise, the interest of GJ and High Sierra continues to be a statutory lien on the subject property until all redemption amounts are paid to GJ and High Sierra. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Appellants respectfully requests that this Court reverse and render a decision finding that Appellees Robert M. Daley and Jeremia R. Daley lack standing to attack the validity of the subject tax sales and granting such other relief as appropriate under the 3

circumstances. This the 12th day of January, 2015. HIGH SIERRA TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC AND GJ TAX SALE PROPERTIES, LLC By: /s/ Jon J. Mims Their Attorney Jon J. Mims, MSB # 100341 Rawlings & MacInnis, P.A. P.O. Box 1789 Madison, MS 39130-1789 601-898-1180 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jon J. Mims, do hereby certify that I have on this day, January 12, 2015, filed the foregoing Reply Brief with the Clerk of the Court using the MEC system which sent notification of such filing to the following and otherwise I certify service was effectuated via first class mail, postage pre-paid:. Rawlings & MacInnis, P.A. 1296 Highway 51 North Post Office Box 1789 Madison, Mississippi 39130-1789 Telephone No. (601) 898-1180 Telecopier No. (601) 969-1041 Lewie G. Skip Negrotto 2505 14 th Street, Ste. 500 Gulfport, MS 39501 snegotto@frfirm.com mbroussard@frfirm.com Gary S. Evans, Special Counsel Office of the Board Attorney P.O. Box 998 Pascagoula, MS 39568-0998 gevans@jcboadatty.com Nancy Morse Parkes, Special Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 220 Jackson, MS 39205-0220 nancy.parkes@sos.ms.gov Kathy Gillis Clerk of the Supreme Court P.O. Box 249 Jackson, MS 39205-0249 Chancellor D. Neil Harris P.O. Box 998 Pascagoula, MS 39568-0998 /s/ Jon J. Mims Jon J. Mims 5