information related to this file can be found at

Application Details: Location: Registered Owner: Agent: Municipality of Grey Highlands Planning Information Report pl.13.37 July 22,2013 Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2I2.20t3 Part Lot 101, Concession 1 NETSR (Markdale) 1628851 Ontario Inc. (Dimakos) Ron Davidson Planning Consultants Settlement Area (Primary Settlement Area) Grey County Official Plan: Grey Highlands Official Plan: Neighbourhood Area Zoning By-law No. 2OO4-5O: Residential (R) and Hazard (H) Purpose of Application:. To amend the Municipality of Grey Highlands Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2O04-5O to rezone the subject lands in order to implement a condition of Draft Approval (42T-91001) which will permit detached residential lots and semi-detached lots. Effect of Application:. To change the zone symbol on Schedule'B-1'from Residential (R) and Hazard (H) to Residential Multi (RM), Hazard (H) and Open Space (OS) as shown on Schedule 'A' attached hereto. Note: This report has been compiled for information and overview purposes only. A full Planning Report will be provided to Council moving forward. This amendment is related to Draft Approval (42T-91001). Further information related to this file can be found at http://www.qrev.calservices/planninq-development/new-planninq-applications/dimakossubdivision-red-l ine-revision/ RECOMMENDATION: RESOLVE, That the Committee receive Planning Report PL.13.37 for information purposes only. 1.O Overview: On June 16, 1993 the Ministry of Municipal Affairs granted Draft Approval (42T-91001) for a residential Plan of Subdivision proposed within Markdale. The Draft Approval permitted 59 single family residential lots and stormwater management facility. The developer had begun to meet conditions, however the complete set of conditions were never met and as such the approval remains a Draft Approval. It is important to note that the Ministry approvals at that time did not include (a sunset clause) an expiration date and as such, the approval is still in effect and valid. The developer now wishes to move forward. The County and Municipality have pre-consulted with the developer. The developer wishes to make some changes to the Draft Plan and as such a Red-Line Revision is required. In addition, the zoning by-law amendment application has now been applied for. It is noted that the Draft Approval conditions will be updated with this Red-Line Revision, as many of the conditions are no longer valid, do not include the up to date clearances required and do not provide such details as issuance of allocation or expiration date. As applied for, the proposed changes to the plan would result in some of the lots becoming narrower therefore allowing two additional lots to be added. The proposal also includes the addition of a public open space area which consists of two lots. Therefore, the number of

Municipality of Grey Highlands Planning Information Report pl.13.37 July 22, 2013 residential lots to be created remains at 59. The Red-Line also includes a slight reconfiguration of the road network. The requested zoning by-law would place the lañ s within a Multiple Residential zone which would allow for semi-detached units. This was not contemplated in the draft approval, but is a change that both Municipal staff and County staff encouraged in order to provide a variety of housing within Markdale. This public meeting is being held to notify the public of the intended Zoning By-law Amendment; however, it is also noted that this is the public's opportunity to comment on the Red-Line Revision to the Draft Plan request as well. The Municipality will provide the County with suggested Conditions once Council has reviewed the proposal and provided staff with a recommendation on the Red-Line Revision application. A follow-up report will be provided to Council after the statutory public meeting is held and comments are received from Agencies, Departments and Ratepayers. 2.O Documents Submitted: The following documents were provided as part of the Red-Line Revision request and Zoning By-law Amendment:. Planning Report (Ron Davidson, June 5, 2013). Revised Draft Plan (Genivar, July 2013) 3.O Comments (summarv): Comments were provided from the following authorities having jurisdiction over the subject lands: The County of Grey Planning and Development Department: The County would request that a decision be deferred on the subject application until such time as the County has rendered a decision on the red-line revision application. The Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority: The proposed Zoning By-law amendment and proposed Red Line Revision are acceptable to the SVCA. The Municipality of Grey Highlands Building Department: Comments not yet received. The Municipality of Grey Highlands Transportation and Environmentat Services Department: Comments not yet received.

4.O Conclusion: Municipality of Grey Highlands Planning Information Report pl.13.37 July 22,2013 Planning Staff recommend that Council receive comments from the public at this time and that further consideration of the file be undertaken once staff has þrovided a wholesome report including the Draft Plan Approval conditions and a recommendation. r* #r 9rù I utttr Kristine Loft, MCIP RPP Consulting Planner Attachment No. 1 - Agency and Department Comments Attachment No. 2 - Planning Report (Ron Davidson) Attachment No. 3 - Draft Plan - Revised (Genivar) Attachment No. 4 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment and Schedule

dcgffit, Planning and Development July 8, 2013 595 grh Avenue East, Owen Sound Ontario N4K 3E3 519-376-2205 / 1-800-567-GREY / Fax 519-376-7970 Ms. Debbie Robertson, Clerk Municipality of Grey Highlands 206 Toronto Street South, Unit # 1, P.O. Box 409 Markdale, Ontario, NOC 1H0 { a, {^ ^','( 5"13 2 (zot3 Re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application 212.2013 Part Lot 101, Concession 1 NETSR (geographic Town of Markdale) Municipality of Grey Highlands Owner: 1628851 Ontario lnc. Agent: Ron Davidson, Land Use Planning Consultant lnc. Dear Ms. Robertson: This correspondence is in response to the above-noted zoning by-law amendment applicatíon. County Planning staff have had the opportunity to review the application in relation to the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and the County Official Plan and would offer the following comments. The proposed zoning by-law amendment would implement a condition of a draft approved plan of subdivision (County File # 42T-91001). The amendment will permit detached and semi-detached residential units on the subject property. The County is also processing a red-line revision to the plan of subdivision concurrently with the proposed zoning by-law amendment. Section 1 of the PPS generally promotes new development within municipally serviced settlement areas. The proposed development is within a designated settlement area and would be serviced by municipal water and sewer services. The PPS also encourages opportunities for infill and intensification. The proposed zoning by-law amendment would facilitate the provision of some semi-detached residential units within a dratl approved plan of subdivision, which was previously only planned to include single detached uníts. The subject property is designated as 'Primary Settlement Area' and 'Hazard Lands' in the County Official Plan. Within the Primary Settlement Area designation the County Plan permits a wide variety of residential units, but generally defers to the detailed land Grey County: Colour lt Your Way

Page 2 July 8,2013 use policies and development standards of the Municipal Official Plan. Section 2.6.3(5) of the County Plan requires an average development density of 20 units per net hectare. Appendix A to the County Official Plan identifies the subject property as being partially within the Wellhead Protection Area Zone D. ln this regard the proposed rezoning would not be introducing new types of land uses or hazards, beyond what the current draft approved subdivision or zoning would already permit. Comments could also be received from the Conservation AuthOfity or Drinking Water $ou ce PrgtecJion stafi in this regard. Appendix B to the County Official Plan identifies a small portion of Other ldentified Wetlands on the subject property. This small pocket of wetlands would appear to be in the poftion of the propeñy proposed to be zoned as Hazard. The subject property is located on Grey Road 12, and as such comments should be received from the County Transportation Services department, prior to rendering a decision on the subject application. The County would request that a decision be deferred on the subject application until such time as the County has rendered a decision on the red-line revision application. The County requests notice of any decision rendered with respect to this file. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 51 9-372-021 9 extension 1238 scott.taylor@grey.ca www.orev.ca cc. Amber Tabor, Municipality of Grey Highlands (by email only) Kristine Loft, Municipality of Grey Highlands (by email only) Ron Davidson, Land Use Planning Consultant lnc. (by email only) Grey County: Colour lt Your Way

July 10,2013 1078 Bruce Rd. 12. PO. Box 150 Formosa ON Canada NOG lw0 Tel 5 l9-367-3040 Fax5l9-367-3041 publicinfo@svca.on.ca www.svca.on.ca rluniciparityorgreyhigh'""0ålël'üpn?l"y;3t, P.O. Box 409 206 Toronto Street South unit I Markdale, ON NOC IHO Countv of Grev 595 9tñ Ave. Eást, Owen Sound, ON N4K 383 JUL 15 2ot3 RECËIVED ATTENTION: Debbie Robertson. clerk. Municipality of Grely Highlands Scott Taylor. Planner. Grey County Dear Ms. Robertson and Mr. Taylor: RE: Proposed Zoning By-Law Amendmentzlz.2}L3 Proposed Red Line Revisions 42T-91001 Part Lot 101, Concession I N.E.T.S.R. Geographic Village of Markdale Municipality of Grey Hiehlands (1628851 Ontario Inc.) The Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA) has reviewed this proposed Zoning By-law amendmenr and proposed Red Line Revision in accordance with the SVCA's mandate and policies and the Memorandum of Agreement between the Authority and the Municipality of Grey Highlands relating to Plan Review. The proposed Zoning Bylaw amendment and proposed Red Line Revision are acceptable to the SVCA. The SVCA offers the following commenrs. The SVCA understands draft plan conditions of approval specific to svca review and the Hazard zone will remain in place associated with this circulation. If this is not the case this proposal is recommended to be deferred until the SVCA has had opportunity to review those changes. Conservation ü')+t"''a;'* A M vrgen o The proposed townhouses in place of the single detached dwellings on a number of lots, and the slight adjustment of the road alignment and proposed lot boundaries, can likely be accommodated by the current storrnwater plans and reports given recent correspondence between the SVCA and the proponent's engineer. That being said, an updated report and related plans will need to be submitted in support of those changes to the SVCA for review in order to clear condition of draft approval #13. Conservation ONTARIO \, 1,,'/ r.1.,'t,,"r.

Grey County and Municipalrty of Grey Highlands July 10,2013 Page2 Yffe ün st these comments are helpfrrl. Should questions arise or if clarification is needed, please do not hesitate to contâct this office. Yo rs Sincerely, Erik Downing Environmental Planning Coordinator EA cc: David Kell, SVCA Director, via email 1628851 Ontario Inc. c/o Jim Dimakos 217 Toronto St eer South, Markdale, ON NOH 1H0 Ron Davidson,265 Beattie Sûeet, Owen Sound, ON N4K 6X2

RONDAVIDSON LAND USE PIANNING CONSULTANT INC. June 5, 2013 County of Grey Planning & Development Department 595 9m Avenue East Owen Sound, Ontario N4K 3E3 Attention: Scott Taylor Senior Planner Dear Scott: Re: Application for Red-Line Revisions to Draft Approved plan of subdivision - part of Lot i0l, concession r iërsr, Geographic!!ltag9 of t[arkdate, Municipatity of Grey Highlands File No: 42T-9t00t File Name:.,Dimakos Subdivision" Owner: 162885l Ontario tnc. Further to our previous meetings and numerous discussions regarding the above-noted matter, please accept this letter as our formal request for red-linl rev õions to the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision. As per your request, I have submitted the following:. a cheque in the amount of $1,270, payable to the,,county of Grey"; o five copies o{ l9oryi."g_ showing the Plan of Subdivision that was Draft Approved on June 16, 1993 with the propased changes shown in red ink; ' fiye copies of the proposed Draft Ptan of Subdivision showing only the end result of the redlined changes. (This copy to be stamped.draft nõproval.); o five copies of proposed phasing plan; and, TEL: 519-371{829 FAX: SltSTlJt3t ronalddavidson@rogcrs.oom www.rondavidson.c

2lPage iìcrt-t ir c Iìer isirrns r(r [)ral't.\ppr.or r:ri l)l ll trl' Subtiir isi.n I óli{tì5 I ()r rrrir lrir'. 1..i)irn:rlios Subclir ision.. I o a disk containing PDF versions of the above drawings and an AutoCAD vers on of the drawing to be stamped "Draft Approval'_ To assist your off ce in evaluating the proposed red-line rev sions, I offer the following information: Historv of Development Proposal: On June 16, 1993, the Ministry of MunicþalAffairs (the approval authority for plans of Subdivisions at that time) granted Draft Approval to a resid'ential Plan of Subdivision proposed within the Mllage of Markdale. The proposal involved 5g single family residential lots and a stormwater managemeni faðitity. The developer and its Engineering Consultant had taken some steps towards fulfilling the conditions of Draft Approval; however, the work ceased after "*t, le, and since thän, very little work on this project has been accomplished, until recenly. fórtunately for the developer, the conditiong of_draft Approval imposed by the Ministry did not include a lapsing date. As such, the file has remained active. The developer now wishes to move forward with the project, and is hoping to obtain FinalApproval as soon as possible. Some minor cnänges to the tayout ãnd intended use of the subdivision are proposed, and therefore it is ñecessary to have red ine revisions made to the Draft plan prior to seeking FinalApproval. The request for red-line revisions to the DlaftApproved Plan is therefore being made to the county, which is now the approval authority for plans of subdivision. Proposed Ghanses: The proposed alterationsto the design of the subdivision are minor in nature. The redline revision would result in a few of the original proposed lots becominj narro-\/er, thereby allowing for two additional lots to'be created. ffre prõpáãal, "ilghly -however, also includes the establishment of a public park which would occupy i*" ottf," residential lots that were originally proposed. As a result, the num'bär of residential parcels to be created would remain at Sg. The proposed red-line revisions also include a minor reconfiguration of the road boundaries in two areas. Ïhe-other change to the proposed subdivision involves a revision to the legend of the Draft Plan- The developer is now proposing to include some semidetached residential

3lPage Rc.i-l:r c lìcr isiorìs {,r [)r lr,\ppror cti pl rn ol' Suhilir isiorr I 6llìS5 I Or i io Irr... ('-[)irlrukos Subtjir isroll.. I lots as part of this development. The majority of the lots, as they are shown on the ex st ng Draft Plan, are already of adequate vti Otf and area to accommodate either a detached dwelling or a pair of semidetached du ellings, and therefore the lots don't need to be reconfigured. At the present time, the owñer is not entirely sure which lots would have semi{gta9h{ dwellings erected upon them and therefoie is requesting that the legend of the Draft Plan be revised in such a manner that either type of Owét ng could be erected. That notwithstanding, the developer is committed to OuiiOing detached dwellings on at least 17 of thè 21 lots being estabtished in phase 1 and wishes to keep the options open for either type of dwelling to be erected on the r.emaining four lots (Lots 18 to 21) within this first phase. ln Phases 2 or 3, it would likely be impossible to erect semi-detached dwellings on some of the non-rectangular parcels. It should be explain_ed that if a pair of semidetached dwellings are erected on any of the parcels, a Part Lot Control By-law can be adopted by Counci that would establish a new lot line along the common wallsuch that the units can be situated on their own respective properties and can be sold as separate parcels. Other changes being proposed are the addition of two 0.3 metre reserves and the renumbering of the lots and blocks. ln addition to the changes to the Draft PIan, the County Planning & Development Department has advised that it will also take this opportunity to ievise the öonditions of Draft Approval that were imposed by the Ministry of Municiþal Affairs in 1gg3. Such revisions will include making reference to semidetached dwellings as discussed above, changing all references to Village of Markdale" with "Municipality of Grey Highlands", replacing the term "Environmental Protection" with "Hazard" and recognitingine County of Grey as the approval authority as opposed to the Ministry. Countv of Grev Official Plan: All lands located within the former Village of Markdale are designated 'primary Settlement Area' on Schedule A (Land Use) to the County of Grey Official plan. The 'Primary Settlement Areas' are intended to serve as the focal points for development with the County and, as such, permit a variety of urban type activity including an assortment or residential, commercial, industrial, institutionaland recreational land uses. It is the general intent of the Official Plan to require all development to be connected with municipalwater and sanitary sewers in the settlement areas where such municipal services are available. The proposed development will be serviced with municipalwater

4lPage rìctr -r i.'l' 0",;'.;';ì,'ì,,1ì:,",';1,'ìîì:l'ìììi',,j';îî."*,;t,j',,n,,I',\iì,',,,,.,,, and sanitary sewers. The Municipality has confirmed that capacþ cunently exists to supply water and sewer to at least 59 residential dwellings.with n itr s suuoivision. By the time the developer is seeking Final Approval for the ãd and 3d phases, the Municipality will be in a position to commit to a greater servicing capacity, ãs will be necessary due to the fact that the inclusion of semi{etached dwellings witnin tnis development will increase the number of houses beyond 5g. The 'Primany Settlement Area' policies recommend an overall average devetopment density of 20 units per net hectare within the urban area of Markdalel This foiicy was not in effect when the subdivision was Draft Approved in 19g3, and therefoie the minor modification to the subdivision cannot be expécted to comply with it. lt is worth noting, however, that by now including semi-detached dwellings n tir s devetopment, the subdivision will be achieving a higher lot density and tñerefore come cl'oser to meeting the above-noted target. Section 6.12 of the County Official Plan details the policies in which lot creation and, fore specifically, Plans of Condominium are to be evaluated. The poli6es are general in nature- The proposed red-line revisions are in compliance with this section. Section 2.8 of the Plan provides a series of policies designed to protect various types of natur.al heritage fe{yres. ln this regard, there are no significant heritage i."trr"" identified on the subject property or adjacent lands. Based o1!e foregoing, it is evident that the proposed modifications to the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision are consistent with the County of Grey Official plan. The subject property is designated primarily'neighbourhood Area' on Schedule A to the Munícipality ol_grey Highlands official plari. rnãparcel intended for stormwater management (Block.61) 3!d the rear portions of the abutting residential tots are desig nated' Hazard Lands'. The purpose of the'neighbourhood Area'designation is to identify lands within Markdale which are primarily residential in natùre while also suitable toinéigfrbourhood commercial, institutional, open space and other uses compatible w tfr res eît a development- Permitted uses include a variety of low and mediur ã"*it' r"sidential uses, neighbourhood convenience commercial uses, home occupations, óed and breakfast establishments, recreational uses such as parks and ómmunity recreation, and institutional uses such as schools, churches, libräries and retirement homes.

5lPage rìc'i -l i rc 't", ',,',';;ì,",,,1',',,",',',,'ìï::'.,,ììì',,i,,1',:',''..'1rt,,r",'l','.',ì,',,'.1', The Official Plan provides locationalcriteria for medium density development (e.g. in clg e proximity to parks and schools and in locations where traffic impacts are avoided) while generally allowing low density development anyrvhere in the,nåighbournood i\rea designation. Both detached ân sem etacheä Jwefiings "r".oî" o"red to be low density. T.fe-Grey Highlands Official Plan also includes generat policies for plans of Subdivision, all of which are satisfied by the proposed changãs to the Draft plan. The local Official Plan also stlv-gs to protect significant natural heritage features. As noted in the "County of Grey Official Plan" sect on above, no such features have been identified on the subject property or adjacent lands. ln- view- 9f the foregoing, it is evident that the proposed changes to the Draft Approved Plan of subdivision conform with the Grey Hlghlands official plan. Provincial Policv Statement: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) directs urban type activity to the designated settlement areas of the Qounty, and encourages such-àevelopment to bã cãnnected to full municipal services. The proposed lot creãtion is clearly cònsistent wittr such policies. The PPS encourages a variety of residential dwelling types and densities in order to meet the accommodation needs of all present ano fùture residents of the community. The proposed semidetached dwelling component of the Plan of Subdivision would be considered more in-keeping with this housing policy than would the current Drafr Approved Plan which involves allsingle familycweilings on relatively large lots. The PPS also serves to protect certain natural heritage features (e.g. Significant Woodlands, Significant Wetlands, ANSI's, etc.) of which none are located within close proximity of the subject lands. Furthermore, the PPS strives to protect significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes Witl"r regard to this põlicy, no buildings or structures exist on the property and it is highly uñtitety that t'he oéve opmànt would impact on any built heritage resources tha[mãy existin this general aiea of Markdale. ln terms of potentialarchaeological significance of the property, an Archaeological Assessment was not requested when the subdivision was'grañted Draft Approval in 1993 because the Provincial Policy Statement was not in elfect at that t må. C ven tfre minor nature of the changes to the Draft Approved Plan and the relevance of the "Clergy Principle", which would be relevant in this situation, an Archaeological

6lPage Re,l-t irrr',\ r r 1rr! rl l)l rn trl' Suhrli r ision I ne. (.' l)inr;ilrrs Srrbti i r isir r") Assessment has not requested as part of this red-line rev s on request. It is evident that the proposed changes to the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision are cons stent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Municioalitv of Grev Hiqhlands Zoninq Bv{aw The subject lands are zoned predom nantly'r' (Residential) according to the Municipality of Grey Highlands Zoning ByJaw No. 2004-50. The stormwater management facility block and the rear portions of the abutting residential lots are zoned 'H' (Hazard). The'R'zone permits single family dwellings and an accessory home occupat on. ln order to allow semidetached dwelling units in this development, the 'R' zoned lands must be rezoned to'rm' (Residential Multiple), a category that permits both detached and semi-detached dwellings in addition to duplexes, townhouses and apartments. ln this regard, an application to amend the Municipal ty's Comprehensive Zoning By-law has been submitted. The following provisions of the 'RM'zone are appricabre at this stage: By-law Requirement Detached Dwelling* Semi-Detached Dwellino* 'Minimum lot area' 500 m' 300 mz 'Minimum lot frontaoe' 15 metres 9 m per unit connected lo serulr:ês All 59 lots within the revised Plan of Subdivision meet the above-noted minimum standards for both types of dwelling units. {s nojed previously in this letter, the developer intends to construct single family dwellings on at least 17 of the 21 lots created in Phase 1, and leave thãoption ópen to erect either detached or semidetached dwellings on the remaining four parceb (tots ta to 21). At the present time, the developer is not sure which lots in the second and third phases will be developed for semidetached dwellings, although single family dweltings will definitely be constructed on the non-rectangular shaped párcels: Ttte existing 'H' zone that has been applied to the stormwater management facility block (Block 61) and the rear portions of the abutting residential parcels (Ùots a6 to 5g) will remain. The 'H' zone generally prohibits buildings and structures except for flood and erosion/sedimentation control measures.

TlPage Red-Line Revisions to Drafr Approved Plan of Subdivision ló288t1 Otìtârio lnc 1"f)inrakos Sr bdirision") The proposed parkland parcel (Block 60) should be rezoned to'os' (open Space), a zoning category that permits such public uses. Pre-Consultation Discussions The planning and engineer ng consultants have been involved in a ser es of recent discussions involving the County of Grey Planning & Development Department and the Municipality of Grey Highland in regard to the proposed changes. The red-line revis ons now be ng requested and the submission package reflect those discussions and the recommendations provided by the County and Municipal staff. In addition, the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority was asked to comment on the need for the stormwater management reports to be updated since the development now involves semi-detached dwellings. Erik Downing of the Conservation Authority stated the following in a May 24,2013 e-mail: "As the proposed townhouses fo be alternated with single detached dwellings on the described lots wíll represent less impermeable area then the initíal proposal approved by the SyCA in 2008, wíth the same stormwater controls, I cannot see issue wíth the proposed changes. Please ensure finished grades, drainage directions, roof leaders, and any other details of the single detached lots are carried over to the revised townhouse plans. I presume the SVCA will have opportunity to comment to the Red line revision via the municipal approval process and will have a closer look at that time." Furthermore, the County of Grey Transportation Services Department was asked if the additional dwelling units being proposed within the subdivision would warrant a Traffic lmpact Study. Patrick Hoy of the Transportation Services Department responded on May 21,2013 with the following: "Grey County Transportation Seruices would not require a traffic impact study for the first phase of the above noted development. Please confirm that Phase I is 25 lots. Subseguenf pfiases may require a traffic impact study.' (ln response to the above comment, the end result of Phase 1 will be 25 lots if semidetached dwellings are erected on Lots 18 to 21 and new lot lines are later established along the common walls.)

SlPage' R'l'ú-ri ' c *"','o'r';,îì,'ì,,1',',,",'ìl'ìlli",-ì;',,ïjlî,,'1,;t,,1,.,0,u.,,\lì,',,,,.,', Concludino Remarks: The proposed redline revision is minor in nature and is being treated as a'minor Red- Line Revision' request. The rwisions require an amendment to the Municipality's Zoning Bylaw. ln this regard, a rezoning application has been filed with Grey Highlands. The proposed changes have been considered in drafr format by the County of Grey Planning & Development Department, the Municipalrty of ereyhignlanos jtaff, the Grey Sauble Conservation Authority and the County of erey Transþortãtion Services Department- The proposal, as is being submitted, addressesthe issues that were raised during this pre-consultation process. The minor changes conform with both County and local Official plans and are consistent with the Prwincial Policy Statement. With a semi{etached dwelling component being added to this sumivision, the red-line proposal would appear to be lgp iqkeeping with the housing policies of the County bffic al ptan and ihe provinciat Policy Statement than the current Draft Approval plan. Based on the foregoing, it is evident that the proposed redjine revised Draft plan represents sound land use planning and should be given approvat. Ron Davidson, BES, RPp, MClp c.c. Doug Sowerby Ross Slaughter, Genivar lnc. (via e.mail only) Dan Best, Grey Highlands (via e-mait only) Kristine Loft, Grey Highlands (via e-mailonly)

ç9 (Ð ^g Dimakos Subdivision Part l.ot 101, Concession I NETSR Former Village of Markdale Municipality of Grey Highlands RON DAVIDSON LAND US Pt M{t {OCCilSr-:alt [{c olfitn sorrilo. orlráro SCALE 1:4000

The corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING CONCERNING A PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT RELATED TO PLAN OF SUBDIVISION DRAFT APPROVAL 42T-91OO1 TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands has appointed: Monday, July 22,2OL3 at 5:OO p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing into this matter to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 as amended. The meeting will be held at the Municipality of Grey Highlands Municipal Offices (Grey Gables Building, lower level), 206 Toronto Street South, Unit #1, MARKDALE, Ontario. APPLICATION FOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT: ztz.z0tg REGISTERED OWNER: 1628851 Ontario Inc. AGENT: Ron Davidson, Land Use planning Consultant Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part Lot 101, Concession 1 NETSR The former Town of Markdale CTVIC ADDRESS: None FRONTAGE: L77 m / 23O m DEPTH: 198.2 m AREA: 8.9 ha HAVING ACCESS ON: Main Street East Grey Road 12 ASSESSM ENT ROLL N U M BER: 42. 08.240. OO1. 3o3oo.OOOO PURPOSE: o To amend the Municipality of Grey Highlands Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2004-50 to rezone the subject lands ín order to implement a conditíon of Draft Approval (42T-91001) which will permit detached residential lots and semi-detached lots. This amendment is related to Draft Approval (42T-91001). Further information related to this file can be found at htto://www.grev.calservices/plannino-develoomenunew-olanninoappl ications/dimakos-su bd ivision-red-line-revision/ THE EFFECT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT. To change the zone symbol on Schedule 'B-1' from Residential (R) and Hazard (H) to Residential Multi (RM), Hazard (H) and Open Space (OS) as shown on Schedule 'A' attached hereto. ANY PERSON may attend the Public Meet ng and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment. Property owners within 120 metres (legislation requires 120 metres) of the subject land are hereby notified of the above application for a rezoning amendment. Individuals who submit letters and other information to Council should be aware that any personal information contained within their communications may become part of the public record and may be made available through the Council agenda process. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Municipality of Grey Highlands in respect of the proposed Zoning By-law, does not make oral submissions at the Public Meeting or make written submissions to the Municipality of Grey Highlands before the proposed Zoning By-law is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal. Additional information relating to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment may be obtained by contacting the undersigned during regular business hours. A Key Map is provided to show the location of the lands to which this By-law pertains. When requesting information please quote File No. ZL2.2OL3 - L628824 Ontario Inc. Agenda's for all meetings are published on www.greyhighlands.ca - Council Agendas and Minutes Debbie Robeftson, Clerk, The Municipality of Grey Highlands 206 Toronto Street South, Unit #1, P.O. Box 409 Markdale ON NOC 1H0 Telephone: (519) 986-2811; Fax: (519) 986-3643 For fufther information please contact the Corporate Services Depaftment Dated at the Municipality of Grey Highlands this 26th day of June, 2013

Nole uþddled zane labels cctlveiled io dnnota!þt) COUNTY OF GREY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 212 2ai3 1623a51oNnc nxd

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY.LAW NUMBER 2O13.XX BEING a By-law to amend the Municipality of Grey Highlands Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2004-50; WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Grey Highlands deems it in the public interest to pass a By-law to amend By-law No. 2004-50. AND WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, By-laws may be amended by Councils of Municipalities; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. By-law No. 2004-50 is hereby amended by affecting the lands described as Part Lot 101, Concession 1 NETSR in the former Village of Markdale, as shown Schedule "A-1" attached hereto. 2. Schedule "B-1" of By-law No. 2004-50 is hereby amended by changing the zone on the subject property from Residential (R) and Hazard (H) to Residential Multiple (RM), Hazard (H) and open space (os) as shown on schedule 'A" attached hereto. 3. Schedule "A-1" and all other notations thereon are hereby declared to form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into force and take effect upon being passed by Council subject to any approval necessary pursuant to the Planning Ãct, R.S.O. 1gg0, as amended. Read a first and second time this,2013. Read a third time and finally passed this,2013. Mayor, Wayne Fitzgerald Clerk, Debbie Robertson