May 1, 2017 BZA Meeting Exhibit 1 BZNA Agenda Item #2. BZNA John & Amy Shankland 998 South 9 th Street

Similar documents
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

1. ROLL CALL Richardson (Vice-Chair) Vacant Bisbee Hamilton Wells Roberts-Ropp Carr (Chair) Peterson Swearer

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT. Development Variance Permit in order to allow construction of a 249m2 2-bedroom single family residence.

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

Final Agenda CITY OF OVERLAND PARK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Wednesday, October 10, :00 P.M. Council Chamber City Hall 8500 Santa Fe Drive

SPECIAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.), REZONING, and COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PACKET

Taylor Lot Coverage Variance Petition No. PLNBOA North I Street Public Hearing: November 7, 2012

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

Planning & Development ~OWNER 'S AGENT D PROPERTY O WNER D CONTRACT PURCHASER RZM ' tf.. f u.,;o{)-!~,~ lv"'"'( '7 '7 0 ll.

VA R I TEM #3

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Variance Permit to increase the maximum height of an accessory building.

CASE# PRESENT ZONJNG: RC. Oxford Plamring Commission Classification Report. (For Planning Purpose Only)

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKAGE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS

Town of Brownsburg Board of Zoning Appeals Project Synopsis

HAYS AREA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING AGENDA CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1507 MAIN, HAYS, KS July 13, :15 A.M.

City of Chesapeake, Virginia April 27, 2018 Parcel Number: Property Address (Primary): Parcel Class: 5000 Parcel Class Description: 1008

Boone County Area Plan Commission Minor Residential Subdivision Plat APPLICATION PROCEDURES: STEP ONE: PRE-APPLICATION

Board of Zoning Appeals

# Coventry Rezoning, Variation and Preliminary/Final PUD Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

The Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular Meeting

Administrative Zoning Variation Application Procedures and Checklist

TOWN OF CHILI 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, NY Tel: Fax:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Spence Carport Variance

The Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular Meeting. File No.:

CHANGE IN CONDITIONS APPLICANT'S RESPONSE STANDARDS GOVERNING THE EXERCISE OF THE ZONING POWER

TAKE A ROLL CALL TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A QUORUM OF MEMBERS PRESENT

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

AGENDA ITEM #4.G. TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council. February 15, 2018

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

ANDOVER CITY PLANNING COMMISSION / BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Tuesday, September 19, 2017 Minutes

VARIANCE FROM USE APPLICATION PROCEDURES

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

VARIANCE FROM THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICATION PROCEDURES

5. REGULAR AGENDA A. Z-12-18

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF NOVI Community Development Department (248)

Public Notice. Subject Property. May 10, Subject Property: 920 Kilwinning Street

VAR17-03 St. Charles County Board of Zoning Adjustment

AGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CITY OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KANSAS AGENDA July 10, 2018 **MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 6:30 P.M.

2. Specify the limited conditions and circumstances under which nonconformities shall be permitted to continue.

VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLETENESS REVIEW

SONBERG EASTIN FENCE 1586 EASTIN AVE.

USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION

STAFF REPORT #

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

,,...,..,..., A CITY OF OXFORD, MISSISSIPPI SPECIAL EXCEPTION OR VARIANCE. DATE August 10, Ole Miss Wesley Foundation NAME

TOWN OF NEW SHOREHAM ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW APPLICATION PROCEDURE

D OWNER'S AGENT D PROPERTY OWNER 1111 CONTRACT PURCHASER

PUBLIC HEARING SWANTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. Thursday, September 24, 2015

Variation Application

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OFNOVI Community Development Department (248)

Necessary Resources/Impacts. Attachments

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

L A S COLINA S PL A Z A

WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA

BO' l> A VI. ' Easement. Scale 1" 50 Dec. 9, 1965

'.,,. '--. '. ADDRESS: CITY: e+ta""-blit..~ STATE: PHONE: 1-t04--lf SS-~ b '+

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

TITLE DATA Excellence by Design. Document Types. Description

ANDERSON HALL PUD TEXT AMENDMENT PRESENTED BY STEVEN D. HARDIN, ESQ.

NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR VARIANCES

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING CHAPTER 94 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE ORDINANCE, TEXAS), AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY AMENDING; RELATING

MEMORANDUM. Monday, November 19, :00 p.m. Kiawah Island BZA Meeting Packet

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS

Case applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties owners within the neighborhood;

Nelson Garage Setback Variance

MINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Park Township Hall nd Street Holland, MI Regular Meeting April 27, :30 P.M.

Lot 1 KAP Lot 1. Lot 1. Lot 4. ot 5

Department of Planning and Development

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One

Boone County Board of Zoning Appeals Special Exception APPLICATION PROCEDURES: STEP ONE: PRE-APPLICATION STEP TWO: APPLICATION

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Chesapeake, Virginia September 19, 2018 Parcel Number: Property Address (Primary): Parcel Class: 2010 Parcel Class Description:

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

EXHIBIT "A" All that certain real property situate in the City of Fremont, County of Alameda, State of California, and described as follows:

CITY OF PARK RIDGE. 505 BUTLER PLACE PARK RIDGE, IL TEL: 847/ FAX: 847/ TDD:847/ URL:

CONDITIONAL USE/ VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION

CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCES

Fairbanks North Star Borough

Charles Boulard, Director of Community Development, Elizabeth Saarela, City Attorney and Angela Pawlowski, Recording Secretary

CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND

pqzj Agenda Item # Page # CHAIR AND MEMBERS BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING ON MONDAY, JULY 18,2011: 7:40 p.

May 17, 2018 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

AGENDA ITEM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING ( ) Discussion only ( X ) Action FROM (DEPT/ DIVISION): County Counsel

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION USE ON REVIEW REPORT

CHARLES A. VON STEIN, INC.

Paper copies & an electronic copy (pdf) of the following drawings or plans: 1 full size scalable certified survey and 1 (11 x 17) copy

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Transcription:

May 1, 2017 BZA Meeting Exhibit 1 BZNA 000036-2017 Agenda tem #2 BZNA 000036-2017 John & Amy Shankland 998 South 9 th Street UDO 9.B.2.C.1 Variance of Development Standards to allow the construction of an accessory structure that exceeds the maximum size and height limits for properties less than one acre in size (1,000 square feet/14 feet permitted; 1,127 square feet/16 feet requested) General nformation: Applicant Owner Location Requested Action Applicable Regulations Zoning District Property Acreage Adjacent Land Uses John and Amy Shankland John and Amy Shankland 998 South 9 th Street Variance of Development Standards to allow the construction of an accessory structure that exceeds the maximum size and height limits for properties less than one acre in size (1,000 square feet/14 feet permitted; 1,127 square feet/16 feet requested) UDO 9.B.2.C.1 R-4 (Moderate to High Density Single-Family Residential/Two- Family Residential) 0.20 acres North: Residential South: Residential East: Commercial West: Residential Adjacent Zoning Districts North: R-4 South: R-4 East: LB West: R-4 Road Condition South 9 th Street: Fair Plum Street: Fair Printed 04/26/17 1

May 1, 2017 BZA Meeting Exhibit 1 BZNA 000036-2017 Exhibits: 1. Staff Report 2. Parcel map 3. Aerial Photo 4. Site Photographs 5. Variance of Development Standards Application 6. Site Plan CURRENT 7. Site Plan PROPOSED 8. Elevations 9. Floor Plans Analysis: The subject site is located on the northeast corner of S 9th Street and Plum Street and is 0.20 acres in size. The site currently contains a 2,718 square foot residence and a 360 square foot detached garage that was originally constructed in 1940. The petitioners, also the owners of the site, contacted Planning and Development staff to discuss the removal of the existing accessory structure and the construction of a new 1,127 square foot, 16 foot tall detached accessory structure on the property. The proposed structure would exceed the maximum size and height limits for accessory structures on properties less than one acre in size (1,000 square feet; 14 feet) but otherwise meets all bulk development standards in the R-4 zoning district, and the petitioners are requesting approval of a Variance of Development standards to allow the construction of the new accessory structure. Variance of Development Standards Findings AGENDA TEM #2: The Noblesville Board of Zoning Appeals is authorized to approve or deny variances of development standards from the terms of the zoning ordinance. The BZA may impose reasonable conditions as part of its approval. A variance of development standards may be approved only upon a determination in writing that the following three (3) conditions are met (see ndiana Code 36-7-4-918.5): 1. The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community: The proposed variance will NOT be injurious to public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. The existing accessory structure is visibly and structurally deficient and would be replaced by a new structure. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner: The use and value of real estate adjacent to the subject site will NOT be affected in a substantially adverse manner by allowing the requested variance. Accessory structures frequently exceed the maximum size and height limits in the Special Landscape District. Nearby property owners may remonstrate against this petition if they believe this request will have significant adverse effects Printed 04/26/17 2

May 1, 2017 BZA Meeting Exhibit 1 BZNA 000036-2017 on adjacent properties. Should nothing contrary be brought to light by adjacent owners at the public hearing, it is presumed that the approval of this variance request will not have a substantially adverse effect on the use and value of adjacent properties. 3. The strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property: The strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property. The proposed structure is similar to large, detached accessory structures on adjacent properties and is common within the Special Landscape District. VARANCE RECOMMENDATONS: AGENDA TEM #3: Approve the requested variance based upon the following findings of fact: The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community; The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner; The strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property; With the following specific conditions: 1. The structure shall be used for personal use only. The structure will not be used for any business, commercial, or industrial use. 2. The Applicant shall submit all necessary applications to demolish the existing garage and construct the new accessory structure in accordance with all applicable regulations. 3. The Applicant shall sign the Acknowledgement of Variance document prepared by the Planning and Development Department Staff and return to the Department within 60 days of this approval. Staff will then record this document against the property and a file stamped copy of such recorded document shall be available in the Department of Planning. 4. Any alterations to the approved site plans and/or building plans, other than those required by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Development prior to the alterations being made, and if necessary, a BZA hearing shall be held to review such changes. Printed 04/26/17 3

EXHBT 2 - PARCEL MAP 998 S 9th Street April 4, 2017 Building Building Foundation Parcels 0 0.005 0.01 0.02 mi 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 km Basemap information here 1:720

EXHBT 3 - AERAL PHOTOGRAPH 998 S 9th Street April 4, 2017 Parcels 0 0.005 0.01 0.02 mi 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 km Basemap information here 1:720

EXHBT 4 - STE PHOTOGRAPHS

EXHBT 4 - STE PHOTOGRAPHS

EXHBT 4 - STE PHOTOGRAPHS

EXHBT 5 - VARANCE OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLCATON *NDANA* CTY OF NOBLESVLLE BOARD OF ZONNG APPEALS VARANCE OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD APPLCATON Application Number: The undersigned requests a Variance of Development Standards as specified below. Should this variance request be approved, such approval shall only authorize the particular use described in this application and as further limited by reasonable conditions imposed upon such approval by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Project Name or Occupant Name: ~0 h V\ (.l.v\d. A ro~ 8 \1\.. a.t\,tzl alt\.d Common Address q q ~ S q +\ S -t r e e.. T N D~:dvs v ~ Lt., L\ lu OU. 0 ApplicantName: J ohl\ 0-.V\ti( AM~ S kt ct/\ ~ L avt.d Applicant Address: ~ q_ g 5. q-+v\.5'-t r te:+ N o6 lt...sv ~ lfla 0 L? 0 Applicant City/State/Zip: N 0 \o ~ s v '1 \ l0 \-t'l!e otuo E-mail: O.M ~ S Vt Clvtld a."'- v{~ \tl o-t-mc~ ~~ Applicant Phone #1 ~ / - ~ () ( -t> ~.L O Phone #2: 311-1 :5O -- J~ ot.f Fax:.1 C\... Owner Name: c \ oh. 1\ a V\_ vt frm \~ S \A Cll\ k l QV\. d Owner Address: q q g 0 q ~.5+ r-u + N Db le.. S V le_ lf lo 0/i 0 Owner City/State/Zip: N ok}.e.. Sv ~ \ ~, N 4LR~~ te-mail: & fv'l.y c;h.a. /\ klavj ;J vro tvvt 1-i~.;tVt Owner Phone #1:) 1, ~.J o -o blp,o Phone#2: 01 '1-1 S C- fj.o'if=ax: Jt'\~(o...:...:... _ Property Location: D Not located in a recorded subdivision, see legal description attached. Subdivision Name: ~ ' N\, &ctw l.s Ad ol't -tl o 1\ Subdivision Section: Lot Number: 3 Last Deed of Record Number -11 q - 'J i 5 Existing Land Use: (yar-a.. ~ (_ Common Description of Request: b-=a..rct j L w ATv :ftl,t/\ Wl ea-+ Q.,_.Q.a. a. b () ~ Zoning District of Property: Code Section(s) Appealed: UDO Date: 3 - f - 1'7

EXHBT 5 - VARANCE OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLCATON The Noblesville Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) is authorized to approve or deny Variances of Development Standard from the terms of the Unified Development Ordinance. The BZA may impose reasonable conditions as part of its approval. A Variance of Development Standard may be approved only upon a determination in writing that the following three (3) statements are true (see ndiana Code 36-7-4-918.5): 1. The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. Explain why this statement is true in this case: ~ 5o,~ a_ j e_ w ~ ll b~ e. - f Cl(\cUJ. ::to 0-- <-. '. ' \ ;)_ - c_a_r LU\l -t AJ ~ -t-v\ el\±er -+'A (' W e.11. + etr--e.o- Q ~ o \J'"L. Q "'-J w ; \ ~ o C.et -t eel of\ -t-v\.e.., ex ~ S-t \ ~ 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner by the approval of this variance request. Explain why this statement is true in this case: \~ tj a_,ct j ~ \-~~ U 5~'tl \ b-e_ DA o u_r p-rop e vt'l a A Gt w ~ U A o+ ev\.c..r 'D ctc.l " LA f D/\ ~k 01. Le y J 8 1' ole (A) a ile ) S -t,a--t-) &..r 1\.X-tj la \o w ', Aj 3. The strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will result in practical difficulties in the use of the subject property. Explain why this statement is true in this case: w <:_. Q_Q/\ f<- o-t rz r p ClAd 0 C)_r '3 ~~ei._ ~ e ~ ~ 1\ -t-ku ('1\..Cl A!fl 1/...r t...jvl W,- S h \N ;---tv\ -+be: c_ ~.t-t' D r ot ~ v'\.a vt tt,!-±-ow-e u-e r) \fj-.< \ac) e_~ -tk &te_s lj Vl vv \ l \.t; -\- c.u~.j\ u > \ ±k1 EJ la-r k ~ S-t ()v- ;-c 7

EXHBT 5 - VARANCE OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLCATON John and Amy Shankland Narrative Statement April, 2017 1. Legal Description- 998 S. 9th Street, Noblesville, N 46060 2. Site Plan- see attachment 3. Narrative Statement Due to its age and condition, we are requesting your approval to demolish our garage and build a larger one with an entertainment area above it. Our current garage has been leaning to the side for many years and is unsafe. We would like to build a new garage with the entertainment space above it for our family to enjoy. t would include a small kitchenette and bathroom. t is our understanding that even though this new garage will match our home and fit well within our neighborhood, it would be larger than what City of Noblesville standards allow. Therefore, we are submitting this application and its attachments in order to prepare for the May 1 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. We thank you for your help and look forward to the next steps.

EXHBT 6 - STE PLAN - CURRENT @ENCHMARK grurveyng, ~NC. Donn M. Scotten, Registered Land Surveyor 10986 Windjammer Ct. ndianapolis, ndiana 46256 (317) 841-1506 Property Description: Lot 3 in G.M. SHAW'S ADDTON, an Addition t o the City of Noblesville, Hamilton County, ndiana, as per plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 1, page 2, in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, ndiana. }lay 20, 1991 Benchmark Job 09 1-1315 ~~ ()'\ 13(' ~- --c.v.r. -:;:;-- -. - l Lor 3,--,.,----; ' ~(:... ~::::..._.!r---.~-~--~~l>ec.k 1'' 30' /3?' +...;; f_piuftj Sl: 7-4PPFJoveo srre PLAN

EXHBT 7 - STE PLAN - PROPOSED 132'. 25' -...... -.. u -.. u -.. Porch One Story Frame Residence 32' 21' 1" 11'... w -.. 2'2" 12'..! 1:_ i 16' t- - - - - ~ -. Deck 1' s. ' ' 1" 12. - 29 ' - - - ~.. r----~-:2:.o,:-:-. ' 'il ---...,.-..... -... Proposed Garage ~ - - --18' - - - - -... Asphalt Pad.~c L----...:...:~---...J...... / ' 11'.. - >- -~ c:t: 132' Plum Street

EXHBT 8 - ELEVATONS

EXHBT 8 - ELEVATONS ROCFNCS MATERAL <SEE ROOf F LAt'V Cs. L CsUTTER ON 2 X 8 FA&ciA C!\U DO1.N5PCXJTS <SEE ROCf' FLArN) T.OP. CEDAR 51-UNCSLE SD N6 NSTALL FER MA-PJF. SFEC5. WNDOJJ HEAD F_llil?!:!:? fl:qd_b T.OP. ujndouj HEAD REAR ELEVATON T.O.P. ~ WNDOW HEAD ~~Tr,~~~v lh '~~~~~~ T.O.P. WNDOW 14EAD LEFT SDE ELEVATON FRONT ELEVATON

EXHBT 9 - FLOOR PLANS 24' ~ GARAGE 29/0 X 23/0 (9' CLG.) ~ 30' ~

EXHBT 9 - FLOOR PLANS (VAULTED) STUDO 21/5 X 19/0 +/- ON. REF 0 0... - - -..................