POLYTECHNIC OF TORINO FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE 2 Degree in Architecture Honors theses

Similar documents
Presentation to the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand 28 October 2016

MUNICIPALITY OF TURIN. NOTICE OF PUBLIC AUCTION No. 90/2018 "LINGOTTO GUEST HOUSE: ESTABLISHMENT OF A NINETY-NINE-YEAR-OLD

A. Land Use Relationships

Historic Centre of Florence, Centrica

Planned Residence District (PR) To review a plan to construct 11 single family homes on approximately 4.01 acres.

Note on housing supply policies in draft London Plan Dec 2017 note by Duncan Bowie who agrees to it being published by Just Space

HAVEBURY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

06.09 Urban Structural Density (2017 Edition)

Right-sizing as an Asset Management Technique

To achieve growth, property development, redevelopment and an improved tax base in the cities and boroughs in the Lehigh Valley.

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Draft Neighbourhood Plan for the former Land Settlement Association Estate at Great Abington March 2017

PROVINCE OF FORLÌ-CESENA PUBLIC AUCTION NOTICE FOR THE SALE OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN BAGNO A RIPOLI NAMED VILLA PEDRIALI AND VILLA LA CIPRESSA.

The date for the opening of the offers and for their examination is postponed to 23 November 2017.

THE LAND POOLING RULES OF THE KINGDOM OF BHUTAN 2009 ROYAL GOVERNMENT OF BHUTAN MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT

Minimum Documentation Fiche composed by national/regional working party of: Docomomo, Italy

Burnetts Assured Shorthold Tenant Eviction Scheme

Return of the single end? back to the future for UK social policy

CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT

roberto verdelli architetto

EXHIBIT LIST No Exhibit Name Page 1 P7 Compensation Presentation.pdf (P7) 2-47

Promoter s Introduction to Land Compensation. Colin Smith FRICS

Problems of land consolidation in the Republic of Moldova. Stefan Calancea Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry

Rural Land Market in Armenia: Formation Peculiarities and Development Trends

NORTH LEEDS MATTER 2. Response to Leeds Sites and Allocations DPD Examination Inspector s Questions. August 2017

Cadastral data, a case of role repositioning. Alberto Donis

Strata Plan Fast Facts

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

What are Urban Landuse Zones?

Update: Directions 2031 and Beyond

Re-vamping land usage to Meet Updated Needs

Minimum Documentation Fiche composed by regional working party of LOMBARDIA, Italy

PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

SUBDIVISION DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

FIRM ARTICLE ITALIAN LAW ON REAL ESTATE. Real estate matters are fundamentally regulated by the Civil Code.

Official Community Plan (OCP) LAND USE HANDBOOK

Kidbrooke Village, Greenwich

apply sustainability principles to all residential developments in Ardee;

The Società degli Ingegneri e degli Architetti di Torino, or SIAT, ranks among the oldest Italian associations still active today.

Initial Project Review

Land Acquisition and Property

The Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland 1

Letting out your property

Experience in Innovative Technologies Application to Change Urban Space for Sustainable Territory Development

F O R S A L E F R E E H O L D

MAKING THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF LAND

THE BLUFFS AT CYPRESS CREEK SUBDIVISION

HOUSING NEED SURVEY 2017

Laying the Foundations

A Guide to Developing an Inclusionary Housing Program

Briefing: Rent reductions

Land Reform Act. Passed RT 1991, 34, 426 Entry into force

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

TIMOR-LESTE EXPROPRIATIONS LEGAL FRAMEWORK APPROVED

Potsdam-Kirchsteigfeld

Groupe d Etudes UTILISATEURS WAGONS Studiengruppe WAGENVERWENDER Study Group WAGON USERS

Resettlement Policy Framework

3 November rd QUARTER FNB SEGMENT HOUSE PRICE REVIEW. Affordability of housing

ROLE OF SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL HOUSING. Section 26 of the Constitution enshrines the right to housing as follows:

The Characteristics of Land Readjustment Systems in Japan, Thailand, and Mongolia and an Evaluation of the Applicability to Developing Countries

How do I Object to Flats and Apartments in my Area?

Milano Farini Rail Yard

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Mass Valuation and the Implementation Necessity of GIS (Geographic Information System) in Albania

Comparative Housing Market Analysis: Minnetonka and Surrounding Communities

Institutional design of irrigation and rural development projects and management in Japan

Heathrow Expansion. Land Acquisition and Compensation Policies. Interim Property Hardship Scheme. Policy Terms

State Highway Revocation: Policy and Guidance

4.13 Population and Housing

CHAPTER 50 LAND USE ZONES ARTICLE 50 BASIC PROVISIONS

Response to the London Mayor s Good Practice Guide on Estate Regeneration

Consider retention of existing low-rise family housing where this does not prevent the achievement of wider regeneration objectives

Decree on State Land Lease or Concession

Urban Land Supply, Real Resource Constraint or Man Made Shortage? World Bank March 9 10, 2009 Washington DC

Vietnam Land Administration - the Past, Recent and for the Future

Letting out your property

Planning Procedure for L Association Fonciere Urbaine Autorisee (Registered Land Urban Association)

United States Post Office and Multi-Family Residential; and, Single- Family Residence with an Apartment

Behavioral Impact of the Financing Collection Mechanism on Accessibility:! Two Cases from Chinese Cities

Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW. Title: CA//16/02739/FUL. Author: Planning and Regeneration.

4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report

Renting Homes (Wales) Bill

Response: Greater flexibilities for change of use

York Chester Historic District. Established 1988

FENCES BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

q/., S Lt _ _.._--.

AHURI Research & Policy Bulletin

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE URBAN GROWTH ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as UGZ12. Kororoit Precinct Structure Plan

Configuring Service Charge Settlement in Flexible Real Estate Management (RE FX)

Residential Management Regulations. tenants information

1 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

WEST MELBOURNE URBIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET OUTLOOK

CHAPTER 4 IMPACT FEES

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

Funding Auckland s greenfield infrastructure

AT Land Adjacent to Tollgate Cottage, Broughton Grounds Lane, Milton Keynes. Parish: Broughton & Milton Keynes Parish Council

LAW ON EXPROPRIATION (Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro, No 55/00, 12/02, 28/06)

Transcription:

POLYTECHNIC OF TORINO FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE 2 Degree in Architecture Honors theses Excise duty fences in Turin by Alessandro Ravina Tutor: Giovanni Maria Lupo The establishment of the excise duty fence in 1853 was a consequence of the Charter of Carlo Alberto of 1848. This Charter referred to executive laws as for several regulations: the law of October 7 th, 1848, concerning Municipal Administrations, made it possible for the town the excise duty collection. That way Turin and the other towns were put on the same footing. pic. 1: Edoardo PECCO (Head of the Civico Ufficio d Arte), Pianta Regolare della Città di Torino, suoi Borghi e Adiacenze, compilata per cura del Municipio sulla scala della mappa territoriale, Progetto della Cinta Daziaria, Turin, August 1 st, 1853 (Historical Record Office of the City of Turin, Royal Decrees, 1849-1863, series 1K, no. 11, f. 106)

The new excise duty fence had to be suitable for the enlargement of the capital of the Kingdom of Sardinia and, in the meanwhile, wide enough to involve a considerable part of the population, until then duty-free because living in the suburbs of the town, in the new administrative provision. The orography of the municipal territory and the historical settlement of the town characterized the plan and the development of the fence. The excise duty line followed the streets and was delimited by waterways and town walls. The part of the wall about 12 Km long on the flat area on the left side of the river Po was decreed on August 1 st, 1853 (see pic. 1) as public utility, with the approval of the project signed by Edoardo Pecco, chief engineer of the town. The project presented a wall with a moat and inner streets for the rounds and outer circle line, with a clear military connotation. The construction of the wall was started at once and ended by 1860. pic. 2: Edoardo PECCO (Head of the Civico Ufficio d Arte), Piano Generale dell andamento della Cinta Daziaria di Torino sulla sponda destra del Po secondo il progetto del Sott. in data 26 Aprile colla modificazione approvata dal Consiglio Delegato in sua seduta 3 Agosto 1853, Turin, November 13 th, 1853, (Historical Record Office of the City of Turin, Royal Decrees, 1849-1863, series 1K, no. 11, f. 112) The part of wall about 4,5 Km long on the hilly area on the right side of the river Po was decreed on November 13 th, 1853 (see pic: 2) as public utility, with the approval of the project signed by Edoardo Pecco again. Due to the particular orographic conditions of that part of territory, the Municipal Administration decided to build a wall without moat, which followed the orographic characteristics of the site and joined the walls of the villas nearby. The construction of this part of the wall was started up only in the eighties of XIX century, with principles totally different from the excise duty fence on the left side of the river Po: iron railings with internal and external ring roads. The entrances to the town, called barriers, were located on the intersections between the tollgate line and the suburban and regional connection roads. The barriers were constituted by a free space (variably shaped) suitable to allow the temporary stop of the goods waiting to be paid for. Outside the fence, along the barriers and the main street axis of the town, suburban villages rose and developed.

This fact caused a considerable difference between inner and outer town. In the municipal area of Turin, this difference showed itself at several levels: from the tax system to the regulations of the town-planning scheme. In fact, while strict controls were exercised over area plans for building in the inner towns town-planning and extension schemes, sanitary, building and decoration regulations, there was an almost total absence of control systems over the building regulations in the outer towns. Later on, regulations were applied along the street axis leading to the town, together with rules over expropriation for public utilities. The Regolamento per l ornato e la polizia edilizia della Città di Torino (1862) ruled the town-planning scheme in the polygonal urban area. The area included between the fragmentary line and the excise duty fence was conceived according to the leitmotiv of the extension of the city of Turin: the integrated addition principle, always adopting the orthogonal street network, while outside the city limits, small urban centres grew around the fence and the street network was built around the rural infrastructures. Such suburban centres grew without rules. The Piano regolatore pel prolungamento dei corsi e vie principali fuori la Cinta Daziaria della città di Torino (1887) was a planning scheme decreed for the areas outside the fence: they were new regulations aiming to control the sub-urban building activity. The plan included several street extensions and the widening of the regulations of 1862 about the main streets axis along and out of the excise duty fence. That prescriptive agreement strictly fixed the building development along the main rural lines of communication leaving the land around without regulations. The Piano regolatore per la regione di San Paolo (1898-1901) was the only planning scheme designed between XIX and XX century to be approved ad adopted by the legal authority. The scheme concerned a vast area outside the fence, west of the town, was late in stopping the growing disorder of a difficult urban situation, whose development depended for the most part on the adjacent railway yards, present in the area from the beginning of the eighties of XIX century. The scheme seemed to find an agreement between a past street model (widening of the town historical axis, street parallelisms and so on) and a new model for a town which was no longer a central town but was becoming a peripheral town (wide blocks of houses, radial streets, squares as street junctions, concentric ring roads). The plan suggested wide blocks, whose expanse depended on the industrial location: in case this proposal had not been successful, the blocks would have been divided into lots to create residential neighbourhoods with private roads. The fences were strictly connected to the planned routes of the old roads as town accesses: they played a morphogenetical role in relation to the urban shape outside the fence. The Piano Unico Regolatore e d Ampliamento della Città di Torino (1906-1908) concerning the whole town, was made feasible on April 5 th, 1908, with the special law no. 141. The plan ratified the development criteria and the assembly schemes previously and that were expired or expiring. The plan, late in respecting the building process already carried out in the town, linked up with town-planning schemes of 1887 and 1901. In particular, it borrowed the extension plan outside the fence, regarding the primary accesses to the town, from the plan of 1887, and the extension plan for wide areas from the plan of 1898-1901.

Among the salient points of the town-planning scheme of 1906-1908 we must point out the official record of the villages connected to the barriers of the first fence; the extension, where possible, of the main street axis of the town; a new road network considering the existing rural road network but essentially based on new ring roads, with a planimetric course tuned to the course of the first excise duty fence of 1853 (wide ring roads following the curvilinear course of the fence and connecting the existing rural villages); wide blocks incorporating the existing villages and urban conglomerations (to cut the expropriations which caused demolitions and to house industrial settlements). With the above-mentioned special law, the town got the extension of the excise duty fence, necessary by then to bear the heavy expenses for the infrastructure public works. The territorial limits fixed by the plan corresponded to a hinterland line, that should have become the new excise duty fence and should have been realized since 1909. But every decision was postponed. Not only: it was an unpopular project, thwarted by socialists in the Town Council and by the categories of industrialists and tradespeople, that brought the mayor Secondo Frola and his administrative board to resignations. Nevertheless, the town still presents deep signs of the line projected by the plan of 1906-1908. pic. 3: Torino e dintorni, Torino, Tip. e Lit. Checchini, 1914, in Città di Torino, Relazione circa l allargamento della cinta daziaria di Torino, Torino, Tip. e Lit. Checchini, 1914, first enclosure (Archivio Storico della Città di Torino, Miscellanea, Lavori Pubblici, Poste, Telegrafi, Telefoni, no. 582)

The main streets, concentric ring roads in relation to the excise duty fence of 1853 on the municipal territory on the left side of river Po, were built as well during the following decades, because the route at issue was reconfirmed by the subsequent town-planning schemes. The enlargement of the fence was ratified on June 23 rd 1912, with a special law, no. 621. The reasons for such new enlargement were the bad financial conditions of the Municipality and the need to include in the fence the new villages growing outside the fence. The new route of 1912 (see pic. 3) coincided in part with the municipal boundaries and measured about 34 Km. The fence on the flat area had a carriageable double ring road and was in part a brickwork (about 14 Km) and in part build out of reinforced concrete (about 5 Km). On the hilly territory right of the Po river the new fence was temporary and only where possible. Consequently to the enlargement, the XIX century fence was dismissed. The route of the excise duty infrastructure of 1853 left a deep mark on the urban territory. On the empty place a series of circularly linked main streets were carried out. The fence of 1912 imposed a strong shift of the excise duty fence mark (particularly westwards and southwards); in the meanwhile, the regulations of the plan scheme of 1906-1908 were extended up to the new excise duty limit. To be approved, the fence of 1912 had to include necessarily an area plan for building: as a consequence, in 1913, the municipal administration charged the Civico Servizio Tecnico of the Public Works with the study of a coordination and integration plan for the plan of 1906-1908, in relation to the new line of the fence. The excise duty fence of 1912, the Piano Regolatore e di Ampliamento della parte pianeggiante a sinistra del fiume Po e alla destra dello stesso sino alla nuova cinta daziaria della Città di Torino (1913-1920), the Piano Edilizio Regolatore e di Ampliamento di parte della zona di territorio collinare della Città di Torino (1913-1918), and the following versions and relevant planimetries fixed the elements the town was based on until the Piano Regolatore Generale Comunale della Città di Torino of 1959. The excise duty fence of 1912 was abolished in 1930, as a consequence of the new law, which turned the national territory in a closed commune. As it had happened in the past around the abolished fences, several streets with a ring route, concentric respect to the excise duty fence of 1853, were built on this line, leaving a sign on the urban territory. For further information, e-mail: Alessandro Ravina: alessandro.ravina@virgilio.it Maintained by: CISDA - HypArc, e-mail: hyparc@polito.it