East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) HCP/NCCP Application Process.

Similar documents
Chapter HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN / NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE

IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT. for the EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN/ NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN.

MEMORANDUM. Current Development Fees

CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES

Yolo Habitat Conservancy County of Yolo City of Davis City of Winters City of West Sacramento City of Woodland University of California, Davis

East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association

South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Study

CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES

Introduction to INRMP Implementation Options

CITY OF WINTERS HABITAT MITIGATION PROGRAM

Georgia Conservation Tax Credit Program Frequently Asked Questions

The Maryland Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat Conservation Program

A. Maintenance. All legally established, nonconforming structures can be maintained (e.g., painting and repairs);

9.2 Cost to Implement the Habitat Plan

APPLICATION. Telephone Fax Address. Telephone Fax Address FOR MARTIN COUNTY USE ONLY

East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association

Honolulu District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Mitigation and Conservation Banking

M EMORANDUM LAND VALUE ESTIMATES

Biodiversity Planning Policy and Guidelines for (LEP) Rezoning Proposals

Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Acquisition Selection for the Colorado Wildlife Habitat Protection Program

OF THE. A Report to. The County of Placer. Prepared by Hausrath Economics Group. December 2018

SPECIFIC RESPONSES TO AREA COMMISSION OPPOSITION :

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WA0-0089

TOWN OF BRASELTON, GEORGIA STREAM BUFFER AND SETBACK VARIANCE APPLICATION

Land Use Application

APRIL 30, ILL. ADM. CODE 2580 CH. I, SEC. 2580

Conservation Easement Stewardship

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

County and related Memorandum of Understanding MOU

Claudia Stuart, Williamson Act Program Manager and Nick Hernandez, Planning Intern

Savannah District. Regulatory Program. reg199.ppt 1

Yolo County Habitat/Natural Community Conservation Plan Joint Powers Agency

How Mitigation Banks and ILF Programs Can Help Conservation

Thurston County Planning Department BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS. Chapter 24.

OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. Reflections on the Value of Acquiring Property for Preservation Purposes

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Chapter SWAINSON S HAWK IMPACT MITIGATION FEES

Town of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District

Thurston County Planning Department PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT. AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS Chapter /18/2011 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Conservation Design Subdivision Option

CONSERVATION EASEMENT INCLUDING MITIGATION

Antelope Ridge Wind Farm Habitat Mitigation Plan November 2011

Purpose: Regulations:

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Application Packet

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

Creek Rehabilitation Plan for Apple Valley Questions and Answers from the Pre-Bid Meeting and Site Visit 06/23/2016

The Maryland Rural Legacy and CREP Easement Programs

VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

Environmental Credit Offsets: Not Just for Wetlands Transportation Engineers Association of Missouri

113,923,000. Article 1 Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

OPEN SPACE & RECREATION PLAN

Skamania County Community Development Department

LAND USE APPLICATION

Tiered Environmental Review Format (2017)

Strategic Growth Council: Identifying Infill Barriers

LIVING LANDS BIODIVERSITY GRANTS: INFORMATION AND APPLICATION. Due: January 16, 2009

SADC Guidance Document Farmland Preservation: Frequently Asked Questions

FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. GRANT PROGRAM: Endangered Species Act Section 6 Recovery Land Acquisition

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Resource Protection Area Map Update - Frequently Asked Questions

A. General Information

Validation Checklist. Date submitted: How to use this check-list. Ecosystem Credit Accounting System. Version 1.1&2. Project Information

Application: DVP Owner: Pillar West Developments Inc. Address: 4646 McClure Rd Applicant: Integrity Services Inc.

A. General Information

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. City of Santa Ana

R E S O L U T I O N. a. Remove Table B from the plan.

Final South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan 12 ECONOMICS ANALYSIS AND FUNDING PROGRAM

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

A Comparison of Swainson s Hawk Conservation Easements. County of Sacramento City of Elk Grove. Summary Report

Draft South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan 12 ECONOMICS ANALYSIS AND FUNDING PROGRAM

Special Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist. Property Address:

YMCA Property Discussion. City Council Study Session April 10,

AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAND CONSERVATION AND RESILIENCE. THE ELIZABETH RIVER S URBAN LAND TRUST

Implementation Tools for Local Government

Article 3 - Rural Districts

WHY ARE WE UPDATING THE RURAL AREA LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS)?

Transfer of Development Rights. February 13, 2017

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE

Taking on the Long-Term Stewardship of Wetland Mitigation Sites

Sample Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) Annotated Template for Environmentally Important Land

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

Rezoning Staff Report St. Croix County Community Development Committee Gerald & Joan Mellgren Hearing Date: July 16, 2015

Bandera Corridor Conservation Bank: a conservation story

Ensures that all perennial streams and connected wetland are identified and protected for projects that disturb more than 2,500 sf of land.

Staff Report for Town Council

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

Comprehensive Plan 2030

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

6. Other Matters of Business: Information/Discussion a SJMSCP Development Fees b. SJ County Agricultural Building Permit Process

Subdivision (Plat) Checklist

Joint Public Notice. US Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

SAULT STE. MARIE NORTH PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR A CONSENT TO CREATE NEW LOTS

RECITALS. B. WHEREAS, Ranch, its successors and assigns, are referred to in the Easement as the Grantor ; and

REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTENT. Maine Natural Resource Conservation Program Letter of Intent Package. June The Nature Conservancy in Maine

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

Transcription:

East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) HCP/NCCP Application Process January 9, 2008 John Kopchik (Contra Costa County) and David Zippin (Jones & Stokes) 925-335-1227; jkopc@cd.cccounty.us www.cocohcp.org Topics Application process overview Who does what? Implementing ordinances Application form & planning survey Frequently Asked Questions Case studies

Application Process 1. Project proponent applies for take coverage under City/ County s permit using HCP/NCCP application form and planning survey report 2. City or County reviews application for completeness and verifies required fees 3. City or County conditions project with applicable requirements of HCP/NCCP 4. Project proponent pays fees before or at grading permit (at first construction permit if no grading permit) 5. Project proponent conducts any required pre-construction monitoring and construction monitoring Who Does What? Roles for Processing HCP/NCCP Applications Applicant responsibilities Conduct planning survey Incorporate relevant HCP/NCCP conditions into project design Complete and submit HCP/NCCP application and planning survey report to City or County Pay fees Conduct pre-construction monitoring, if applicable Conduct construction monitoring, if applicable

Who Does What? Roles for Processing HCP/NCCP Applications Cities and County responsibilities Receive and review applications for HCP/NCCP coverage Determine and collect fees Prepare application material for own projects Conservancy responsibilities Provide general information to public through web site Provide technical assistance to Cities, County Calculate HCP/NCCP fees each year Evaluate special cases Implementing Ordinances Cities and the County have each adopted Ordinances that implement the HCP/NCCP. Brentwood, Clayton and County Ordinances take effect January 15, 2008. Oakley and Pittsburg Ordinances take effect January 18, 2008. Ordinances establish the various HCP fees, set the application process, require that projects be conditioned consistent with the HCP and define applicability. Ordinances are relatively short and often reference the approved HCP/NCCP.

Planning Survey Field survey required to document specific conditions Land cover types and acreage Covered and no-take plant populations Sign of certain wildlife species such as burrowing owl, kit fox Planning Survey Report required to document field survey, determine fees and determine which avoidance measures needed for conditions of approval Planning survey report template Tool to ensure information is complete and consistent Will be available as click-and-fill Word Template on HCP/NCCP web site (www.cocohcp.org) Preparers given specific instructions to follow Frequently Asked Questions Which projects does the HCP apply to? What are the fees and how are they calculated? Are development fees charged for the entire parcel? The project site now appears very disturbed; can the fees be reduced? How will fees change over time? Can applicants provide land or restoration in lieu of fees? Can applicants pay early? Pay late?

Frequently Asked Questions Do the results of the planning surveys or construction monitoring affect the project or the fees? Which provisions may affect the project footprint? Which provisions may affect project timing? How will the HCP affect the CEQA process? How will wetlands permits interact with the HCP? Which projects does the HCP apply to? HCP applies to all development projects inside City Limits or County ULL except: Parcels less than 1 acre Projects that occur entirely on land mapped by the HCP as urban, turf, landfill or aqueduct land cover types Projects with various types of vested rights (see Ordinances for details) Projects of a type not covered by the HCP (most everything is covered but activities like windfarms are not). See end of Chapter 2 for activities not covered. Projects where application of the HCP would result in a taking of land

What are the fees and how are they calculated? Two types of fees will apply to projects in City Limits or the County ULL: 1. Development Fee: varies by zone (3 tiers) applies generally to entire parcel area used to buy and operate off-site preserve land 2. Wetland Fee: varies by type of wetland to be filled applies to the wet area only is in addition to the development fee used to restore or create wetlands off-site in the preserve Development Fee Amounts Zone III (Infill<10 acres) $6,229 per acre Zone I (ag lands) $12,457 per acre Zone II (natural lands) $24,913 per acre

Wetland Mitigation Fees Land Cover Type Riparian woodland/scrub Perennial wetlands Seasonal wetland Alkali wetland Ponds Aquatic (open water) Slough/channel Streams 25 feet wide or less Streams greater than 25 feet wide Fee per unit of Impact $60,004/acre $82,111/acre $177,908/acre $168,433/acre $89,480/acre $45,266/acre $102,113/acre $489/linear foot $737/linear foot Are development fees charged for the entire parcel? (Can I count the golf course as conservation?) (NO!) Answer: Yes, generally fees will be calculated based on the entire area of the development parcel. HCP requires the development fee be charged over the acreage of land permanently disturbed (p. 9-17): Acreage of land permanently disturbed is broadly defined in this section to include all areas removed from an undeveloped or habitat-providing state and includes land in the same parcel or project that is not developed, graded, physically altered or directly affected in any way but is isolated from natural areas by the covered activity. As further described below, unless such undeveloped land is dedicated to the Preserve System or is a deed-restricted creek setback, the development fee will apply. The development fees were calculated with the assumption that all undeveloped areas within a parcel (e.g., fragments of undisturbed open space within a residential development) would be charged a fee; the fee per acre would have been higher had this assumption not been made. Lands inside the UDA and mapped as urban, turf, landfill, or aqueduct land cover types in the HCP/NCCP will not be assessed the development fee.

The project site now appears very disturbed, can the fees be reduced? No. The HCP fees are based on conditions at the time the plan was approved. The HCP development fees are tiered by zone to reflect broad differences in habitat and open space value. The HCP was designed to provide a relatively level playing field in terms of fees. Setting the fee in this way also removes incentives for applicants to degrade the resources on their property before applying. How will fees change over time? Here s the formula: Fee n = [[L n -1*(HPI n-1 /HPI n-2 )]+[(S n-1 *(CPI n-1 /CP In-2 )]]*Z Actually. Development fee will be adjusted annually based on a combination of a home price index (~2/3) and a consumer price index (~1/3). Wetland mitigation fee will be adjusted annually based on a consumer price index.

Can applicants provide land or restoration in lieu of fees? Yes, if approved by Conservancy. Can applicants pay early? Pay late? Yes and Yes (under certain conditions; see p. 9-31) Which provisions may affect project timing? None, if planning surveys conducted far enough in advance Do the results of the planning surveys or construction monitoring affect the project or the fees? Generally No. Survey results only affect wetland fee. Which provisions may affect project footprint? Stream setback provisions, mainly. But also no-take plant provisions, some wetland provisions, fuel buffer provisions and a few others.

How will the HCP affect the CEQA process? - HCP surveys will usually completely overlap with those performed for CEQA. - Report prepared in 2008 will document benefit of HCP/NCCP for all special-status species - HCP will streamline CEQA for biology How will wetlands permits interact with the HCP? - Wetland permit requirements should mostly (or entirely) overlap with mitigation for HCP/NCCP - Simple Sect. 7 consultation between Corps and FWS - Regional wetland permits still being pursued to provide additional streamlining Review HCP/NCCP Application and Planning Survey Template

On to case studies! GENERAL PROCESS