HIGHLANDS TDR PROGRAM

Similar documents
Highlands Development Credit Bank Meeting. May 6, 2010

2016 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution , the activities of the Bank must be guided by the Highlands Regional Master Plan; and

Land Preservation in the Highlands Region

2018 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Module 3: December 8, 2009 Submission To the New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

ORDINANCE NO OA

Public Comments and Staff Responses regarding Highlands TDR Program Deeds of Easement April 23, 2010

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Practice

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) ORDINANCE Revised November 2013

Re: Preliminary Draft of the Technical Report on the Transfer of Development Rights

Transfer of Development Rights:

Updating the Housing Element Planning for your Community s Future

Teton County & Town of Jackson TDR Feasibility Assessment Findings and Recommendations

PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CASE STUDIES

CHAIRMAN WOLPERT AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND URBAN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE

Transfer Development Rights

FRUITA/MESA COUNTY TDR/C PROGRAM. October 2005

Density Transfer Credits. A workable approach to TDR for New Hampshire

A Transferable Development Rights Program for Land Preservation

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

(Draft Glenville ordinance, June 2008) ARTICLE XXII Transfer of Development Rights

The Greater Pine Island Transferable Development Rights Program

TOWN OF PELHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

Introduction to West Milford

ST. TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE TO CREATE A NEW SECTION OF THE PARISH CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.

2011 AICP Review Course

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

1. an RSF-R, RSF-1, RSF-2, RSF-4, RMF-5, or RMF-8 zoning district; or

Working Lands Initiative

A TDR Program for Naples. May 11, 2007

Comparison of Highlands Plan Conformance versus Non-Conformance for Oakland s Highlands Planning Area

During the time devoted to this course, we will talk about the following matters.

Affordable Land Preservation Tools: Contiguous & Noncontiguous Clustering

TABLE OF CONTENTS I OVERLAY ZONING...1 FLOATING ZONES...3 III CLUSTER ZONING...5 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT...8 INCENTIVE ZONING...

BOROUGH OF CALIFON Hunterdon County, New Jersey

The Economic Benefits of Historic Preservation Designation

Affordable Housing Bonus Program. Public Questions and Answers - #2. January 26, 2016

Transfer Development Rights

City of Bellingham Redevelopment Incentive Recommendations at a Glance

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Adoption of Transferable Development Rights Land Development

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center

HIGHLANDS TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM DEED OF EASEMENT (For Non-Agricultural Property with Bonus Highlands Development Credit Allocation)

Analysis of Infill Development Potential Under the Green Line TOD Ordinance

Transfer Development Rights. Roy Kraynyk VP Land Protection & Capital Projects

BURGIS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Public Hearing. Green Township Petition for Plan Conformance

Instructions: Script:

Flexibility in the Law: Reengineering of Zoning to Prevent Fragmented Landscapes

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

A STUDY OF TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) IN THURSTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Funding Auckland s greenfield infrastructure

Module 3: December 8, 2009 Submission To the New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council

The Status of TDR Implementation in New Jersey

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

Summary of Key Issues from Skagit County TDR Focus Group Meetings January 7, 2014

RHODE ISLAND HOUSING Application for Letter of Eligibility

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Transfer of Development Rights

6-6 Livermore Development Code

Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

Council and Town Council Crests. Proposed Amendments to Draft Mayo Housing Strategy 2008

There are a number of resources available to help you begin to

Results Population Characteristics of Highlands Region s Municipalities

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

Transfer of Development Rights Bylaw/Ordinance for Towns in Barnstable County, Massachusetts

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center

FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

American Planning Association's Smart Codes: Model Land-Development Regulations 4.4 MODEL AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS ORDINANCE

Inclusionary Housing. The what, where, when, and how of affordable housing choices

GPR STANDING ADVOCACY and PUBLIC POLICY POSITIONS


TDR RULES AND PROCEDURES TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) PROGRAM

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS IN NEW JERSEY A BACKGROUND PAPER

THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) PROGRAM

Town of North Topsail Beach

City Council Study Session Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 S Meridian, Puyallup Tuesday, February 5, :30 PM

Section Intent

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Elk Grove Residential Assessment Narrative April 16th, 2019

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review. Discussion Paper: Second Residential Units. Prepared for: The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

Preserving Rural Landscapes Using Transferable Development Rights and Other Open Land Preservation Tools. December Alberta, Canada

Public Hearing. Lebanon Borough Petition for Plan Conformance

Transferable Development Rights Edmonton, Alberta

ARTICLE VII TDR. 701 Purpose.

August 17, 2012 Final Report TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM MARKET STUDY FOR THE CITY OF TACOMA

(1) At least ten percent of the total units are designated for low income households.

ARTICLE III: DENSITY AND INTENSITY

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Evanston Residential Assessment Narrative Updated: April 8 th, 2019

Ind AS 115 Impact on the real estate sector and construction companies

The Honourable Peter Milczyn Minister of Housing/Minister Responsible for the Poverty Reduction Strategy College Park, 17th Floor

TOWN OF BALLSTON WORKSHOP SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES

A Resource Guide to Designing Transfer of Development Rights Programs in Washington State

New Jersey Highlands Council Housing Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Summary 20 July 2005

Transcription:

HIGHLANDS TDR PROGRAM HDC Bank Board Meeting April 2, 2009

Highlands TDR Program The Highlands TDR Program is a regional program that permits the transfer of development rights, termed Highlands Development Credits (HDCs), to further the goals of the Highlands Act. A community may utilize market forces to encourage the transfer of development potential from areas that the community wants to preserve, called Sending Zones, to areas that are more appropriate to accommodate increased growth, called Receiving Zones. Landowners in the Sending Zones receive HDCs for the development limitations placed on their property, which they may later sell. HDCs purchased to build in a Receiving Zone allow for development at a density or intensity greater than that otherwise permitted in the underlying zoning. Receiving Zones under the Highlands Act are voluntary.

Highlands TDR Program Five main components: Sending Zones Receiving Zones Allocation of Highlands Development Credits Initial HDC Value Highlands Development Credit Bank

Sending Zones Under the goals, policies and objectives of the TDR Program, the following lands are eligible to serve as Sending Zones: All lands located within the Preservation Area except for those located in the Existing Community Zone or approved Highlands Redevelopment Areas; and Upon municipal conformance, all lands located within the Planning Area except for those located in the Existing Community Zone or approved Highlands Redevelopment Areas. In addition, the parcel of land for which an allocation is sought must be at least 5 acres in size or have lost at least three development opportunities. Even where these thresholds are met, it is still possible for a parcel not to receive an HDC allocation due to pre-highlands Act environmental constraints and/or the effect of municipal zoning and development regulations.

Receiving Zones

Receiving Zones Under the goals, policies and objectives of the Highlands TDR Program, the following lands are eligible to serve as Receiving Zones upon approval of the Highlands Council: Lands located in the Existing Community Zone; Lands located with a Highlands Redevelopment Area designated by the Highlands Council; Lands located within the Conservation Zone provided that designating a Receiving Zone is consistent with the RMP and the development does not conflict with the maintenance of viable agriculture; and Lands located within a municipality outside of the Highlands Region but within the seven Highlands counties. 5 municipalities undertaking TDR Receiving Zone Feasibility Grant studies; several other municipalities have expressed interest in submitting grant applications.

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Residential allocation method accounts for 3 important questions: Where is the property located? How many acres is the property? What is the applicable zoning?

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Residential allocation method has 3 components: Net Yield How many lots could be sited on parcel given pre-highlands Act environmental constraints and municipal development regulations Location Factor Adjustment that accounts for relative differences in land value for similarly zoned properties across Highlands municipalities Zoning Factor Adjustment that accounts for relative differences in land value due to applicable zoning (i.e. land value for homes zoned 1 unit per 5 acres different from that zoned 1 unit per ½ acre)

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Sample Allocation of HDCs to Residentially Zoned Parcel Municipality Zoning Parcel Size (Acres) Net Yield (Potential Lots) Location Factor Zoning Factor HDC Allocation West Milford 2 acre lots 12 6 1.44 1.00 8.64 Where is property located?

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Sample Allocation of HDCs to Residentially Zoned Parcel Municipality Zoning Parcel Size (Acres) Net Yield (Potential Lots) Location Factor Zoning Factor HDC Allocation West Milford 2 acre lots 12 6 1.44 1.00 8.64 How many acres is parcel?

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Sample Allocation of HDCs to Residentially Zoned Parcel Municipality Zoning Parcel Size (Acres) Net Yield (Potential Lots) Location Factor Zoning Factor HDC Allocation West Milford 2 acre lots 12 6 1.44 1.00 8.64 What is the zoning?

Allocation of HDCs - Residential Sample Residential Allocation Calculations Parcel Example Municipality Zoning Parcel Size (Acres) Net Yield (Potential Lots) Applicable ZF (see Appendix A) Applicable LF (see Appendic es B & C) HDC Allocation Value of HDC Allocation* HDC Value Per Lot HDC Value Per Acre A Chester Twp 3 acre lots 20 6 1.37 3.23 26.55 $ 424,809.60 $ 70,801.60 $ 21,240.48 B Bethlehem 3 acre lots 16 5 1.37 1.45 9.93 $ 158,920.00 $ 31,784.00 $ 13,243.33 C Tewksbury 12 acre lots 84 7 2.44 9.07 154.92 $ 2,478,649.60 $ 354,092.80 $ 34,425.69 D West Milford 2 acre lots 12 6 1.00 1.44 8.64 $ 138,240.00 $ 23,040.00 $ 11,520.00 Chester Twp (5 acres of E wetlands) 3 acre lots 20 6.25 1.37 3.23 27.66 $ 442,510.00 $ 70,801.60 $ 22,125.50 Examples A through D assume no pre-highlands Act environmental constraints Example E assumes that property located in High Value Conservation Priority Area * HDC Price = $16,000 per HDC

Allocation of HDCs Non-Residential Non-residential allocation method accounts for 3 important questions: How many acres is the property? What is the applicable zoning? What type of non-residential development can be constructed on the property?

Allocation of HDCs Non-Residential (Permitted Square Footage) (Non-Residential SF for Specified Use) = HDC Allocation Use $/SF FAR Range Average $/SF Ratio Industrial $10 - $20 FAR $15/SF 1.0 Office $20 - $40 FAR $30/SF 2.0 Retail $25 - $60 FAR $42.50/SF 2.83 A conversion factor is applied based on the type of non-residential use. Industrial uses tend to support employees at a ratio of 1 per 1,500 SF. This becomes the basis for establishing the conversion factors to account for value/price variations in the end use. Consequently, HDCs are allocated to the above uses at the following square foot intervals: Industrial Use = (1,500/1 = 1,500) Office Use = (1,500/2 = 750) Retail Use = (1,500/2.83 = 530) = 1,500 SF = 750 SF = 530 SF Thus, an allocation of HDCs to an undeveloped lot zoned for non-residential use would be as follows: 10,000 SF industrial building 1,500 SF = 7 HDCs 10,000 SF office building 750 SF = 13 HDCs 10,000 SF retail building 530 SF = 19 HDCs

Initial HDC Price Assessment Under Highlands Act section 13.h, Highlands Council charged with establishing the initial value of a development right. Establishing initial value requires balancing of two critical interests: HDC price must be sufficient for sending zone landowners to realize an economic return on sale of HDCs; HDC price cannot be so great that it reduces a developer s profit to such an extent that it renders a receiving zone development project uneconomical. Overtime, value of HDCs will increase as more opportunities to use credits arise.

Initial HDC Price Assessment Fundamental principle underlying any TDR program is that, for each additional unit on a given lot, the increase is revenues is greater than increase in development costs. Main source of cost savings when building bonus units in a receiving zone is reduced land costs. Generally, the higher the permitted residential density or non-residential FAR, the lower the per unit land costs. Must account for developer s willingness to pay.

Initial HDC Price Assessment Methodology: Highlands Council sought to predict the added value of a lot where a fifth unit to the acre is added. Data set comprised of Class 2 MOD IV parcels that are residentially developed and cannot be further subdivided. Four mathematical functions used to predict added value of fifth lot. Reduced municipal per lot values by 30% because values reflect lots in an approved and improved condition. Adjustment of 75% applied to regional lot value to reflect developer s willingness to pay programs with mandatory receiving zones have applied a 50% adjustment for this factor.

Initial HDC Price Assessment Results: Regional lot value average is $64,657.25. Target HDC price of $16,164.31; Highlands Council rounded down to $16,000. Current average price per right in Pinelands PDC Program is $18,000. Prices have ranged from $2,500 per right to as high as $40,000 per right. Regional Plan Association and Environmental Defense Fund 2006 study of potential developer s willingness to pay for Highlands credits found that values ranged from $14,000 in Warren County to $108,000 in Bergen County.

Initial HDC Price Assessment Next Steps: HDC Bank will need to determine under what circumstances it will purchase HDCs to alleviate unique and extenuating financial circumstances (hardship cases), and what amount it will pay per HDC.