Texas Land Trust Conference March 6, 2015

Similar documents
Pipelines & Eminent Domain THE PROPOSED KINDER MORGAN PERMIAN HIGHWAY PIPELINE OCTOBER 29, 2018 JIM BRADBURY JAMES D.

EMINENT DOMAIN Educational Series

IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOU

Bill of Rights. Cities of 5,000 or more population; adoption or amendment of charter

Application Procedures for Easements or Rights of Way on City of Fort Collins Natural Areas and Conserved Lands March 2012

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY WETLAND CONSERVATION ORDINANCE OF 2002

Natural Gas Pipelines: The Role of Conservation Commissions MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS

EMINENT DOMAIN LANDOWNER GUIDE What Every Wisconsin Landowner Should Know

Welcome to the Easement Webinar Call-In Number for audio: Conference Code:

6. The entity proposing to take your property must make a good faith offer to buy the property before it files a lawsuit to condemn the property.

Authority of Commissioners Court

A Property Owner s Survival Guide to Eminent Domain. 10 Things You Must Know When the Government Wants Your Property

NEVADA EMINENT DOMAIN LAW AND PROCEDURES

25 Annual Water Law Conference Coronado, CA February 22-23, Fundamentals of Prior Appropriation Systems

Eminent Domain Law and Practice in Minnesota

Conservation Easement Stewardship

Senate Eminent Domain Bill SF 2750 As passed by the Senate. House Eminent Domain Bill HF 2846/SF 2750* As passed by the House.

Land Matters Regarding the Pipeline

LCRA BOARD POLICY 401 LAND RESOURCES. Sept. 21, 2016

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hatfield OPEN SPACE PROJECT GUIDELINES

Litigating Environmental Issues in Eminent Domain Matters: Issues To Consider and Pitfalls To Avoid

Introduction to INRMP Implementation Options

I. BACKGROUND. As one of the most rapidly developing states in the country, North Carolina is losing

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

Joseph B.C. Fitzsimons. Chase Currie, Ph.D. Blair Fitzsimons. Uhl, Fitzsimons, Jewett & Burton. Joint Venture. Land Trust

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PLAN OF SUBDIVISION or CONDOMINIUM DESCRIPTION Under Section 51 of the Planning Act

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

ACQUISITION. Real Property Acquisition For Kansas Highways, Roads, Streets and Bridges

Acquiring Real Property for Federal and Federal-Aid Programs and Projects

CHAPTER 352 COUNTY LAND PRESERVATION AND USE COMMISSIONS

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ACQUIRE AND GOOD FAITH OFFER

Notice of Intent Supplemental Form for Riverfront Area

LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE NATURAL RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION PACKET

As seen in the September issue of Michigan Lawyers Weekly THE DIMINUTION OF THE GOOD FAITH OFFER PROTECTIONS IN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS

What is a land trust? Their mission is to preserve land via conservation easements and/or acquisition.

Larimer County Planning Dept. Procedural Guide for 1041 PERMITS

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

APPENDIX C REAL ESTATE PLAN BOULEVARD RESACA, BROWNSVILLE, TX CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

Validation Checklist. Date submitted: How to use this check-list. Ecosystem Credit Accounting System. Version 1.1&2. Project Information

education conservation cooperation

Welcome! Sarpy Transmission Project. Public Hearing October 23, 2018

MODEL DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT-3 (PASPGP-3) DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR CONSERVATION

PROJECT SCORING GUIDANCE. Introduction: National Proiect Selection:

F R E QUENTLY AS K E D QUESTIONS

PUBLIC HEARING FM 2499 Section 4

Precondemnation Procedures: Acquiring Right of Way in a New World October 9, Presented by David Graeler and Brad Kuhn

OPEN-SPACE CONVERSION REQUEST

Right-of-Way and Easements for Electric Facility Construction

Disappearing Idaho Farmland:

BRISTOL CONSERVATION COMMISSION INLAND WETLANDS AGENCY FORM IW-1 (Application for a Wetlands Permit)

JANUARY 2016 MAMARONECK & SHELDRAKE RIVERS NEW YORK FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK APPENDIX E

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

(c:t\ol-_ Randall Doneen Environmental Review Planning Director

The Guadalupe Blanco River Trust and the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority: Creating and Then Working with a Non-Profit Conservation Partner

LEGAL PITFALLS OF RIGHT OF WAY : DELAYS IN ACQUISITION. Darby F. Venza, ROW Attorney

CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFYING SECTION 4(f) PROPERTIES

Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Conservation Act 2017 Annual Reporting Form

MEMORANDUM. Michael D. Minton, Esq., Brad R. Gould, Esq. and Richard I. Withers, Esq.

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Litigating A Public Infrastructure Eminent Domain Case

A Business Owner s Survival Guide to Eminent Domain. 10 Things You Must Know When the Government Wants to Condemn Property

Farmland and Open Space Preservation Purchase of Development Rights Program Frequently Asked Questions

A Guide to Water Supply Replacement and Subsidence Damage Repair

Railroad Permitting Issues. Matt Carroll Balch & Bingham, LLP Telephone:

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

Submittal of the Minutes from the March 9, 2011, April 5, 2011, and April 19, 2011 Cabinet Meetings.

RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RAP) BOOKLET THE 10 MINUTE MANAGER

WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY Cooperative Forest Legacy Program. Sample Conservation Easement

APPLICATION TO CONVERT BASE IRRIGATION GROUNDWATER CHANGE IN LAND USE

Texas Pipeline Easement Negotiation Checklist

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

Application for 1-d-1 (Open-Space) Agricultural Use Appraisal

NANTUCKET ISLANDS LAND BANK AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY Adopted by the vote of the Land Bank Commission on November 10, 2015

ZONING VARIANCES ADMINISTRATIVE

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

JAMES M. RAMSEY, JR., ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL APRIL 16, 2015 COMMISSIONER OF HIGHWAYS

PUBLIC HEARING. Loop 88 Segment 3 Thursday, October 12, 2017 Lubbock-Cooper Performing Arts Center at 6:00p.m. Date. Footer Text

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A PLAN OF SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM DESCRIPTION Under Section 51 of the Planning Act

Sign Permit Requirement Checklist

Some Points Re Perpetuity - Code and Regulations

COUNTY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

Appendix G. Non-Federal Letters of Support and Draft Real Estate Plan

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS. Public Policy Considerations for PRIVATE Land Management Harriet M. Hageman Hageman & Brighton, P.C.

New Requirements for Pipeline Projects James D. Bradbury, PLLC

( ) Ordinance. Environmental Resources Management

When Grandma's House Gets in the Way of Windmills

Balancing Property Rights, Energy Production And The Environment

TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Project History and Description of the Proposed Improvements Perry Steger, Steger & Bizzell Engineering, Inc.

Ordinance #68. Highlighted items in bold and underline font to be added. Highlighted items in strikethrough font to be removed.

(Continued on back of page)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

Paul M. Harden and D.R. Repass, Jacksonville, and Michael J. Korn of Korn & Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

Ohio State University Extension, 2120 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210

Evaluating and Processing Road and Utility Easement Proposals on Corps Lands and Flowage Easements

[PROPOSED REVISED] CHAPTER 16 LOS ANGELES COUNTY COURT RULES

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

o Completed o Not Completed o In Process o No Longer Applicable

WHEN A PUBLIC AGENCY IS INTERESTED IN ACQUIRING AN EASEMENT

Transcription:

Texas Land Trust Conference March 6, 2015 James D. Bradbury James D. Bradbury, PLLC Austin Fort Worth

An Overview

Unique area of law where the government can take private property Protected by the US Constitution Law has evolved to allow condemnation by private corporations Modern era has enabled the taking of property for a wide array of purposes The needs of growth and development have expanded the scope of private property takings

The federal government State of Texas City County Texas Department of Transportation Utilities School District Railroads Pipeline companies Hospitals Many others, no defined list yet

Taking must be for a public purpose. Highway Utility right of way (electricity, water, gas, cable) School Library Railroad track Oil and gas pipeline Sports Stadium Recreational and housing development? Groundwater for supply?

Rights are protected by the US Constitution and Texas Constitution These rights are addressed in statute; In essence, define how you will be paid. Also inverse condemnation, where there is a taking of your property by an act of government without a proceeding. Still entitled to value but you may have to file the suit The Taking is a forced deal between you and the government or condemnor; It s a sale to which you cannot say no. But you can say no to the price, value is your right. Landowner has little right to challenge the taking.

Photo by Keith Burgess-Jackson

All takings in Texas are governed by Chapter 21 of the Property Code Most transfers of property take place in a negotiation outside formal proceedings; But significant disadvantage to landowners Lawyers cost money, deceptive tactics, distraction, emotion and value is difficult Entity seeking to acquire property must negotiate in good faith for the value before filing any action If no result, may file an action in the county where the property is located No immediate notice to landowner Judge appoints three special commissioners (not lawyers) to set value

Prior to any formal proceedings, there exists a period of planning, initial contacts by condemnor, and negotiations. Involves visit from negotiation agent or landman to discuss scope of taking and payment. When negotiations start to become futile, landowner will receive a Last Offer letter. For highway condemnation, there will also be an appraisal. Appraisals are unlikely, however, for pipelines. Last Offer may actually be less than previous offers. If no response or agreement, condemnor will file an action in the county where the property is located.

After the condemnor files its action with the court, the judge will promptly appoint three commissioners to sit in a quick Special Commissioners Proceeding The Commissioners will select a time and place for a hearing on value (not on validity of taking) Then the landowner will get notice (usually 3-4 weeks) Have the right to object and replace a commissioner Entity seeking to acquire must provide appraisal with offer ahead of hearing Landowner has the same obligation in advance of hearing But landowner may testify to value without appraisal

Special Commissioners Hearing is short and reasonably informal Each side has the right to question any witness Commissioners will confer and make an award Either side may appeal to a jury trial on issue of value or possibly right to take (rare) Regardless of appeal, condemnor gets property Money is deposited with the court and may be withdrawn At the time money is deposited, property belongs to condemnor Costs can go either way-set by Commissioners By this point, landowner has lost the chance to avoid project, change route, or negotiate for additional provisions

Damages are: The value of the part taken (what you lose times value); and The value of the damage to the remainder (what you keep). You do not generally get your attorneys fees back Does the taking lower the value of the property you keep? Cannot be damages that are general to the public. If the case proceeds to a jury trial, these are the issues to be answered by the jury. If you withdraw the money, there is a true up after the verdict Judge can determine whether the entity had the legal right to take property.

Part Taken Remainder

The Wild West of Condemnation

In pipelines condemnations: No real role by any state agency No formal process of routing or involving stakeholders Once a line is drawn by an engineer, essentially permanent Purely private companies can condemn

Common Carrier Pipelines Railroad Commission process to determine if a pipeline will be operated as a common carrier Common carriers have eminent domain power Maintain right of the landowner to challenge status in court

Proposed rule prescribes procedure by which a pipeline operator may identify itself as a common carrier, gas utility, or private line operator. Must state requested classification and purpose as a common carrier, gas utility or private line operator Must provide sworn statement providing factual basis for classification sought Must provide documentation to support classification if applicable or requested by RRC Commission s decision on issuance of a pipeline permit shall be completed within 45 days of determination that application is complete. Classification of pipeline as common carrier, a gas utility, or private pipeline based upon information and documentation submitted by applicant.

Taking of Designated Public Land TxDoT may approve the use or taking of public land designated and used as a park, recreation area, scientific area, wildlife refuge, or historic site only: If there is no feasible alternative; and The project includes all reasonable planning to minimize harm to the land resulting from the use or taking, including mitigation measures. Taking of Protected Private Land TxDoT may approve the use or taking of private land encumbered by an agricultural conservation easement purchased under Nat. Res. Code, Ch. 183 only: If there is no feasible alternative; and The project includes all reasonable planning to minimize harm to the land resulting from the use or taking.

Photo by Phillip C. Marshall

Certain triggers determine whether coordination is required between TxDoT and TPWD If the project is within the range of a state threatened or endangered species If the project may adversely impact important remnant vegetation If the project includes in the right of way or conservation, construction or drainage easement, more than 200 ft of stream channel for each single and complete crossing or one or more of the following that is not already channelized or maintained: Channel realignment Stream bed or stream bank excavation, scraping, clearing or other permanent disturbance Isolated wetlands At least 0.10 acre of riparian vegetation Disturbs certain amount of habitat

For projects subject to review for archeological resources and cemeteries: TxDoT must evaluate for potential project effects to archeological historic properties and to determine whether the site contains cemeteries TxDoT must make reasonable efforts and act in good faith when complying with this requirement

Certain events trigger coordination between TxDoT and TCEQ: Air quality Water quality Projects that require Tier II Individual Clean Water Act Section 401 certification Projects located in a recharge, transition, or contributing zones of the Edwards Aquifer Projects located within five miles or an impaired assessment unit and within the watershed of an impaired assessment unit

TCEQ is designated agency for environmental review of transportation project TCEQ sets forth rules for environmental review that must include: Public comment on TxDoT s environmental reviews Including procedure for requesting a public hearing Evaluation of direct and indirect effects of projects Analysis of project alternatives Written report Specifies decision on project Shows mitigation measures on environmental harm Environmental review must be conducted before adoption of location or alignment of project TxDoT must coordinate with other agencies in preparing environmental review TCEQ has power of condemnation to acquire property to mitigate an adverse environmental impact that is a direct result of a state highway improvement project

TxDoT sought to condemn private property for project to expand a state highway. The proposed expansion would require that four out of ten 200-300 year-old oak trees would be cut down to make way for the highway The landowners (who have owned the land for nearly 150 years) fought the planned expansion, requesting an alternative plan to save the trees TxDoT agreed to alter the design to avoid the trees

Photo by Marie D. DeJes, Houston Chronicle

Protections, Tips, and Key Strategies

Get involved as early as possible Once lines are drawn, increasingly hard to alter Come to the conversation with potential alternatives Along row, parallel to other utilities, boring for pipelines Opposition is natural and a necessity but must also keep the negotiations open for additional benefits to you and the land Retain experienced appraiser familiar with condemnation and conservation easements Retain experienced counsel

Do not take the first offer, they will come back Make sure that you want to get into the fight Landowner s Bill of Rights explaining your rights is required Entities with the right of eminent domain have the right to enter and survey-but no destructive testing Careful opposing this Careful with landmen or agents You do not lose the right to contest value if you refuse offer

Pipelines Ask can it be bored vs. trenched double-ditch soil Re-seed and maintain grass cover for period of time Limited access Notice prior to access Lighter equipment No surface facilities Abandonment Do not use their easement form

Highways Publicity, letters, and political support may help More opportunities to get involved in early stages of planning than for pipeline TxDoT has changed route for certain reasons (e.g., ancient oaks near Somerville, TX) Money is always good, but often you can accomplish more through non-monetary concessions (e.g., narrow right-of-way, avoid trees, etc.)

Arrange a meeting with principals of condemnor (not negotiation agents) and your director and/or selected board members Explain your holdings, nature and permanency of conservation easement, structure of transaction. Don t assume your conservation easement is understood.

817.339.1105 www.bradburycounsel.com