CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

PC RESOLUTION NO. 15~11-10~01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)

City of San Juan Capistrano Supplemental Agenda Report

EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:

RESOLUTION NO

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4678

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Gateway Center has been developed in phases. overtime; and

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

CITY OF SAN DIMAS PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

CITY OF PALMDALE REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE CITY MANAGER. DATE: March 6, 2013

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

ATTACHMENT B-2. City of Pleasant Hill. March 11, Tamara Smith 291 Boyd Road Pleasant Hill, CA 94523

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

Planning Commission Staff Report

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

RESOLUTION NO

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 Page 2

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

RESOLUTION NO. PC

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #15-03 AGENDA ITEM: 4.3

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO APPROVING THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AND THE NEW VILLAGE SCHOOL.

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #17-06 AGENDA ITEM: 4.4

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

RESOLUTION NO xx

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO A.P. #

City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department STAFF REPORT

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 6,

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #12-21 AGENDA ITEM: 4.1

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #17-01 AGENDA ITEM: 4.3

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Policy Agenda Number: 60.

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO

1. The reason provided for the opposing votes was that the two commissioners wanted something else to be developed on their parcel.

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

Item 10C 1 of 69

Planning Commission Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

AGENDA: APRIL 13,1999 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A PORTION OF AN OPEN SPACE EASEMENT, APN

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: JUNE 21, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

Resolution No. The following resolution is now offered and read:

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report. Executive Summary

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION NUMBER 5059

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

Chair Barron, Vice-Chair Brittingham, Commissioner Keith, and Commissioner Rush. Mathew Evans, Community Development Director

ORDINANCE NO. 615-C.S.

high turnover sit down restaurant ( Super Duper Burgers) with outdoor seating and beer and wine

Planning Commission Report

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MONTESSA SUBDIVISION

Transcription:

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC 2011-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11-009 AND DENYING THE APPEAL FILED BY MR. EYAD ALI ALLOWING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL SALES INCLUDING A DISTANCE WAIVER LOCATED AT 37935 47 TH STREET EAST, SUITES A26, A27, AND A28 A. RECITALS WHEREAS, Mr. Eyad Ali has filed a timely appeal requesting that the City Council of the City of Palmdale reverse the approval of Conditional Use Permit 11-009, as approved by the Planning Commission on August 11, 2011, as described herein (hereinafter referred to as Application ). WHEREAS, The appeal application applies to the adoption of Resolution No. PC-2011-036 which approved the request to establish a convenience store with tobacco and alcohol sales and a distance waiver from existing residential uses and an existing incidental alcohol beverage establishment located at 37935 47 th Street East, Suites A26, A27, and A28, referred to on the County Assessor s role as APNs 3023-040-063 and 3023-040-064 and legally described on Attachment I hereto and shown on the map attached as Attachment II. WHEREAS, The Application, as contemplated, proposes to establish a convenience store use to include the sale of tobacco and alcohol. As proposed, the application includes a request for a waiver from the distance separation requirements for a new primary alcoholic beverage establishment and existing residential uses and an existing incidental alcoholic beverage establishment. WHEREAS, Zone designations on adjacent properties are R-1-7,000 (Single Family Residential 7,000 sf minimum lot size) to the south and west, C-3 (General Commercial) to the north and C-1 (Light Commercial) to the east. WHEREAS, This project is Categorically Exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review based on Section 15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which permits licensing of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency s determination.

Page 2 WHEREAS, On August 11, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Palmdale conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application, and concluded said hearing on that date. WHEREAS, On August 18, 2011, a timely appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit 11-009 was filed by the appellant, Mr. Eyad Ali, in accordance with Section 20.11 of the Palmdale Zoning Ordinance. The appellant requested that the adoption of Resolution No. PC- 2011-366 be overturned and grant the request to deny the approval of the Planning Commission of Conditional Use Permit 11-009. WHEREAS, On October 13, 2011, the City of Palmdale City Council conducted a public hearing to revisit Conditional Use Permit 03-02 Major Modification at the City Council Chamber, 38300 North Sierra Highway, Suite B, Palmdale, California 93550, and concluded that the conditional use is being conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions of Conditional Use Permit 03-02 Major Modification in an appropriate manner and that no action to modify is necessary. WHEREAS, On December 7, 2011, the City of Palmdale City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit 11-009 at the City Council Chamber, 38300 North Sierra Highway, Suite B, Palmdale, California 93550 and concluded said hearing on that date. WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Palmdale, as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced December 7, 2011, public hearing, including public testimony, and written and oral staff reports, this Council specifically finds as follows:

Page 3 (a) (b) The existing use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan because the General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as NC (Neighborhood Commercial), which permits the establishment of a convenience store use including the sale of tobacco and alcohol products, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use will provide a convenience to patrons within the vicinity of the project site by providing sales of convenience merchandise, tobacco / tobacco related products and alcohol products. Further, the project is located within a multi tenant commercial building within an existing shopping center as approved under Conditional Use Permit 03-02 and Conditional Use Permit 03-02 Major Modification designed and constructed in compliance with the standards of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance in effect at that time of approval. Except for minor interior alternations, no aspect of the project requires substantial modification to the existing facilities to accommodate the use. The proposed convenience store use, including the sale of tobacco and alcohol products, is beneficial and desirous to the community and is consistent with the purpose, intent, and standards of the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances and codes adopted by the City of Palmdale because the use complies with the C-1 (Light Commercial) zoning designation that permits establishment and operation of a convenience store use, including the sale of tobacco and alcohol products, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use has been conditioned to comply with all applicable provisions of the Palmdale Zoning Ordinance related to a convenience store use, tobacco and alcohol sales, which are intended to reduce the potential health and safety impacts associated with convenience stores with tobacco and alcohol sales. Additionally, the proposed project design and site plan as constructed meets all current applicable and special development standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance with regards to building and landscape setbacks, building heights, parking spaces and lot design requirements with the exception of the distance separation requirement between primary alcohol uses and existing residential uses to the south and west and one existing incidental alcohol use to the northeast for which a waiver is requested.

Page 4 Further, the proposed use will provide a convenience for customers to obtain convenience merchandise, tobacco, and alcohol related products while shopping within the community for patrons shopping at the existing commercial center, and other stores within the vicinity of the project site. (c) (d) The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate all yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls and fences, parking areas, fire and building code considerations pertaining to the application because the existing site was constructed in compliance with Zoning Ordinance standards in effect at the time Conditional Use Permit 03-02 and CUP 03-02 Major Modification were approved with respect to building and landscape setbacks, required parking stall size and drive aisle widths. Further, parking facilities are not impacted by the existing use and will not require modifications as a result of the use. The project has been reviewed with regard to fire and building code considerations by the representative departments and found to be satisfactory. Evidence supporting this finding is contained in the submitted plans and application materials including a site plan that indicates the location of the proposed use and a floor plan that indicates the convenience store sales area and display and storage areas for tobacco and alcohol related products. The proposed convenience store use including the sale of tobacco and alcohol products and the on-going operation of the use will not have a substantial adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof, and will not generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic, or other disturbances, nuisances, or hazards because the use is separated from the existing residences by a six foot wall as required between transitional uses. The existing incidental alcohol use to the northeast is separated by 450 feet which include parking areas and arterial roadways. Additionally, Conditions of Approval have been placed upon the use to mitigate potential impacts associated with a convenience store use including the sale of tobacco and alcohol related products.

Page 5 (e) (f) The site for the proposed use has adequate access meaning that the site design incorporates street and highway limitations because all access points to the site are existing and no new access points are proposed. The design of the project and the Conditions of Approval do not require dedication and improvement of publicly-owned facilities as all improvements were required and constructed under previous approvals. (g) The proposed use is consistent with the purpose of Section 92.07, Alcohol Beverage Establishments of the Zoning Ordinance because the use meets the distance separation requirements for a Primary Alcoholic Beverage Establishment, with the exception of residential and existing incidental uses, for which a waiver has been applied. Further, the hours of operation of the proposed use are similar to other existing uses within the vicinity and are not detrimental to the adjacent uses and residents. Section 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced December 7, 2011, public hearing, including public testimony, and written and oral staff reports, this Council specifically finds as follows with respect to the request for a waiver from the distance separation requirements for a Primary Alcoholic Beverage Establishment as specified in Zoning Ordinance Section 92.07(D)(3): (a) (b) The proposed use will serve specific community needs because the proposed use is a convenience store offering faster service than other full service markets in the vicinity and will provide other convenience items to the immediate residents in the area and patrons shopping at the existing commercial center. Further, the proposed use will not be contrary to the purpose of Zoning Ordinance Section 92.07, Alcohol Beverage Establishments, because the proposed use, subject to the Conditions of Approval, continues to comply with the remaining provisions of Section 92.07 related to the Off-Sale Development Standards for alcohol establishments intended to reduce secondary effects of alcohol related uses by regulating sales and server training, safety and security related issues such as lighting and loitering, and operational conditions. The proposed use is

Page 6 separated from other alcohol sensitive uses such as schools, churches, hospitals, parks, and sexually oriented businesses, and is located on land with a commercial land use designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial) and is zoned C-1 (Light Commercial) which permits convenience stores subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. (c) The use as proposed will not adversely affect nearby property because the proposed use is separated from the existing residential uses by a six-foot wall providing a physical separation with no direct pedestrian access to the commercial center. Further, the proposed use is separated from the residential uses located approximately 40 feet to the south and 160 feet to the west of the convenience store. The existing incidental alcohol beverage establishment use is separated by existing parking, landscaping setbacks and an arterial street with a distance of 450 feet between the uses. The proposed use is separated from other sensitive uses such as schools, parks, hospitals, churches and sexual oriented businesses, as required by per Section 92.07(D)(1). Given the physical separation provided between the uses, an interface problem between the off-site sales of alcoholic beverages and other sensitive uses is not expected. (d) The proposed alcohol sales use will not encourage the development of an adult entertainment area or otherwise promote community blight since the proposed use provides other convenience items to the residents in the neighborhood and shoppers within the commercial center. The use will occupy an existing vacant shop space that is physically separated from existing residential uses and other alcohol related uses and is not a liquor store type use that could result in a use that would promote the establishment of adult entertainment. The use is a convenience store use located in a highly visible area with a commercial land use designation that will not promote blight by establishment of the use.

Page 7 Section 4. The City Council hereby finds as follows with respect to the Notice of Exemption: (a) (b) (c) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ) and the City s local CEQA Guidelines, City staff determined the project to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which permits licensing of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency s determination. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the determination and of the intent to find the project exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the CEQA Guidelines. The City Council has reviewed the Notice of Exemption and all comments received regarding the Notice of Exemption and, based on the whole record before it, finds that the Notice of Exemption was prepared in compliance with CEQA. The City Council further finds that the Notice of Exemption reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Notice of Exemption. The custodian of records for the Notice of Exemption, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council s decision is based, is the Planning Manager of the City of Palmdale. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Palmdale located at 38250 Sierra Highway, Palmdale, California 93550, telephone (661) 267-5200. Section 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby upholds the August 11, 2011, Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit 11-009 and denies the appeal as requested by Mr. Eyad Ali subject to the revised Conditions of Approval in Attachment III.

Page 8 Section 6. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7 th following vote: day of December, 2011, by the AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: James C. Ledford, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Rebecca J. Smith City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney

ATTACHMENT I LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Conditional Use Permit 11-009 Assessor s Parcel Number: 3023-040-063 and 3023-040-064 THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TOTHTE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND. EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 50 FEET THEREOF.

ATTACHMENT II ASSESSOR S PARCEL MAP FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11-009