AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY District Impacted 1 = Haberstroh 2 = Woolard 3 = Boyd 4 = Cisneros 5 = Bergmann All ITEM NO: AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 DESCRIPTION: Untable and Consider a request for a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 6.01.002, Drainage and Flood Hazards, Section 6.01.002, Facilities Required for 32 Herff Road to exclude the 7 residential lots from this requirement. RECOMMENDED ACTION (be specific) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON Table the variance request per the review of the Public Works director. Planning and Community Development Chris Turk SUMMARY Baron Houser, the owner and developer of The Village at 32 Herff has requested that the variance request be tabled again as he is still working with the County for approval of his request. Staff is supportive of his request. COST SOURCE OF FUNDS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION POWER POINT? The Commission may untable and then table again the request. It will come back on the next agenda. This summary is not meant to be all inclusive. Supporting documentation is attached.
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY District Impacted 1 = Haberstroh 2 = Woolard 3 = Boyd 4 = Cisneros 5 = Bergmann All ITEM NO: AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 DESCRIPTION: Consider a request for a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance, Article 5, Section 02, Required Street Improvements, for 508 Irons for relief of the requirement to construct a sidewalk. RECOMMENDED ACTION (be specific) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON SUMMARY Approve the variance to the Subdivision Ordinance, Article 5, Section 02, Required Street Improvements, for 508 Irons for relief of the requirement to construct a sidewalk. Planning and Community Development Chris Turk City staff would not under most circumstances recommend approval to a request not to construct sidewalks anywhere in the city. This time we are supportive of the request because we should not have required plat note requiring sidewalks be placed on the amending plat. Amending plats are for the purpose of correcting errors in distances or other measurements and or for removing lot lines to create fewer lots which was the case in this instance. The only change to the original plat that should have been made was the removal of the lot line, we cannot remove restrictions that were on the original plat nor should we add new restriction to an amending plat. COST SOURCE OF FUNDS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION POWER POINT? This summary is not meant to be all inclusive. Supporting documentation is attached.
508 Irons HE RF F k Cr IO NS LO Legend Parcels Creeks H RY VE R ST O G SC RA DY G RA TT HA M IR O SCHOOL Fr ed e ri c N SA N TO AN Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY District Impacted 1 = Haberstroh 2 = Woolard 3 = Boyd 4 = Cisneros 5 = Bergmann All ITEM NO: AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 DESCRIPTION: Consider approval of a vacating plat for Parkway Subdivision, Lot 1A, (vacates lot back into Garden Oaks Subdivision, Lot 1). Take necessary action. RECOMMENDED ACTION (be specific) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON SUMMARY Approve the vacating plat for Parkway Subdivision, Lot 1A, (vacates lot back into Garden Oaks Subdivision, Lot 1). Planning and Community Development Chris Turk Cliff Wheeler owns two properties in two separate subdivisions off of industrial drive. He would like to get the properties back into a single lot. In 1987 a subdivision was created out of various lots of the Garden Oaks subdivision for the purpose of creating a business park. The new subdivision was called the Parkway subdivision. In order to accomplish Mr. Wheeler s goal of having all of his property in one lot we suggested that he vacate the lot that is in the Parkway Subdivision. In doing so the lot would then revert to being in the Garden Oaks subdivision. At a future date he can amend the plat of his two lots that are part of the original Lot 1 of Garden Oaks subdivision, remove the lot line thus leaving a single lot. The vacation of a portion of a plat requires the signature of all the existing lot owners in the subdivision approving the action. They have obtained all the required signatures as can be seen in the attachment of the proposed plat Staff recommends that the Commission approve the vacating of Lot 1-A Parkway subdivision. COST SOURCE OF FUNDS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
POWER POINT? This summary is not meant to be all inclusive. Supporting documentation is attached.
Parkway Subdivision Vacate Lot 1A