RESOLUTION NO

Similar documents
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

The City Council makes the following findings:

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

ORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. 7,562 N.S. AMENDING BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION AFFORDABLE HOUSING MITIGATION FEE

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

... AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BELMONT INCLUSIONARY ZONING AND IMPACT FEES

RESOLUTION NO. -15 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE ADOPTING HOUSING IMPACT FEES FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

ORDINANCE NO

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

ORDINANCE NO XX

BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TULARE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

CITY OF BELMONT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

3 Resolution approving, for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

City Council Draft 08/15/03

Chapter 17.90: Affordable Housing Incentives

City of Salinas Nexus Studies Overview and Summary February 2016

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

ORDINANCE NO

Consultant Team. Today s Meeting 5/7/2015. San Mateo County Multi City Nexus and Feasibility Studies

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code

Chapter 14C - INCLUSIONARY HOUSING [42]

Agenda Re~oort PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO INCLUSIONARY IN-LIEU FEE RATES

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2018 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018

Item 10C 1 of 69

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

18.15 (Residential Density Bonus) of Title 18 (Zoning) ofthe Palo Alto

AN ORDINANCE OF THE NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAPA COUNTY AND NAPA REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the City of San Diego that new non-residential

City of Calistoga Staff Report

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

CALIFORNIA VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT (213) RENEE DAKE WILSON. i, 4 if.-*" V. j H* .AV ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

RESOLUTION NO

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: APRIL 27, 2017 EXPIRATION DATE: MAY 1, 2017

Information Only. WHEREAS, the collection of development fees will assist the Township in meeting its affordable housing obligations; and

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6490) Finance Committee Staff Report

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

TRANSPORTATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES

IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE City of Emeryville

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

6-6 Livermore Development Code

Rules and Regulations

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL SURFACE WATER RATE RESOLUTION

Re: Grand Jury Report No. 1707, Homelessness in the Cities by the Contra Costa Grand Jury

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 73. Introduced by Assembly Members Chiu and Caballero (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin, Santiago, and Ting) December 16, 2016

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

RESOLUTION NO. PC

JOBS HOUSING NEXUS ANALYSIS

F. There is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed,

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO THE CITY'S

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. December 11, 2018

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus

(1) At least ten percent of the total units are designated for low income households.

City of Belmont Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, Thomas Fil, Finance Director,

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 7/13/17 RESOLUTION NO

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. 074532 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA * * * * * * RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RATES FOR AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE PROGRAM FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, State of California, that WHEREAS, the provision of safe and stable housing for households at all income levels is essential for the public welfare of the County; and WHEREAS, housing in San Mateo County has become steadily more expensive and housing costs have gone up faster than most residents incomes; and WHEREAS, federal and state government programs do not provide enough affordable housing to address the needs of very low, low, or moderate income households, resulting in a severe shortage of adequate, affordable housing for extremely low, very low, lower, and moderate income households, and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors has adopted its 2014-2022 General Plan Housing Element which contemplates, among other things, an ordinance to provide a mechanism to increase the supply of affordable housing in the County; and 1

WHEREAS, to implement the affordable housing goals, policies and programs of the County s Housing Element, the Board of Supervisors has considered and adopted an Ordinance that, among other things, authorizes the imposition of affordable housing impact fees for certain residential and non-residential Development Projects to mitigate the impact of such projects on the need for affordable housing in the County (the "Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance"), which is codified at Chapter 5.154 of Title 5 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code; and WHEREAS, because new market-rate housing developments result in new residents who purchase goods and utilize services in the community, increasing local employment and attracting employees, of whom a quantifiable number will have very low, low, or moderate incomes and cannot afford market-rate housing; and WHEREAS, because non-residential commercial development also attracts employees, of whom a quantifiable number will have very low, low, or moderate incomes, new non-residential developments similarly increase the demand for and exacerbate the shortage of housing available for people at these income levels while also reducing the supply of land potentially available for housing development; and WHEREAS, to ensure that such future Development Projects mitigate their impact on the need for affordable housing in San Mateo County, and to ensure that any adopted housing impact fees do not exceed the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the Development Projects to which the fees relate, the County participated in the preparation of a nexus study through the countywide 21 Elements collaboration project; and 2

WHEREAS, the County has received and considered reports from Strategic Economics and Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc. dated September 2015 entitled Residential Impact Fee Nexus Study" and " Commercial Linkage Fee Nexus Study" (together, the "Nexus Studies"); and WHEREAS, the Nexus Studies use widely accepted methodologies that this Board finds appropriate to determine the maximum amounts needed to fully mitigate the burdens created by residential and non-residential development on the need for affordable housing; and WHEREAS, to ensure that Development Projects remain economically feasible, the recommended housing impact fees as shown in the attached Exhibits A and B are lower than the maximum amount needed to fully mitigate the burdens created by new development on the need for affordable housing as determined by the Nexus Studies; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to adopt housing impact fees for certain new residential and non-residential Development Projects as authorized by the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance, which fees do not exceed the justified fees needed to mitigate the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the Development Projects to which the fees relate, as determined by the Nexus Studies; and WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance authorizes the Board of Supervisors to adopt, by resolution, housing impact fees for residential and nonresidential development, and the Board of Supervisors desires to do so; and 3

WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance further authorizes the Board of Supervisors to adopt by resolution a fee for processing applications for waivers from or modifications to the housing impact fees, and this Board desires to do so; and WHEREAS, the County has determined that the payment by Residential Development Projects and Non-Residential Development Projects of Area Standard Wages which are defined as the general prevailing wage determinations for San Mateo County as made by the State of California Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, will increase certain households' ability to afford housing in the County, thereby reducing the impact of those Residential Development Projects and Non- Residential Development Projects on the need for affordable housing in the County; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the reduced impact of projects paying Area Standard Wages, the Board of Supervisors desires to reduce the Housing Impact Fee for all Residential Development Projects and Non-Residential Development Projects that voluntarily enter into an agreement with the County to pay Area Standard Wages consistent with this Resolution; and WHEREAS, at least ten days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, data was made available to the public indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including general fund revenues, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019; and WHEREAS, at least fourteen days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, notice was provided to any persons or organizations who had requested notice, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019; and 4

WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the proposed fee was published twice in the manner set forth in Government Code Section 6062a, as required by Government Code Sections 66004 and 66018; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has reviewed the information contained in this Resolution and the accompanying staff report and any attachments at meetings held on May 24, 2016 and June 7, 2016, and the staff report accompanying this Resolution and referenced documents have been presented to and considered by the Board of Supervisors in support of the findings and approvals set forth in this Resolution; are hereby incorporated by reference in this Resolution; and, together with the above recitals any public testimony received, form the evidentiary basis and establish the analytical route for reaching the ultimate findings and conclusions contained in this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. 2. The findings of the Nexus Studies have been considered and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. 3. The facts and substantial evidence in the record establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and the impacts of the development described in the Nexus Studies for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the housing impact 5

fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as is described in more detail in the Nexus Studies. 4. The Nexus Studies set forth cost estimates, in 2015 dollars, that are reasonable for constructing affordable housing, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed these costs. 5. All capitalized terms in this Resolution that are not otherwise defined shall have the definitions set forth in the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance. 6. The Board of Supervisors hereby adopts those Housing Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects shown on Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby adopts those Housing Impact Fees for Non-Residential Development Projects shown on Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 8. Payment of the Housing Impact Fees for Development Projects, as defined in the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance, shall be due at the time of issuance of the first Building Permit for the Development Project. The fees shall be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time the Building Permit is issued. 9. All Housing Impact Fees collected shall be deposited into the County s Affordable Housing Fund to be used to increase and preserve the supply of housing affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households (including necessary administrative costs related to the increasing and preserving of the supply of such housing). The County Manager is directed to disburse 50% of the fund balance after deduction of reasonable administrative costs in the Affordable Housing Fund to the 6

Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of San Mateo County at such times and in such manner as the County Manager deems appropriate, but in no case less than annually. 10. The Board of Supervisors hereby adopts the Exemptions and Reductions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 11. The Board of Supervisors hereby determines, pursuant to Section 5.154.150(B) of the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance, that the following percentages of Affordable Housing Units, if provided by a developer of a Residential Development Project under Section 5.154.150 of the Ordinance in lieu of the Housing Impact Fee, where the project types and affordability categories have the same meaning as employed in the Nexus Study, will mitigate the impacts of residential development on the need for affordable housing: Type of Unit Single Family, Duplex, Townhouse Condominium and Apartment Moderate Income Low Income Very Low Income 15% 12.5% 10% 12. The Board of Supervisors hereby determines, pursuant to Section 5.154.150(B) of the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance, that the following percentages of Affordable Housing Units, if provided by a developer of a Non- Residential Development Project under Section 5.154.150 of the Ordinance in lieu of the Housing Impact Fee, where the project types and affordability categories have the 7

same meaning as employed in the Nexus Study, will mitigate the impacts of residential development on the need for affordable housing: Required Affordable Housing Units per 100,000 sq. ft. Moderate Income Low Income Very Low Income Total Office 3 5 2 10 Retail etc. 2 2 4 Hotel 2 2 4 13. Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects where the developer voluntarily enters into an "Area Standard Wage Participation Agreement" ( Agreement ) with the County, shall be entitled to a reduction of twenty-five percent (25%) of the Housing Impact Fee that would otherwise be applicable to the development project, if the Agreement (1) applies to construction of the development project and related public works that are within the customary jurisdiction of the construction trades and crafts, whether performed on or offsite, but need not include offsite work performed by materialmen, as defined under California law; and (2) provides that all employees performing construction work for a project subject to the Agreement shall be paid not less than the Area Standard Wage or the highest prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and published by the California Department of Industrial Relations subject to California Labor Code Section 1733 from the commencement of construction until the issuance of the later of either a final certificate of occupancy or a 8

final inspection, but excluding tenant improvements. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to prohibit payment of more than Area Standard Wages, and nothing in this Resolution shall preclude enforcement by the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement for any matter over which the Division has jurisdiction. 14. The Board of Supervisors may review Housing Impact Fees from time to time. For any annual period during which the Board of Supervisors does not review the Housing Impact Fee, fee amounts shall be adjusted once by the Community Development Director based on the percentage increase in the Engineering News- Record Construction Cost Index for San Francisco, California. 15. The Board of Supervisors hereby adopts a fee for processing applications for waivers from, or modifications of, the Housing Impact Fee, as applied to any particular Development Project, as shown on Exhibit "D," attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Waivers from, or modifications of, the Housing Impact Fee shall be considered on a case by case basis and shall be granted only when the standards for administrative relief set forth in Section 5.154.180 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code are met. 16. The Board of Supervisors finds that all of the Housing Impact Fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution do not exceed the actual affordable housing impacts of the development projects to which those Housing Impact Fees relate, as further set forth in the Nexus Studies. 17. The Community Development Director shall have the authority to issue guidelines, rules or regulations from time to time in furtherance of this Resolution. 9

18. Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this resolution is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this resolution contains no provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or nonresidential structures (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). 19. This Resolution shall take effect on August 8, 2016, but only if the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance is and remains effective as of that date. 10

Exhibit A Housing Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects Type of Residential Unit Single-Family Detached Home (1 unit) Single-Family Detached Home (2 to 4 units) Fee Per Square Foot of Net New Residential Floor Area $0 per square foot for first 2,500 sq ft $5.00 per each square foot over 2,500 $5 per square foot for first 2,500 sq ft $12.50 per each square foot over 2,500 Single-Family Detached Home (5 or more units) $15 Townhomes & Condominiums (4 or fewer units)** $5 per square foot for first 2,500 sq ft $12.50 per each square foot over 2,500 Apartments (any development size) $10 ** Townhome and Condominium Developments that are 5 or more units are subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Calculation of Square Footage: Housing impact fees for residential projects shall be calculated using the net new square footage of Residential Floor Area for the dwelling unit to which the housing impact fee relates. For purposes of this Resolution, Residential Floor Area is defined as follows: For Single-Family Detached Homes, Townhomes, and Condominiums, Residential Floor Area includes all horizontal areas of the several floors of such buildings measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the center line of party walls separating two (2) buildings, minus the horizontal areas of such buildings used exclusively for parking. For Apartments, Residential Floor Area includes all horizontal areas of the several floors of such buildings measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the center line of party walls separating two (2) buildings, minus the horizontal areas of such buildings used exclusively for covered porches, patios, or other outdoor space, amenities and common space, parking, elevators, stairwells or stairs between floors, hallways, and between- unit circulation. State Density Bonus: For Residential Development Projects that are granted a density bonus pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915, et seq. (the "State Density Bonus Law"), the Housing Impact Fee shall apply to all market-rate units, including any additional market-rate units provided under the State Density Bonus Law. The required Housing Impact Fee shall be reduced proportionately to the extent that any Affordable Units mitigate the market rate units' impact on the need for affordable housing in the unincorporated County. The Community Development Director may issue guidelines from time to time regarding the calculation of any fee reduction. 11

Exhibit B Housing Impact Fees for Non-Residential Development Projects Non-Residential Use Fee Per Square Foot of New Net Gross Floor Area Hotel $10 Retail, Restaurants and Services $5 Office, Medical Office and Research and Development Uses $25 All Housing Impact Fees for Non-Residential Development Projects, including new construction and conversion of a residential use to a non-residential use, shall be calculated using the gross floor area of net new non-residential space, excluding structured parking. Projects up to and including 3,500 square feet of net new gross floor area shall be exempt from payment of the fee; projects generating in excess of 3,500 square feet of net new gross floor area shall pay the fee per square foot on the total net new gross floor area. 12

Exhibit C Exemptions & Reductions In accordance with section 5.154.140(C)(5) of the Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance, the following specific Development Projects are exempt from the payment of the Housing Impact Fee: 1. Public Facilities as defined by Section 6102.68.3 of the San Mateo County Zoning Regulations, including, but not limited to, facilities and grounds owned or operated by park and recreation districts, schools, fire departments, churches, municipal institutions, and community organizations including clubs, lodges and similar uses; 2. Institutional Uses as defined by Section 6102.49.1 of the San Mateo County Zoning Regulations, including, but not limited to, houses of worship, schools and colleges, recreational facilities, cultural institutions and private hospitals; 3. Child Care Centers, including Family Child Care Homes as defined by Section 6102.96.2 of the San Mateo County Zoning Regulations; 4. Recreational facilities for public use and enjoyment within commercial or industrial developments; 5. Housing for the Elderly, housing for the disabled; nursing homes, rest homes, residential care facilities, and skilled nursing facilities as defined by Sections 6102.48.7 and 6102.48.8 of the San Mateo County Zoning Regulations; 6. A new dwelling unit which a developer proposes to make available that will be rented at an affordable rent or sold at an affordable ownership cost to very low, low or moderate income households with a deed restriction meeting County standards; 7. Accessory Dwelling Units/Second Units built in compliance with Chapter 22.5 of the San Mateo County Zoning Ordinance that are less than 2,500 square feet in size are exempt; 8. Property eligible for the California Property Tax Welfare Exemption in that it is (1) used exclusively for charitable purposes, and ( 2) owned or held in trust by nonprofit organizations operating for those purposes and that have a current tax exempt letter from the Internal Revenue Service or the Franchise Tax Board. 9. Residential and Non-Residential Development Projects where the developer voluntarily enters into an "Area Standard Wage Participation Agreement" ( Agreement ) with the County meeting all requirements of Paragraph 13 of this Resolution shall be entitled to a reduction of twenty-five percent (25%) of the Housing Impact Fee that would otherwise be applicable to the development project; 10. Replacement structures of equal or less square footage; provided, however, that replacement structures exceeding the square footage of the structures they 13

replace shall be subject to the Housing Impact Fee as calculated in Paragraphs 10 and 11 below; 11. Addition of square footage to existing residences shall be charged the fee provided in Exhibit A on the net new square footage only, at the rate of $0 for each square foot of net new square footage until the structure exceeds 2,500 square feet, and then the rate of $5.00 for each square foot thereafter, as provided by Exhibit A; 12. Addition of up to and including 3,500 square feet to existing Non-Residential Development Projects, provided, however, that additional square footage in excess of 3,500 square feet shall subject the entire additional square footage to the applicable fee for Non-Residential Development Projects. 14

Exhibit D Fee for Waivers and Modifications Waivers and Modifications of Requirements of Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance: Initial Deposit of $1,500 To be charged on a cost recovery basis, where the staff charges their time and other costs against the initial deposit, recovering the actual cost of project review. 15

RESOLUTION NUMBER: 074532 Regularly passed and adopted this 7th day of June 2016 AYES and in favor of said resolution: Supervisors: DAVE PINE CAROLE GROOM DON HORSLEY WARREN SLOCUM ADRIENNE J. TISSIER NOES and against said resolution: Supervisors: NONE Absent Supervisors: NONE President, Board of Supervisors County of San Mateo State of California Certificate of Delivery I certify that a copy of the original resolution filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County has been delivered to the President of the Board of Supervisors. Deputy Clerk of the Board of Supervisors