ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 16, 2017

All items include discussion and possible action to approve, modify, deny, or continue unless marked otherwise.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

22 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

SECTION 36. ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES. A. Enforcement.

TAKE A ROLL CALL TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A QUORUM OF MEMBERS PRESENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

March 6, The County Board of Arlington, Virginia. Ron Carlee, County Manager

RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER VAR Gulf Beach Road pool

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

ZONING COMPATIBILITY & WORKSHEET

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for December 15, 2010 Agenda Item C2

Board of Zoning Appeals

ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

Planning Commission Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Town of Lake George. Area Variance Review Application

BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION

R E S O L U T I O N PUBLIC HEARING

CVA Robert and Renate Bearden

60. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, DATE: July 13, 2018

CITY COMMISSION REPORT (and Planning Board Report) For Meeting Scheduled for November 7, 2013 Vested Rights Special Permit Resolution

ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION and INSTRUCTIONS

MINUTES VILLAGE of ARDSLEY ZONING BOARD of APPEALS REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2017

Case #1 The Maurice M Newton Revocable Trust October 7, 2015

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CITY OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KANSAS AGENDA July 10, 2018 **MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 6:30 P.M.

1. Applicants, Michael and Mary Phillips are the owners of a property located

ARTICLE 44. PD 44. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 6, 2004

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FORT DODGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 3, 2017

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Public hearing on revisions to Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in the Land Development Code LEGISLATIVE

ORDINANCE NO

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 887 Grosvenor Avenue (River Heights - Fort Garry Ward) File DAV /2018C [c/r DCU /2018C]

CITY OF LABELLE ORDINANCE BROWARD AVE LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE

RESOLUTION NO CITY OF MAPLE GROVE

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011

ARTICLE 4.00 NONCONFORMITIES

Town of Brookeville Zoning Ordinance

3. Section is entitled Accessory Buildings ; limited applicability/regulation.

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI Phone: (616) Website:

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING AUTHORITY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 22, 2018

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING CHAPTER 94 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE ORDINANCE, TEXAS), AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY AMENDING; RELATING

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 39. Charter Township of Commerce Page 39-1 Zoning Ordinance. Article 39 Nonconformities

ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Change HEARING DATE: JUNE 7, DAY DEADLINE: JUNE 26, 2018

Application for Part Lot Control Exemption and/or Deeming By-law

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 20, 2018

CITY OF MURFREESBORO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AGENDA HAILEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Monday, March 23 rd, 2015 Hailey City Hall 5:30 p.m. (Special Meeting)

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MANSFIELD RESOLUTION NO CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF SHARON IRICK VARIANCE APPROVAL

The Town of Wasaga Beach Committee of Adjustment/Consent November 20, 2017

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

CHAPTER 21.11: NONCONFORMITIES...1

CHAPTER 3 PERMITS, PLANS AND ANNEXATION

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

(If proposed use is business or industry, enclose a detailed

Watertown City Council

May we also take this opportunity to inform you of the following:

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11185-16-UP-1: Meeting of October 12, 2016 DATE: October 7, 2016 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Elizabeth Taylor 3829 9 th Street South R-6, One-Family Dwelling District 15,681 Square Feet Low 1-10 units per acre SUBJECT: Use Permit request to permit a setback of 4.5 feet from the left side property line instead of 8 feet as required and an aggregate side yard of 15.8 feet instead of 18 feet as required; re new one-story left side addition. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution granting the subject Use Permit, with conditions. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS: For all one-family dwellings and their accessory structures, 10 feet, provided that one side yard may be reduced to eight feet. The aggregate width of both side yards on any lot shall not be less than 30 percent of the required width of the lot, provided that on interior lots no structure shall be located closer than 25 feet from a rear lot line. (Article 3, Section 3.2.6.A.2(b) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property is a 50.26-foot wide interior lot containing 15,681 square feet of land area. The lot is Zoned R-6 One Family Dwelling District. This zoning district permits one-family dwellings on lots that are a minimum of 60 feet wide and contain at least 6,000 square feet of land area. The General Land Use Plan is Low 1-10 Units per acre. County real estate records show that the existing two-story detached single-family dwelling was constructed in 1934 and a 20 x 16 rear addition in 1965. The existing dwelling is located 45.3 feet from the 9 th Street South right-of-way, 11.3 feet from the right side property line, 4.6 feet from the left side property line, and 224.1 feet from the rear property line. PREVIOUS BZA ACTIONS: V-11185-16-UP-1 was deferred at the September 14, 2016 meeting so that the applicant could have a surveyor draw the proposed addition in order to accurately identify the proposed setback of the addition to the property line. PROPOSED CHANGES: The applicant is requesting to construct a new one-story rear addition measuring 11 feet wide by 16 feet deep (176 square feet). The setback proposed and shown on the plat is 4.5 feet. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff: Amanda Clement, Acting Board of Zoning Appeals Coordinator, Zoning Administration V-11185-16-UP-1

(1) Would the proposal promote compatibility of development with the surrounding neighborhood because the overall footprint size and placement are similar to the structures on the properties surrounding the subject property and would the proposal help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees and foliage? The proposal would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood because the overall footprint size and placement would be similar to the structures on the properties surrounding the subject property (see chart below). Address Structure Side Yard Setback Approval 3825 9 th 2-story single family St S 4.0 dwelling By-right 3824 9 th St S Single family dwelling 5.2 By-right 3832 9 th St S Single family dwelling 6.4 By-right 3812 9 th St S Single family dwelling 4.5 By-right Staff is supportive of the proposal because the proposed addition will be in-line with the existing house and will only encroach 0.1 feet further into the left side yard due to the fact that the existing home is not perfectly parallel to the left side boundary. Furthermore, the proposal would not affect natural land form, historical features, or significant trees or foliage. (2) Would the proposal adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood? The proposal would not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood. (3) Would the proposal be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood? The proposal would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. (4) Would the proposal be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning related policies of the County? The property is zoned R-6, which permits single family residences. The GLUP designation is Low 1-10 units per acre. The property is improved with a one-family dwelling which is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance and is in accordance with the GLUP. The proposal is not in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning related policies of the County. COMMENTS FROM NEIGHBORS: Staff has received one (1) statement in support of the proposal. - 2 -

CONCLUSION: The proposal would promote compatibility of development with the surrounding neighborhood because the overall footprint size and placement would be similar to the structures on the properties surrounding the subject property, therefore Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution granting the Use Permit. MOTION: I move that the Board of Zoning Appeals adopt the attached Resolution approving the Use Permit V-11185-16-UP-1 subject to the conditions listed in the Resolution. - 3 -

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals ( BZA ) has held a duly advertised public hearing on October 12, 2016 on case number V-11185-16-UP-1 for a Special Use Permit to permit a setback of 4.5 feet from the left side property line instead of 10 feet as required by Article 3, Section 3.2.6.A.2.(b) of the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance and an aggregate side yard of 15.8 feet instead of 18 feet as required by Article 3, Section 3.2.6.A.2.(b) of the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance for the construction of a new one-story rear addition on the premises known as 3829 9 th Street S; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the BZA finds that the proposal will not be in conflict with the purposes of the master plans and land use and zoning policies of the County; and, WHEREAS, the BZA has determined that the modification is compatible with development in the surrounding neighborhood and that the structure s overall footprint size and placement are similar to comparable structures on other properties in the County and the proposal would help preserve natural land form, historical features and/or significant trees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the BZA hereby approves Special Use Permit case number V-11185-16-UP-1, subject to the following: 1. The applicants agree that the structure/addition shall be constructed in accordance with the footprint shown on the survey, and the architectural drawings attached to the staff report dated October 7, 2016 and that no enlargement of the structure/addition may be made in any dimension shown on the plat or architectural drawings. 2. The applicants shall obtain and provide to the Zoning Administrator one or more plats, which may include a wall check plat when the foundation is constructed and a final plat at the completion of the project, unless determined by the Zoning Administrator that such plats shall not be required. 3. The applicants agree that the new addition shall not be built over. 4. The applicants shall obtain a building permit to construct the structure permitted herein by October 12, 2017 or the Use Permit shall be null and void. - 4 -