MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Similar documents
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Action MEMORANDUM. Jeffrey L. Zyon~enior Legislative Analyst

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

AN AMENDMENT to the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance to: - establish the Montgomery Village Overlay Zone. Development Standards for Euclidean Zones

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Attachment 4 ANALYSIS I. Current Special Exception Use Standards for Accessory Apartments (Also See Attachment 2 Table for Quick Comparison)

MEMORANDUM. Agenda Item 9A July 17, 2018 Introduction. July 13, 2018 TO: County Council FROM: Jeffry L. Zyon/ Lor Legislative Analyst

Chapter 59 Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance [Planning Board] Preliminary PHED Committee Draft

MEMORANDUM. Action - Zoning Text Amendment 15-12, Overlay Zone - Montgomery Village

MEMORANDUM. Action - Revised Zoning Text Amendment 16-20, Overlay Zone - Bethesda

MEMORANDUM. Action-Revised Zoning Text Amendment 16-20, Overlay Zone -Bethesda

Use of the Zoning Ordinance

Chapter 59 Montgomery county zoning ordinance planning board draft

\Z Jeffrey L. Zyontz, Senior Legislative Analyst

TO ADDRESS THE PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY FORMERLY ZONED HOLDING IN

Accessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

By: District Council at Request of the Planning Board. AN AMENDMENT to the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance to:

STAFF REPORT. Zoning Text Amendment #PLN , For Boundary Line Adjustments Between Non- Conforming Lots (Countywide)

Article Optional Method Requirements

STAFF REPORT. The City Council referred the ordinance amending the text to the committee of the whole.

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PENDING BUSINESS LEGISLATION

County Council Of Howard County, Maryland

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN COUNTY OF MONMOUTH

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

MEMORANDUM. Background

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, FROM: General Manager, Planning & Development FILE:

μ1:750 SUBJECT PROPERTY RRI INST RRI O RRI DISCLAIMER: This map is based on current information at the date of production.

Denver Zoning Code Amendment General Development Plan Revisions REDLINE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 1/16/19

MEMORANDUM. Background. Current code. PHED Committee #2 & 3 September 18, September 14, 2017 TO: Planning, H

ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS TO CONFORM WITH STATE LAW

LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:

ORDINANCE NO

Zoning Code Training MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

Staff Memorandum. From: Pamela Dunn, Joshua Sloan,

CITY OF TAFT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2016 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 209 E. KERN ST.

KANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FARMSTEAD EXEMPTION IN THE A1 DISTRICT

Ravenna Township. Dakota County, Minnesota. Variance Application. Please Print or Type All Information

North Cambridge Business Park Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Public Information Centre (December 14, 2017) Information Handout

1. Multi-family dwellings, including town homes, apartments, or condominiums.

Omnibus Zoning Amendment (FILE # D ) Proposals

4-1 TITLE 4 ZONING CODE 4-4

Section Development standards for single family districts.

Instructions: Script:

The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission (TMAPC) has jurisdiction for all of the City of Tulsa and the unincorporated parts of Tulsa County.

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

WHEREAS, the direction from the Study is to amend the Land Use Code in the following particulars:

Accessory Residential Buildings Setbacks and Floor Areas Reviewed by Zoning Administrator unless otherwise indicated

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

TOWN OF HANOVER APPLICATION FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AND/OR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT Under Sec. 22 (4) of the Ontario Planning Act, R.S.O.

PLANNING & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. FROM: Julie Caporgno DEPARTMENT: Planning Advance Planning Manager

ARTICLE OPTIONAL METHOD REGULATIONS

PROPOSED TEXT CHANGES TO LAND USE BYLAW - JULY 2016

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment on Proposed Rules

Zoning Rewrite Implementation Worksession #1. Agricultural, Rural Residential, & Residential Zones March 12, 2013

150% of the height of a WECS from the base to a property line.

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DISTRICT OF NORTH SAANICH BYLAW NO. 1306

Butte County Board of Supervisors

Phone Fax Phone Fax. Owner/Agent Signature (Agents must provide written proof of authorization) OFFICE USE ONLY

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

City of Munford, Tennessee 1397 Munford Avenue Munford, TN City Hall (901) Dwayne Cole, Mayor

Master Plan Review POTOMAC. Approved and Adopted March Updated January 2013

ARTICLE V - DIVISION 10 RM-10 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT

Master Plan Review OLNEY. Approved and Adopted April Updated September

ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

TABLE (A): TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS REQUIRED YARDS [4], [5] SIDE YARD (FT) REAR YARD (FT) R-1 DISTRICT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CITY OF RENO Planning Commission February 6, Staff Report

ORDINANCE NUMBERb5"- 03

INSURANCE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF THE NEW JERSEY REAL ESTATE COMMISSION REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Presentation. Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date February 3, Erkin Ozberk, Planner. Prepared By. Brian T. Kenner City Manager.

PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE Plan Commission Hearing. December 2, 2014

Division Of Codes And Standards Uniform Construction Code Barrier Free Subcode Proposed Amendments: N.J.A.C. 5:23-7.2, 7.5, 7.6, 7.10, 7.11 and 7.

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the proposed Ordinance Amendments; and

Transcription:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 8 Date: 1-10-19 Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 18-12, Setback Exemption - Fences Gregory Russ, Planner Coordinator, FP&P, gregory.russ@montgomeryplanning.org, 301-495-2174 Jason Sartori, Acting Chief, FP&P, jason.sartori@montgomeryplanning.org, 301-495-2172 Completed: 1/3/19 Description ZTA No. 18-12 would revise the standards for an exemption to the building line and setback requirements for certain fences. Summary Staff recommends approval of ZTA 18-12, to revise the standards for an exemption to the building line and setback requirements for certain fences. Background/Analysis Currently, the Zoning Ordinance exempts fences and walls from setback requirements if the height of the structure is 6.5 feet or lower. (Exceptions are granted for deer fencing or other fences located in the Agricultural or Rural Residential zones and any other fence that is 8 feet or less in height and located on land that is farmed and agriculturally assessed or fences 8 feet or less in height in a residentially zoned property when the property abuts a non-residentially zoned property in Commercial/Residential, Employment, or Industrial zones). A landowner who wants a higher fence is either required to meet the setback requirement or to apply for a variance. The sponsor believes that fences up to 8 feet tall also should be allowed without a setback or a variance if it abuts a master planned right-of-way for a rail line or abuts any service road that provides access to a master planned right-of-way for a rail line. Staff has no objection to ZTA 18-12 given that the relaxation of the height standard could assist in minimizing possible visual and audible obtrusions associated with trains. Staff has highlighted the applicable ZTA language below for the Board s convenience. Section 6.4.3. General Landscaping Requirements C. Fences and Walls 1

3. Exemptions from Building Line and Setbacks Building line and setback requirements do not apply to: a. deer fencing: i. in an Agricultural or Rural Residential zone; or ii. behind the front building line for property in a non-agricultural or non- Rural Residential zone unless the property adjoins a national historical park[.]; b. a retaining wall where changes in street grade, width, or alignment have made such structures necessary; c. any other wall or fence that is not on a property abutting a national historic park and is: i. 6.5 feet or less in height when not abutting a Commercial/Residential, Employment, or Industrial zone; or ii. 8 feet or less in height when [located in a Residential zone and] the fence abuts: (A) a Commercial/Residential, Employment, or Industrial zone; or (B) a master planned right-of-way for a rail line; or (C) any service road that provides access to a master planned rightof-way for a rail line; d. a rustic fence on a property abutting a national historical park; e. any boundary fence behind the front building line, if the property is located within 100 feet of a parking lot in a national historical park; and f. deer fencing and any other fence that is 8 feet or less in height, if the property is farmed and agriculturally assessed. Attachments 1. ZTA No. 18-12 as introduced 2

ATTACHMENT 1 Zoning Text Amendment No.: 18-12 Concerning: Setback Exemptions Fences Draft No. & Date: 1 11/16/18 Introduced: December 11, 2018 Public Hearing: Adopted: Effective: Ordinance No.: COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR THAT PORTION OF THE MARYLAND-WASHINGTON REGIONAL DISTRICT WITHIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND Lead Sponsor: Councilmember Riemer AN AMENDMENT to the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance to: - revise the standards for an exemption to the building line and setback requirements for certain fences By amending the following sections of the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 59 of the Montgomery County Code: Division 6.4. General Landscaping and Outdoor Lighting Section 6.4.3. General Landscaping Requirements EXPLANATION: Boldface indicates a Heading or a defined term. Underlining indicates text that is added to existing law by the original text amendment. [Single boldface brackets] indicate text that is deleted from existing law by original text amendment. Double underlining indicates text that is added to the text amendment by amendment. [[Double boldface brackets]] indicate text that is deleted from the text amendment by amendment. indicates existing law unaffected by the text amendment.

ORDINANCE The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland, sitting as the District Council for that portion of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery County, Maryland, approves the following ordinance: 2

Zoning Text Amendment No.: 18-12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Sec. 1. DIVISION 59-6.4 is amended as follows: Division 6.4. General Landscaping and Outdoor Lighting Section 6.4.3. General Landscaping Requirements C. Fences and Walls 3. Exemptions from Building Line and Setbacks Building line and setback requirements do not apply to: a. deer fencing: i. in an Agricultural or Rural Residential zone; or ii. behind the front building line for property in a non- Agricultural or non-rural Residential zone unless the property adjoins a national historical park[.]; b. a retaining wall where changes in street grade, width, or alignment have made such structures necessary; c. any other wall or fence that is not on a property abutting a national historic park and is: i. 6.5 feet or less in height when not abutting a Commercial/Residential, Employment, or Industrial zone; or ii. 8 feet or less in height when [located in a Residential zone and] the fence abuts: (A) a Commercial/Residential, Employment, or Industrial zone; or (B) a master planned right-of-way for a rail line; or 3

Zoning Text Amendment No.: 18-12 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 (C) any service road that provides access to a master planned right-of-way for a rail line; d. a rustic fence on a property abutting a national historical park; e. any boundary fence behind the front building line, if the property is located within 100 feet of a parking lot in a national historical park; and f. deer fencing and any other fence that is 8 feet or less in height, if the property is farmed and agriculturally assessed. Sec. 2. Effective date. This ordinance becomes effective 20 days after the date of Council adoption. This is a correct copy of Council action. Megan Davey Limarzi, Esq. Clerk of the Council 4