PROPERTY EVALUATION: HWY 82, OLD SNOWMASS CONOCO

Similar documents
Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

Article Optional Method Requirements

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Chapter 9 - Non-Conformities CHAPTER 9 - INDEX

19.12 CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

Transfer of Development Rights. February 13, 2017

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

Packet Contents: Page #

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 4 LRR - Large Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

TABLE (A): TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS REQUIRED YARDS [4], [5] SIDE YARD (FT) REAR YARD (FT) R-1 DISTRICT

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CHAPTER 4: DISTRICT REGULATIONS

APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OF A SKETCH PLAN with checklist

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

1. an RSF-R, RSF-1, RSF-2, RSF-4, RMF-5, or RMF-8 zoning district; or

(Draft Glenville ordinance, June 2008) ARTICLE XXII Transfer of Development Rights

SECTION 8 - GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT

** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FORT DODGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 3, 2017

4. If any perennial surface water passes through or along the property lines of the acreage, a minimum of 200 feet or frontage should be required.

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Reviewing Growth Management Planning for Housing

SUBURBAN AND URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE PETERS TOWNSHIP PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE, E. McMURRAY ROAD McMURRAY, PA 1531 (724)

THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS REVISED MAY 2006

AMENDED AGENDA BLUFFDALE CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. January 24, 2017

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Kitsap County Department of Community Development

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #8

A.3. ARTICLE 7 PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION AND/OR LAND DEVELOPMENT

Rezone property from RR(T)D3, D1(T)D3, and RR(T)D15 to D3 and D15 along North Douglas Highway.

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. MINUTES May 11, :30 PM

WOODLAND AREA GENERAL PLAN URBAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY

FORA Board Consistency Determinations Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Section 1 Purposes. 6. Section 2 Statutory Authorization. 7.

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: July 6, 2015

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan.

Vacant Corner Lot in Golden Gate

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System

PAPRlamird4-Lairds Corner

AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER

PUBLIC HEARING: October 14, 2014 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

That the Planning Commission finds and advises EBMUD that the proposed disposal of property is in conformance with the County General Plan.

ARDEN PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION AREA (5-31-3)

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

TOWN OF RIB MOUNTAIN

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Pestcom Pest Management LLC CU-PH

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program

Historic Preservation Incentives Workshop

-Section Contents- 201 Districts Overlay Districts Incorporation of Maps District Boundaries...

NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 39. Charter Township of Commerce Page 39-1 Zoning Ordinance. Article 39 Nonconformities

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Final Draft Ordinance: Matrix

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the following conditions:

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

Parkland Dedication By-Law User Guide

Boyertown Borough and Colebrookdale and Pike Townships Joint Zoning Ordinance

Wednesday, January 4, E CESAR CHAVEZ ST 78702

STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

DOUGLAS COUNTY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION Article 4 Preliminary Plan 10/13/2015

Project Location 1806 & 1812 San Marcos Pass Road

WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA

ARTICLE 3 ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP. Table of Contents

ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS

Town of Brownsburg Board of Zoning Appeals Project Synopsis

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Administrative Staff Report

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Transcription:

PROPERTY EVALUATION: 26800 HWY 82, OLD SNOWMASS CONOCO Date: 7/30/2018 Address: 26800 Hwy 82(Snowmass Conoco) Zoning: B-2 General Business Jurisdiction: Pitkin County Area: 1.66 Acres, 72,449sf Parcel ID: 246727202001 - AVALANCHE ASSOCIATES SUB EXEMPTION COMMERCIAL PARCEL Created For: Blake Appleby, Douglas Elliman Blake: Please find my initial summary property evaluation below for 26800 Hwy 82. The existing gas, liquor, and convenience store businesses are the closest option for a significant population area of Pitkin County, and the existing uses reflect that practical reality. The parcel is unique in this regard, and remains one of the very few opportunities for commerce between Basalt and Snowmass Village. However, the General Business zoning allows for a wide array of potential commercial usage opportunities and also allows for some residential including multifamily opportunities as well. It is a flexible underlying zoning type and would serve a buyer looking to diversify the development on this site. The parcel has phenomenal customer access and a unique location. Additional information is included in the following pages with some notes on the subdivision exemption and other particulars to this parcel. Kind regards, Andrea Korber AIA - Principal/Owner, Land+Shelter Architecture and Planning, andi@landandshelter.com, 970.366.1582 1/ 5

A plat (book 53 page 48) is provided above showing the 1999 subdivision that created the subject parcel (left) and the post office parcel (right). Floor Area: The underlying zoning allows for 0.36 Floor Area Ratio, based on the lot area. A lot area calculation requires a survey to be accurate, but it would not include steep slopes or the access easement dedicated to the Post Office to the east. If you reduce the lot size by ~12,000sf (rough estimate) that would leave 65,500sf lot area or 23,580sf in allowable floor area. This is a guesstimate to be reviewed via survey, but in any case - the floor area potential has other practical constraints, like (but not limited to) providing parking on site for the uses proposed. For nonresidential uses, one parking space per 400sf of commercial space is required. Residential use parking requirements vary with the number of bedrooms and number of units. There is also a minimum lot area required per dwelling unit that would impact any multifamily development on the site: 3 bedroom multifamily = 4,000sf /unit 1 bedroom multifamily = 3,200sf /unit 2/ 5

Studio multifamily = 2,500sf /unit Minimum open space = 1,200sf /unit Existing Conditions: The existing site development includes a structure with ~6200sf of commercial space in two grade level suites and one second floor storage area and ~800sf of residential space (one two-bedroom unit). The building does not conform to the 200 setback from the highway. The site is not deep enough to comply with this setback; it is less than 200 deep overall and future uses would face this setback challenge. The existing structure was granted a variance to allow an awning to be constructed in recognition of this hardship, (Ordinance 99-27 Setback Variance and Sign variance recorded at 434236). The post office on the neighboring parcel was also granted a variance to be constructed within that setback as well. Future users will need to seek approvals to develop within the setback no matter what occurs on this site. Since the existing structure is existing and non-conforming, it is allowed to remain operating with current uses, but a developer cannot increase the non-conformity. Any change of use would also bring up this issue and new development might not be granted as much leeway as the existing structure, which is approximately 70 from the edge of highway 82 and literally sitting on the rear property line without any setback. Subdivision Exemption The subdivision exemption that created this parcel did not create particular usage or development restrictions per se, but there are also several easements between the neighboring parcel and the subject parcel that would need to be honored or officially revised for any re-development plans. The access road to the post office in particular cuts through a likely site for a significant redevelopment, so a future developer might consider a realignment of that access. Encumbrances on the parcel should be reviewed in a title work review; the following are apparent in the plat notes: Water well easement reception#: 433672 Sewer and septic easement reception#: 433873 Access easement reception#: 433871 Leach field easement reception#: 442695 Subdivision Exemption: o Resolution 98-126 reception#: 423374 o Resolution 98-25 reception#: 423373 o Amended Plat B53 P48 May 5, 2000 Zone Districts: The zoning on this parcel is B-2 or general business. The zoning intent for this district supports continued commercial uses on the site, and also supports a secondary residential use if it does not conflict or limit the commercial nature of the site. The site may not be a transferrable development right (TDR) sender or receiver (i.e. the floor area allowance cannot be revised by any future transaction). The land use code for the zone district is excerpted here: 3/ 5

The B-2 (General Business) zone district is intended to provide for the establishment of commercial and lowintensity, non-polluting industrial uses that do not require or generate high customer traffic volumes and to permit customary accessory uses, including a small portion of the land area in high density, long- term residential dwelling units. Because of the need to preserve the existing inventory of B-2 zone district lands for commercial purposes, residential uses are secondary in priority to commercial uses. TDRs may not be severed and sold from lands located in the B-2 zone district. TDRs may not be purchased and used in the B-2 zone district from other zone districts. Lands in the B-2 zone district are subject to the GMQS. Zoning related dimensional requirements are summarized below: FAR Max - 0.36 Setbacks 200 from highway 82, 50 from Snowmass Creek Road ( Collector ), 10 from rear. Current Building does not conform to any of these setbacks. Height maximum is 28 for the principal use and 20 for accessory structures. Scenic View Corridor: The site is subject to Scenic View Corridor review process, and would be required to follow that land use process, which protects the rural, unique nature of Pitkin County s scenic view corridors. This does not place specific stylistic constraints, but does add to the land use approval process. GMQS: In Pitkin County, all new development is subject to a growth management quota system (GMQS). In this case, the existing commercial uses could remain without triggering this process, but any expansion and/or change of use would require a GMQS application process and fees mitigating the growth. That translates to fees offsetting new employees that would be generated by any expansion commercial uses on this site. Like the scenic view corridor requirements, this does not create specific architectural constraints, but does add to the land use approval process. Notably: traffic generation would be reviewed in this process. Uses that greatly change the nature of and/or increase the traffic generated to the site may bump up against some approval challenges, but the site has existing traffic that would offset that impact. Notes on Other Hazards or Restrictions: The site is mapped low wildfire hazard via Pitkin County graphic information systems (GIS) website. No other hazards were available in the online mapping, but this parcel is located at the tow of a slope, so like almost any Pitkin County site - avalanche, alluvial fan, and other geological hazards should be studied during due diligence. Conclusion: This site offers a convenient location between the commercial centers of Basalt and Snowmass. It has served the Old Snowmass community since before the current zoning existed and that zoning supports this 4/ 5

continued service. The visibility, location, and flexible zoning of this site are unique selling points in the Roaring Fork Valley corridor. The above image was created by overlaying of the recorded plat map and aerial photography of the site. Please call Andrea Korber at Land+Shelter: 970-963-0201 with any land use questions or clarifications. 5/ 5