INRODUCTION STATISTIC DATE OF DWELLINGS STOCKS IN POLAND.

Similar documents
B Application example

Emil Møllers Gade 41 Horsens, Denmark

Property condition survey for the Ewa Silo building located in the premises of the Port of Szczecin

To Improve Space Utilization Efficiency: Periodic Renting Strategies of Residential Open Buildings

OPERABLE ALL-GLASS BALCONY GLAZING SYSTEMS. NanaGlass SL25

Standards of Housing for Rent Built by Municipal Social Building Society in Bialystok (Poland) during

Chapter III THE HOUSING STOCK

Energy Efficient and Passive House Building Design Guidelines

Energy efficient renovation of building stock of Jugla

CHANGE IN VALUE ALTERATIONS MADE OCCUPANCY CHANGES

Renovating older apartment buildings A multi-disciplinary international project. Architectural design & construction

Modernization of historical houses in Sopot: a case study

OF CHANGE IN SHEAR WALL LOCATION ON STOREY DRIFT OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

Urban Planning and Architectural Standards for Social Housing Architectural Design

O S O B N Í L I S T A

Renovation Toolbox. Introduction

Architecture - Reaching for the Sky

Construction information

SHORT DESCRIPTION DORFSTRASSE Wengen DORFSTRASSE WENGEN NEW APARTMENTS WITH LIFT ABOVE SWISS MADE SHOP AND FRESH MARKET

WINTERTUINWONINGEN NIEUW ZUID, ANTWERPEN / BE (2016)

RT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules

We are building future. Kodumaja.

Construction scheme "Am Kaiserforum", 1010

THE CURRENT RESULTS OF URB.ENERGY PROJECT IN THE TARGET AREA JUGLA (Riga)

Housing conditions in the slum 3. Problem with ergonomics 5. Concept 7. Ergonomic modification, materials. 8. Logical reasoning.. 9. Site plan...

[BUILDING STATISTICS PART I]

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

BAUHAUS IN THE HEART OF PASARÉT, 1026 BUDAPEST, HŰVÖSVÖLGYI ST 53/B

The Impact of the financial Crises on Housing Cooperatives in Europe

Energy Performance Contracting for Soviet-era Housing in Latvia

System furniture. Essentiel BENCH

Maratonvägen 36. Project summary. Energy concept: To achieve a substantial reduction of the energy losses.

A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

Czech housing estates: Mass public housing construction in private ownership (facades, colours, details)

The Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017

De Dichterlijke Vrijheid Poetic Freedom

Stark HS. Housing Solutions. By:

The Impact of Balconies on Wind Induced Ventilation of Singlesided Naturally Ventilated Multi-storey Apartment

w a t e r t o w e r D o r t e M a n d r u p A r c h i t e c t s A p S. C l i e n t, G e n t o f t e M u n i c i p a l i t y a n d D o m e a

RM-1 and RM-1N Districts Schedule

Balanced ventilation in apartment buildings

PROBLEMS? Social &financial problems Social segregation Criminality Downgrading of the district. WHO? 7300 inhabitants

The Five Points of a New Architecture in Earthquake Zones"

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

Greening up your Apartment?

CONVERTING OFFICE SPACE. using modular prefab architecture to convert vacant office buildings

Energy consumption in an old residential building before and after deep energy renovation

Residencial El Prado - "Viviendas desde *. Plaza y Trastero Incluido" Ensanche de Vallecas (caseta nº 1)

510 MAIN STREET WINNIPEG CITY HALL Green Blankstein Russell and Associates (Bernard Brown and David Thordarson, principal designers),

CORY BREEGLE KENNY CHEUNG JEAN-PIERRE DEMERIUX GOMEZ DARWIN DIAZ. Team One

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

RM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule

Energy variations in apartment buildings due to different shape factors and relative size of common areas

Lunetten 4D Utrecht, The Netherlands,

Residencial Cármenes Balcón de Granada c/ Zahareña (Barranco del Abogado),

Apartment Building in Brogården, Alingsås SE

HOUSE ARCHER, STELLENBOSCH HOUSE WHITFIELD, SOMERSET WEST HOUSE PLOUGHMANN, SOMERSET WEST

Residencial Altos del Sabinal - "Viviendas desde *. Plaza y Trastero Incluido"

Residencial Bola de Oro - Edificio San Remo C/ Cerro de los Machos,

Community Affairs and Planning Committee Paul Allore, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development Services

Registration of the Premises in 2D Cadastral System in Poland

IT TAKES A BLOCK BLOCK LAYERS THE BUILDINGS THE ROOFSCAPE THE URBAN ARBORETUM THE GALLERIES GREENHOUSE AND MEETING PLACE ROOF TOP FARM

Residencial Puerta de Levante c/ Enric Valor 2,

Tiny House on Wheels A Tiny House

Berlin's post soviet refurbishment strategy - lessons learned (Filip Milojkovic, IWO e.v.)

The effect of atrium façade design on daylighting in atrium and its adjoining spaces

RT-7 District Schedule

FM-1 District Schedule

Traditional Palestinian Architecture. Dr. Hazem Abu-Orf. Palestinian Architecture Lecture 5

Participatory design. Housing in the 21 century. Marita Weiss. 1 Factors Shaping Urban Shelter Design. The significance of housing

Andraus high-rise, Sao Paulo, Brazil, February 1972

Fundamental Study on Thermal Surface Analysis

RT-8 District Schedule

Residencial Jardins del Castellarnau - Fase VII C/ Walter Benjamin 27, 08206

Future is purchased by the present ELYSIUM

DESCRIPTION OF LANDLORD'S WORK & TENANT'S WORK

STAIRS Design & Construction

SFH in Mautern AT. IEA SHC Task 37 Advanced Housing Renovation with Solar & Conservation

FM-1 District Schedule

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 )

RedStone Private Country Estate architectural guidelines

Aignan Municipality. Guihemblanc Housing Estate. Housing Estate Regulations

LOCATION ORIENTATION ARCHITECTURAL UNIQUENESS STATE OF CONSERVATION RETURN ON INVESTMENT

HOUSES COMPANY PROFILE

Machine for Living. A live-work complex in Zurich, designed by Müller Sigrist Architekten, is a city in itself.

Modern concepts of urban cadastre

Attic Floor Bedrooms 1 & 2 Family Dwellings

STYLE AND ARCHITECTURAL PHILOSOPHY

15. September 2014 Reconstruction after WW II

CHAPTER 10 ARTICLE II DIVISION 2: MINIMUM STANDARDS

Energy Efficiency and Urban Renewal of a UNESCO-listed historical centre: The case of Porto. Álvaro Santos Paulo Valença José Pacheco Sequeira

Devin Defriza Harisdani 1*, Edward Anugrah Zai 1

SCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER (Amended by By-law ) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES

The Improved Net Rate Analysis

Secondary Suites Changes between the 2006 ABC and the 2014 ABC Requirements

SAIIER sir aurobindo institute for intgral education and research

Rénovation. municipal

Published in: NSB 2014: 10th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics June 2014 Lund, Sweden

The Analyses of EE in typical buildings and of the state of the energy supply infrastructure

Transcription:

Large-panel dwelling building, current state ways of construction and architectural modifications. Author: Adam Rybka Dept. of Civil Engineering, Rzeszow University of Technology ABSTRACT: In this paper was inserted statistic date of dwellings stocks in Poland, prefabricated dwellings systems using in Poland between 1950-1995, present - day requirements of the existing largesize panel building, ways of construction and architectural modifications of this buildings. INRODUCTION Building in the people clusters is aimed to create the environment for man life and his needs. Man life in the huge clusters and economical issues have influences into rising huge urban agglomerations. In Poland, growing expanse of urban developed areas and reduction of the costs of housing caused from 50's to 90's creating of characteristics for this period perpendicular's buildings shapes - "large-panel building". The new settlements of multifamily buildings with characteristics "box's shapes houses" have been rising. STATISTIC DATE OF DWELLINGS STOCKS IN POLAND. Poland is located in the Central Europe. Poland covers an area of 312 690 km ². The longest distance from East to West is about 800 km and from North to South about 750 km. Poland has a population of 38 654000 million averaging 124 persons per 1 km². 23 908 000 people live in cities and urban areas. Poland has not a high standard of housing. On an average, the population has at its disposal 1,04 rooms per person. State-owned firms for non-profit housing associations built most of the housing in Poland in period-1945 1995. These associations constitute an instrument for realizing public housing and building policy. The associations have played an important role in the long-term development of industrialized housing in Poland. At present time most of the housing in Poland is build by private firms for private investors. Poland has a temperate climate with cold winters and warm summers. The winter temperature between 15 20 C degrees below zero the summer temperature normally between 20 and 30 C, still with rather great variations. The west and east are the prevailing directions of the wind. This, combined with rain and a lot of snow and the fact that the temperature passes freezing point an average 50 times each winter and that the ground is freezing to 60 80 cm, means high requirements to structures, design of exterior walls, joints, etc. Building activity is not maintained all year round. December, January and February are hard to reach for building activity, because of the weather. Total area of Poland in 1999 as of 31 December was 312 690 km ² Area of Poland in 1999 as of 31 December per inhabitant was 0,0081 km ² Population of Poland in 1999 as of 31 December based on balances was 38 654 000 Of which Urban areas 23 908 000 in % 61,8 Rural areas 14 746 000 in % 38,2 Population of Poland in 1999 as of 31 December based on balances per 1 km ² was 124. Poland s housing stock in 1999 as of 31 December based on balances was 11 763 300 Usable floor dwellings space per person 19,0 m² Usable floor space per dwellings 61,3 m² 1

year all units one-family houses % multi-family houses % PREFABRICATED DWELLINGS SYSTEMS USED IN POLAND BETWEEN 1950-1995 1960 142072 27519 19,4 114553 80,6 1965 170446 34321 20,1 136125 79,9 1970 194173 28769 14,8 165404 85,2 1975 248117 50809 20,5 197308 79,5 1980 217090 39901 18,4 177189 81,6 1985 189625 37648 19,9 151977 80,1 1990 134215 15434 11,5 118781 88,5 1991 136790 10718 7,8 126072 92,2 1992 132969 8190 6,2 124779 93,8 1993 94449 5922 6,3 88527 93,7 1994 76080 3842 5,0 72238 95,0 1995 67072 2531 3,8 64541 96,2 1996 62130 1612 2,6 60518 97,4 1997 73706 1380 1,9 72326 98,1 1998 80594 1438 1,8 79156 98,2 1999 81979 964 1,2 81015 98,8 Table 1. Dwellings completed in Poland. Large size-elements system. Dwellings system with large-size elements. That system was used in Poland started from 1950 year. In this system building structure was arrangement as crosswise, lengthwise and mixed configuration. Crosswise configuration was the main arrangement used in this system. Modular grid 60 x 60 cm was put into use in horizontal projection of storey. Span ceilings were 600, 480, 360, 240 cm. Ceilings were 22 cm fat. Main walls were 15 cm fat. Storey height was 280 cm, in cellar 250 cm. Usable floor space in inhabited dwelling in thous. m2 Dwellings build in large size elements in thous. m2 December 1970 December 1978 December 1988 Mai 1995 410002 502649 633107 706097 430719 in % 61 Dwellings build in other method in thous. m2 275378 dwelling 8 295 000 9 528 000 10 875 000 11056000 dwelling build in large size elements dwelling build in other method 3924880 7131120 in % 35,5 usable floor space in m2 per dwelling 50,7 53,9 59,1 63,9 Table 2. Dwellings stocks based on census data. Figure 1. Large size-elements system. Building structure was arrangement as lengthwise configuration. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) 12 000 000 10 000 000 8 000 000 dwelling build in other method 6 000 000 4 000 000 2 000 000 dwelling build in large size elements 0 December 1970 December 1978 December 1988 Mai 1995 Graph 1. Dwellings stocks based on census data. Mai 1995. Figure 2. Large size-elements system. Building structure was arrangement as crosswise configuration. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) 2

Figure 5. Large panel elements system. Building structure was arrangement as: a) two-way configuration, b) cross configuration (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Figure 3. Large size-elements system. Example of facade and repeatable storey. New Town Nowa Huta, Poland (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Figure 4. Large size-elements system. Wind membrane, building structure- crosswise configuration: a), b) in inside walls, c), d) in outside walls (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Large panel elements system. Dwellings system with large-panel elements. That system was used in Poland started from 1955 year. Modular grid 60 x 60 cm was put into use in horizontal projection of storey. Span ceilings were 600, 480, 360, 240 cm. Ceilings were 25 cm fat. Main walls were 15 cm fat. Storey height was 280 cm, in cellar 250 cm. Figure 6. Large panel elements system. Repeatable storey in two-way construction system. One of the settlements in Warsaw, Poland. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) 3

Figure 7. Large panel elements system. Example of the repeatable storey in cross construction system. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Skeleton construction system. Figure 9. Skeleton construction system. Building structure was arranged as cross configuration. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Open dwellings system with pillar and horsehead elements. Skeleton construction system was used in Poland between 1954-1958 year. In this system building structure was arrangement as plate-skeleton configuration. Crosswise configuration was the main arrangement used in this system. Modular grid 60 x 60 cm was put into use in horizontal projection of storey. Span ceilings were 480, 240 cm. Ceilings were 14 cm fat. Main walls were 15 cm fat. Storey height was 280 cm, in cellar 250 cm. Figure 10. Skeleton construction system. Example of facade and repeatable storey. Nowe Tychy, Poland (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) W 70 System. Figure 8. Skeleton construction system. Configuration of element building structure. (ref. Lewicki B., 1962) Open dwellings system with large-size elements. W 70 system was used in Poland started from 1970 year. In this system building structure was arrangement as crosswise, lengthwise and mixed configuration. Crosswise configuration was the main arrangement used in this system. Modular grid 60 x 60 cm was put into use in horizontal projection of storey. Span ceilings were 600, 480, 360, 240 cm. Ceilings were 22 cm fat. Main walls were 15 cm fat. Storey height was 280 cm, in cellar 250 cm. 4

Figure 12. W 70 System. Example of flats forming. (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Figure 11. W 70 System. Methods of houses forming. (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Figure 13. Example of facades in W-70 system. Poland (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) 5

Figure 15. Building structure was arrangement as cross configuration (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Szczecin System. Open dwellings system with large-size elements. Szczecin system was used in Poland started from 1971 year. In this system building structure was arrangement as crosswise, lengthwise and mixed configuration. Crosswise configuration was the main arrangement used in this system. Modular grid 60 x 60 cm was put into use in horizontal projection of storey. Span ceilings were 480, 240 cm. Ceilings were 14 cm fat. Main walls were 15 cm fat. Storey height was 280 cm, in cellar 250 cm. Figure 16. Szczecin system. Building structure was arranged as two-way configuration (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Figure 17. Szczecin System.Building structure was arranged as crosswise configuration (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Figure 14. Szczecin System. Configuration of building structure elements. (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) Figure 18. Example of facades in Szczecin system. Poland (ref. Węglarz M., 1972) 6

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LARGE-PANEL BUILDING. The large-panel building consisted in an initial prefabricating of the building elements. The buildings were built with mix or crosswise constructional system. Basement made from prefabricating elements founded on continuous footing poured out on the building site. Ceiling above the last storey usually was used as ventilated roof ceiling. The buildings were made with height: to five storeys without the passenger's lift shafts, to eleven storeys or higher with passenger's lifts and rubbish chutes. In the prefabricating elements plants there have been produced in the industrial way, on ready prepared technological lines the elements like: ceilings, inside walls with door's holes, outside shelter walls with ready made textures, outside walls with window's holes and balcony's door holes, balcony and loggia panel's elements, staircase landings and flights of staircases. EXISTING PROBLEMS OF THE PREFABRICATED MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS. REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRESENT DAY BUILDING. are even bigger. Development area and flexibility of its usage by the users. It requires to use a big spans usually founded on the pillars net made out in the way which allows easy exchange and arrangement of the elevation and usage area developing and their quick adopting for the running activity. Buildings made of the large-panel - possibility of adapting it to present-day architectural requirements. Present-days housing and service building results from social needs. New community needs for bigger living area allows the architects forming with bigger momentum and implementing the variety of forms and unique of shapes. The question arises: what to do with the buildings made from large-panel, which form monotonic housing estate development built in previous years? By the aesthetic matters and new needs for living area they can be demolish. Looking through the economic side - are we able to afford for such a drastic move? Compromise seems to be the only reasonable solution. Adapting the large-panel building to the present-day social and architectonic needs requires introducing constructional changes. Construction strengthening for roof shape change, change of usable room spans, adapting to heat energy consumption requirements. All of those changes are in order to adapt of largepanel building to the present day architectural needs and to meet functional and aesthetic users expectations. The requirements of the present day building have changed a lot in last years. Architectural requirements. INSIDE EXCHANGES OF EXISTING LARGE- PANEL DWELLING BUILDING. FLEXIBILITY OF INSIDE AREA ( BIGGER / SMALLER ). The present day apartment house has increased the requirements for using modem forms. Varied buildings solids, implementation of the new materials, determine a new level of those buildings. Quantity of the architectural forms and spatial compositions joined with usage of materials and surface textures requires implementing of different constructional solutions. Usable requirements. Change of the life standards makes building of the flats in the way, which gives the possibility of easy change of the flats development shape. Easy of forming the living space with possibility of free adapting to own needs is a very important factor, which have influence to the shape of present day building. The requirements for ground floor development, which are usually dedicated for services Flats area enlarging. Due to usable matters its is often required to enlarge flats area. Large-panel housing offers small flats with specialised small usable area rooms. Building made out of large-panel technology are usually used in mixed construction system. Flats area enlarging can be achieved in two ways, through joining the flat on the same level or joining neighbourhood flats on two following storeys. Enlarging the usable room's and flat's area in its level involves with removal of the wall one of the building construction element. To ensure load transfer, construction and users safety it is required to exchange disassembled wall with another element. It seems rational to use beams, which are founded under the ceiling transferring loads on the vertical construction's elements. It is constructor skill to joint knots shaping and calculating construction stability. 7

Construction solutions should not constraint architecture visions and usable room s height. Rooms developing through joining flats on two storeys can bring another troubles. Joining flats on two neighbour s storeys makes transportation problems. Easy transportation between storeys has to be assured. The most common element are staircases seldom passenger lifts. It makes additional troubles because of ceilings that are construction elements. How to put stairs in safety way into the ceiling which originally had no holes? Changing of first floor area in existing largepanel flats buildings. First floor area in existing large-panel flats buildings like others floors in this type of buildings are used for dwellings. For changing the quality of live of occupant of the houses ought to be move in new function for example: shops, restaurants, clubs, recreation areas, cultural service, etc. This function needs other construction utilities. heavier roof covering, usage of attic as additional usable floor space. Construction of the ceiling in the shape of ferroconcrete panels unable direct load transfer to ceiling. It seems rational to use steel or wood construction - which is light -strengthening and reinforcing additional loads on the building walls. The whole construction should be light with possibility of easy assembly. We ought to be able to assembly such construction near the existing building, on the ground and afterwards put it up of the building. Such constructions should be able to transmit the usable loads and dead weight on responsible construction elements. Additionally the heat insulating power and noise protection requirements in the rooms for people should be met. New part Old part OUTSIDE EXCHANGES OF EXISTING LARGE-PANEL DWELLING BUILDING. Adding vertical elements. Outside exchanges of existing large-panel dwelling building can be done by adding new vertical elements. New part Old part Figure 19. Example of adding vertical elements. (Rybka A., Ostafijczuk A.) Composition of the roofs covers. In the low buildings change of roofs shape seems to be rational solution. Change of the roofs shape varies building shape and can make at the same time its renovation or possibility of flats development. Change of the roofs construction for rafter framing often forcing the load increase on the last storey. That load can increase itself because of application of Figure 20. Example of adding roof with new shape and new last storey. (Rybka A., Ostafijczuk A.) 8

Adding horizontal elements. Changing of shape of existing large-panel flats buildings by adding new elements: new parts of building. Changing of first floor area in existing large-panel flats buildings plus adding new elements outside of the building. material on the outer surfaces. The insulating material is mainly foamed polystyrene, which is joint to the walls by glue materials and mechanical elements. This elements are additionally strengthen with plastics nets and covered by plaster mortar. Advantage of this method is thermal bridges total liquidation, speed and execution simplicity. In the buildings with higher finishing quality requirements, there are often nobly finishing material used. In that case the outer wall's surface is putted on a framework between which the heat insulation panels are fixed. Old part Elevation aesthetic raising. New part Figure 21. Example of adding horizontal elements. (Rybka A., Ostafijczuk A.) Improving of quality of connections of elements in existing large-panel flats buildings. Sometimes there are problems with connection of elements in existing buildings. Specially with balcony elements. Increasing of thermal comfort. The large-panel buildings aesthetic value has devaluated a lot in last years. In order to change its view different solutions can be applied. The simplest one seems to be an application of a new colouring of the elevation. It can be made together with thermal renovation. There are new textures used such as acrylic or mineral plasters laid after heat insulation making or as facing of ready made elements in the shape of panels. More advanced one solution for elevation view improvement is its total change. It seems to be possible to exchange the outer walls with new constructions with the simultaneously change of its architecture, which enables the change of view and possibilities for buildings adaptation. The question arises how big influence has the change of the elevation on the building construction's stiffness. It seems to be possible to change the shape of the building by its partial demolition. Disassembling of a few storeys from the perpendicular's shape building will vary its body. We can add new elements which can change elevations and help us to enlarge flats area. Rising prices of heat energy and requirements for thermal comfort makes necessity to apply additional heat insulation on buildings. Large-panel buildings whose outer partition walls include low layer of insulating materials characterise high heat transfer coefficient, which follows lowering thermal comfort and high exploitation costs. There is necessity to make additional thermal insulation on the existing buildings to reduce cost of its using. The most frequently used in Poland method of heat insulation is light method. It consists in increasing of wall's thermal resistance through laying the insulating Old part New elements 9

Figure 22. Example of adding to facade new elements. (Rybka A., Ostafijczuk A.) CONCLUSION. In Poland, first problem is that, we must to demolish about 800 000 dwellings because of their technically poor condition level. Also, we have approximately 300 dwellings per 1000 inhabitants in Poland, nowadays. This coefficient is one of the lowest in Europe. We must build about 1500 000 dwellings because of our social needs in Poland. So in total, we need about 2300 000 new dwellings in Poland in near future. Second problem is, haw to accommodate to new social needs dwelling-buildings which were been done with using of prefabricate technologies in last 5 decades (between 1950-1995 year). In Poland, large-panel building started in fifties and continued by forty five years was in order to meet the social flat requirements, towns' developing together with the cost reduction. The simplest solution was mass-production. In advance preparation of the typed building elements speeded up the assembly and increased the quantity of putted to use buildings - that was the matter. Do the buildings which have exist for dozens of years, must to be change? If we look at present day flat and service development, that direction is unavoidable. Due to still high cost of development, the large-panel building is going to be used. One more possibility remains adaptation of the buildings to actual housing and servicing needs. What is most needed here and now? Improving of quality of connections of elements in existing large-panel flats buildings. Increasing of thermal comfort in existing buildings. Because of climate conditions we must change composition of the existing roofs covers. In the low buildings change of roofs shape seems to be rational solution. While we will change of the roofs shape we can varies building shape and we can make at the same time its renovation or we have possibility of increase number of flats in existing building. Another thing is problem of changing first floor area in existing large-panel dwelling buildings. Nowadays social needs shows that we need more space for retail trade or for handicraft in neighbourhood of the flats. We can find the area for it on the first floor in existing buildings. Adding horizontal elements to existing large-panel dwelling buildings. We will have opportunity to increase number of flats in existing building. Changing of shape of existing large-panel flats buildings by adding new elements: new parts of building. We will have opportunity to improve thermal comfort in existing buildings. Changing of first floor area in existing large-panel flats buildings plus adding new elements outside of the building. We will have opportunity to enlarge area for new retail trade or for handicraft in neighbourhood of the flats in existing buildings. References: 1. Collective work, 1998, Concrete building, Arkady, Warsaw 2. Węglarz M., 1972, collective work, Dwelling construction systems, Arkady, Warsaw 3. Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland 1995, 1999. Polish Statistical Office, Warsaw 1996,2000. 4. Januszaniec B., l985, Concrete building for architects, Białystok University of Technology, Białystok 5. Kobiak J., 1991, Ferroconcrete constructions. Arkady, Warsaw 6. Krol W., 1969, Ferroconcrete constructions. PWN, Warsaw 7. Lewicki B., 1961, Big size elements for dwelling buildings, Arkady, Warsaw 8. Parczewski W., 1995, Concrete building for architects: finishing work elements, Warsaw University of Technology Publishing House, Warsaw. 9. Rybka A., 2001, Evaluation of MBT buildings Modernisation Aspects and an estimation of a heat insulation of multi-story houses made of large-sized prefabricated units, COST C12, Bled 10. Starosolski W., 1985, Ferroconcrete constructions, PWN, Warsaw 11. Voivodships from 1995 till 2000, www.stat.gov.pl 12. www.stat.gov.pl What we will need tomorrow? Flexibility of inside area in existing large-panel dwelling buildings ( bigger / smaller ), we will need flats area enlarging. 10