CONCEPTUAL REVITALIZATION PLAN DRAFT 3, APRIL 2009

Similar documents
6 th Annual Green Building Conference

Biodiversity Planning Policy and Guidelines for (LEP) Rezoning Proposals

Upper Southampton Township US ACOE USF&WS UNH

Marin County Agricultural Land Conservation Program March 1, 2014

Protecting Water in the Stream: Colorado s Instream Flow Program Sustaining Colorado Watersheds

Staying Connected in the Northern Appalachians

Introduction to INRMP Implementation Options

Land Conservation Agreements Project Guidance

Corte Madera Marsh Restoration Project Update

Colorado s Instream Flow Program: History and Current Activities. New Mexico Environmental Flows Workshop March 15, 2010 Albuquerque, New Mexico

OUR FUTURE. Recreation & Conservation Choices for Northern Colorado

Appendix G. Non-Federal Letters of Support and Draft Real Estate Plan

Sample Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) Annotated Template for Environmentally Important Land

Validation Checklist. Date submitted: How to use this check-list. Ecosystem Credit Accounting System. Version 1.1&2. Project Information

NEW YORK CITY WETLANDS TRANSFER TASK FORCE PROPERTY ASSESSMENT FORM

Township of Tay Official Plan

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

Conservancy Mission. Leveraging GIS Technologies in Chesapeake Conservation and Restoration 10/17/2018

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation January 18, Carmel River Parkway Acquisitions. File No Project Manager: Trish Chapman

Hutt River City Centre Upgrade Project Preliminary Integrated Design

***** Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS ***** PERMIT APPLICATIONS

Big Darby Accord Watershed Master Plan

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

I N T R O D U C T I O N

Proposed Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge and Conservation Area

Public Notice. Applicant: Avere Real Estate Project No.: SWF Date: May 30, Phone Number:

Schedule "A Fees (Planning Advisory Program)

Application Form for the Transfer / Release of Aquatic Life

Mingo County, WV Community Coordination Preliminary Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Map. Thursday, September 25, 2014

Council Public Meeting

Baseline Documentation and Inventory Protocol, Version 2

United States Post Office and Multi-Family Residential; and, Single- Family Residence with an Apartment

Implementation of Permanent Easements and Associated Nutrient Load Reductions

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

Implementation Tools for Local Government

Chapter 10 Local Protection Measures

City of Brandon Brownfield Strategy

APPENDIX H REAL ESTATE REQUIREMENTS

ONE FINANCIAL PLAZA. Syracuse New York

PROJECT SCORING GUIDANCE. Introduction: National Proiect Selection:

LIVING LANDS BIODIVERSITY GRANTS: INFORMATION AND APPLICATION. Due: January 16, 2009

Comprehensive Plan /24/01

Integrating the Napa River Flood Project. into the City of Napa

Nova Scotia Community Lands Trust Discussion Paper. Approaches to Enable Community Participation In the Purchase of Land

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 17, 2018

113,923,000. Article 1 Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY OFFICIAL PLAN ADOPTED BY COUNCIL

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Protecting Rivers and Streams Through. November 17, 2011 Silverton, Colorado

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Project Description Preferred Alternative

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65302

Executive Summary Montana Land Use Planning Strategies to Reduce Wildfire Risk Headwaters Economics September 2017

An Update on the Activities of The Appraisal Foundation

Local Climate Action Planning Process Final Report

Reviewing Growth Management Planning for Housing

ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. Reflections on the Value of Acquiring Property for Preservation Purposes

PURPOSE OF STUDY. physical and social environments, as well as our political and economic institutions. As a commodity,

Easement Program Guidelines for Water Resources and Stream Work

Date: June 17, Recreation and Park Commission. Dawn Kamalanathan Planning Director

Lessard Sams Outdoor Heritage Council

Transfer of Development Rights. February 13, 2017

RECITALS. B. WHEREAS, Ranch, its successors and assigns, are referred to in the Easement as the Grantor ; and

Meetinghouse Village. Proudly Introducing. CONDOMINIUMS Norfolk, Massachusetts

Martin Correctional Institution and Work Camp

Atlanta BeltLine REGIONAL SYMPOISUM ON IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT PLANS

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 8, 2016

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

Land Trust of Santa Cruz County. Strategic Plan. July 2012 to June This is a public version of a more detailed internal plan.

Skagit Countywide UGA Open Space Concept Plan Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. CALL TO ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE MEETING 4. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF

Frequently Asked Questions

NOTICE OF LAND USE DECISION BY THE COOS COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DROUGHT CONDITIONS ON LAKE HARTWELL AND THE SURROUNDING REGION

NEW STARTS. Land Use & Economic Development. gbplacemaking.com

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. NASDAQ: CHCI. New Business Model March 2018

APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OF A SKETCH PLAN with checklist

Conservation Development in the West: Trends in Regulation and Practice SARAH REED, LIBA PEJCHAR & LINDSAY EX

BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT

Tonawanda Brownfield Opportunity Area

LAND USE Inventory and Analysis

Easement Program Guidelines for Locating Septic Systems outside. Acceptable Development Areas (ADA)

2016 HIGHLIGHTS. 98 Market Avenue

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Acquisition of Florida Power and Light

Home Warranty Industry Another Warranty Niche

The Guadalupe Blanco River Trust and the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority: Creating and Then Working with a Non-Profit Conservation Partner

Kent Land Trust Strategic Reassessment Project Final Report

Using Easements to Conserve Biodiversity. Jeff Lerner Defenders of Wildlife

Using Affirmative Covenants in Conservation Easements

Alberta Conservation Association 2015/16 Program Summary Report

CULPEPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED TO VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JUNE 2013

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REVISED SITE PLAN CONDITIONS

Neds Corner Station. What is a Conservation Covenant?

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

, Brussels Andras Krolopp. The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to: conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

AMENDMENT NUMBER 38 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST LINCOLN (COMPLIANCE)

Transcription:

CONCEPTUAL REVITALIZATION PLAN DRAFT 3, APRIL 2009 Onondaga Environmental Institute

Onondaga Creek Conceptual Revitalization Plan was produced by Onondaga Environmental Institute as a work product of the Onondaga Creek Conceptual Revitalization Plan Project (OCRP). Visit www.esf.edu/onondagacreek for more information. The Onondaga Lake Partnership (OLP) sponsors the Onondaga Creek Conceptual Revitalization Plan Project with federal funds from Congressman James T. Walsh granted through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Visit www.onlakepartners.org for more information about the OLP. Disclaimer: This report has been reviewed by the individual members of the Onondaga Lake Partnership. Approval for publication does not signify adoption or approval for purposes of regulatory, enforcement or other legal actions. Nor does it obligate any of the member agencies to endorse any of the factual, scientific or legal assertions, characterizations or conclusions contained herein. Contributing Authors Atlantic States Legal Foundation: Samuel Sage Cornell Cooperative Extension of Onondaga County (CCE): Amy Samuels, Kelly Somerlot Onondaga Environmental Institute (OEI): Samuel Gordon, Edward Michalenko, Meredith Perreault State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF): Tanushree Chowdhury, Richard Smardon Graphic Design Samuel Gordon and Julia Renn, Onondaga Environmental Institute Acknowledgements Onondaga Creek Working Group Community participants in Onondaga Creek Working Group and Goal and Issue Solicitation Meetings OCRP Project Team OEI Staff: Tyler Andre, Brigit Burt, Daniel Gefell, Samuel Gordon, Robert Griffiths, Donald Hughes, Stephanie Johnson, Nancy Kaiser, Julia Renn, Joan Cope Savage, Carla Wiemers OEI Interns: Tim Jones, Dylan Smith OEI Former Staff: Clark Burdick, Jennifer Fredenberg, Lindsay Speer ESF Graduate Students: Janet Marsden, Bruno Takahashi Onondaga Creek Community Forums Facilitator: Kim Farrell Kim Farrell Consulting, Inc. Onondaga Creek Resource Experts: Steven Nann City of Syracuse Department of Engineering; Cathy Keenan Natural Resources Conservation Service; Diane Carlton and David Lemmon New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC); Mark Schaub Onondaga County Soil and Water Conservation District; Emanuel Carter, Virginia Collins, Theodore Endreny, Myrna Hall, Maren King, Catherine Landis, Donald Leopold, Karin Limburg, Neil Ringler, and Kathy Stribley SUNY ESF; Jacob Bendix Syracuse University; William Kappel U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Onondaga Creek Stakeholder Meeting Facilitators: Amy Samuels and Kelly Somerlot CCE; Judith Mower J.C. Mower Consulting, Inc.; Kim Farrell Kim Farrell Consulting, Inc.; Diane Carlton and Stephanie Harrington NYSDEC; Richard Smardon SUNY ESF; Edward Bogucz Syracuse Center of Excellence; Theodore Brown, Thomas Perreault, Sarah Pralle Syracuse University U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2: Seth Ausubel and Christopher Dere Stakeholder Meeting Sponsors: COR Development Company, Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, and Wachovia Securities Onondaga Environmental Institute CONCEPTUAL REVITALIZATION PLAN 2009 Onondaga Environmental Institute Printed on 50% post-consumer recycled paper

Table of Contents vi Executive Summary - An overview for all readers Purpose Existing Conditions and Problems Drivers and Goals - A guiding image for Onondaga Creek s future Recommendations - Process steps and pilot projects The Onondaga Creek Conceptual Revitalization Plan - Chapter by chapter xvii Forward 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Onondaga Creek Conceptual Revitalization Plan? Project Goal Project Area Project Sponsorship and Funding Project Participants Mandate and Authority Why Do We Need a Plan? What is Revitalization? The Role of Public Participation Understanding the System Conclusion Watershed Planning: A new approach 9 Chapter 2: Onondaga Creek - Geography & Historical Context First Nation Physical Setting Early Development and Industry Flooding and Waste Treatment Onondaga Creek Channelization Urban Momentum 17 Chapter 3: The State of Onondaga Creek Findings Water Quality Fish and Aquatic Habitat Hydrology Flood Control Tully Valley Mudboils Access Land Use and Land Cover 29 Chapter 4: Revitalization Plan Development - Process Technical Information Public Education Goal and Issue Solicitation Working Group Learning Phases and Plan Components Development Map Development Map Review and Project Area Development Goals and Plan Development 39 Chapter 5: Revitalization Plan - Results Technical Information Public Education Goals and Issue Solicitation Working Group Revitalization Map Series

77 Chapter 6: Other Local Initiatives Example 1: Onondaga Creek Walk Example 2: Connective Corridor Example 3: Near Westside Initiative 85 Chapter 7: Constraints Constraints Social and Economic Constraints Environmental Constraints Data Gaps The Advantages of Monitoring 91 Chapter 8: Implementation Strategies Opportunities in Existing Land Use Rural Strategies Regulatory Measures Non-Regulatory Land Purchase Mechanisms Assistance Programs for Specific Landowners Urban Strategies Lakefront: Inner Harbor to Franklin Square Downtown: Clinton Square and Armory Square Southside: Midland RTF to Botanical Garden and Arboretum Valley: North Valley and South Valley Establishment of Design and Sustainability Standards Establishment of Standards for Ecological Creek Restoration Intermunicipal Agreements for Creek Watershed Management Funding Resources Potential Funding Streams 109 Chapter 9: Immediate Next Steps Process Steps Recommended Pilot Projects Conclusion 115 Abbreviations List 116 Glossary (Definitions for words in italics can be found here) 118 Photo Credits 120 Reference List Appendices (on compact disc) A. OCRP Workplan B. Onondaga Creek Fact Sheets C. Case Studies Guide D. Working Group Meeting Minutes E. Working Group Handouts F. OCRP Project Team Minutes G. Goal and Issue Solicitation Results H. OCRP Communications and Media I. Best Management Practices: Management measures and practices to control nonpoint source pollution into receiving waters J. SUNY ESF Flora and Fauna Lists for Onondaga Creek K. On-going Projects List L. Onondaga Creek Habitat Restoration Demonstration Initiative Restoration Proposals M. Data Gaps N. Funding Sources

Urban centers all over the world have rediscovered their waterways. The phenomenon known as waterfront revitalization has reconnected people to water in cities across the United States and has served as a means for environmental, social, and economic enhancement. Photos: South Platte River in Denver, Colorado, top; Tennessee River, Chattanooga, Tennessee, top inset; Onondaga Creek at Newell Street, Syracuse, bottom; Onondaga Creek at Franklin Square, Syracuse, bottom inset. (Photo credits: Richard Smardon and OEI) vi Executive Summary