PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN

Similar documents
BULLETIN NO. 5. Senate Bill No. 35 Affordable Housing Streamlined Approval PLANNING DIRECTOR. SECTION 1: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET

IS YOUR CITY READY FOR SENATE BILL 35? Amara Morrison 1111 Broadway, 24 th Floor Oakland, CA

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 2162 (CA GOVT. CODE 65650) AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION PACKET

SENATE BILL No. 35. December 5, 2016

2012 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, California Government Code Section Project Submittal 1.C Applicant Statement October 26, 2018

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

New Planning Code Summary: HOME-SF and Density Bonus Projects

Honorable Members of the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board. Chair Selawsky, Vice Chair Laverde-Levine and Commissioner Townley

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

ANALYZED STATE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM INFORMATIONAL PACKET

IMPACT OF NEW HOUSING LEGISLATION City of Concord

A Closer Look at California's New Housing Production Laws

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5

An act to add Chapter 4.35 (commencing with Section ) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to housing.

DRAFT Permanent Supportive Housing Ordinance Page 1 As amended by the City Planning Commission on December 14, 2017 CPC CA ORDINANCE NO.

City of San Juan Capistrano. Agenda Memorandum

CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, 2016 NEW BUSINESS REVIEW AND UPDATE THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS LAW MAYOR LAUREN MEISTER

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Change INFORMATIONAL HEARING DATE: MAY 17, 2018

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. City of Santa Ana

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

Community Development

100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONUS PROGRAM

Guidelines for Implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance of the City of San José, Chapter 5.08 of the San José Municipal Code.

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Density Bonus Law Overview. January 5 th, 2016

ANALYZED STATE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 73. Introduced by Assembly Members Chiu and Caballero (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin, Santiago, and Ting) December 16, 2016

ORDINANCE NO

Affordable Housing Bonus Program

PERCENTAGE OF INCLUSIONARY UNITS AND AFFORDABILITY LEVELS:

ORDINANCE NO

UNDERSTANDING THE 2017 HOUSING BILLS Bay Area Planning Directors Association

Executive Summary Planning Code Amendment HEARING DATE: JANUARY 28, DAY DEADLINE: MARCH 15, 2016

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915

100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONUS PROGRAM

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: MAY 10, 2018

Affordable Housing Bonus Program

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

CONDITIONAL USE AUTHORIZATION

ORDINANCE NO

Strategic Growth Council: Identifying Infill Barriers

Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to all residential developments within the City.

Focus: onsite affordable units. Kearstin Dischinger, Planning Department October 12, 2016 / Inclusionary Housing TAC

LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL 1069 (WIECKOWSKI) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Letter of Determination Suite 400

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 2018 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Affordable Housing Incentives. Regional TOD Advisory Committee June 15, 2018

Item 10 November 16, 2016

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

American Planning Association's Smart Codes: Model Land-Development Regulations 4.4 MODEL AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS ORDINANCE

Title 8 - ZONING Division AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Chapter RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

GENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE- DWELLING DEVELOPMENT

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

07/16/2014 Item #10E Page 1

Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities

CITY OF OAKLAND SUPPLEMENTAL FORM AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and Katy Wisinski, Assistant City Attorney

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ACADEMY 2018 IN THE TRENCHES WITH YOUR GENERAL PLAN

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

Hercules Zoning Code Amendment

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

Re: Grand Jury Report No. 1707, Homelessness in the Cities by the Contra Costa Grand Jury

ORDINANCE NO

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

APPLICATION PACKET FOR. In the Coastal Zone Area

18.15 (Residential Density Bonus) of Title 18 (Zoning) ofthe Palo Alto

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

HILLS BEVERLY. Planning Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills

Housing Element City of Brisbane. City of Brisbane 50 Park Place Brisbane, CA 94005

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Memo to the Planning Commission JULY 12TH, 2018

CITY OF BELMONT INCLUSIONARY ZONING AND IMPACT FEES

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

6-6 Livermore Development Code

RESOLUTION NO. PC

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ARTICLE 101 Workforce Housing Regulation

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title )

VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN

N.C. Housing Finance Agency

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 101 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING OVERVIEW. September 18, 2017 Housing Subcommittee

City of Palo Alto (ID # 8694) City Council Staff Report

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE

MEETING DATE: 08/1/2017 ITEM NO: 16 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: JULY 27, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER

CHAPTER 82 HOUSING FINANCE

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

Transcription:

This Bulletin outlines how the Planning Department administers streamlined approval for affordable and supportive housing. PLANNING DIRECTOR Streamlined Approval Processes for Affordable and Supportive Housing First Issued: DECEMBER 2017 Updated: JANUARY 2019 References: Government Code Section 65650 (Assembly Bill 2162) Government Code Section 65913.4 (Senate Bill 35) Planning Code Section 206.4 Planning Code Section 315 INTRODUCTION: The State of California has introduced various programs for streamlining housing production, including Senate Bill 35 which became effective January 1, 2018, and Assembly Bill 2162 which became effective January 1, 2019. These two programs require local jurisdictions to provide a ministerial approval process for affordable, mixed-income, and Supportive Housing projects that meet certain criteria. The ministerial approval process removes the requirement for CEQA analysis, and removes the requirement for Conditional Use Authorization or other similar discretionary entitlements granted by the Planning Commission. This bulletin includes the eligibility criteria for each program, and outlines how the Planning Department administers streamlined approval. SB-35 (CA GOVT. CODE SECTION 65913.4) Overview California Senate Bill 35 (SB-35) was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 29, 2017 and became effective January 1, 2018. SB-35 applies in cities that are not meeting their Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) goal for construction of abovemoderate income housing and/or housing for households below 80% area median income (AMI). SB-35 amends Government Code Section 65913.4 to require local entities to streamline the approval of certain housing projects by providing a ministerial approval process, removing the requirement for CEQA analysis, and removing the requirement for Conditional Use Authorization or other similar discretionary entitlements granted by a Planning Commission. This bulletin outlines how the Planning Department administers streamlined approval set forth in Government Code Section 65913.4. Eligibility Criteria Currently, San Francisco meets its RHNA goal for construction of above-moderate income housing. However, the City is not meeting the RHNA goal for affordable housing below 80% AMI. Therefore, at this time, projects providing on-site affordable housing at 80% AMI are eligible for streamlining in San Francisco if they meet all of the following criteria: Affordability. At least 50% of the proposed residential units must be dedicated as affordable to households at 80% AMI for either rental or ownership projects. In order to assure that the affordable units remain so dedicated, they must comply with the San Francisco Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program Procedures Manual with regard to monitoring, enforcement, and procedures for eligibility, including the lottery. Number of Units. The development must contain at least two or more residential units.

Zoning and Residential Uses. The development must be located on a legal parcel or parcels that are zoned for residential uses. At least 2/3 of the floor area of the proposed building must be dedicated to residential uses. Location. The development must be located on a property that is not within a coastal zone, prime farmland, wetlands, a high fire hazard severity zone, hazardous waste site, a delineated earthquake fault zone, a flood plain, a floodway, a community conservation plan area, a habitat for protected species, or under a conservation easement. Demolition of Residential Units. The project does not demolish any housing units that have been occupied by tenants in the last 10 years; are subject to any form of rent or price control, or are subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low incomes. Historic Buildings. The project does not demolish a historic structure that is on a national, state, or local historic register. A local historic register includes those properties listed within Article 10 or 11 of the San Francisco Planning Code. Consistent with Objective Standards. The project must meet all objective standards of the Planning Code at the time of SB-35 application submittal. Such objective standards are those that require no personal or subjective (discretionary) judgment, such as objective dimensional requirements, and as otherwise set forth in the Additional Eligibility Criteria for Ministerial Approval below. Prevailing Wages. If the development is not in its entirety a public work, as defined in Government Code Section 65913.4 (a)(8)(a), all construction workers employed in the execution of the development must be paid at least the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for the type of work and geographic area. Skilled and Trained Workforce provisions. A skilled and trained workforce, as defined in Government Code Section 65913.4 (a)(8)(b)iii, must complete the development if the project consists of 75 or more units that are not 100 percent subsidized affordable housing. Subdivisions. The development did not or does not involve a subdivision of a parcel that is subject to the California Subdivision Map Act, unless the development either (i) receives a low-income housing tax credit and is subject to the requirement that prevailing wages be paid, or (ii) is subject to the requirements to pay prevailing wages and to use a skilled and trained workforce. SB 35 Development Review Timeline SB-35 includes timelines for streamlined ministerial review. Planning staff must determine if a project is eligible for streamlining within 60 days of application submittal for projects of 150 or fewer units, and 90 days for projects containing more than 150 units. If the Department provides written comments to a Project Sponsor detailing how a project is not SB-35 eligible as proposed, then the 60 or 90 day timeline will restart upon submittal of a revised development application in response to the that written notice. Design review or public oversight must be completed in 90 days for projects with 150 or fewer units and 180 days for projects with more than 150 units. AB 2162 (CA GOVT. CODE SECTION 65650) Overview California Assembly Bill No. 2162 (AB-2162) was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 26, 2018 and will be effective January 1, 2019. AB-2162 applies statewide and requires that supportive housing be a use that is permitted by right in zones where multifamily and mixed-use development is permitted. AB-2162 amends Government Code Section 65583 and adds Code Section 65650 to require local entities to streamline the approval of housing projects containing a minimum amount of Supportive Housing by providing a ministerial approval process, removing the requirement for CEQA analysis and removing the requirement for Conditional Use Authorization or other similar discretionary entitlements granted by a Planning Commission. This bulletin outlines how the Planning Department administers streamlined approval set forth in Government Code Section 65650. 2 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

What is Supportive Housing? Supportive Housing is defined as housing with no limit on the length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and is linked to on-site or off-site services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving their health status, and maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community (CA-HSC 50675.14). Target populations include homeless individuals, youth and families, and people with disabilities. Eligibility Criteria Projects are eligible for streamlining under AB-2162 if they meet all of the following criteria: Affordability. All of the proposed residential units must be dedicated as affordable to households at 80% AMI or below for a period of at least 55 years. At least 25% of the total number of units, or 12 units (whichever is greater) must be restricted for residents of Supportive Housing who meet the Target Population. If there are fewer than 12 units in the project, then the entire project must be restricted for residents of Supportive Housing. Supportive Services. Supportive Services include, but are not limited to, a combination of subsidized, permanent housing, intensive case management, medical and mental health care, substance abuse treatment, employment services, and benefits advocacy. For projects with 20 units or fewer, at least 90 square feet of space must be dedicated to supportive services. For projects with more than 20 units at least 3% of the non-residential floor area must be dedicated to supportive services. Zoning. The project must be in a District that allows for multifamily (2 or more units) or mixed-use zoning. Replacement of Existing Units. If the project demolishes any existing residential unit, then the project must include replacement unit(s) in the Supportive Housing Development in the manner described in CA Govt. Code Section 65915(c)(3). Amenities. Each unit, excluding the manager s unit, must have at least a bathroom, refrigerator, stovetop and sink. Consistent with Objective Standards. The project must comply with objective, written development standards and policies which apply to other multifamily developments within the same Zoning District. Such objective standards are those that require no personal or subjective (discretionary) judgment, such as objective dimensional requirements, and as otherwise set forth below. AB 2162 Development Review Timeline AB-2162 includes timelines for streamlined ministerial review. Planning staff must determine if a project is eligible for streamlining within 30 days of application submittal. If the Department provides written comments to a Project Sponsor detailing how a project is not AB-2162 eligible as proposed, then the 30 day timeline will restart upon submittal of a revised development application in response to the that written notice. Design review or public oversight must be completed in 60 days for projects with 50 or fewer units and 120 days for projects with more than 50 units. Additional Eligibility Considerations for Ministerial Approval There are various programs and entitlement paths in the Planning Code for projects providing 50-100% of the residential units as affordable. The following section provides information about these specific project types. 3 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 315 May be used in conjunction with: SB 35 and AB 2162 Currently, 100% Affordable Housing Projects are considered a principally permitted use and must comply with administrative review procedures provided in Planning Code Section 315. Under Planning Code Section 315, an Affordable Housing Project may seek exceptions to Planning Code requirements that may otherwise be available through the Planning Code, including but not limited to Sections 253, 303, 304, 309, and 329, without a Planning Commission hearing. These have been considered discretionary exceptions from the objective controls of the Planning Code. The Planning Department will ministerially grant an eligible project any exception that is equal to or less than the Zoning Modifications automatically granted to a 100% Affordable Housing Bonus Project pursuant to Planning Code Section 206.4. Any 100% Affordable Housing Project granted such an exception, pursuant to Planning Code Section 315 and this Bulletin, will be considered to be consistent with the objective controls of the Planning Code. Under Planning Code Section 206.4, qualifying projects are entitled to receive certain Zoning Modifications, as well as a density bonus and height increase. These modifications are provided in detail as follows: Rear Yard. The required rear yard per Section 134 or any applicable special use district may be reduced to no less than 20% of the lot depth or 15 feet, whichever is greater. Corner properties may provide 20% of the lot area at the interior corner of the property to meet the minimum rear yard requirement, provided that each horizontal dimension of the open area is a minimum of 15 feet; and that the open area is wholly or partially contiguous to the existing midblock open space, if any, formed by the rear yards of adjacent properties. Dwelling Unit Exposure. The dwelling unit exposure requirements of Section 140(a)(2) may be satisfied through qualifying windows facing an unobstructed open area that is no less than 15 feet in every horizontal dimension, and such open area is not required to expand in every horizontal dimension at each subsequent floor. Off Street Loading. No off-street loading spaces under Section 152. Automobile Parking. Up to a 100% reduction in the minimum off-street residential and commercial automobile parking requirement under Article 1.5 of the Planning Code. Open Space. Up to a 10% reduction in common open space requirements if required by Section 135, but no less than 36 square feet of open space per unit. Inner Courts as Open Space. In order for an inner court to qualify as useable common open space, Section 135(g)(2) requires it to be at least 20 feet in every horizontal dimension, and for the height of the walls and projections above the court on at least three sides (or 75% of the perimeter, whichever is greater) to be no higher than one foot for each foot that such point is horizontally distant from the opposite side of the clear space in the court. 100 Percent Affordable Housing Bonus Projects may instead provide an inner court that is at least 25 feet in every horizontal dimension, with no restriction on the heights of adjacent walls. All area within such an inner court shall qualify as common open space under Section 135. 100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING BONUS PROJECTS UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 206.4 May be used in conjunction with: SB 35 and AB 2162 The 100% Affordable Housing Bonus Program allows for objective Zoning Modifications in association with a Development Bonuses, including a density bonus and height increase. Projects that are eligible for the 100% Affordable Housing Bonus Program pursuant to Section 206.4 qualify for streamlining pursuant to SB-35 or AB- 2162, provided they meet all eligibility requirements above, and require no additional Planning Code exceptions from the Planning Commission. 4 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

STATE DENSITY BONUS PROJECTS UNDER PLANNING CODE SECTION 206.5 OR 206.6 May be used in conjunction with: SB 35 and AB 2162 Projects that use the State Density Bonus Program and meet all other eligibility requirements above qualify for streamlining under SB-35 and AB-2162. Any waivers, concessions, or incentives, conferred through the State Density Bonus Law are considered code-complying, and therefore are consistent with the objective standards of the Planning Code. MIXED-INCOME AFFORDABLE PROJECTS (50-99% AFFORDABLE) Applicable to SB 35 projects only Mixed-income projects that provide at least 50% of units that are affordable to qualifying households and meet all other eligibility requirements above are eligible for streamlining pursuant to SB-35. If Planning Code exceptions are required as part of a project approval including, but not limited to, a Variance (Sec. 305), a Downtown Authorization Project (Sec. 309), a HOME-SF Project Conditional Use authorization (Sec. 303), or a Large Project Authorization (Sec. 329), the project is not eligible for streamlining because it does not comply with objective standards of the Planning Code. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS Projects that elect to take advantage of streamlining must submit a site or building permit application, a Project Application, and either an AB-2162 or SB-35 supplemental application indicating the project s eligibility. CEQA review is not required for eligible projects because they are subject to a ministerial approval process. The site or building permit will not be subject to any applicable neighborhood notice requirements in the Planning Code, as the Department will not accept Discretionary Review applications for these projects because they are subject to a ministerial approval process. The Planning Director may decide, on a case by case basis, to schedule a design review hearing for an SB-35 project at the Planning Commission and/or Historic Preservation Commission. CONTACT For additional information, please contact Kate Conner at 415.575.6914 or by email at kate.conner@sfgov.org. 5 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call or visit the San Francisco Planning Department Central Reception 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco CA 94103-2479 TEL: 415.558.6378 FAX: 415 558-6409 WEB: http://www.sfplanning.org Planning Information Center (PIC) 1660 Mission Street, First Floor San Francisco CA 94103-2479 TEL: 415.558.6377 Planning staff are available by phone and at the PIC counter. No appointment is necessary. 6 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT