RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NUMBER 5059

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

RESOLUTION NO WHEREAS, an airport land use report was subsequently prepared by Johnson Aviation for the City of Perris; and

WHEREAS, public notice was provided in accordance with Government Code Section of the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; and

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4678

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 Page 2

RESOLUTION NO xx

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

ORDINANCE NO. 17- WHEREAS, Ordinance No , by law, is effective for only 10 months and 15 days and expires on January 26, 2017; and

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. (,.J Key Words: Southwest Dixon, General Plan, Specific Plan Rezone Meeting Date: May 18, 2016

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MONTESSA SUBDIVISION

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. 615-C.S.

Item 10C 1 of 69

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

RESOLUTION NO

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

MONTEREY COUNTY STANDARD SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

Agenda Item No. 6B January 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

The City Council makes the following findings:

820 BEL MARIN KEYS BOULEVARD, NOVATO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Planning Commission Staff Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

ORDINANCE NO REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD)

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

City of Calistoga Staff Report

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO A.P. #

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Planning Commission Staff Report August 4, 2016

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

2/16/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

1708 Martin Luther King Jr. Way

AN ORDINANCE OF THE NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAPA COUNTY AND NAPA REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO

7-1. Finance and Insurance Committee. Board of Directors. 7/11/2017 Board Meeting. Subject. Executive Summary. Details

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

ORDINANCE NO

Maureen T. Carson, Community Development Director

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Gateway Center has been developed in phases. overtime; and

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, many Vacation Rentals are currently operating throughout Mendocino County; and

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission

CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, :30 A.M.

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT MARCH 26, 2015

CITY OF PALMDALE REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM THE CITY MANAGER. DATE: March 6, 2013

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436)

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

Planning Commission Resolution No

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

ORDINANCE NO XX

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO THE CITY'S

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING: (1) TENTATIVE MAP AND STREET VACATION 05-0112 (COUNTY MAP NO. 33587) TO SUBDIVIDE 90.0 ACRES INTO FIVE PARCELS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PERRIS BOULEVARD AND MARKHAM STREET; AND (2) DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 05-0113 FOR THE PLOTTING AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE OF SAID LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, on March 23, 2005, the applicant, Industrial Development International, Inc., filed a formal planning application for: (1) Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #200611102) to assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project; (2) Tentative Map and Street Vacation 05-0112 (33587) to subdivide the 90.0 gross acre project site into five parcels and to vacate Nance Street between Perris Boulevard and Indian Avenue; and (3) Development Plan Review 05-0113 for the plotting and building architecture of said industrial development; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2006, the Planning Commission held a scoping meeting and workshop for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to discuss and hear from the public on the potential environmental impacts and plotting and building architecture of said industrial development; and WHEREAS, from October 29, 2008, through December 15, 2008, the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was available for public inspection and comment during the state-mandated 45-day public review period; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2009, the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) was distributed to the City of Perris City Council and Planning Commission, and to those agencies and persons that commented in writing on the Draft EIR; and WHEREAS, the EIR was prepared for the project in accordance with Sections 21000 through 21177 of the California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA) and Sections 15000 through 15387 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines); and WHEREAS, the EIR identified several air quality impacts (project specific and cumulative) that would result in environmental impacts for which mitigation measures are not available to reduce the impacts to below levels of significance and a Statement of Overriding Consideration of Environmental Impact will need to be adopted prior to approval by the City Council; and

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, the EIR identified all other potential environmental impacts as either not an impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact with mitigation and a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared for those potential impacts requiring mitigation, which is part of the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, Section 66411 of the California Government Code (Subdivision Map Act) vests in the legislative bodies of local agencies the regulation and control of the design and improvement of subdivisions; and WHEREAS, Title 18 of the City of Perris Municipal Code (Subdivisions) implements the state Subdivision Map Act and authorizes the Planning Commission to act as an advisory agency to the City Council and authorizes the City Council to take action on a subdivision; and WHEREAS, Chapter 19.54 of the City of Perris Municipal Code (Zoning Code, Authority and Review Procedures) authorizes the City to approve, conditionally approve, or deny requests for Development Plan Review; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 2009, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, considered public testimony and materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for: (1) the Statement of Overriding Consideration of Environmental Impact and the Final EIR (which includes the Draft EIR); (2) Tentative Map and Street Vacation 05-0112 (County Map No. 33587); and (3) Development Plan Review 01113; and adopted Resolution No. 09-16 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed project; and WHEREAS, on June 30, 2009, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, considered public testimony and materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for: (1) the Statement of Overriding Consideration of Environmental Impact and the Final EIR (which includes the Draft EIR); (2) Tentative Map and Street Vacation 05-0112 (County Map No. 33587); and (3) Development Plan Review 01113; and adopted a Resolution certifying the EIR and adopting a Statement of Overriding Environmental Considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Perris, as follows: Section 1. Section 2. The above recitals are all true and correct. The determinations reflect the independent judgment of the City. Section 3. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Map and Street Vacation 05-0112 (County Map No. 33587) to subdivide 84.0 net acres, located at the northwest corner of Perris Boulevard and Markham Street, into five parcels and the vacation of Nance Street between Perris Boulevard and Indian Avenue, subject to the conditions of approval and finding that:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 Page 3 of 5 (a) The Tentative Map and Street Vacation are consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial all other applicable General Plan policies, as amended; and (b) The Tentative Map and Street Vacation are consistent with the Zoning designation of Light Industrial and all other applicable Zoning Code standards, as amended; and (c) Subdivision Map Act; and The Tentative Map and Street Vacation are in compliance with the (d) The site is physically suitable for the newly created lot sizes and the type of industrial development; and (e) The design of the Tentative Map and Street Vacation and the type of improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, other than as addressed by the adopted Statement of Overriding Considerations of Environmental Impact; and (f) The design of the Tentative Map and Street Vacation and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (g) The design of the Tentative Map and Street Vacation and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgment, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Section 4. The City Council hereby approves Development Plan Review 05-0113 for the plotting and building architecture of said industrial development, subject to the conditions of approval and finding that: (a) The Development Plan Review, including the location, size, General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial and all other applicable General Plan policies, as amended; and (b) The Development Plan Review, including the location, size, Zoning designation of Light Industrial and all other applicable Zoning Code standards, as amended; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the location, size, design, density, and intensity of the plotting and architectural design for the type of industrial development; and (d) The Development Plan Review, including the location, size, Sustainable Community Element of the General Plan, in that the Project supports the City s

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 Page 4 of 5 commitment to protect the environment, improve quality of life, and promote sustainable development by incorporating certain measures into the design, construction, and maintenance of the buildings and overall project development, as provided in the conditions of approval; and (e) The subject site is physically suitable, including but not limited to parcel size, shape, access, and availability of utilities and services, for the type of light industrial development of Development Plan Review 05-0113; and (f) The Development Plan Review and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained is compatible with abutting properties and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (g) The architecture of the Development Plan Review is compatible with community standards and protects the character of other City industrial developments; and (h) The landscaping plan of the Development Plan Review ensures visual relief and provides an attractive environment for the public's enjoyment; and (i) The safeguards necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare have been required for the Development Plan Review. Section 5. The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED, SIGNED and APPROVED this 30 th day of June 2009. ATTEST: Mayor, Daryl R. Busch City Clerk, Judy L. Haughney

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 Page 5 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PERRIS ) I, JUDY L. HAUGHNEY, City Clerk of the City of Perris, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 4238 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Perris, at a regular meeting held the 30th day of June, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Rogers, Yarbrough, Landers, Evans, Busch NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None City Clerk, Judy L. Haughney S:\Planning\Development Plan Review-COM\2005\05-0113 NWC Markham & Perris (IDI)\City Council - June 30, 2009\Resolution for Project