PLAN 724 Introduction to Law for Planners

Similar documents
PLAN 724 FALL

Coursetools Site:

TAKINGS LAW UNDER THE U.S. AND CONNECTICUT CONSTITUTIONS

Respecting, Regulating, or Rejecting the Right to Rebuild Post Sandy: What Does the Takings Clause Teach Us?

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center

Title 6 - Local Government Provisions Applicable to Special Purpose Districts and Other Political Subdivisions

Advanced Zoning and Land Use in California

Chapter XVIII LAND USE REGULATION A. ZONING. The most significant scheme for controlling land use in America is zoning, by which

Legal Dimensions of Land Use. Issues and Trends

Chapter 6 Summary Control of Land Use: Control of Land Use

CLASS 8-C: LAND USE CONTROLS AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

Town of Truckee. Contents. Article I - Development Code Enactment and Applicability. Chapter Purpose and Effect of Development Code...

APPENDIX C-1 DEVELOPING FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR PLANNING AND ZONING

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes to amend 25 CFR 151

I. BACKGROUND. As one of the most rapidly developing states in the country, North Carolina is losing

Local units of government control the use of private

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

Securing Florida s Future, Together

SEQRA (For Land Surveyors) Purpose of this Presentation

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center

LRC Study Committee Property Owner Protection and Rights

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 757

TABLE OF CONTENTS LOS ANGELES PLANNING AND ZONING CODE

2011 AICP Review Course

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW FOURTH, PROPERTY PROJECTED OVERALL TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME [1] THE BASICS OF PROPERTY DIVISION ONE: DEFINITIONS

Guide to Permitting Town of Groton, MA

9/1/2017. Government Controls and Real Estate Markets

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Flexibility in the Law: Reengineering of Zoning to Prevent Fragmented Landscapes

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.1 Official Title Effective date Authority

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL REAL PROPERTY DIVISION

PROTECTING WATER RESOURCES AFTER MURR v. WISCONSIN

FAIR HOUSING & FAIR SHARE PLANNING California s Housing Element Law & Inclusionary Zoning

PLANNING FOR OUR FUTURE

Overview of Land Preservation Tools. Ted Feitshans Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics North Carolina State University ARE 309

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

April 2, Michel J. Danko Marine Fisheries Agent New Jersey Sea Grant Extension Program Building 22 Fort Hancock, NJ

Land Matters Regarding the Pipeline

APPENDIX B COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT CODE

Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara. Location 3236 Little Island Road GPIN Site Size acres AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL

CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION EASEMENTS ACT Act of Jun. 22, 2001, P.L. 390, No. 29 AN ACT Providing for the creation, conveyance, acceptance,

2/22/2016. Planning and Zoning. David Owens March 2016 SOME CONTEXT

If It s Property Tax Exempt, Tax It Anyway!

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 8, 2016

5. Appearance Standards LRC Study Committee Property Owner Protection and Rights UNC School of Government March 3, 2014

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hatfield OPEN SPACE PROJECT GUIDELINES

Citizen and Developer s Guide to the Permitting and Approval Process for Land Development in Montour Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania

CHAIRMAN WOLPERT AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT AND URBAN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE

Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

BELL COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME RENTAL COMMUNITIES

Department of Development


TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Section 1 Purposes. 6. Section 2 Statutory Authorization. 7.

CITY OF THOMASVILLE NORTH CAROLINA ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS

Board of Zoning and Planning Members. Justin A. Milam, AICP, Planning Officer. Positive recommendation of a rezoning to City Council.

The Governance of Land Use

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7065

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Variance Submittal Requirements

X. The Roles of Federal, State, and Local Governments

TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program: Land Acquisition and Restoration Process and Criteria

Zoning and Subdivision Regulations in Kansas: What They Are, How They Work, and Their Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan

Citizen and Developer s Guide to the Permitting and Approval Process for Land Development in Locust Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania

1. Governmental powers over private property rights include a. power of taxation. b. power of escheat. c. police power. d.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TOWN OF SIDNEY, MAINE

B. Subarea Provisions, including the Design Elements and Area of Special Concern and Potential Park/Open Space/Recreation Requirements;

Rough Proportionality and the City of Austin. Prepared for the Austin Bar Association 2016 Land Development Seminar (9/30/16)

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

INCLUSIONARY ZONING GUIDELINES FOR CITIES & TOWNS. Prepared for the Massachusetts Housing Partnership Fund By Edith M. Netter, Esq.

Citizen and Developer s Guide to the Permitting and Approval Process for Land Development in Madison Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania

September 10, Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

The Status of Lake & Natural Shoreline Friendly Ordinances in Michigan

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROCESS FOR HUD GRANTEES

Due Diligence & Environmental Compliance Issues for Tribal Energy Projects: Hazardous Waste

Advanced Zoning & Land Use in California

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land Chapter and Revised Code of Washington

ZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICANTS

Planning 101: Annexation and Municipal & County Zoning. Annexation Title 7, Chapter 2, Parts Required Provision of Services

Forest Service Role CHAPTER 2

Authority of Commissioners Court

LCRA BOARD POLICY 401 LAND RESOURCES. Sept. 21, 2016

By: Christine Dietrick, City Attorney, San Luis Obispo

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

ACADEMIC COURSE SYLLABUS

PICKENS COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ORDINANCE. Organization of the Ordinance

Critical facts regarding the DRE licensing exam SAMPLE

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

Transcription:

PLAN 724 Introduction to Law for Planners University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of City and Regional Planning Fall 2015 Syllabus David J. Brower 1 Office Location PLAN 724 New East 205 9:30-10:45am brower@email.unc.edu Tuesdays and Thursdays 919-962-4775 Hanes Art Center 218 Office Hours By Appointment Course Description This course examines the legal framework within which urban planning and development takes place. This includes the nature of law, the allocation of authority between institutions, public and private, the nature of real property as well as the practice of managing urban development, cultural resources and the natural environment. Special emphasis is given to current issues such as RLUIPA, Reed v. Gilbert (6.18.2015), the Clean Water Rule (8.28.2015), the Chesapeake TMDL (7.6.2015), the Clean Power Plan (8.3.2015), Climate Change and perhaps others as they unfold. COURSE SCHEDULE Session 1 August 18th I. Introduction LUP 1-12 Session 2 & 3 August 20 th, 25 th II. Background Burn 167-177 A. The Law and the Courts 1. The Law: Defined a. The regime that orders human activities through systematic application of the force of politically organized society b. The aggregate of legislation, judicial precedents, and accepted legal principle; the body of authoritative grounds for judicial and administrative actions (1) Constitution (2) Statutes (3) Regulations (4) Judicial decisions (5) Executive Orders: Presidential Directives; signing statements (6) Guidance c. A set of rules or principles dealing with a specific area of the legal system (1) Civil (2) Criminal (3) Torts (4) Real Property (5) Environmental (6) Constitutional (7) Local Governments (8) Land Use

d. The judicial and administrative process; legal action and proceedings 2. Legal Materials 3. The Courts B. Institutional Framework and Relationships LGL Chap 1-8, 12 1. Federal Government 2. State Government 3. Regional Government 4. Local Government a. Relationship with state government (1) Incorporation (2) Dillon s Rule (3) Enabling Acts (4) Home Rule b. Types of local governments (1) County (2) Municipal (3) Township (4) Special District c. Organization of Local Government (1) Legislative body (2) Executive and staff (3) Boards and commissions d. Boundaries (1) Corporate limits (2) Annexation (3) Extra-territorial jurisdiction e. Relationship with federal government f. Relationship with regional and other local governments 5. Non-Governmental Organizations 6. Private Organizations 7. Institutional Hierarchy a. Site b. Structure c. Subdivision d. Neighborhood e. Special District f. Municipal Corporation g. County h. Special Authority i. Metropolitan Area j. Region k. State l. Nation m. International Session 4 & 5 August 27 th, September 1 st C. Land Ownership Sing 1-19 1. The relationship of human beings one with another and their individual and collective relationship with the land 2. Systems of land ownership a. Customary land (tribal, familial, communal) (1) Whose cave is this anyway? 2

(3) Who gets to sit closest to the fire? (4) Who has to clean up afterwards? b. Feudal: Hapless baby George and the future of Downton Abbey c. Land Tenure d. Anthroprocentric: statutory law e. Ecocentric values (intrinsic value) (1) Thomas Berry (2) Tribe, Sax, Singer, Freyfogle, Stone, Purdy (3) Earth Law, Wild Law, Animal Rights 3. Real Property Law in the United States a. Introduction (1) Real Property: Definition & Dimensions (2) The Right to Exclude Sing 24-27 (a) The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Sing 45-47 (b) The Americans with Disabilities Act Sing 65-66 (3) Personal Property Sing 796-797 b. Relationships Among Neighbors (1) Nuisance Sing 98-104 (2) Water Sing 128-135 (3) Support Sing 135-136 (4) Light and Air Sing 138-139 (5) Adverse Possession Sing 142-145 (6) Easements (a) Introduction Sing 180-184 (b) Express Easements Sing 210-223 (c) Implied Easements Sing 186 (d) Prescriptive Easements Sing 200-202 (e) Easements of Necessity (7) Covenants (a) Introduction Sing 230-238 (b) Public Policy Sing 281-293 c. Common Types of Ownership (1) Introduction Sing 304-304 (2) Fee Simple Sing 308-311 (3) Life Estates Sing 313 (4) Trusts Sing 317-318 (5) Public Trust Doctrine Sing 86-87 d. Concurrent Ownership Sing 352 e. Family Property Sing 396-398 f. Leaseholds Sing 437-447 g. Real Estate Transactions (1) Introduction Sing 501-502 (2) Recording Sing 545-546 h. American Indian Property Sing 755-758 i. Water Sing 127-134 (1) Stream and River Water (a) Preferred Use (b) Natural Flow Doctrine (c) Reasonable Use Doctrine (d) Appropriation Systems (2) Surface Water (a) Common Enemy Doctrine 3

Session 6 (b) Natural Servitude Doctrine (c) Reasonable Use Doctrine (3) Underground Water (a) Absolute Ownership (b) Reasonable Use Doctrine (c) Appropriation (4) Littoral Rights (5) Water per se is owned only after it has been taken from a stream or lake September 3 rd THE STORY III. Approaches to Managing Urban Development A. Characteristics of Development 1. Quantity 2. Location 3. Bulk 4. Timing 5. Quality 6. Appearance 7. Impact 8. Scale B. Management Objectives/Values 1. Economic 2. Aesthetic 3. Tax Base 4. Environmental 5. Biodiversity 6. Greed 7. Quality of Life 8. Sustainable Development 9. Political Power C. Policy Options for Managing Development 1. Regulation 2. Acquisition 3. Taxation 4. Education 5. Spending D. Policy Strategies for Managing Development 1. Common law 2. Land Ownership 3. Statutory Law 4. Disclosure 5. Command and Control 6. Criminal Penalties 7. Civil Penalties 8. Cap and Trade 9. Social Funds 10. Incentives 11. Contracts and Spending 12. Investment E. Common Urban Development Management Policies 1. Zoning ordinance 4 Campbell-Mohn 107-124

2. Subdivision control ordinance 3. National Flood Insurance Program LUP 47 Session 7, 8, 9 September 8 th, 10 th, 15 th 5 IV. Constitutional Mandates and Admonitions Chem 1-32 A. Introduction LUP 387-390 B. Authority (Federal) Chem 247-286 1. The Power to Regulate Commerce LUP 463-464 2. The Spending Power C. Authority (State) 1. Tenth Amendment a. Commerce b. Spending c. Police Power D. Mandates and Admonitions Chem 545-548 1. Substantive Due Process LUP 454-462 Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. LUP 427-435 Nectow v. City of Cambridge 2. Procedural Due Process LUP 435-437 3. Equal Protection 437-445 City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center Village of Willowbrook v. Olech Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation Texas Dept. of Housing v Inclusive Communities (6.25.2015) 4. Fundamental Rights: Strict Scrutiny Chem 791-802 Session 10 September 17 th 5. Taking LUP 390-392 a. Eminent Domain Chem 667-689 Poletown Neighborhood Council v City of Detroit LUP 340-408 Wayne County v Hathcock Kelo v City of New London Private Property Rights Protection Act(s) Session 11 & 12 September 22 nd, 24 th b. Physical Invasion LUP 392-395 Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV c. Regulatory Impact LUP 395-400 Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City d. Essential Nexus LUP 400-403 Nollan v. California Coastal Dolan v. City of Tigard Session 13 September 29 th e. Economic Impact LUP 403-409 Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v.debenedictis f. Investment Backed Expectations LUP 409-412 Palazzolo v. Rhode Island

g. Unit of Property LUP 412-415 Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency h. Compensation LUP 415-418 First English Evangelical Church v. County of Los Angeles Session 14 & 15 October 1 st, 6 th i. Ripeness LUP 419-424 MacDonald v. Yolo County j. Taking Legislation LUP 424-427 6. First Amendment a. Signs LUP 446-450 Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego Linmark Assoc. v. Township of Willingboro City of Ladue v. Gilleo Reed v Town of Gilbert (6.18.2015) b. Sex Oriented Business City of Littleton v. Z. J. Gifts Young v. American Mini Theatres City of Renton v. Playtime Theatre c. Religion (1) Uses (2) Religious Freedom Restoration Act (3) Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act d. Skokie Parade 7. The Regional General Welfare LUP 445-464 Save a Valuable Env t v. City of Bothell Session 16 October 8th 6 V. Managing Urban Development LUP 53-61 A. Definition B. Rationale C. Legal Basis 1. Police Power (State) 2. Enabling Laws (Local) D. Typical Policies 1. Zoning a. Overview (1) The teeth of the zoning ordinance (2) How does zoning work? (a) Zone district map (b) District requirements (3) History of zoning (4) Authority to zone (5) Standard State Zoning Enabling Act (6) Types of regulations (a) Cumulative v. exclusive (b) Performance v. prescriptive (c) Of right v. administrative findings b. Zoning and the comprehensive plan (1) Standard State Zoning Enabling Act

(2) Standard State Planning Act (3) In Practice c. Zoning decision makers (1) Legislative (elected state and local officials) (2) Planning Commission (appointed) (3) Board of Adjustment / Board of Zoning Appeals (appointed) (4) Planning Department (employees) (5) Affected Parties (a) Development industry (b) Citizen participants (c) The community as a whole (d) The region d. Constitutional parameters of zoning LUP 437-445 (1) Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.* (2) Nectow v. City of Cambridge* (3) Challenges: facial v. as applied Session 17 October 13 th e. District Requirements (1) Use (a) Residential (b) Single Family Use What is a family? Village of Belle Terre v. Boras Moore v. City of East Cleveland (c) Group Homes City of Cleburne v Cleburne Living Center* (d) Agricultural Uses (e) Commercial Uses (f) Industrial Uses (g) Accessory Uses (h) Buffer Zones (i) Public Uses: schools, hospitals, etc. (j) Religious Uses (i) Religious Freedom Restoration Act (ii) Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Substantial Burden Compelling Governmental Interest Least Restrictive Means Equal Terms - Comparators FALL BREAK October 14 th Session 18, 19, 20 October 20 th, 22 nd, 27 th (2) Height LUP 94-108 (3) Density (4) Yard Size (5) Floor-to-Area Ratio (6) Bulk LUP 78-83 Teton County v. Crowe (7) Setback 7

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council* (8) Parking (9) Signs f. Flexibility LUP 84-93 (1) Floating zones (2) Contract zoning/conditional zoning (3) Incentive zoning (4) Interim zones (5) Overlay zones g. Non-conforming Situations LUP 108-116 Hadacheck v. Sebastian Los Angeles v. Gage h. Administrative, Legislative, or Quasi-judicial Action? LUP 118-133 (1) Delegation to an administrative body (2) Delegation to property owners (3) Initiative and referendum City of Eastlake V. Forest City Enterprises Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community i. Rezoning: Amending the Ordinance LUP 133-150 (1) Generally (2) Grounds for rezoning (3) Extraordinary majorities (4) Rezoning and the Comprehensive Plan (5) Spot zoning Bartram v. Zoning Commission j. Variances LUP 150-156 (1) Use variances (2) Other variances k. Special Permits LUP 164-167 Rockhill v. Township of Chesterfield l. Vested Rights LUP 169-182 Parkview Associates v. City of New York City of Dallas v. Vanesko 49 TX Supreme Court 487 m. Development Agreements LUP 180-186 n. Exclusionary Zoning LUP 205-232 (1) The Americans with Disabilities Act (2) Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing* (3) Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority In External Links (4) The Fair Housing Act Folder on Sakai Texas v. Inclusive Communities Project (5) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing In External Links (6) Fisher v. University of Texas (Fall 2015) Folder on Sakai (7) Singapore Inclusionary Housing Policy LUP 189-191 o. Frustrations with Traditional Zoning 214-251 2. Subdivision Control, Official Maps and Planned Unit Development LUP 234-275 a. Subdivision Control (1) Process (2) Design requirements (3) Exactions (4) Dedication (5) Plats (6) Documents 8

(7) Homeowners Associations b. Planned Unit Developments c. Official Maps 3. Utilities 4. Building Codes LUP 276-322 5. Housing Codes 6. Moratoria Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency* 7. Ownership of Land LUP 345-349 a. Fee Simple b. Less than Fee Simple (1) Easements (2) Covenants (3) Homeowner associations c. Transfer of Development Rights d. Land Banking e. Eminent Domain 8. Development Agreements LUP 598-603 9. Economic Incentives Maready v. City of Winston-Salem 10. Panaceas (cures for whatever ails you including the common cold) Session 21, 22, 23 October 29 th, November 3 rd, 5 th VI. Managing Cultural Resources (See PAS Reports in Room 489/490 & 570) LUP 513-515 A. Definition: Culture, Resources B. Rationale: Sax C. Legal Basis: Sax, Stone D. Built resources 1. Signs LUP 515-516 2. Architecture LUP 516-521 Berman v. Parker Reid v. Architectural Board of Review Cathedral of St. John the Divine 3. Historic Preservation LUP 521-532 Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York Vestry of St. Bartholomew s Church v. City of New York 4. National Historic Preservation Act a. Historic Resources of National Interest b. National Register of Historic Places c. Section 106 5. NEPA 6. Dept. of Transportation Act 7. Flora E. Landscape 1. Palisades, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 2. Scenic vista (Nollan) 3. Adjacent Lands 4. View sheds: Boulder, Austin 5. Corridors 6. Ridge laws F. Community Design 1. New Urbanism 9

2. Form Based Zoning 3. Design Manuals 4. Bully Pulpit: Charleston, Columbus, Indiana Session 24 & 25 November 10 th, 12 th VII. MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT EL&P 1-110 A. Definition B. Rationale C. Legal Basis D. Policies 1. NEPA EL&P 333-349 a. What does NEPA do? b. What does an EIS do? Calvert Cliffs v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission c. When must an EIS be prepared? Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers d. NEPA Decision Making Process Chart 2. Air: The Clean Air Act EL&P 111-140 a. NAAQS EL&P 115 (1) State Implementation Plans EL&P 118 (2) Non-Attainment EL&P 119 b. Climate Change EL&P 134 (1) Massachusetts, et al. v. EPA (2) Clean Power Rule (8.3.2015) (3) Oklahoma v. EPA (US District Court) (4) Michigan v EPA (6.29.2015) (5) COP21 Session 26 November 17 th 3. Water: The Clean Water Act EL&P 173-204 a. Pollution EL&P 172 (1) Point Sources EL&P 179 (a) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits EL&P 180 (b) Publicly Owned Treatment Works (PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT EL&P 180 WORKS) (c) Industrial Point Source EL&P 182 (d) Existing Point Sources EL&P 184 (e) New Point Sources EL&P 185 (2) Non-Point Sources EL&P 189 (a) Section 208 (b) Section 319 (3) Water Quality Standards (a) Section 303 EL&P 194 (b) Impaired Waters (c) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) EL&P 195 (d) Continuing Planning Process (CPP) EL&P 196 (e) Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load EL&P 195 (f) American Farm Bureau Federation et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al. (7.6.15) b. Wetlands (1) CWA Section 404 EL&P 277 (a) Waters of the United States EL&P 277 10

(i) 1972 Clean Water Act EL&P 279 (ii) 1975 Regulations EL&P 279 (iii) 1985 Migratory Bird Rule (iv) 2001 Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) (v) 2006 Rapanos v. United States (vi) 2011 Draft Regulations (vii) 2015 Clean Water Rule (viii) 2015 Murray Energy Corp. v. EPA (b) Discharge EL&P 280 (c) Permitting EL&P 283, 285 Session 27 November 19 th 4. Biodiversity EL&P 271-310 a. Endangered Species Act EL&P 287 (1) Federal Agency Activity (2) Section 7(a)(2) (3) TVA v. Hill EL&P 295 (4) Private Activity (5) Section 9(a)(1) EL&P 300 (6) Babbitt v. Sweet Home (7) Habitat Conservation Plans EL&P 303 b. Public Trust Doctrine EL&P 272 (1) Roman Law (2) European (3) Colonies (4) Northwest Ordinance of 1878 (5) SCOTUS: Illinois Central v. Illinois EL&P 272, 274 (6) CA: Marks v. Whitney EL&P 273 (7) Other States EL&P 274 5. Natural Hazards LUP 502-503 a. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) b. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act) c. Hazard Mitigation Act of 2000 Session 28 November 24 th 6. Coastal Zone LUP 495-501 a. Coastal Zone Management Act (1) State Coastal Management Programs (2) Implementation (3) Consistency b. Coastal Barrier Resources Act c. Ocean Policy 7. Energy EL&P 311-329 THANKSGIVING BREAK November 25 th Session 29 December 1 st VIII. Last Class Key to s LUP: JURGENSMEYER & ROBERTS, LAND USE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONLAW THIRD EDITION 11

BURN: BURNHAM, LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE U.S. THIRD EDITION LGL: REYNOLDS, LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW THIRD EDITION SING: SINGER, PROPERTY THIRD EDITION CHEM: CHEMERINSKY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOURTH EDITION EL&P: SALZMAN & THOMPSON, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY FOURTH EDITION COPYRIGHT 2015 DAVID J BROWER 12