CITY OF SAMMAMISH WASHINGTON

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO

Section 150, Impact Fees, Pinellas County Land Development Code

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, in RCW the Legislature has authorized counties to adopt an ordinance imposing impact fees; and

ORDINANCE NO. 1_7_1_2_2:._7_

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES ROADS

City of Banks TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE. Methodology Report. February 2016 FCS GROUP. Prepared by:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Article 6 - IMPACT FEES BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NUMBER 995

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

Impact Fees Charged on Development in Unincorporated Sarasota County

City of Philadelphia

The City Council makes the following findings:

Regional Development Impact Fee Joint Powers Agency

DATE: March 6, 2018 ORDINANCE X COUNCIL INFORMATION RESOLUTION MOTION

Cabarrus County, NC Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. Contents

City of Casselberry Public Works Department

City of Philadelphia

Lee County Board Of County Commissioners DATE CRITICAL Agenda Item Summary

City Council Draft 08/15/03

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION WORK SHEET FY Revised 07/01/2017 Available on the City s web site at

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Proposed amendments to Bill No Amendment no. 1. Delete Section 1 of the bill in its entirety.

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

Administrative Procedures for the collection of Development Impact Fees

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Information Only. WHEREAS, the collection of development fees will assist the Township in meeting its affordable housing obligations; and

WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the City of San Diego that new non-residential

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND BYLAW #2503

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

ORDINANCE NO

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of STAT~

ATTACHMENTS: 1. By-law No with proposed amendments 2. Supplementary Report Public Hearing CLEARANCES: DATE: October 5, 2017 APPROVALS:

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

CITY OF SPRING HILL BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN SPECIAL CALL MEETING PACKET THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, :00 P.M.

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A

ORDINANCE NO. 17- Housing Study Assessment and to develop recommended changes to the program; and

ORDINANCE NO XX

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Pinellas County. Staff Report

City of Philadelphia

Sebastian Inn Suites FOR SALE US Hwy 1 Sebastian, FL $2,499,000

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Council of the City of Alpharetta, Georgia hereby ordain:

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

Summary of City of Oakland Impact Fees Effective September 1, 2016

City of Orange Development Fees

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

Fire District Revenue/Collection Rate (2016) We have two main sources of revenue: property tax and the Fire Benefit Charge.

Section IV: HOME Narratives

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

CITY OF NORTH OAKS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 109 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING THE CHARLEY LAKE PRESERVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities

DRAFT Value Capture Ordinance May 25, 2017 CPC CA ORDINANCE NO.

WORKFORCE HOUSING DEED OF TRUST

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, City staff plan to present recommendations regarding just cause eviction policies no later than May 28, 2015; and

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

ORDINANCE NO P 39a/12-16(klk)

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

(Ord. No , 1, )

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

CITY OF GLASGOW ORDINANCE NO. 2809

Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 608

TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM ORDINANCE NO

City of Orange Development Fees

ARTICLE 9 C-B - COMMERCIAL-BUSINESS DISTRICT

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. WHEREAS the City of Guelph will experience growth through development and redevelopment;

Suburban Commercial Center ( CE-S ) Permitted Principal Uses and Structures

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

ATTACHMENT C. Development Requirements

Zoning Fee Schedule. Per Chapter Part VIII Administrative Code

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM

AFFORDABLE HOUSING SECTIONS 5.1 GENERAL GOALS

Ordinance No

AN ORDINANCE BY COUNCILMEMBERS ANDRE DICKENS, KWANZA HALL, AND CLETA WINSLOW

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

Municipal Housing Facilities By-law

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1

CITY OF HANFORD APPLICATION, FILING, AND PROCESSING FEES

Transcription:

CITY OF SAMMAMISH WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. O2014-366 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAMMAMISH, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTERS 14A.05 AND l4a.15 OF THE SAMMAMISH MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDHVGTHE IMPACT FEE WAIVER PROVISION AND ADJUSTING THE IMPACT FEES FOR STREETS WHEREAS, the State of Washington Growth Management Act, RCW Chapter 36.70A and related sections, (the GMA ), requires the City to adopt a Comprehensive Plan that provides adequatepublic facilitiesto serve development;and WHEREAS, the City Council adoptedthe City s Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance 2003-130 on September 16, 2003, and adoptedordinance2013-363 on December 3, 2013 amendingthe Transportation Elementof the Comprehensive Plan to revise Level-Of-Service ( LOS ) standards as related to the future needs of the Town Center and future phases of improvements to East Lake Sammamish Parkway; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 82.02.070, the City Council has adopted Chapter 14A.15 of the Sammamish Municipal Code, (the SMC ), which regulates street impact fees; and - the WHEREAS, during a 2006 concurrency revision process, the City of Sammamish conducted extensive research documenting the procedures for measuring the impact of new development on public facilities; and had prepared technical reports which serve as the basis for action taken by the Council; and WHEREAS, the Council hereby incorporates into this ordinance by reference a Supplement dated April 10, 2014 to the following study: Rate Study for Impact Fees for Streets, City of Sammamish,datedNovember 2, 2006; and WHEREAS, a need exists to amend Chapter 14A.l5 to revise the street impact fee rates in SMC 14A.15.l1O to be in accord with the amendedtransportation Element;and WHEREAS, the State of Washington amended RCW 82.02.060, allowing cities to provide exemptions of up to 8-0%of impact fees for low income housing without finding an alternative source of funds; and WHEREAS, Sammamish supports Sammamish. and encourages low income housing options within NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: OF THE CITY OF SAMMAMISH,

Section 1. The proposed amendmentssubjectto this Ordinance are set forth in Attachment A hereto. Section 2. Severability. The above Whereas clauses of this Ordinance constitute speci?c?ndings by the Council in support of passage of this Ordinance. If any provision of this Ordinance or its applicationto any person or circumstanceis held invalid,the remainderof the Ordinance or the applicationof the provision to other persons or circumstancesis not affected. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinanceshallbe publishedin the of?cial newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in?lll force?ve (5) days after the date of publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF THE 6 DAY OF MAY, 2014. ON CITY OF SAMMAMISH ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Mayor ThomasE. Vance Melonie Anderson,Cllty Clerk Approved as to form: ;;:<éei_le_q/ ; Michael R. Kenyon, City Attorney Filed with the City Clerk: April 10, 2014 First Reading: April 15, 2014 Passed by the City Council: May 06, 2014 Effective Date: May 14, 2014

Attachment A....,..... Affordable housing or Low-income housing means residential housing that is rented or owned by a person or household whose monthly housing expenseseests, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30 percent of the applicablemedian family income listed below and adjusted for household size. Based on the King County Income and Affordability Guidelines, housing affordability levels include: (a) Low income means a family earning between zero and 50 percent of the King County median householdincome. (b) Moderate income means a family earning between 51 and 80 percent of the King County median household income. (c) King County median household income means the median income of the Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Area ( SMSA ), adjusted for household size, as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ( HUD ). In the event that HUD no longer publishes median income?gures for King County, the City may determine such other method as it may choose to determinethe King County median household income, adjusted for household size....... _.... (1) Pursuant to RCW 82.02.060,the City may provide exemptions for low-incomehousing and other development activities with broad public purposes; provided, that the impact fees from such development activity shall be paidfrom public funds other than impact fee accounts if the waiver is greater than 80% of the impact fee. The director shall be authorized to determine whether a particular development falls within an exemption identi?ed in this chapter. Determinations of the director shall be in writing and shall be subject to the appeals procedures set forth in SMC 14A.l5.060. (2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, the following development activities are exempt from the requirements of this chapter. An impact fee shall not be assessed for: (a) Any development activity undertaken by the City of Sammamish; Attachment A - l

(b) Publicschools; (c) Accessory dwelling units approved by the City. (3) Except as provided above, the provision of affordable housing families as de?ned in SMC l4a.05.010 may be exempted from some or all of the required impact fees as shown in Table 1: Table 1: Proposed Impact Fee Reductions for Affordable Housing Units Impact Fee Maximum Number of Affordable Housing Affordable Housing Reduction* Units per Development Low-Income 0%-teé09;4ref K ingup to 100% 4 units 50% to 5 units or more (1nc1ud1ngthe?rst 4) sub]ect to 99% recommendationby the commumty development 80% director in consultation with the public works director Media-n-Moderate-Income 5 l % Up to 50% m 80% 4 units 0% to 50% 5 umts or more (1nclud1ngthe?rst 4) sub]ect to U:S. I=IU9) recommendation by the community development director in consultation with the public works )- director *The % fee reduction is expressed as a maximum amount per unit. (a) As a conditionof receiving an exemption or percentage fee reduction under this subsection,prior to any development approval, the owner shall execute and record in the King County real property title records a City preparedlien, covenant, or other contractualprovision against the property that provides that the proposed housing unit or development will continue to be used for low- or moderate-income housing and remain affordable to those families/households for a period of not less than 30 years. The lien, covenant, or other contractual provision shall run with the land and apply to subsequent owners and assigns. In the event that the housing Attachment A - 2

unit(s) no longer meets the de?nition of affordable housing set forth in Table 1 during the term of the life of the lien, covenant or contractual provision, then the owner(s) shallpay to the City the amount of impact fees from which the housing unit(s) was exempted into the City s account for impact fees plus 12 percent interest per year. (b) In determining the impact fee reductions for development(s) containing?ve or more affordablehousing units, the community development director in consultation with the public works director should consider the following: (i) Theproposed housing units meet the provisions set forth by the City s housing strategy plan adopted by the City council. (ii) The proposed housing units will assist the City in meeting Sarnmamish s affordablehousing targets. (iii) The location of the units meets the City s comprehensiveplan policies for the proposed housing type and density. (iv) Approval of the proposed housing units and the associated impact fee reductiondoes not exempt the proposed housing units from meeting the City s concurrency requirements and public works standards. (c) The impact fee amounts waived in excess of 80% heusing u.-mts shall be paid from public funds from sources other than impact fees or interest on impact fees, and budgeted for this purpose. ((1)Determinations of the community development director in consultation with the public W01 ks director regarding the reduction of impact fees shall be in writing and shall be subject to the appeals procedures set forth in SMC 14A.15.060. (Ord. 02006-2.0.8 2; 0rd. 02004-140 1; 0rd. 02004-136 1)......... In accordance with RCW 82.02.060, the street impact fees are based upon a schedule of impact fees which is adopted for each type of development activity that is subject to impact fees and which specifies the amount of the impact fee to be imposed for each type of system Attachment A - 3

improvement. The scheduleis based upon a formula and/or method of calculating the impact fees. In determining proportionateshare, the formula and/or method of calculating the fees incorporates, among otherthings, the following: (a) the cost of public facilities necessitated by new development; (b) an adjustment to the cost of the public facilities for past or future payments madeor reasonably anticipated to be made by new development to pay for particular system improvements in the form of user fees, debt service payments, taxes, or other payments earmarkedfor or proratable to the particular system improvement; (c) the availability of other means of funding public facility improvements; (d) the cost of existing public facilities improvements; and (e) the methods by which public facilities improvements were?nanced. The street impact fee rates in this section are generated from the formula for calculating impact fees set forth in the street impact fee analysis, which is incorporatedherein by reference. Except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in SMC 14A.15.120, exemptions in SMC 14A.l5.030, and credits in SMC 14A.15.040, all new developments in the City will be charged the impact fee applicableto the type of development: Attachment A - 4

' " 9' 9 '9 100% TmnsportationImpact Fee Rates _ēr Unit of Develo - ment Net New ITE Percent Trip Trips per Trip New Length Develop- Impact Fee per Unit @ ITE Land Use Category Rate 2 Trips 3 Factor ment Unit $44, 706:89 $14,063.63 per Trip Park and Ride with Bu}s Service. 7,910.79 per Space Light industrial 0.98 100% 1.22 1.196 171583955 16.81 per Sq. Ft. industrial Park 14.76 per Sq. Ft. Manufacturing. 12.70 151 Mm Warehouse 0.26 75% 0.29 0.057 83 «l.57-0.80 per Sq. Ft. Single Family House 14,204.27 Apartment. 8,719.45 231 Low-Rise Condo /Townhouse 0.78 100% 1.00 0.780 4-1,4-1.38 10,969.63 per DU Mobile Home 0.560 8:235:85 7,875.63 Sr. Housing Detached. 2,742.41 Sr. Housing Attached 75% 1.00 0.083 4-,?-13:32 1,160.25 per DU Congregate Care Facility 550.59 Assisted Living (limiteddata). 310 Hotel 0.59 75% 0.29 0.128 41887725 1.80 per Sq. Ft. Motel Marina (limited data). 430 Golf Course 0.30 75% 0.29 0.065 95-9:62 917.65 per Acre LiveTheater (limited data) M.iItiplexMovieTheater. Racquet Club 0.64 50% 0.29 0.093 4:37-0:06 1.31 per Sq. Health Fitness Club 0.587 8763562 8.26 per Sq. Recreational Com rnuiliiity Center Public Elementaryschool Public Middle School Public High School 0.259 3:896:54 3.64 per Sq. 0.259 3:806:54 3.64 per Sq.. 534 Private School K-8 (limiteddata) 3.40 75% 0.29 0.740 40:95:15 10.40 per Sq. Private School K-12 (limited data) Church over 20,000 sq, Ft. Church under 20,000 Sq. Ft. Day Care Center Library 0.29 0.096-1-,4-01:45. 1.35 per Sq. 610 Hospital 1.18 75% 0.29 0.257 3:744:52 3.61 per Sq. Nursing Home Clinic (limited data). 710 General Of?ce 1.49 1.22 1.818 2-6, 7-34. 1-9 25.56 per Sq. Single Tenant Of?ce Medical/Dental Of?ce. 732 U.S. Post Of?ce 25.00 25% 0.29 1.813 26-,656. 24 25.49 per Sq. Of?ce Park 1.50 100% 1.22 1.830 25:9-1-3:6-1 25.74 per Sq. Free Standing Discou n"tsuperstore Specialty Retail Center 8.29 per Sq. Free Standing DiscountStore Hardware/Paint Storew. Shopping Center<1 MillionSq Ft 3.75 43% 1.00 1.613 2-3, 7 1 4.87-22.68 per Sq. Tire Store 0.481 7,9-7-9.-90 6.77 per Sq. FireSuperstore Supermarket 34% 0.29 1.030 4-5:163:54 14.49 per Sq. Convenience Market Attachment A - 5

A A ' " " Net New ITE Percent Trip Trips per Trip New Length Develop- Impact Fee per Unit @ ITELand Use Category Rate 2 Trips 3 Factor ment Unit $44, O6=89 $14,063.63 Convenience Marketvii/GasPumps. 10,974.30 per Trip Discountsupermarket. 19.60 Discount Club. 25.64 Home lmprovem ent Super Store Electronics Super Store Of?ce Supply Superstore Pharmacy/Drug Store Pharmacy/Drug Store w/drive-up Video Rental Store Walk in Bank (limited arse) Drive-in Bank Quality Restaurant High Turnover Restauiiant FastFood Fast Food w/drive up. Drinking Place. 17.57 Quick Lube. 2,963.40 Autocare. 4.14 Gas Station Gas Station w/convert Mrt Gas Station w/conven Mat&Car Wash. 7,611.21 Self Serve Car Wash. 3,163.25 Instituteof Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (7th Edition} 2 Trip generation rate per development unit, for PM peak hour of the adjacent street traf?c (4-6 p.m.). Note: Sq. Ft. rate expressed per 1,000 SF. 3Omitslinked/diverted and pass b-ytrips,per Trip Generation Handbook: an ITE Recommended Practice, March, 2001 AverageTrip Length Relative to Single Family Trip 5 DU = dwelling unit, Sq. Ft. = Square Feet, VSP = vehicle servicing position If an applicant proposes a land use that is not identi?ed above, the impact fee shall be an amount equal to 14 063.63 for each p.m. peak hour trip generated, adjusted for trip length and percentage of new trips using methods and data comparableto those in the street study. (Ord. 02006-208 2; 0rd. 02004-140 1; 0rd. 02004-136 1) Attachment A - 6