NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALGARY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

Similar documents
Demolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue

REASONS FOR LISTING: 306 AND 308 LONSDALE ROAD. #306 Lonsdale #308 Lonsdale. 306 and 308 Lonsdale Road Apartments

COBOURG HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM

Kerr-Wallace Residence

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

STAFF DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT

A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

Woodland Smythe Residence

DOWNTOWN FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement, 80 Bell Estate Road (Thornbeck-Bell House)

Richardson s Bakery. Description of Historic Place. Heritage Value of Historic Place

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

COUNCIL MEETMI 5 JUL f 5 08

THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby enacts as follows:

Loveland Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

Infill & Other Residential Design Review

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

ReNOVATION à la carte Program

ANDERSON HALL PUD TEXT AMENDMENT PRESENTED BY STEVEN D. HARDIN, ESQ.

Rénovation. municipal

PRESERVATION AREA BY-LAW BY-LAW #

Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - College Street Properties

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

Economic Non-Viability Application

Mary J. Berg House 2517 Regent Street

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

510 MAIN STREET WINNIPEG CITY HALL Green Blankstein Russell and Associates (Bernard Brown and David Thordarson, principal designers),

CALIFORNIA. cfr. i l fi ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Wyman Historic District

PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR THE

DHR Resource Number: AVON STREET

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Hastings CBD Heritage Inventory Project

This location map is for information purposes only. The exact boundaries of the property are not shown.

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE27.20, adopted as amended, by City of Toronto Council on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Fig. 16 & 17 Left: Carved limestone detail. Right: Carved limestone and metal screen at main entrance on west elevation.

New incentives for character home retention

1 WAY STREET. Private Residence

PRESERVATION RESTRICTION AGREEMENT between the TOWN OF HINGHAM by and through the HINGHAM HISTORICAL COMMISSION and [owners of the property]

Registered Plan 84, Pari Lot 17 S, Part Lot 18 (civic address 110 Collingwood Street), also known as Inglewood, on May 17,2005;

BYLAW NUMBER 64D2010

Kieran Boughan. San Francisco Architect RESIDENTIAL

Director of Planning in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

This Paper was written by. Katherine Hillock. for the 2007 Spring Semester of the. Historic Preservation Studio Course

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Ueberrhein-Dumanowski Residence

West Heath Barn Lynn Lane, Great Massingham, King s Lynn, Norfolk, PE32 2HL

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Rock Island County Courthouse History & Significance

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

LOCATION RFM ROAD, CABUYAO, LAGUNA

Report of: DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SECTION HEAD. 19 Cassiobury Park Avenue PARK

A Better Community Through Cooperation

FORM A - AREA MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

6 Elmsfield Park. Asking Price Of 749,950. Aughton, L39 6TJ FANTASTIC DETACHED HOUSE EN-SUITE & FAMILY BATHROOM LIVING ROOM, DINING KITCHEN

BY-LAW NO X 147 Church Street, Bath

City of Loveland Community and Strategic Planning Civic Center 500 East 3 rd Street Loveland, Colorado Fax

The Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017

Durant Ave., Berkeley

CALIFORNIA S' '( * ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Hazelton Avenue Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

MEETING OF: June 3, Tom Beil, Goring and Straja Architects

I 1-1. Staff Comment Form. Heritage Impact Assessment 7764 Churchville Road (Robert Hall House)

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION

RT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules

Qu Appelle Hall. University of Saskatchewan Heritage Register November 2014

Item No BENJAMIN WIER HOUSE ADDITION AUGUST 22 ND 2014 Design Rational & LUB Summary

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION LESSARD HOUSE NH STATE NO Second Avenue, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

LOCATION MAP, PHOTOGRAPHS AND BACKGROUND: ATTACHMENT NO. 2A 650 QUEEN STREET EAST

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Friends Meeting House, Acomb. The Green, Acomb, York, YO26 5LR. National Grid Reference: SE Statement of Significance

ORTON HOUSE LOWER PENN SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE

Property Name Haxton-Griffin Farm Location Athens vic., Greene County, New York NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET

1 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation of Folsom Street (aka Gaughran House)]

Historic Property Report

FORMER SHAUGHNESSY HOSPITAL

An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the Zoning map.

Section 2: SPRING LANE (Odd and even numbering)

Architectural Inventory Form

29 Springfield Road, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA12 0EJ

Proponent s Guide to the NCC s Federal Land Use, Design and Transaction Approvals Process

Church and Gloucester Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

F a r m s & E s t a t e s R e a l t y, I n c. P r e m i e r P r o p e r t i e s

Location map, showing the Main Block (#1) and the links to the West (#2) and East (#3) Wings that are included in the Reasons for Designation.

RM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule

Code Update Process For: Downtown Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB)

Portland Historic Resources Zoning Regulations

Checker Building Architectural Design and Details

Submitted to Fire Station 8 Working Group and Arlington County Public Library HOUSE AT 2211 NORTH CULPEPER STREET

CULTURAL RESOURCES CULTURAL PROPERTIES AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW OF PROPOSED STATE UNDERTAKINGS THAT MAY AFFECT REGISTERED CULTURAL PROPERTIES

City of Coral Gables. Historic Preservation Ad-Valorem Tax Exemption Program

Transcription:

PUD2017-0081 ATTACHMENT 1 BYLAW NUMBER 13M2017 BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO DESIGNATE THE WHITE RESIDENCE AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS the Historical Resources Act, R.S.A. 2000 c. H-9, as amended (the Act ) permits The City of Calgary Council ( City Council ) to designate real property as a Municipal Historic Resource whose preservation City Council considers to be in the public interest because of its heritage value; AND WHEREAS the owners of the White Residence have been given sixty (60) days written notice of the intention to pass this Bylaw in accordance with the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALGARY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: SHORT TITLE 1. This Bylaw may be cited as City of Calgary Bylaw to Designate the White Residence as a Municipal Historic Resource. BUILDING AND LAND DESIGNATED AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE 2. The White Residence comprises a Prairie Style house dating from 1915 and is located at 1524 33 Ave S.W., legally described as Plan 4479P; Block 63; Lots 11 and 12 as shown on attached Schedule A. 3. The White Residence is hereby designated as a Municipal Historic Resource as defined in the Act. 4. The heritage value of the White Residence is hereby described in the attached Schedule B. 5. The specific elements of the White Residence possessing heritage value are hereby known as the Regulated Portions (the Regulated Portions ). The Regulated Portions are specifically described or identified in the attached Schedule C. PERMITTED REPAIRS AND REHABILITATION 6. a) The Regulated Portions of the White Residence, as described or identified in Schedule C shall not be removed, destroyed, disturbed, altered, rehabilitated, repaired or otherwise permanently changed, other than routine preservation and maintenance work, without prior written approval from City Council, or the person appointed by City Council as the Approving Authority for the purposes of administration of Section 26 of the Act. Any alteration, rehabilitation, repair or change to the Regulated Portions must be in accordance with the terms of the Parks Canada 2010 publication Standards

and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, (the Standards and Guidelines ), as referenced and summarized in the attached Schedule D. b) All portions of the White Residence, which are not described or identified as a Regulated Portion in Schedule C are hereby known as the Non-regulated Portions (the Non-regulated Portions ). The Non-regulated Portions are not subject to the Standards and Guidelines and may be rehabilitated, altered or repaired, provided that such rehabilitation, alteration, and repair does not negatively impact the Regulated Portions or adversely affect the historical, contextual or landmark character of the property, and that all other permits required to do such work have been obtained. COMPENSATION 7. No compensation pursuant to Section 28 of the Act is owing. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS 8. Any employees of The City of Calgary who exercise land use and heritage planning powers and duties are hereby authorized to execute such documents as may be necessary to give effect to this Bylaw. SCHEDULES 9. The schedules to this Bylaw form a part of it. 10. This Bylaw comes into force on the date it is passed. READ A FIRST TIME THIS DAY OF, 2017. READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF, 2017. READ A THIRD TIME THIS DAY OF, 2017. MAYOR SIGNED THIS DAY OF, 2017. CITY CLERK SIGNED THIS DAY OF, 2017. Page 2 of 18

SCHEDULE A TO THE BYLAW TO DESIGNATE THE WHITE RESIDENCE AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE Page 3 of 18

SCHEDULE B TO THE BYLAW TO DESIGNATE THE WHITE RESIDENCE AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE Description This 1915 stucco-clad, low-pitched hipped roof one and a half-storey home is a Prairie Style house, and is one of the early houses built in South Calgary that represents the use of this style in the early part of the 1900s. Heritage Value The heritage value of this house is based in its Prairie Style architectural elements and its original interior details. Built in 1915 by Robert White, a mechanic, and Mary Ethelwynne White, the house is located on a parcel on 33 AV near 14 ST SW in the community of South Calgary. The White family, through inheritance and marriage, retained title to the parcel from 1914 to 1959. Following the White family ownership, James and Rose Murray lived in the house for almost two decades with few known alterations. One of the key pieces to this home is the uniquely well preserved condition of its interior. The White's Prairie style house is representative of housing for the trades and bluecollar workers who settled on less expensive lots prior to an economic surge after South Calgary was annexed into The City of Calgary in 1907. The house is located a stone's throw from the historic Calgary Municipal Railway system, of which route seven ran south along 14 ST to 26 AV, west to 20 ST, then south to 34 AV and back east to intersect 14 ST forming a virtual transit loop around South Calgary's perimeter before heading back downtown. When the streetcar line was first extended down 14 ST beyond 17 AV in late 1911 it reached only as far as 26 AV, then returned. However, bowing to pressure from the growing population settling in South Calgary the south line was extended at the end of 1913. Marda Loop which includes the community of South Calgary attributes its community name to this streetcar loop. This Prairie Style house has strong horizontal lines, a low-pitched hipped roof, with a front facing hipped dormer on the second storey featuring a horizontally oriented window. The porch, which stretches under the deep eaves across the entire front of the house, features squared support columns that run continuously from the ground up to the roofline. Porch columns with stylized capitals are characteristic of the Prairie Style. The interior of this house has very high heritage value, as significant portions of it are original including: Douglas fir floors, wood paneling, door and window casings, windows, light fixtures and ceiling beams. Page 4 of 18

Character-Defining Elements The exterior character-defining elements of the White Residence include but are not limited to its: - One- and-a-half storey low-pitched hipped roof with deep eaves and a front facing hipped dormer on the upper storey; - Porch across the front of the house, with a deeply recessed front door; squared support columns that begin at ground level and terminate under the eaves with stylized column capitals and eave brackets; wooden tongue and groove soffits and porch ceiling; solid balustrades; and - Roughcast stucco clad with wood trim, wood door and window casings with aprons at the porch openings. The interior character-defining elements of the White Residence include but are not limited to its: - Douglas fir floors, throughout the main and upstairs area; - Douglas fir stairwell with original wood railings; - Board and batten wood paneling at two-thirds wall height with plate rail throughout main entryway, living room, parlour/sitting room and dining room areas on the main floor; - Wood baseboards and door/window casings throughout; - Decorative exposed wood beams on ceiling; - Brickwork on two fireplaces (one on each side of a shared chimney stack); - Windows in much of the house, including transom window configuration in the dining room, original windows in the living room and front parlour; and - Original glass light fixtures in dining room, living room and main floor hallway. Page 5 of 18

SCHEDULE C TO THE BYLAW TO DESIGNATE WHITE RESIDENCE AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE REGULATED PORTIONS 1.0 Context, Orientation and Placement - The placement of the building on the parcel of land as indicated in Image #1.1; and - The 579.9 square-meters of land which comprises the entire parcel, and specifically its soft-landscaping character. 33 AV SW (Image #1.1 Building orientation and placement on parcel) Page 6 of 18

2.0 Exterior - The form of the house and its one-and-a-half storey massing, excluding northwest second-storey addition 1 (Image #2.1, Item 1; Images #2.2-2.5); - The wood frame construction on concrete foundation; roughcast stucco cladding; wood trim (Image #2.5); - The low-pitched hipped roof with deep eaves (Image #2.2, Image #2.4); south and west hipped-roof dormers; wooden tongue and groove soffits (Image #2.5); - The partially-enclosed front porch (Images #2.6-2.7); deeply recessed entrance with glazed multi-light wood panel front door (Image #2.8); squared support columns with stylized column capitals and eave brackets (Image #2.6, Image #2.9); solid balustrades (Image #2.6); wood tongue-and-groove porch ceiling (Images #2.7-2.8); - The second-storey balcony on north façade with simple wood balustrade 2 (Image #2.2); and - The fenestration and window openings in the Regulated portions of the house; wood window casings (Image #2.2). 1 Full-height second-storey addition completed 1989 (Image #2.1, item 1) 2 First-storey rear entranceway with second-storey balcony above constructed after 1955 (Image #2.1, Item 2) N 1 2 (Image #2.1 Building form of the White Residence, showing known changes to form) Page 7 of 18

(Image #2.2 South façade of the White Residence) (Image #2.3 North façade, showing northwest second-storey addition) Page 8 of 18

(Image #2.4 East façade of the White Residence) (Image #2.5 West façade of the White Residence) Page 9 of 18

(Image #2.6 Exterior of enclosed porch section, showing roughcast stucco) (Image #2.7 Interior of enclosed porch section, with wood ceiling) Page 10 of 18

(Image #2.8 Porch detail, showing recessed entry and wood ceiling) (Image #2.9 Example of column capital with eave brackets) Page 11 of 18

BYLAW NUMBER 13M2017 3.0 Interior The layout and configuration around hall & northeast stair; The Douglas fir woodwork throughout first and second storeys including baseboards, door/window surrounds, wainscoting and decorative ceiling beams throughout first-storey, dining room pocket doors (Image #3.1- #3.6); The Douglas fir staircase between first and second stories (Image #3.3); The light fixtures in dining room, living room, main floor hallway (Image #3.7); The two brick fireplaces with wood surrounds, mantels, and built-in bookcases (Image #3.8); and The decorative ventilation grilles (Image #3.9). (Image #3.1 Dining room looking into hall, showing Douglas fir detailing throughout) Page 12 of 18

(Image #3.2 Front hallway) (Image #3.3 Douglas fir staircase and handrail between main and upper stories) Page 13 of 18

(Image #3.4 Dining room showing woodwork details) (Image #3.5 Two views of living room, showing woodwork details) Page 14 of 18

(Image #3.6 Sliding pocket doors to dining room, half-open) (Image #3.7 Left: Dining room fixture; centre: living room fixture; right: one of two hallway fixtures) Page 15 of 18

(Image #3.8 Living room fireplace one of two identical fireplaces here with bookcases) (Image #3.9 Ventilation grilles) Page 16 of 18

SCHEDULE D TO THE BYLAW TO DESIGNATE THE WHITE RESIDENCE AS A MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE The primary purpose of the Standards and Guidelines is to provide guidance to achieve sound conservation practice. They are used to assess proposed changes to designated Municipal Historical Resources and form the basis for review and assessment for the approved rehabilitation program. The Standards and Guidelines were developed by Parks Canada and were formally adopted by The City of Calgary in 2005. They provide a philosophical consistency for project work; and while neither technical nor case-specific, they provide the framework for making essential decisions about those features of a historic place, which should be maintained and cannot be altered. The Standards listed below and the referenced Guidelines shall apply to the Regulated Portions and any rehabilitation or maintenance work undertaken with respect to them at any time. The Standards Definitions of the terms in italics below are set forth in the Introduction of the Standards and Guidelines. In the event of a conflict between the italicized terms below and those in the Standards and Guidelines, the latter shall take precedence. The Standards are not presented in a sequential or hierarchical order, and as such, equal consideration should be given to each. All Standards for any given type of treatment must therefore be applied simultaneously to a project. General Standards (all projects) 1. Conserve the heritage value of a historic place. Do not remove, replace, or substantially alter its intact or repairable character-defining elements. Do not move a part of a historic place if its current location is a character-defining element. 2. Conserve changes to a historic place which, over time, have become character- defining elements in their own right. 3. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for minimal intervention. 4. Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time, place and use. Do not create a false sense of historical development by adding elements from other historic places or other properties or by combining features of the same property that never coexisted. 5. Find a use for a historic place that requires minimal or no change to its character defining elements. 6. Protect and, if necessary, stabilize a historic place until any subsequent intervention is undertaken. Protect and preserve archaeological resources in place. Where there is potential for disturbance of archaeological resources, take mitigation measures to limit damage and loss of information. Page 17 of 18

7. Evaluate the existing condition of character-defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the gentlest means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention. 8. Maintain character-defining elements on an ongoing basis. Repair characterdefining elements by reinforcing their materials using recognized conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively deteriorated or missing parts of character-defining elements, where there are surviving prototypes. 9. Make any intervention needed to preserve character-defining elements physically and visually compatible and identifiable upon close inspection and document any intervention for future reference. Additional Standards Relating to Rehabilitation 10. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements. Where character-defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair, and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements. Where there is insufficient physical evidence, make the form, material and detailing of the new elements compatible with the character of the historic place. 11. Conserve the heritage value and character-defining elements when creating any new additions to a historic place or any related new construction. Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place. 12. Create any new additions or related new construction so that the essential form and integrity of a historic place will not be impaired if the new work is removed in the future. Additional Standards Relating to Restoration 13. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements from the restoration period. Where character-defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements. 14. Replace missing features from the restoration period with new features whose forms, materials and detailing are based on sufficient physical, documentary and/or oral evidence. Guidelines The full text of the Standards and Guidelines is available from: City of Calgary Planning and Development P.O. Box 2100, Stn. M, #8073 Calgary, Alberta, T2P 2M5 Parks Canada National Office 25 Eddy Street Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0M5 Page 18 of 18