CITY OF SUBIACO PLANNING POLICY 3.15

Similar documents
Newtown West Heritage Review

Expert Witness Statement by: Peter Andrew Barrett. Registered Address Level Collins Street Melbourne. For: Planning Panels Victoria Hearing

Re: Justification to support the creation of two survey-strata lots at Lot 156 (#44) High Street, Sorrento.

16.1 ISSUES OBJECTIVES POLICIES RULES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 5

Guidelines for good practice on: The Substantial Change Exemption in Rent Pressure Zone Areas

REPORT BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE LYTTELTON/MT HERBERT COMMUNITY BOARD 28 SEPTEMBER 2010

VILLAGE OF LITTLE CHUTE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT/FAÇADE RENOVATION PROGRAM

BERMUDA 9 BEACHES (DANIEL S HEAD, SANDY S PARISH) ORDER 2010 GN 1099 / 2010

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

Ashby Heritage Review Stage 2

Qualification Snapshot CIH Level 3 Certificate in Housing Services (QCF)

STAFF REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

density framework ILLUSTRATION 3: DENSITY (4:1 FSR) EXPRESSED THROUGH BUILT FORM Example 1

Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Demolition of Listed Buildings

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING THE CERTIFICATE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 89 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Planning Rationale. 224 Cooper Street

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review. Discussion Paper: Second Residential Units. Prepared for: The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

CD-1 (264) 101 Terminal Avenue By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

Cressingham Gardens Estate, Brixton. DRAFT Masterplan Objectives for discussion. September 2015

Old Administration Area. Archival Recording. Final January 2016

An Bord Pleanála. Inspector s Report. Single storey extension to rear at 26 Fitzroy Avenue, Drumcondra, Dublin 3.

Vesting of Roads and Reserves Policy

AMENDMENT NUMBER 38 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST LINCOLN (COMPLIANCE)

Activities which do not satisfy the General Rules and are not provided for as Restricted Discretionary activities... 9

RE: Draft Planning Directive Standards for Single Dwellings and Multiple Dwellings (Villa Units and Townhouses) in the General Residential Zone

Application for Township of King Community Improvement Plan Financial Incentive Programs

Rawlinson House, Lewisham, London SE13 5EL

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Maintenance & Preservation Agreement [SAMPLE]

SCHEDULE 12 TO THE URBAN GROWTH ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as UGZ12. Kororoit Precinct Structure Plan

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Land Acquisition and Property

PORT PHILLIP PLANNING SCHEME. Condition

Planning Commission Report

i) To agree to the publication of the draft Brownfield Land Register for a 4 week period of consultation from 20 October 2017 to 17 November 2017.

A Lifestyle Choice. Glengarry Court

POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

VILLAGE OF Niles Facade & Streetscape Improvement Program APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT The following includes the Façade & Streetscape Improvement

Relating to Hotel in Operation. Invest Hotel Scheme

Community Occupancy Guidelines

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

RT-3 District Schedule

Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

PART 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES

PROVIDENCE (BOLLARD BULRUSH SOUTH) LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2263Rep146E

City-Initiated Study for the West Side of Roncesvalles Avenue, Between Marmaduke Street and Marion Street Final Report

Cartersville Code of Ordinances Historic Preservation Commission

Page 1 of 5. Name of Firm:

SECTION B - GUIDELINES

pqzj Agenda Item # Page # CHAIR AND MEMBERS BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING ON MONDAY, JULY 18,2011: 7:40 p.

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Budget and Finance ******************************************************************************

RHLF WORKSHOP The National Housing Code

Land Use Planning Analysis. Phase 2 Drayton Valley Annexation Proposal

Residential Design Guide Appendices

1816, Independence Hall 1850, Washington s Headquarters

PLANNING. Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan POLICY 1 - NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Non-statutory Planning Guidance

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

$30.00 ZONING REGULATIONS CITY OF STAMFORD CONNECTICUT

Expert Witness Statement by: Peter Andrew Barrett. Registered Address Level Collins Street Melbourne. For: Planning Panels Victoria Hearing

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2012

ORDINANCE NO. 972 N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ADDING ARTICLE V. CHAPTER OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION

SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

DRAFT PROPOSED CHAPTER 21 SPECIFIC PURPOSE - FLAT LAND RECOVERY ZONE

Historic Yonge Street - Study Area Designation By-Law

Re: TP , Flinders Street MELBOURNE, demolition and construction of 13 storey building.

Notified Concession Officer s Report to Decision Maker

Task Force Kickoff Meeting January 10, 2016

Rental. National. Affordability. the Questus Residential Investment Fund. National Rental Affordability Scheme and NRAS

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Lisburn Golf Club Clubhouse Development Plans

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) PDSP and Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #6

CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER COUNCIL

The Corporation of the District of North Vancouver ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY MANUAL. Section: Land Administration 8. Sub-Section: Development 3060

APPROVED URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY PRINCE EDWARD ROAD WEST / YUEN NGAI STREET DEVELOPMENT SCHEME PLAN NO. S/K3/URA2/2

APPLICANT CONSENTS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION BEING RELEASED Yes No. APPLICANT S SIGNATURE: 15 September 2015

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Rider To Purchase Agreement

Northern Territory Property Report October 2016

14F Heritage Buildings and Structures

Development Permit Application Guide

NCP Amendment Rezoning Development Variance Permit

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

BEP 2: What you need to know

PLNPCM : Attached Garage Regulations for Residential Districts ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

BUSI 452 Case Studies in Appraisal II

DISTRICT OF SICAMOUS REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

International Village By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. Form of Development: 1139 West Cordova Street

Flinders Avenue, Lara Planning Scheme Amendment Combined Application for Rezoning and Multi-Lot Subdivision Reference : Decembe

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

South African Council for Town and Regional Planners

Transcription:

CITY OF SUBIACO PLANNING POLICY 3.15 SADLIER & REDFERN STREET HERITAGE AREA DRAFT DATE: 7 DECEMBER 2017 AUTHORITY: TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO.4 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (LOCAL PLANNING SCHEMES) REGULATIONS 2015 STATUTORY BACKGROUND This Policy is made under clauses 4 and 9 of Schedule 2 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. Schedule 2, Part 3, clause 9 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 requires the local government to adopt a planning policy for each heritage area. Purpose (i) (ii) To identify key issues specific to the Heritage Area. To ensure that new development does not reduce the heritage values and character of the Heritage Area or the contributory value of individual places within the area. Application of the Policy The boundary of the Heritage Area is shown in Figure 1. This planning policy applies to all places and buildings located within the Heritage Area. POLICY Objectives i. To conserve existing buildings identified as making a considerable or some contribution to the cultural heritage significance and character of the Heritage Area. ii. To encourage new building developments and alterations and additions to existing buildings, that are in harmony with, and maintain the integrity of, the Heritage Area s cultural heritage significance, its established character and visual amenity. iii. To conserve the cultural heritage significance of the Heritage Area which is significant for the reasons explained in the statement of significance for the area. 1.0 Statement of Significance The Sadlier & Redfern Street Heritage Area, is of cultural heritage significance within the City of Subiaco for the following reasons:

Aesthetic Value As an aesthetically pleasing streetscape with a strong identifiable character, featuring an avenue of mature street trees, which frame views of the largely intact Interwar residences; For its collection of many good, representative examples of Federation and Inter War cottages and villas which collectively illustrate a range and evolution of detailing between the 1920s and the 1940s; and For the cohesive streetscape created by a limited palette of materials and styles. Historic Value As a representative collection of houses that illustrate the scale and standard of housing for the homes of unskilled workers to semi-professional and tradespeople, in the early twentieth century; For the evidence it provides about the manner in which the residences of semiprofessional and tradespeople existed alongside the residences of working people and employees; and For its association with the subdivision and rapid settlement of the area from the 1920s to the 1940s which demonstrates the rapid change of the district of the district in this period. 2.0 Key Features/Elements The Planning Policy is specifically concerned with the component parts of the Sadlier and Redfern Street Heritage Area that directly contribute to the public, streetscape views (including the setting, building envelopes, external fabric and detailing). Key features/elements within the Sadlier and Redfern Street Heritage Area are identified in the Heritage Assessment of 5-51 Sadlier Street and 103-119 Redfern Street, Subiaco prepared by Hocking Heritage Studio, July 2017. 3.0 Levels of Contribution The Heritage Assessment of 5-51 Sadlier Street and 103-119 Redfern Street, Subiaco prepared by Hocking Heritage Studio in July 2017 determined the contribution of each dwelling to the overall significance of the Heritage Area (Table 1). All places that were assessed as making considerable or some contribution are considered to be contributory places for the purposes of this planning policy. Note: Contributory places are those that make a positive contribution to the cultural heritage significance and heritage character of the Heritage Area. In the context of this policy, the significant fabric of a contributory place means those parts that contribute to the heritage significance and character of the place within its streetscape setting (i.e. as visible from the public realm). In addition to building fabric, this can include landscape elements and fencing. Places that have been assessed as being of considerable contribution have generally retained evidence of their traditional external detailing/character and/or have important historical associations. Places that have been assessed as being of some contribution have

undergone more substantial external alterations over time, but their underlying character still remains consistent with the heritage streetscape. Places of some contribution also retain sufficient evidence to provide a basis for future restoration, if and when the opportunity arises. The majority of these places contribute to the Sadlier and Redfern Street Heritage Area because of their age, design characteristics and their moderate to high level of authenticity. Individually, they are not necessarily items of particular heritage significance, but they do possess collective significance within their streetscape context. Loss of, or significant alteration to, the facades of the contributory dwellings would erode the heritage significance and character of the area as a whole. Many of the houses in the heritage area have been upgraded over recent years with a combination of additions, alterations and conservation works. To date, this has had a relatively minor impact on the aesthetic values of the traditional streetscapes. Table 1 - Levels of Contribution The Heritage Assessment of 5-51 Sadlier Street and 103-119 Redfern Street, Subiaco determined the level of contribution of each building to the overall significance of the Heritage Area (Figure 1) Considerable Contribution 5 Sadlier Street (Lot 67) 7 Sadlier Street (Lot 68) 28 Sadlier Street (Lot 29) 31 Sadlier Street (Lot 16) 35 Sadlier Street (Lot 18) 37 Sadlier Street (Lot 19) 41 Sadlier Street (Lot 21) 43 Sadlier Street (Lot 22) 4.0 Conservation Principles Some Contribution 103 Redfern Street (Lot 77) 107 Redfern Street (Lot 35) 109 Redfern Street (Lot 34) 111 Redfern Street (Lot 33) 115 Redfern Street (Lot 32) 117 Redfern Street (Lot 31) 119 Redfern Street (Lot 102) 106 Redfern Street (Lots 83 & 82) 108 Redfern Street (Lot 81) 114 Redfern Street (Lots 78 & 79) 11 Sadlier Street (Lot 70) 13 Sadlier Street (lot 71) 15 Sadlier Street (Lot 72) 17 Sadlier Street (Lot 73) 19 Sadlier Street (Lot 74) 21 Sadlier Street (Lot 75) 23 Sadlier Street (Lot 76) 25 Sadlier Street (Lot 77) 32 Sadlier Street (Lot 28) 33 Sadlier Street (Lot 123) 39 Sadlier Street (Lot 20) 47 Sadlier Street (Lot 24) 51 Sadlier Street (Lot 25) Little/no Contribution 105 Redfern Street (Lot 36) 110 Redfern Street (Lot 80) 9 Sadlier Street (Lot 69) 45 Sadlier Street (Lot 23) Ensure that the key features/elements of the Sadlier & Redfern Street Heritage Area are retained and enhanced. When undertaking repairs or alterations to a contributory place, change as little of the significant fabric as possible where visible from public streetscape views. Where conservation works are necessary to areas visible from public streetscape views, match the traditional techniques, materials and finishes as far as reasonably practical. Ensure that conservation and refurbishment of significant fabric retains the character acquired through the natural aging of well-maintained fabric, inclusive of the signs of normal wear and tear. Ensure that new building fabric is discernible at close inspection, and does not obscure an understanding of the original scale and design of the place.

In general it is recommended that conservation works be undertaken in accordance with The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (The Burra Charter 1999). The Burra Charter defines key terms, including maintenance, repair, restoration and reconstruction. 5.0 Key Development Constraints There are no key development constraints identified in the Policy Area. 6.0 Development Principles In accordance with Local Planning Policy 3.6 Development Guidelines for Residential Heritage Areas. 7.0 Development Applications Normal maintenance and internal alterations can be undertaken without development approval, provided the works do not adversely affect the significant fabric of the place. For information regarding other works that do not require development approval in a heritage area refer to Local Planning Policy 1.8 Development approval exemptions. Local Planning Policy 1.2 Refunding and waiving planning and building fees outlines Council policy to waive fees for development applications which may otherwise be exempt under Schedule 2, Part 7 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations. The information required by the City of Subiaco to accompany a Development Application is set out in Schedule 2, Part 8 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. Property owners intending to make alterations and additions to their properties are urged to consult with the Heritage Officer at the City of Subiaco at the earliest stage of the design process. Figure 1 Policy Area