Public Hearing November 14, 2017 On Table Items Item Type Date Item No. Item Name Reason For On-Table Distribution Presentation November 14, 2017 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) Presentation by Allaire (Applicant) November 14, 2017 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) Public Input November 14, 2017 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) Received after agenda publication Received after agenda publication Received after agenda publication Document: 421428
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 3 64-74 Seaview Drive OCP Amendment and Rezoning Public Hearing November 14, 2017 location 1
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 4 land use policy context OCP Zoning project highlights 28 3 storey townhomes access from Seaview Drive FAR: 0.95 3 bedroom units unit sizes: 1304ft. 2 to 1731ft. 2 building heights: 33ft. to 40ft. 62 parking spaces large play area future intersection upgrades CAC - $183,685 2
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 5 implementation Bylaw 3099 OCP Amendment Bylaw 3100 - rezones site to Comprehensive Development Zone 68 (CD68)» lot coverage of 44%;» FAR of 0.95;» max. building heights by individual building;» varied setbacks from exterior property lines; and» parking requirements Bylaw 3109 Housing Agreement Bylaw Development Permit project process Advisory Design Panel June 1, 2017 Community Information Meeting September 7,2017 o 25 residents o support for project o concerns over OCP amendment CPAC October 3, 2017 o project support Council October 24, 2017 o 1 st and 2 nd Readings of bylaws 3099, 3100 and 3109 3
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 6 conclusion responds to OCP housing policies o more affordable alternative to single family home o housing for families adjacent to multi-family and commercial uses located at edge of community access to transit 4
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 7 Public Hearing 14 NOVEMBER 2017 CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES 64 / 68 / 72 / 74 SEAVIEW DRIVE - PORT MOODY - BC OWNER ALLAIRE GROUP - HEADWATER LIVING ARCHITECTINTEGRA ARCHITECTURE INC. LANDSCAPEJONATHAN LOSEE LTD. context photo 1
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 8 SMALLER BUILDING FORM RESIDENTIAL SCALE DIRECT ACCESS 2
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 9 unit section perspective view VARIATION SCALE UNDULATING FACADE - WRAP ENDS OF BUILDINGS GRADE CHANGE LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF REPETITION LANDSCAPE AT ENTRIES STREET PRESENCE 3
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 10 SMALLER WINDOWS ON SOUTH BALCONY SCREENS WINDOW PROPORTION TALLER FOR NORTH LIGHT LIMITED WALL AREA VISUALLY SHARED SPACE GREEN SCREEN BETWEEN UNITS RECESSED AREAS ENTRY materials and colour 4
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 11 REVISED WEST ENTRY WIDER STAIR INCREASE PLANTING MORE DECORATIVE TREATMENT revisions REVISED AMENITY AREAS ACCESSIBLE DESIGN - NO STAIRS revisions 5
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 12 LOWERED WALL OVER 20 TO PROPERT REVISED NORTH-EAST COR SETBACK MORE OPEN SPACE INCREASED PLANTING revisions REVISED NORTH-EAST COR SETBACK MORE OPEN SPACE INCREASED PLANTING revisions 6
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 13 REVISED NORTH-EAST COR SETBACK MORE OPEN SPACE INCREASED PLANTING revisions Minimum Energuide 80 all rezoning applications Energuide 81 project BuiltGreen Silver retained E3 Eco Group sustainability consultant consultant team: architect passive design solutions landscape [ strategies with water retention and materials ] civil [ storm water management ] mechanical [ heat loss and heat gain energy review ] electrical [ systems and equipment ] built green rating - silver sustainability 7
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 14 Public Hearing 14 NOVEMBER 2017 CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES 64 / 68 / 72 / 74 SEAVIEW DRIVE - PORT MOODY - BC OWNER ALLAIRE GROUP - HEADWATER LIVING ARCHITECTINTEGRA ARCHITECTURE INC. LANDSCAPEJONATHAN LOSEE LTD. 8
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 15 cedar ridge perspective view Clark Road - feature homes perspective view 9
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 16 Clark Road - feature home perspective view 10
Public Hearing November 14, 2017 On-Table Public Input Item Type Date Item No. Correspondence Beauregard, Sheila and Gary Correspondence Richoux, Heather Correspondence Northcott, Cam and Sherry Correspondence Karamanian, Jack Correspondence Clarke, James Nov 10, 2017 8h31 Nov 10, 2017 11h23 Nov 10, 2017 19h53 Nov 14, 2017 11h10 Nov 14, 2017 11h35 Item Name 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) 1.1 Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) Reason for On-Table Distribution Received after agenda submission deadline Received after agenda submission deadline Received after agenda submission deadline Received after agenda submission deadline Received after agenda submission deadline
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 3 Nov. 10, 2017 To the Mayor, Councillors and City Clerks of Port Moody Re: Rezoning Application 6700-20-154 Regarding properties at 64, 68, 72 & 74 Seaview Drive, Port Moody We live at Seaview Drive and wish to voice our support for the proposal before Council to amend the Official Community Plan to allow the rezoning of the above named properties. We have attended previous information meetings and favor this development. As long-time residents of the neighbourhood we have enjoyed the benefits of living in a single family detached home with neighbours who are family. However, we also realize that Port Moody is changing and must adapt to a new era. We look forward to the revival of this area of Port Moody. We see a need for more affordable housing which will give our young people, newcomers and seniors another option in which to enjoy this vibrant community. Higher density is inevitable. It was nice to see the developer s model that incorporates the look and feel of the existing neighbourhood. The proposed development offered a setback from the street and a street view from front yards on Seaview much like the homes already in the area. The scale of the development would not overpower existing homes. The design includes sidewalks along the front of the development which would be a huge benefit as presently students are walking along Seaview often in the middle of the road. Sidewalks should ensure more safety for these students and other pedestrians. As well, the proposal for a controlled pedestrian crossing at Seaview and Clarke has been long overdue. The developer has made efforts to include a children s play area and a communal area on the development which should contribute to a sense of community. We are optimistic that new residents would amalgamate with the existing strong, friendly and welcoming neighbourhood. Parking seems to have been addressed. Hopefully, we will not see extra congestion on our streets as we have such close proximity to the Evergreen Line and transit options which should result in less reliance on vehicles. In the near future, more people will be looking at public transit and car share options as a more economical option to personal car ownership. Overall, this development appears to be well planned and would offer a rejuvenation of the present neighbourhood. We hope council will approve this proposal. Sheila and Gary Beauregard Seaview Drive Port Moody, BC
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 4 From: Heather Richoux [mailto: ] Sent: November-10-17 11:23 AM To: Clerks <Clerks@portmoody.ca> Cc: Doug Allan <doallan@portmoody.ca> Subject: Public hearing for rezoning Hi There, I would like to give input for the public hearing, but am unable to attend in person. This is in response for the request for rezoning to develop a townhouse complex on Seaview and Clarke. I have been a resident at Mount Royal Drive for nearly 8 years and have seen a huge increase in the volume of noise and traffic since living here and further densification will only add to this. There are now many multiple family complexes very close to this along Clarke street. It seems that traditional neighborhoods are becoming a thing of the past. I am opposed to the the proposed rezoning and would prefer the land remain R-1 zoning. Thank you, Heather Richoux
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 5 Seaview Drive Port Moody, BC V3H November 10, 2017 via email: clerks@portmoody.ca City of Port Moody 100 Newport Drive Port Moody, BC V3H 5C3 Attention: City Council Re: Council Chambers, Tuesday November 14 2017, 7:00pm Official Community Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application 64-74 Seaview Drive (Allaire Group) My family have happily resided in Port Moody on Seaview Drive for 23 years. We like our neighborhood and enjoy easy access to the lower mainland since the Skytrain was completed. Our neighborhood is mixed use - with single family houses, duplexes, townhomes, commercial, and a large multifamily complex immediately behind us. We feel redevelopment on Seaview Drive is unavoidable. These single family homes (SFH) are older and on decent size lots, thus making them prime candidates for tear down. In neighborhoods throughout the Tri-Cities, older houses such as ours are rapidly disappearing, being replaced with massive mega houses. If the cost and expense of bringing rapid transit to our city is to be justified, continuing to emphasize low-density SFH such as ours /or monster houses doesn't make sense, especially when there is a need for more multi-family units in Port Moody. Not everyone can afford to buy an SFH, and condos may be too small. To provide more living opportunities with townhouses in Port Moody for those who can't afford an SFH is a reasonable solution. The development of townhouses on the 4 Seaview Drive lots by the Allaire Group should begin to revitalize our neighbourhood and and will benefit our community as a whole. This is a good first step and we feel it should lead to further similar projects moving forward. We fully support this rezoning application as submitted by the Allaire Group. In addition, it is our opinion there should be a greater density increase in our area than just this one project affords since the Evergreen Line has been brought to Port Moody. Regards, Cameron & Sherry Northcott Seaview Drive
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 6 From: SHARLEEN KARAMANIAN [mailto: ] Sent: November-14-17 11:10 AM To: Clerks <Clerks@portmoody.ca> Subject: submission to Public Hearing (Nov 14) Re Seaview Rezoning Dear City Clerk: Please find attached and below. 1.1 Notice of Public Hearing Bylaw No. 3099 Bylaw No. 3100 Report Considered at October 24, 2017 Regular Council Meeting: Development Services Department Planning Division, dated October 13, 2017 Public Input Files: 09-3900-02-1 and 13-6700-20-154 A Bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2014, No. 2955. A Bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 1988, No. 1890. Re: Development Proposal on Clark and Seaview: I regret I am unable to make today s Council meeting.please note my following questions and concerns: 1. Affordable Housing : Please do not allow ANY developer to use this expression to support this project unless a finite dollar amount per square foot is provided; then council may determine its affordability. 2. Traffic implications: traffic flow east on Seaview will be compromised a designated bike route and a pedestrian route to Port Moody Senior Secondary has always been seldom used by vehicles. My understanding is this development will house up to 64 cars! This is not meant to be a through road the road is in disrepair as it is! 3. Who exactly is in favour? I wonder if Council is aware that almost no one who lives in the community is in favour. That is, those who are in favour do not live on Seaview east of Clark Drive. Some citizens may say they will take advantage of living in this proposed development how may this be accurate? Especially when costs are not revealed! 4. No public Transit: Since transit rescheduled their services, there is no bus service near Clarke and Seaview. 5. Continued disruption: the Rapid Transit construction just ended after 3 years, and now another 18-24 month development will disrupt the neighbourhood. 6. Minimal monetary contribution to the city: My understanding is that the city will get $50-180k from the developers pitiful! (I apologize for not knowing the by-laws here) 7. Intentions and projections: Experienced council members know not to be swayed by rhetoric regarding what may happen. 8. Rezoning: When I personally approached the city regarding rezoning (RS1) 1 year ago, I was told a city-wide plan already established zoning throughout various districts and that rezoning will prove challenging; now I hear the corridor will allow for rezoning! Why the inconsistencies in stances? 9. Future development: Will Council admit that approval of such a project opens the door for future development on Seaview east of Clark. This is very much on topic. Respectfully, Jack Karamanian Seaview Drive
PH - On-Table - 2017 11 14 7 From: James Clarke [mailto: ] Sent: November-14-17 11:35 AM To: Clerks <Clerks@portmoody.ca> Subject: Public Hearing Notice: 64,68,72,74 Seaview I hope to be able to attend the Public Hearing this evening if not I have the following comments on the OCP amendment and rezoning of 64, 68, 72, 74 Seaview. 1. I do not support the proposed amendment as it is private developer driven and not community and municipality driven, this contradicts the hard work and expertise that went into preparing the Official Community Plan. 2. The development of two rows of town houses on 120' deep lots does not allow for adequate green space in the lane way in the centre of the lot as it would on a larger more comprehensive site. 3. The rezoning of these RS-1 lots to multifamily sets a precedent for large areas of the city which will have negative impacts on the public infrastructure. 4. In my opinion piecemeal rezoning such as this scheme generates fewer benefits to the community than through more comprehensive developments such as those proposed for the Transit Orientated Development areas. I trust that Council will consider the implications of this OCP amendment extremely carefully as I believe that the proposed amendment has wide impacts across the City of Port Moody and on a community plan that has only been adopted as a bylaw for three years. The decisions that we make today will impact on our community for at least the next 50 years. Yours truly, James Clarke Henry Street Port Moody