Capitol Park IV Condominium Association, Inc. 741 Delaware Avenue SW Washington DC 20024

Similar documents
YOUR DC WATER BILL WHAT S NEW? WHAT CHANGES CAN YOU EXPECT IN THE FUTURE? AOBA UTILITY COMMITTE. June 27, By:

YOUR DC WATER BILL WHAT CHANGES CAN YOU EXPECT? AOBA UTILITY COMMITTEE

YOUR DC WATER BILL WHAT CHANGES CAN YOU EXPECT? AOBA UTILITY COMMITTEE

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2003

Lorain County Storm Water District. Lorain County, Ohio. Frequently Asked Questions

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2005

ORDINANACE NO

Dedicated program for municipal drainage management

Current Situation and Issues

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2013

Wesley S. Davis District 1. Gary C. Wheeler Chairman District 3. Joseph E. Flescher District 2. Sandra L. Bowden Vice Chairman District 5

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Change 6, September 1, TITLE 18 WATER AND SEWERS 1

CHAPTER 5 RULES, RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE STORMWATER UTILITY SERVICE 1

DECLARATION OF RESTRICITONS AFFECTING EWING PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTION 2

TOWNSHIP OF ALGOMA. County, Michigan, held in the Algoma Township Hall, Algoma Avenue, N.E., within

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND FACILITIES

Block 130, Lot 4 on the Tax Map

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION OF LAND REGULATIONS TITLE 17

Staff Report. Port Hood Area Advisory Committee Inverness Planning Advisory Committee Inverness County Council. To: Planning Staff (EDPC) From:

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Merrimac PLNSUB Planned Development 38 West Merrimac November 9, Request. Staff Recommendation

CITY OF TAMPA Stormwater Utility Funding Frequently Asked Questions 2017

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 1, 2015

TOWNSHIP OF ALGOMA COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. Minutes of a regular meeting of the Township Board of the Township of Algoma, Kent

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF KALAMAZOO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. KALAMAZOO CHARTER TOWNSHIP SIDEWALK ORDINANCE

DETAILED GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST (TEARDOWN/REDEVELOPMENT)

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE OF RATES, RENTALS & CHARGES

ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW

DISTRICT OF CENTRAL SAANICH SOIL REMOVAL OR DEPOSIT PERMIT APPLICATION. Applicant Information (filled out by applicant)

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: September 10, 2018

CITY OF GLASGOW ORDINANCE NO. 2809

ARTICLE SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

Watertown City Council

25 N 23rd STREET COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

DECLARATION OF RESTRICITONS AFFECTING EWING PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3

CASH FOR GRASS REBATE APPLICATION

of operation designated by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners as provided

Philomath Low-Density Residential Zone (PR-1)

South Park County Sanitation District

1 AC Land (Multifamily)

ORDINANCE NO. 16- WHEREAS, said Code included Title 12, which is the City s Land Use Ordinance; and

City of Palm Bay Stormwater Assessment Program. March 30, 2017

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007)

MIDWAY CITY Planning Office 75 North 100 West Phone: x105 Midway, Utah Fax:

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

Chapter 21 MOBILE HOME PARK REGULATIONS.

TOWN OF DYER, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA ORDINANCE NO.:

COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF NOBLESVILLE

TITLE 7. WATERSHED PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM

Missing Middle Alternative Proposal: Olympians for Smart Development & Livable Neighborhoods

Preliminary Analysis

CHAPTER 18. PROVISION OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICE BY LANDLORDS.

1827 FREEDOM ROAD SUITE 101 LANCASTER, PA 17601

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

SCHEDULE OF RATES, RENTALS & CHARGES

Ordinance No. An Amendment to the City Code of Ordinances

BUFFALO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. Meeting: Monday, March 12, 2018 Place: Buffalo City Center Time: 7:00 p.m.

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

Grand Rapids, MN Stormwater Utility Best Management Practices Credit Policy (As per Section (b) of Ordinance No )

1905 OLDE HOMESTEAD LANE SUITE 101 LANCASTER, PA 17601

X3066. WHEREAS, the Staff Recommended Budget was received in the office of the Board of County Commissioners by March 21, 2017;

City Council Committee Meeting

Lindon City Accessory Apartment Requirements Handbook

STAFF REPORT Administrative Subdivision Hearing West 150 South Street, Parcel # , and

BUILDING & INSPECTIONS DIVISION 200 East Wood Street Palatine, IL Telephone (847)

b. What cap rate will produce a value of $550,000?

DETAILED GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST (TEARDOWN/REDEVELOPMENT) Updated: 12/12/2017

ORDINANCE NUMBER

ARTICLE SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO TELEPHONE: (513)

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the County Council desires to amend the current Code of

Cabarrus County, NC Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. Contents

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

SIMPLIFIED APPROACH PERMIT PROCEDURES

b. What cap rate will produce a value of $550,000?

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHENANDOAH, TEXAS, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO

The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners

MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 8 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

MODEL STORMWATER UTILITY ORDINANCE

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

Appendix J: Stormwater Utility Ordinance Guidance

ORDINANCE NO

AERONAUTICAL USE LEASE POLICYPOLICY GRAND JUNCTION REGIONAL AIRPORT Revised: November 18, 2014

Chapter 3 FINANCE, TAXATION, AND PUBLIC RECORDS

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Articles 1 and 2 define the purpose of the Law and who it covers.

CO-OWNER HANDBOOK. The inner space, which you own, is yours to decorate, to maintain, and to live in.

9. Public (Federal, State, or local

Halifax Water Rate Pricing and Stormwater Management Programs. March 4 th, 2013

Residential Demographic Multipliers Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research

City of Fraser Residential Zoning District

Transcription:

October 20, 2014 Capitol Park IV Condominium Association, Inc. 741 Delaware Avenue SW Washington DC 20024 VIA U.S. MAIL AND EMAIL District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority Customer Service Department 810 First Street, NE, 11th Floor Washington, D.C. 20002 phone: 202.484.5235 fax: 202.484.1754 cpivcondo1973@gmail.com www.capitolparkiv.com RE: DC Water Clean Rivers Impervious Area and Other Water/Sewer Charges Accounts: 0104758-8, 0104757-0, 0104756-2, 0104768-7, 0105035-0, 0104647-3, 0105036-8 Dear Sir or Madam: The Board of Directors of Capitol Park IV Condominium Association, Inc. ( Board and CPIV ) protest the application of DC Water commercial water and sewer rates, including the DC Water Impervious Clean Rivers Area Charge (CRIAC), to our horizontal residential condominium association, which is comprised of 243 single-family residential townhouses. The Board demands that: (1) DC Water apply the proper residential water and sewer rate to CPIV as it is a residential property, and that our eleven (11) accounts be retroactively credited back to the inception of this practice with our accounts with DC Water; (2) DC Water cap the total ERUs for our residential property to 13.5 per the CRIAC ERU rate scale; (3) DC Water reduce our overall ERU based on our implementation of several best management practices (BMPs) and low-impact designs (LIDs) as of January 2014; and (4) DC Water immediately stop the application of all commercial water and sewer rates to CPIV and remediate the extreme, undue and unfair hardship it has created through the CRIAC Pilot Program for our property, specifically with regard to the proposed annual increases to the six-tier CRIAC rate scale through FY 2021. I. DC Water Must Apply the Proper Residential Customer CRIAC Rate to CPIV DC Water established the CRIAC in FY 2011 with a six-tier rate based on the total aggregate square footage of impervious area for each residential property. A sample for FY 2014 is provided below from DC Water s website:

2 FY 2014 Rates Impervious Area (Square Feet) ERU ERU Rate Monthly Cost 100-600 0.6 $11.85 $7.11 700-2,000 1.0 $11.85 $11.85 2,100-3,000 2.4 $11.85 $28.44 3,100-7,000 3.8 $11.85 $45.03 7,100-11,000 8.6 $11.85 $101.91 11,100 and more 13.5 $11.85 $159.98 DC Water states that all non-residential customers are assessed ERUs based on the total amount of impervious surface on each lot. DC Water has been erroneously charging CPIV under the aforementioned non-residential customer policy rate. In fact, each bill states Current Water and Sewer Charges Commercial. CPIV s ERUs are not capped at 13.5 according to the above six-tier rate scale. Instead, the total 321,000 square feet of impervious area for our property is being used to calculate the monthly CRIAC charge. However, CPIV is not a commercial property. It is a unique horizontal residential condominium association made up of single-family townhouse dwellings, akin to traditional townhomes. Founded under the Horizontal Property Act (now the DC Condominium Act), CPIV is a not-for-profit entity. CPIV s Declaration defines the use of the condominium property only for residential purposes and no use may be made of any Unit except as a residence for the Co-Owner [Unit Owner/individual] thereof or his lessees and the members of their families and servants.... Under the DC Condominium Act, "Unit" shall mean a portion of the condominium designed and intended for individual ownership and "Unit owner" shall mean a declarant or any person who owns a condominium unit. The units in CPIV are for individual ownership and residential use only. By DC law, they cannot be used for commercial or multi-family ownership. Furthermore, CPIV s property line falls within the DC Office of Zoning Commission s Zone R-4 category (see attached diagram). The DC Zoning Commission defines zone R-4 to [permit] matter-ofright development of single-family residential uses (including detached, semi-detached, row dwellings, and flats), churches and public schools with a minimum lot width of 18 feet, a minimum lot area of 1,800 square feet and a maximum lot occupancy of 60% for row dwellings,. It is clear that CPIV is a single-family residential townhouse condominium association. Therefore, the residential customer rate for both water and sewer charges should not be at the commercial rate, but at the residential rate. This includes the ERU square footage rate, which should have been capped at 13.5 ERUs in calculating the CRIAC. We demand that the correct residential customer calculation be applied for the water and sewer charge for our accounts, and that DC Water retroactively credit every previous bill from the inception of our accounts that used a DC Water commercial water or sewer rate in calculating these charges for CPIV.

3 II. CRIAC Poses an Extremely Unfair and Highly Detrimental Financial Hardship to CPIV Since inception of the CRIAC, CPIV has been paying twenty (20) times the maximum ERU rate charged to other residential properties. Using aerial photography, DC Water determined in 2009 that CPIV has 321,000 square feet of impervious surface (roofs, courtyards, parking lots and sidewalks), or 321 ERUs. The CRIAC was levied in addition to the metering fee, PILOT fee, Right of Way fee, storm water fee, and the actual cost of the water itself, all of which are subject to future increases, and all of which have been erroneously charged at the commercial rate. In 2009, CPIV s annual budget was $1.3 million. The monthly CRIAC for one ERU was $1.29. CPIV s DC Water expense for that year was approximately $111,000, or 8% of the budget. Since 2011, our annual budget has averaged $1.5 million. Over the last four years, the average monthly CRIAC for one ERU was $10.35. Our average annual DC Water expense during that time has risen to $230,000, or an average of 15% of that $1.5 mil budget, which reflects an approximate 50% increase (double) in what we have paid in the last 4 years. By way of example, in 2013, the CRIAC was $9.57 and DC Water calculated all 321 ERUs under the commercial rate policy. That totaled over $3,000/mo. for just one fee, at an annual expense of almost $37, 000 for just one of six fees! For fiscal year 2014, it rose to $11.85, and another increase was recently approved for FY 2015 for $16.75. This fee rate is currently scheduled to peak at an astounding $30.67 per ERU per month in 2021. The CRIAC will cost CPIV approximately $9,845 per month in 2021! That s a 900% percent increase over the next 11 years! Clearly, CPIV s 243 residents are being disproportionately affected by the CRIAC. The CRIAC, in addition to the other DC Water commercial rate fees, will inevitably bankrupt CPIV. The exponential increases will force us to deplete our reserve fund, force us to increase CPIV owner assessments to an unreasonable and unmarketable amount. This will force us to forego other condominium responsibilities, which will lead to lawsuits, inability of owners to make the assessment payments (in addition to their mortgage payments), an inability to retain or attract owners, and ultimately, bankruptcy. The CRIAC is causing true and substantial harm and damage to CPIV. It is unfair, unduly burdensome, and extremely egregious. We demand that DC Water apply the residential CRIAC cap of 13.5 to CPIV. III. DC Water Must Reduce ERUs for Implementation of Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs) and/or Low Impact Design/Development (LID) In January 2014, CPIV took its first steps to participate in the DDOE RiverSmart and Clean Rivers programs to implement storm water best management practices (BMPs) and low impact design (LID) throughout the property. The first such project was the installation of six-130 gallon rain barrels on the property. Over the course of the last 10 months, these six rain barrels have captured well over 2,000 gallons of rain water. CPIV requests to receive credit for the amounts of rainwater we captured and reused that did not enter the DC Water sewage system. In April 2014, we removed concrete courtyards and replaced sections of concrete sidewalks with engineered permeable sidewalk pavers installed over 18 inches of gravel and sand. In total CPIV removed 7,512 square feet of concrete sidewalks and courtyards. We request that DC Water reduce the overall ERUs for CPIV accordingly. The permeable sidewalks easily handle a 1.2 /hour rain event and are actually much more permeable than most pre-existing grassed areas throughout the property! Because these new permeable sidewalks are adjacent to unpaved areas with abundant grass, shrubs and trees, virtually all of the water that falls on these new permeable sidewalks is absorbed into the ground and/or used by plants. There is virtually no runoff in these areas. Yet, we were stunned to learn that these permeable paver sidewalks are still classified as impervious surfaces, and only qualify under the Clean Rivers IAC program for a 4%

4 discount from DC Water, which is extremely minimal in defraying current DC Water charges to the Association. The Board believes that this DC Water policy is harmful, unbalanced, unfair, illogical, and unjustified. If a property like ours can implement BMPs and LIDS and show that we are capturing 100% of the rainwater from previously impervious areas, DC Water should not continue to count those nowpermeable areas toward the total ERU calculation. We request a full credit back to January 2014, when we implemented the BMPs and LIDS, and a reduction in the total ERU from that date for the areas where we have installed permeable pavement systems. We demand that DC Water immediately cease from applying commercial water and sewer rate charges to CPIV and apply the correct residential charge. We demand that DC Water retroactively credit all CPIV accounts for the misapplied commercial water and sewer charges. We further demand that DC Water properly credit CPIV for the implementation of best management practices and low impact designs throughout our residential property. We look forward to your prompt response, as the new DC Water FY 2015 water and sewer charges have gone into effect. The CRIAC charge is now $16.75, and as currently applied, would result in a monthly CRIAC fee to CPIV of approximately $5400! The Association simply cannot bear these unfair charges and sustain itself. DC Water s misapplication of commercial rates to our residential property has caused us extreme and undue harm and will bring certain financial ruin to CPIV. We are eager to discuss these issues and would like to schedule a meeting to resolve. Please contact me at (202) 368-5865 or our Vice President, Robert Hall at the above number on this letterhead as soon as possible. Sincerely, Felicia Couts, President Capitol Park IV Board of Directors cc Via email only and without attachments: Nagle & Zaller, P.C. ANC-6D Commissioners Mary M. Cheh, Chairman, DC City Council Committee on Transportation and the Environment Tommy Wells, DC City Councilmember, Ward 6 Enclosures: Pictures of Capitol Park IV Condominium Association CPIV Declaration Article III, Section C. DC Zoning Map showing CPIV in Residential R-4 Zone Concrete Courtyard Removal (Before/After pics) and Total ERU Square Feet Concrete Sidewalk Removal (Before/After pics) and Total ERU Square Feet

Capitol Park IV Condominium Association, Inc. 741 Delaware Avenue SW Washington DC 20024 phone: 202.484.5235 fax: 202.484.1754 cpivcondo1973@gmail.com www.capitolparkiv.com Capitol Park IV Condominium Association: DC Zoning Commission Zoned R-4, Single Family Residential R-4 Definition: Permits matter-of-right development of single-family residential uses (including detached, semi-detached, row dwellings, and flats), churches and public schools with a minimum lot width of 18 feet, a minimum lot area of 1,800 square feet and a maximum lot occupancy of 60% for row dwellings, churches and flats, a minimum lot width of 30 feet and a minimum lot area of 3,000 square feet for semi-detached structures, a minimum lot width of 40 feet and a minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet and 40% lot occupancy for all other structures (20% lot occupancy for public recreation and community centers); and a maximum height of three (3) stories/forty (40) feet (60 feet for churches and schools and 45 feet for public recreation and community centers). Conversions of existing buildings to apartments are permitted for lots with a minimum lot area of 900 square feet per dwelling unit. Rear yard requirement is twenty (20) feet.