Bethel Romanian Church - Rezone, RZ

Similar documents
Ricker - PH / Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report

/ Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Jay Walker- All Terra Consulting - RZ

Tracie & Dennis Jones Rezone, RZ

Mike & Sherry Dudley Rezone, RZ

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Vallivue School District - PH

Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Shannan & Latrica Mays -Conditional Use Permit - CU

Planning and Zoning Staff Report JT Ventures, LLC Staging Area, CU-PH

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Maverick Towers Van Wassenhove, PH

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Pestcom Pest Management LLC CU-PH

Radford Ridges Subdivision, SD-PH

AAAA. Planning and Zoning Staff Report Lake Shore Land Holdings, LLC CU-PH Analysis

Planning and Zoning Staff Report for Serenity Hill Ranch - PH

Planning and Zoning Staff Report Meholchick Juniper Ranch, CU

AAAA. Planning and Zoning Staff Report Zoning Text Amendment, ZOA-PH Request

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

Section Preliminary Plat Checklist and Application Forms

CANYON COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD Thursday, October 4, :30 P.M.

Regular Agenda / Public Hearing for Board of Commissioners meeting September 24, 2014

Time Extension Staff Report

MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8

French, Bruce. The applicant is requesting a zone change from Suburban to Rural Service Center.

STAFF REPORT TO THE COMMISSION. April 7, Rezoning Case No

Spirit Lake North, LLC

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOR June 7, 2018

Town of Waxhaw Board of Commissioners. Waxhaw Police Department Community Meeting Room Tuesday January 12, 2016

Regular Agenda / Public Hearing for Board of Commissioners meeting May 4, 2016

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

November 9, 2016 Ponderay Planning and Zoning Commission File AX Annexation Request Thomas L. Clark. Preliminary Survey of Subject Parcel

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

MS MINOR SUBDIVISION TREVITHICK

Larimer County Planning Dept. Procedural Guide for 1041 PERMITS

MINOR SUBDIVISION INFORMATION

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report for Honey Bee Acres Subdivision, SD-PH

Subdivision Staff Report

Tentative Map Application Review Procedures

TOWN OF ELIOT PLANNING BOARD SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

City and County of Broomfield, Colorado

Planning Commission Application Summary

STAFF REPORT FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING. CASE NAME: Taylor Annexation and Zoning PC DATE: August 7, 2013

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Conditional Use Permit / Standard Subdivision Application

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 2015

CITY OF DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA. Zoning Map Change Report. RR Existing Zoning. Rural Rural Density Residential Site Characteristics

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 1, 2018 Ordinance 24, 2018 / *Ordinance 25, 2018

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 15, 2015

Concept Plan Project Narrative For 852 River Ranch Court

HOMER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION LAND USE APPLICATION

APPLICATION PACKET SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HOUSING OPTION REVIEW

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT. Chair and Members of the Committee of Adjustment

Time Extension Staff Report

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

Project File #: SF Project Name: Jackson Ranch Filing No. 4 Parcel Nos.: , and

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

REZONING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Lot Split Application

Staff Report. Planning Commission Public Hearing: October 17, 2007 Staff Recommendation: Denial

SOS ; State of Idaho, Consent to Partially Vacate Public Alley Rightof-Way at 611 North 6 th Street

PRELIMINARY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (PAD)

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

March 26, Sutter County Planning Commission

Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request

Preliminary Subdivision Application (Minor) (Three (3) lots or less)

COUNTY SUBDIVISION. Attachments: (1) Staff Analysis (2) Subdivision Maps (3) Related Documents including the Disclosure Statement

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

DOUGLAS COUNTY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION Article 4 Preliminary Plan 10/13/2015

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

HENDRY COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX S. MAIN STREET LABELLE, FLORIDA (863) FAX: (863)

INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED! GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone address Authorized Agent (if applicable)

Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following:

Regular Agenda / Public Hearing for Board of Commissioners meeting January 7, 2015

KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

Understanding the Conditional Use Process

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING

MINERAL COUNTY PLANNING STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Proposed Elk Run at St. Regis. February 12, 2017

HOW TO APPLY FOR A USE PERMIT

Group Sewer Only** 80 Ft Frontage* 20,000 Sq. Ft. (.46 acre) Minimum** 120 Ft Frontage* 20,000 Sq. Ft. (.46acre) Minimum** 150 Ft Frontage*

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

RIVERTON CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA. May 12, 2016

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 5/7/2009

Application is hereby made for: Major Subdivision (if any utilities are to be dedicated to the Town or over 4 lots)

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PLEASE SUBMIT 7 COMPLETE PACKETS

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

when the following proceedings, among others were held and done, to-wit:

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

Referral Early Consultation

WRITTEN DECISION OF THE HAYDEN CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MAPLE GROVE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (SUB-0013) HAYDEN SIGNATURE, LLC

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

DOÑA ANA COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION REPORT - CONCEPT/USE ON REVIEW

APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT

Transcription:

/ Planning and Zoning Staff Report Bethel Romanian Church - Rezone, RZ2018-0023 Hearing Date: November 15, 2018 Development Services Department Owners: Bethel Romanian Church, Corp. Applicant: Viorel Botos Staff: Dan Lister, Planner II Tax ID: R25677505A Parcel Size 5.21 acres Current Zone: A (Agricultural) Future Land Use Designation: Residential City Impact Area: Nampa Applicable Zoning Land Use Regulations: CCZO 07-05-01, 07-06-05 Notification: 10/02/18: Agencies/Nampa 10/17/18: Property Owners 10/19/18: Full Political 10/28/18: Newspaper 11/6/18: Posting Exhibits: 1. FCO s 2. Project Information: a. Letter of Intent; b. Record of Survey (2004); and c. Neighborhood Meeting Sign- Up List; 3. Maps: a. Small Air b. Vicinity c. Zoning d. Subdivision & Lot Report e. Soils f. Prime Farmland & Report g. Future Land Use h. Nampa s Future Land Use; and i. Red Fox Estates Plat (1997) 4. Agency Comments: a. City of Nampa b. City of Nampa Engineering c. Nampa Highway District #1 d. Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) e. Boise Project Board of Control Request The applicant is requesting a rezone of parcel R25677505A from A (Agricultural) to R1 (Single Family Residential). The vacant parcel is located at the corner Red Fox Drive and Lewis Road with the Red Fox Estates Subdivision (portion of Lot 6 Block 1), Nampa; also referenced as the NE Quarter of Section 14, Township 2N, Range 2W; Canyon County, Idaho. Background The vacant parcel, 5.21 acres, was once a portion of a 10.46 parcel (Lot 6, Block 1) in the Red Fox Estates Subdivision (Exhibit 3i). In 2004, the parcel was divided into three parcels without approval or platting creating the subject parcel R25677505A, parcel R25677505 and parcel R25677505B (Exhibit 2b). In 2002, the subject parcel was approved for a church (CU2002-173), but the approval has since expired. Parcel R25677505, 2.6 acres, contains a dwelling that was constructed prior to the split in 2004. Parcel R25677505B, 2.61 acres, was recently rezoned to RR (Rural Residential) and is currently going through the platting process (RZ2018-0002/SD2018-0022). The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to R1 (Rural Residential, 1 acre average minimum lot size). If approved, platting would be required to allow residential development on the parcel. Analysis Standards of Review for Zoning Amendment ( 07-06-05) A. Is the proposed zone change generally consistent with the comprehensive plan? The proposed zone change is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Residential (Exhibit 3g). The proposed zoning of R1 (Single Family Residential) is consistent with multiple goals and policies of the 2020 Canyon County Comprehensive Plan including but not limited to: Property Rights Policy No. 1- No person shall be deprived of private property without due process of law. Public Services, Facilities and Utilities Policy No. 3: Encourage the establishment of new development to be located within the boundaries of a rural fire protection district. Population Policy No. 3 Encourage future population to locate within areas that are conducive to residential living and that do not pose an incompatible land use to other land uses. Land Use Policy #11 Coordinate planning and development with applicable highway district and health officials. Land Use Residential Policy #1 Encourage high density residential in areas of city impact. STAFF REPORT Bethel Romanian Church, Corp. RZ2018-0023 Page 1 of 3

5. Large Aerial B. When considering the surrounding land uses, is the proposed zone change more appropriate than the current zoning designation? The property is zoned A (Agricultural, 40 acre minimum lot size). North of the subject parcel are parcels primarily zoned RR (Rural Residential, 2 acre average minimum lot size). South of the subject parcel area parcels zone A. The nearest R1 (Single Family Residential, 1 acre average minimum lot size) zone is approximately 0.5 miles west of the subject parcel (Table Meadows Subdivision). See Exhibit 3c. The parcel is located within Red Fox Estates subdivision, which has been subsequently subdivided (Max Estates/Max Estates 2), has an average lot size of 4.5 acres. Three subdivisions are located near the subject parcel (Lewis Addn. #2, Lewis Crossing Subdivision and Chittenden Acres) with an average lot size of 1.49 acres. There are a total of 36 residential subdivisions within the vicinity of the parcel (Exhibit 3d). Of the 36 subdivision, approximately 8 are older subdivisions (prior to 1979), 13 were approved between 1996 to 2005 which includes Red Fox Estates, and 15 have been approved between 2007 and 2018. The parcel is located in the Nampa City Impact Area. City of Nampa s Future Land Use map designates the parcel as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre (Exhibit 3h). The rezone of 5.21 acre parcel to R1 (Single Family Residential, 1 acre average minimum lot size) could potential create a total of five, 1 acre, residential lots. However, due to potential site improvements and easement dedications during the platting process, the amount of lots may be reduced. The applicant s letter of intent indicates that the result of the rezone will be to create four residential parcels. Therefore, based on existing average lot sizes in the area and Nampa s future land use growth of the area into low density residential, the requested rezone is more appropriate than the current zoning designation. C. Is the proposed rezone compatible with surrounding land uses? The majority of the area consist of residential dwellings. The immediate residential properties consist of an average lot size of 4.5 acres (Red Fox Estates and Max Estates Subdivision). Three subdivisions located near the subject parcel (Lewis Addn. #2, Lewis Crossing Subdivision and Chittenden Acres) with an average lot size of 1.49 acres. The 36 residential subdivisions within the general area consist of one acre average lot sizes or less (Exhibit 3d). The request residential zoning district is compatible with the surrounding uses. D. Will the proposed use negatively affect the character of the area? What measures will be implemented to mitigate impacts? The result of the rezone, and subsequent platting, will allow the 5.21 acres parcel to be developed into 1 acre residential parcels. The one acre lot size is smaller than the average lot sizes found in the Red Fox Estates and Max Estates subdivisions which may potentially change the character of those subdivisions. However, when considering the surrounding area, majority of the area to the north of the subject parcel consist of one acre average lot sizes or less. Therefore, the rezone does not impact the existing low density residential character of the area. STAFF REPORT Bethel Romanian Church RZ2018-0023 Page 2 of 3

E. Will adequate facilities and services including sewer, water, drainage, irrigation and utilities be provided to accommodate the proposed use? Adequate facilities/services can be provided to accommodate uses on the parcel. Services are as followed: - Sanitary Service: Nampa s sanitary services do not currently extend to the subject parcel. Therefore, septic systems are required and must be consistent with all applicable Southwest District Health requirements. Southwest District Health will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. - Water Services: Nampa s water services currently extends along Lewis Lane which the applicant may utilize upon agreement with the City of Nampa Engineering Division. (Exhibit 4b). If not, domestic wells will be required and must be consistent with Idaho Department of Water Resources requirements. City of Nampa Engineering Division and Idaho Department of Water Resources will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. - Irrigation Services: Boise Project Board of Control requires platting and development to not impact any existing irrigation canals or laterals without approval by the irrigation district (Exhibit 4e). Boise Project Board of Control will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. F. Does legal access to the subject property for the development exist or will it exist at the time of development? The subject property will have access on Red Fox Drive, a public road. The applicant will be required to adhere to Nampa Highway District #1 requirements and conditions for access (Exhibit 4c). All applicable requirements and conditions will be reviewed as part of the platting application. Comments received from Nampa Highway District, City of Nampa Engineering Division (Exhibit 4b) and ITD (Exhibit 4d) do not express concern or opposition of the rezone. G. Does the proposed development require road improvements to provide adequate access to and from the subject property to minimize undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns created by the proposed development? What measures have been taken to mitigate road improvements or traffic impacts? Nampa Highway District, City of Nampa Engineering Division and ITD did not have concerns regarding traffic impacts to Red Fox Drive or connecting roads. City of Nampa Engineering Division (Exhibit 4b) requires all future development to meet all Nampa Highway District #1 requirements. Nampa Highway District #1 (Exhibit 4c) requires review at the time of division which would be during the platting process. Nampa Highway District #1 also requires that the fence posts that currently encroach into the right-of-way be removed. The request is a code enforcement issue that should be enforced by the Nampa Highway District or required prior to approval of a final plat. H. Will the proposed zone amendment impact essential public services and facilities, such as schools, police, fire and emergency medical services? What measures will be implemented to mitigate impacts? All affected essential public services and facilities were notified. No comments related to essential services were received. No impacts are anticipated by the rezone. Development of the parcel will require platting or discretionary decision which essential services will be notified and related impacts reviewed at that time. Comments Public Comments The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting with property owners within 600 feet of the subject parcel boundaries on July 13, 2018. Consistent with CCZO 07-05-01, property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel boundary were notified on October 17, 2018. No public comments were received at the time of drafting this report. STAFF REPORT Bethel Romanian Church RZ2018-0023 Page 3 of 3

County Agency Comments On October 2, 2018, the following agencies were notified: Idaho Power Southwest District Health Nampa Highway District CC Assessor s Office CC Sheriff Intermountain Gas Dept. of Water Resources City of Nampa CC Ambulance Boise Project Board of Control Nampa Fire District ITD Army Corp of Engineers Nampa School District COMPASS Dept. of Environmental Quality (The checked-box indicates a comment was received. See Exhibit 4 for comment letters) CC Weed & Gopher Control Decision Options The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of the rezone to the Board of County Commissioners as request by the applicant; The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of a more restrictive residential rezone to the Board of Commissioners; The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the rezone to the Board of County Commissioners; or The Planning and Zoning Commission may continue the discussion and request additional information on specific items. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission open a public hearing and discuss the proposed rezone request. Staff is recommending approval and has provided findings of fact and conclusions of law for the Planning and Zoning Commission s consideration found in Exhibit 1. STAFF REPORT Bethel Romanian Church RZ2018-0023 Page 4 of 3

Canyon County Planning and Zoning Commission Bethel Romanian Church Rezone Case No. RZ2018-0023 Development Services Department November 15, 2018 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Findings of Fact 1. The applicant is requesting a rezone of parcel R25677505A from A (Agricultural) to R1 (Single Family Residential). The vacant parcel is located at the corner Red Fox Drive and Lewis Lane with the Red Fox Estates Subdivision. An application was submitted on September 28, 2018 in accordance with 07-06-03(1) of the Canyon County Code. A neighborhood meeting was held in accordance with CCZO 07-01-15 (Exhibit 2c). 2. The 5.21 acres parcel was once a portion of a 10.46 parcel (Lot 6, Block 1) in the Red Fox Estates Subdivision. In 2004, the parcel was divided into three parcels without approval or platting creating the subject parcel, parcel R25677505 and R25677505B (Instrument #200429423, Exhibit 2b). Therefore, the parcel does not have a building permit available. Development would require platting or conditional use permit approval. 3. The parcel is currently zoned A (Agricultural, 40 acre average minimum lot size). The 2020 Canyon County Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel as Residential on the Future Land Use map (Exhibit 3g). 4. The subject property is located within the Nampa Area of Impact. City of Nampa s Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre (Exhibit 3h). The City was noticed in accordance with the Nampa Area of City Impact Ordinance (CCZO 09-11-23). Comments were received on October 25, 2018 in support of the request (Exhibit 4a). However, bicycle and pedestrian pathway easement dedication would be required at the time of platting. 5. Notice of the public hearing was provided as per CCZO 07-05-01. Agencies were notified on October 2, 2018. Property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel boundaries were noticed on October 17, 2018. Full political notice was completed October 19, 2018. Newspaper notice was completed on October 28, 2018. The subject property was posted with a notice on November 6, 2018. 6. The record consists of exhibits provided as part of the public hearing staff report, testimony and any additional evidence submitted during the public hearing on November 15, 2018 and all information contained in Case File #RZ2018-0023. Conclusions of Law For this request the Planning and Zoning Commission finds and concludes the following regarding the Standards of Review for a Zoning Amendment ( 07-06-05): A. Is the proposed zone change generally consistent with the comprehensive plan? Conclusion: The proposed zone change is consistent with the 2020 Canyon County Comprehensive Plan. The requested zone change is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Residential (Exhibit 3g). The R1 (Single Family Residential) is consistent with multiple goals and policies of the 2020 Canyon County Comprehensive Plan including but not limited to: Property Rights Policy No. 1: No person shall be deprived of private property without due process of law. - The notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with CCZO 07-05-01. RZ2018-0023 Page 1

Population Policy No. 3 Encourage future population to locate within areas that are conducive to residential living and that do not pose an incompatible land use to other land uses. - The Future Land Use Map within the Canyon County Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Residential. The subject parcel is located within the Nampa City Impact Area. City of Nampa s Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre. - The area consists primarily of residential uses zoned as Rural Residential, 2 acre minimum average lot size). However, the general area consists of 36 subdivisions with one acre average lot sizes of less which are more consistent with City of Nampa s Comprehensive Plan which designates the future land use as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre. Public Services, Facilities and Utilities Policy No. 3: Encourage the establishment of new development to be located within the boundaries of a rural fire protection district. - The parcel is located within Nampa Fire District. Land Use Component Residential Policy #1: Encourage high density development in areas of city impact. - The rezone meets current residential densities found in the surrounding area. The primary use of the surrounding area is residential. Although the immediate area consists of an average parcel size of 4.5 acres, the general area consists of 36 subdivisions with one acre average lot sizes of less which are more consistent with City of Nampa s Comprehensive Plan which designates the future land use as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre. Land Use Policy #11 Coordinate planning and development with applicable highway district and health officials. - Nampa Highway District #1 was noticed. The comment letter received does not oppose the requested zone amendment (Exhibit 3c). - Southwest District Health and Idaho Department of Environmental Quality were notified on October 2, 2018. No comments were received. Review would be required at the time of platting or conditional use permit application review. B. When considering the surrounding land uses, is the proposed zone change more appropriate than the current zoning designation? Conclusion: The proposed zone change is more appropriate as the current zoning designation. The property is zoned A (Agricultural, 40 acre minimum lot size). North of the subject parcel are parcels primarily zoned RR (Rural Residential, 2 acre average minimum lot size). The nearest R1 (Single Family Residential, 1 acre average minimum lot size) zone is approximately 0.5 miles west of the subject parcel (Table Meadows Subdivision). The parcel is located within Red Fox Estates subdivision, which has been subsequently subdivided (Max Estates/Max Estates 2), has an average lot size of 4.5 acres. Three subdivisions are located near the subject parcel (Lewis Addn. #2, Lewis Crossing Subdivision and Chittenden Acres) with an average lot size of 1.49 acres. There are a total of 36 residential subdivisions within the vicinity of the parcel (Exhibit 3d). Majority of the subdivision have an average lot size of one acre or less. Of the 36 subdivision, approximately 8 are older subdivisions (prior to 1979), 13 were approved between 1996 to 2005 which includes Red Fox Estates, and 15 have been approved between 2007 and 2018. The parcel is located in the Nampa City Impact Area. City of Nampa s Future Land Use map designates the parcel as Low Density Residential, 1-3.9 units per acre (Exhibit 3h). The rezone of 5.21 acre parcel to R1 (Single Family Residential, 1 acre average minimum lot size) could RZ2018-0023 Page 2

potential create a total of five, 1 acre, residential lots. However, due to potential site improvements and easement dedications during the platting process, the amount of lots may be reduced (City of Nampa easement dedication, Exhibit 4a). The applicant s letter of intent indicates the result of the rezone would be a four lot subdivision, an average lot size of 1.3 acres (Exhibit 2a). Therefore, based on existing average lot sizes in the area and Nampa s future land use growth of the area into low density residential, the requested rezone is more appropriate than the current zoning designation. C. Is the proposed rezone compatible with surrounding land uses? Conclusion: The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The majority of the area consist of residential uses. The immediate residential properties consist of an average lot size of 4.5 acres (Red Fox Estates and Max Estates Subdivision). However, the general area consists of 36 residential subdivisions with one acre average lot sizes or less (Exhibit 3d). The requested residential zoning district is compatible with the surrounding uses. D. Will the proposed use negatively affect the character of the area? What measures will be implemented to mitigate impacts? Conclusion: The proposed use will not negatively affect the character of the area. The result of the rezone, and subsequent platting, will allow the 5.21 acres parcel to be developed into 1 acre residential parcels. The one acre lot size is smaller than the average lot sizes found in the Red Fox Estates and Max Estates subdivisions which may potentially change the character of those subdivisions. However, when considering the surrounding area, majority of the area to the north of the subject parcel consist of one acre average lot sizes or less. Therefore, the rezone does not impact the existing low density residential character of the area. No mitigation measures are proposed for the rezone. Development of the parcel will require platting or discretionary review. Development impacts will be addressed at that time. E. Will adequate facilities and services including sewer, water, drainage, irrigation and utilities be provided to accommodate the proposed use? Conclusion: Adequate sewer, drainage, and storm water drainage facilities and utility systems will be provided to accommodate the residential uses at the time of development. Adequate facilities/services can be provided to accommodate uses on the parcel. Services are as followed: - Sanitary Service: Nampa s sanitary services do not currently extend to the subject parcel. Therefore, septic systems are required and must be consistent with all applicable Southwest District Health requirements. Southwest District Health will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. - Water Services: Nampa s water services currently extends along Lewis Lane which the applicant may utilize upon agreement with the City of Nampa. (Exhibit 3b). If not, domestic wells will be required and must be consistent with Idaho Department of Water Resources requirements. City of Nampa Engineering Division and Idaho Department of Water Resources will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. - Irrigation Services: Boise Project Board of Control requires platting and development to not impact any existing irrigation canals or laterals without approval by the irrigation district (Exhibit 3e). Boise Project Board of Control will review platting or discretionary proposals at the time of application for consistency. F. Does legal access to the subject property for the development exist or will it exist at the time of development? RZ2018-0023 Page 3

Conclusion: Legal access to the parcel is proposed from Red Fox Drive, a public road. The parcel will have access from Red Fox Drive, a public road. The road connects to Lewis Lane, a minor arterial. The subject property has frontage on Red Fox Drive and Lewis Lane. The applicant will be required to adhere to Nampa Highway District #1 requirements and conditions for access (Exhibit 4c). All applicable requirements and conditions will be reviewed as part of the platting application. Comments received from Nampa Highway District, City of Nampa Engineering Division (Exhibit 4b) and ITD (Exhibit 4d) do not express concern or opposition of the rezone. G. Does the proposed development require road improvements to provide adequate access to and from the subject property to minimize undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns created by the proposed development? What measures have been taken to mitigate road improvements or traffic impacts? Conclusion: The rezone of the subject property will not cause undue interference with existing or future traffic patterns as proposed. Access is proposed from Rex Fox Drive, a public road. Nampa Highway District, City of Nampa Engineering Division and ITD did not have concerns regarding traffic impacts to Red Fox Drive or connecting roads. City of Nampa Engineering Division (Exhibit 4b) requires all future development to meet all Nampa Highway District #1 requirements. Nampa Highway District #1 (Exhibit 4c) requires review at the time of division which would be during the platting process. H. Will the proposed zone change amendment impact essential public services and facilities, such as schools, police, fire and emergency medical services? What measures will be implemented to mitigate impacts? Conclusion: Essential services can accommodate the requested rezone. The zone amendment is not anticipated to create an impact to essential public services. All affected essential public services and agencies were notified. All comments received did not indicate the rezone would impact public services. Development of the parcel will require platting or discretionary decision which essential services and agencies will be notified and related impacts will be reviewed at that time. Order Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order contained herein the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Case # RZ2018-0023, a request to rezone parcel R25677505A, approximately 5.21 acres, from an A (Agricultural) zone to an R1 (Single Family Residential) zone. APPROVED this day of, 2018 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CANYON COUNTY, IDAHO Richard Hall, Chairman State of Idaho ) SS County of Canyon County ) RZ2018-0023 Page 4

On this day of, in the year 2018 before me, a notary public, personally appeared, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he(she) executed the same. Notary: My Commission Expires: RZ2018-0023 Page 5