What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A Neighbourhood Plan determines the location and design of new transit-oriented land uses, like: Council adopts a Neighbourhood Plan following public consultation and technical review. Who s preparing the Coronation Park housing employment retail Neighbourhood Plan? The City s Planning...as well as Department, working with the City s Engineering, supportive Parks and Finance teams, is infrastructure developing the Coronation Park Neighbourhood Plan such as: streets parks in consultation with residents, property owners and stakeholders. It establishes a clear vision for a neighbourhood s future based on its particular history, physical form, and development needs.
Where are we in the process? June 18, 2015 Community Dialogue July 7, 2015 Land Use Committee Visioning Session December 1, 2015 Council approves Terms of Reference January to April, 2016 Phase 1: Background Work March 15, 2016 Public Consultation approved by Council May 18, 2016 1 Open House #1 - Presentation of Scenarios Summer 2016 Draft Land Use Concept Created September 15, 2016 Fall 2016 2 TODAY! Open House #2 Recommended Land Use Plan presented Draft Plan to Council & Public Hearing (if directed by Council)
Transit-Oriented Development The Coronation Park neighbourhood is part of the Inlet Centre Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Area, designated in the City s Official Community Plan. THE INLET CENTRE TOD LOOKS TO MEET CERTAIN OBJECTIVES: Provide a mix of housing Enhance pedestrian network Incorporate parks and public open space Maintain view corridors and minimize shadowing Provide attractive, green streetscapes Encourage pedestrian activity Provide for a comfortable pedestrian scale THE INLET CENTRE TOD IS ALSO GUIDED BY THE FOLLOWING POLICIES: Consider building heights up to 26 storeys on certain parcels Esso site designated Mixed Use Pedestrian/cyclist overpass or underpass across Ioco Road to Inlet Centre station
Parkland Considerations Coronation Park currently has no parkland, and the 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (PRMP) identifies the need for a new neighbourhood park in Coronation Park. Neighbourhood Parks are typically 1-2 ha (3-5 ac) and include play equipment, pathways, open grass, seating, and sometimes other recreation or athletic facilities. They are meant to form the visual, physical and social focus of the neighbourhood. Access is usually by walking so neighbourhood parks don t require parking lots. HOW MUCH PARKLAND WOULD BE PROVIDED IF Town Centre Park Trasolini Sports Field Recreation Complex Inlet Centre Civic Centre Pioneer Memorial Park Firehall #1 Potential Future Neighbourhood Park Guildford Wy CORONATION PARK WERE A TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT? With a traditional subdivision, the City could require the developer to dedicate up to 5% of the land proposed for subdivision as parkland, or provide cash-in-lieu. As Coronation Park has already been subdivided and parkland dedication cannot be requested, the City would need to purchase land for a park and recover the money Inlet Park Works Yard Coronation Suter Brook Greenway from growth in the neighbourhood or elsewhere. The more parkland envisioned, the more growth will likely be needed to pay for it. Park HOW MUCH PARKLAND IS THE LAND USE CONCEPT BASED ON? e ek Barnet Hwy Dewdney Trunk Rd Inlet Centre Station 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Proposed Parks The total Neighbourhood Plan Area is 9.15 ha (22.6 ac). The 0.4 ha (1 acre) of parkland shown is equal to the amount of land that could be dedicated as parkland in a traditional development, and is a good discussion point for the draft Land Use Concept. C k
Parkspace Considerations A 0.4 HECTARE (1 ACRE) PARK COULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: Large playground with rubber surface Multi-use sport court (tennis, pickle ball, basketball, ball hockey) Picnic table/bench area Open green space Large caliper native deciduous trees
Current OCP Designation OCP Land Use Designation: 1. Single Family Low Density Intended for single family homes with the option for a secondary suite. 2. Multifamily Residential Intended for low to medium density attached housing, including ground-oriented duplexes, townhouses or stacked townhouses to apartment structures, and will generally range from 3 to 6 storeys in height. 3. Mixed Use Inlet Centre Intended for a mix of uses including residential, retail, office, service, civic, institutional, recreational, and cultural. Building heights for mid rise building forms will not exceed 12 storeys. Population: ~500 + 250 when mixed use area is redeveloped Land Use: 15% Roads 55% Residential single 27% family Residential 3% multifamily Mixed use
Open House #1 Feedback TRANSPORTATION 76% of the 54 comments received support adding transportation access if redevelopment is to occur. 80% of survey respondents said more pedestrian connections were very important or important. 79% said managing potential Evergreen Line impacts is very important or important. PARKS AND COMMUNITY AMENITIES 78% said parks and other community amenities are very important or important. If redevelopment is to occur, respondents want the City to leverage that growth for park space and community amenities. GROWTH SCENARIOS Comments on the growth scenarios were varied and thoughtful. There was more support for Scenarios 3 and 4 (Medium-High or High of survey respondents (and 63% of the respondents living in Coronation Park) made the most positive comments towards the Medium-High or High Density Scenarios (3 or 4). Density) than for 1 and 2 (Low or Medium Density).
Open House #1 Feedback KEY PRIORITIES We asked respondents to rate key priorities in terms of importance. Here s what you told us: Managing Growth Manage potential Evergreen Line impacts was the most important Maintain the neighbourhood s unique character was the least. Manage potential Evergreen Line impacts 79% 16% 6% Very Important Promote sustainability 72% 19% 8% Important Accommodate new Port Moody residents Maintain the neighbourhood s unique character 64% 16% 20% 46% 23% 31% Neutral Not Important Not At All Important Type of Growth High density in certain areas was more important than sensitive infill. High density in certain areas 70% 5% 25% Sensitive infill 54% 20% 26% Land Use Parks and other amenities was the most important Commercial Use (retail /shops) was the least. Parks and other community amenities 78% 15% 6% Residential Mix (mix of housing forms, choices, height, density) 75% 10% 15% Mixed-Use (retail/shops at grade with residential above) 51% 26% 23% Commercial Use (retail / shops) 44% 26% 29% Mobility More pedestrian connections was the most important More bike connections was the least. More pedestrian connections 80% 15% 5% More transit connections 65% 19% 16% More vehicle connections 63% 21% 17% More bike connections 49% 28% 22% Due to rounding, some totals may not equal 100%. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Open House #1 Feedback GROWTH SCENARIO COMMENTS We reviewed and broke down each respondent s comments in the following categories: Coronation Park Residents: No change 16% Low Density (Scenario 1) 17% Medium-High Density (Scenario 3) 25% High Density (Scenario 4) 38% Residents Outside of Coronation Park: Medium Density (Scenario 2) 4% Low Density (Scenario 1) 25% Medium-High Density (Scenario 3) 32% High Density (Scenario 4) 25% No Change 4% Medium Density (Scenario 2) 13% All Respondents Combined: No change 13% Low Density (Scenario 1) 18% Medium-High Density (Scenario 3) 27% High Density (Scenario 4) 36% Medium Density (Scenario 2) 6% TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION COMMENTS We asked respondents for their opinion on three transportation options: Transportation Connections General support 41 comments General opposition 13 comments Option 1: Extending Suterbrook Way east into the neighbourhood General support 20 comments General opposition 3 comments 87 % 13 % 24% General Opposition 76% General Support Option 2: Extending Balmoral Drive south to Barnet Highway General support General opposition 11 comments 8 comments 58 % 42 % Option 3: A potential connection from Palmer Ave to Barnet Highway via Coquitlam. This option would require additional discussions with the City of Coquitlam. General support General opposition 13 comments 5 comments 72 % 28 %
Building Blocks & Guiding Principles 1. LAND USE CONCEPT BUILDING BLOCKS EXISTING OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN POLICY TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES PUBLIC FEEDBACK TO DATE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (AMENITIES, DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES, COMMUNITY AMENITY CONTRIBUTIONS) 2. DRAFT LAND USE CONCEPT GUIDING PRINCIPLES POLICY DIRECTIONS LAND USE MAP 3 D RENDERING EARLY IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS Build a complete community Maintain the Inlet Centre ambiance Design with all ages/full life philosophy More efficient use of land, infrastructure & services Allow for gradual evolution of neighbourhood Maintain sense of community Put the park back into Coronation Park
Draft Policy Directions Based on the suggested Land Use Plan s building blocks and public input, we ve developed draft policies in four areas for your consideration: 1. LAND USE 2. PARKS & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 3. TRANSPORTATION/ MOBILITY 4. THE ENVIRONMENT Residential Provide a range of: Forms: Ground-oriented housing (Townhomes, stacked townhomes, rowhomes, apartments) High-rises at periphery Tenures: Freehold, strata, rental, varying levels of affordability via incentives New central City-owned park Strong support for large park vs. pocket parks Early design ideas: music pavilion/gazebo, active and passive areas, gathering places, community garden, splash park, and a playground with castle-like play structures, to pay tribute to the neighourhood s heritage Requires density. Organic, Streets Maintain street layout & names to respect neighbourhood heritage, if possible Pedestrians Overpass to Inlet Centre Station Wide sidewalks in all new developments Potential pedestrian connection via Suterbrook Way Allowing growth in specified nodes protects natural areas and wildlife corridors in other areas of the city More public green space, including a community garden Support alternative transportation modes, including transit Unit sizes: Bachelor to family housing (3+ bedroom), seniors slow or piecemeal growth would not provide parkland How big? 5% of land Bike lanes Connecting the community Medium/High-density is a more efficient use of land and infrastructure (plan area) = 1 ac (0.4 ha) Vehicles Mixed Use along Barnet Highway Leverage visibility Where? TBD based on further study Second road connection needed (pending transportation study) Mature tree retention, if possible Commercial at grade serves neighbourhood residents Some live-work units Child care centre Ample Parking Within new developments Incorporate rooftop gardens and green roofs into new buildings
Proposed Land Use Concept Proposed Land Uses: 1. Low-Rise Residential Mix of townhomes, stacked townhomes and apartments. Maximum height of 4 storeys and site coverage of 40%. 2. Hi-Rise Residential Slender residential towers on 3 storey podium, with groundoriented housing. Maximum height of 26 storeys. 3. Hi-Rise Mixed-Use Slender residential towers on 3 storey podium, with ground oriented retail/commercial. Maximum height of 26 storeys. 4. Parks and Open Space New 1-acre (0.4 ha) park to provide recreational opportunities for Port Moody Residents location TBD. Coronation Park Neighbourhood Plan Land Use Concept LEGEND N 400m TOD radius (5 min. walk) SkyTrain New ped/bike connection New ped/bike overpass New transportation connection (vehicle/bike/pedestrian) Potential retail frontage at-grade Low-Rise Residential Hi-Rise Residential with ground-oriented housing Hi-Rise Mixed Residential- Commercial Use Parkland (1 acre) (location TBD) Coronation Park Neighbourhood Plan Land Use Concept N Population: ~4,449 PEOPLE Land Use Percentages: 45% Low-Rise Residential Old Firehall Site 15% Roads 22% High-Rise Residential 14% High-Rise Mixed Use 4% Parks Future Development Site (Coquitlam)
Density Comparison Below is a residential density comparison of the four scenarios from Open House #1 to the three closest neighbourhoods. The average of Klahanie, Newport & Suterbrook is 60 Units per Acre (UPA), which were approved and built prior to the Evergreen Line. Newport and Suterbrook have significant commercial portions, which do not factor into this residential calculation. SCENARIO UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) POPULATION Coronation Park Baseline 11 ~500 / 750 Scenario 1 - Low Density 17 ~1,250 Scenario 2 - Medium Density 40 ~2,000 Klahanie (* with greenway) *38/41 ~2,675 Newport Village 67 ~1,800 Suterbrook (* with greenway) *57/76 ~2,500 Scenario 3 - Medium-High Density 90 ~5,000 LAND USE CONCEPT (*with park) *93/98 ~4,449 p Scenario 4 - High Density 115 ~5,200 p While the Land Use Concept density is slightly higher than Scenario 3, estimated population is lower, as we will be requiring more larger, family-sized units than envisioned in any of the Scenarios.
Redevelopment Requirements These proposed pre-requisites would need to be met before the City would consider re-development: A new transportation access solution (road) prior to any rezoning Redevelopment of Balmoral Place only if initiated by 80% strata vote (provincial legislation) Require minimum lot consolidation and townhome / apartment % Phasing - some single family homes to remain in the short- to mid-term No orphaned lots, no expropriation by the City Documentation required with any rezoning application (studies on geotechnical, transportation, etc.) Confirmation of Financing Tools
Cost of Amenities The proposed new infrastructure and amenities would cost between $9.4 and $11 million, which would need to be funded by new growth. NEW PARK (1 ACRE / 0.4 HECTARES) ~$4.9 million + park development $ City to study, design, then acquire (in advance)? Park Reserve currently ~$1.5M PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS ~$3.5 to $4 million. This is an estimated cost for a basic bridge. Given its location at the eastern gateway to Port Moody, a more prominent and potentially more expensive feature may be appropriate. NEW ACCESS / ROAD: ~$1 to $2 million (pending alignment) TOTAL COST: $9.4 $11 MILLION Financing tools can be used to distribute these costs to development between each new unit and / or amount of new floor space. Based on the proposed Land Use Concept, these costs translate into approximately $4,225- $4,950 per unit, or $9.50-$11.10 per square foot (in addition to the City s current Development Cost Charges).
Financing Tools To support a growing population, a city needs a variety of infrastructure, services and amenities, including roads and pipes, parks, community spaces, recreation centres, childcare spaces, affordable housing, and heritage retention. Other than property taxes, three main tools that cities can use to finance these services are: 1. DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES (DCCS) These are fees collected from a developer to cover growth-related infrastructure and amenities (in this case, inside Coronation Park). Port Moody has had a DCC program for a number of decades, and is currently completing a DCC Program review. 2. COMMUNITY AMENITY CONTRIBUTIONS (CACS) For infrastructure and amenities not directly related to a new development (and where DCCs cannot be collected), a CAC Program is a way to deliver them without increasing municipal property taxes. In this case, CACs could be collected from development inside Coronation Park to pay for amenities. CACs are a voluntary program with developers, and must be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. Port Moody does not currently have a CAC program. 3. DENSITY BONUSING A density bonusing program is another tool used to pay for amenities. Typically, developers will contribute a portion of the land lift that is created by the City granting additional density (above a certain base level). Port Moody does not currently have a Density Bonus Program.