PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

Similar documents
Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

RTKL ADDISON, TEXAS. A successful Suburb. Activity Center. Employment Center. Addison. Service Center

COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING. Community Summit 02 February, 2012

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH. CITY COUNCIL POLICY No HOUSING POLICY

City of Spokane Infill Development. June 30, 2016

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

When the Plan is not Enough

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Chapter 10: Implementation

UPDATE Board of Selectmen June 20, 2017

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

CHAPTER 2: PEOPLE AND THEIR HOMES

From Policy to Reality

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016

Article Optional Method Requirements

density framework ILLUSTRATION 3: DENSITY (4:1 FSR) EXPRESSED THROUGH BUILT FORM Example 1

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Rural Living (RL) Rural Living

Broadway Corridor Framework Plan Pearl District Business Association November 10, 2015


DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

GATEWAY DISTRICTS DRAFT ZONING & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS City of Portsmouth, NH

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

To: Ogunquit Planning Board From: Lee Jay Feldman, Director of Planning Date: April 18, 2018 Re: Senior/Affordable Multi-Family Housing Assessment

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

CITY OF FATE, TEXAS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. Article III Zoning Districts

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Downtown 2025 Sector Development Plan

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

Chapter 1: Community & Planning Context

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

A. Land Use Relationships

Planning Justification Report

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

DeKalb County Zoning Code Update: Hits, near Hits, and Misses

9. MIXED HOUSING TYPES AND AFFORDABILITY

History of Broadview Avenue

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following diagram depicts the maximum allowable building height in a +3 zone.

VIEWING INSTRUCTIONS:

FEASIBILITY REPORT. 1486, 1490 and 1494 Clementine. Prepared by: Lloyd Phillips & Associates Ltd. For: Ottawa Salus

THAT Council receives for information the Report from the Planner II dated April 25, 2016 with respect to the annual Housing Report update.

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

Better Housing by Design - Proposed Draft Summary

Richardson s TOD Experience From ULI Panel Report to Breaking Ground. September 8, 2011

March Breakfast. Presenters: Chong Shin Carson Design Associates. David Sullivan CodeNEXT Advisory Group. Marjorie Burciaga Independence Title Company

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

CITY OF PORT ORCHARD

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

GNV RISE Subdivision. GNV RISE Subdivision

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

Housing Study & Needs Assessment

ORDINANCE NO

Creating a Housing Ecosystem or You CAN Have Your Cake and Eat it Too! City of Buda, Texas American Planning Association Texas Chapter

Infill Development Incentive Policy

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

Hood River Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Updates. March 19 th, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY. City of Hamilton

GARDEN CITY GREENBELT REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY WITH INCOME 510 E. 41st. St., Garden City, ID 83714

F l e x c o d e. T o w n o f L e l a n d, N C

Oxford, Mississippi Land Development Code

Presentation to the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand 28 October 2016

Planning Rationale. 224 Cooper Street

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

College Avenue. Sowers Street. Calder Way. Beaver Avenue

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

Housing Choice: An Accelerator of Regional Economic. Melina Duggal, AICP, Senior Principal

Proposed Development at Ajax Plaza Windcorp Grand Harwood Place Ltd.

Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

PLANNING REPORT. 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of OHM Arkell Inc. August 4, Project No. 1327

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

Affordable Home Ownership Exploring a Program for Vancouver

AMENDMENT NUMBER 38 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST LINCOLN (COMPLIANCE)

Denver Comprehensive Housing Plan. Housing Advisory Committee Denver, CO August 3, 2017

Introduction. General Development Standards

North Central Texas Council of Governments

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Transcription:

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 2017

HOUSING MARKETS Significant increase in rental housing Offset robust single-family housing Rents up to 40% increase in last 10 years Class A as much as 100% Value Add Acquisitions Luxury Housing high investment continue to drive rentals for Gen. X & Y Source: KC Business Journal MIDWEST MARKETS Source: futureatlas.com / Flickr--CC

REGIONAL CONTEXT I-70 / MO Highway 7 20 Miles east of Downtown KC Fringe of the metropolitan area BLUE SPRINGS

LOCAL CONTEXT Bedroom Community Natural Setting open space / lakes Ranked as best place to live. (CNN/Money Magazine) BLUE SPRINGS

LOCAL MARKET 1 Growing Population - 52,575 (2010) 2015 est. 54,148 Growing Older / More Diverse Median Age 34.7 Minority Population 14% Household Median Income - $66,573 Daytime Population loss of 10,000 people BLUE SPRINGS 1 Census - 2010

LOCAL HOUSING SITUATION 76% of Households are Single Family Household Size is decreasing Supply of Affordable Housing Less that 30% of median income Lack of Affordability Housing + Transportation1 Less that 45% of median income Below 30% of Median Income H Below 45% of Median Income H+T BLUE SPRINGS Kansas City Metropolitan Area 1 Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology

PANELISTS Scott Allen Blue Springs Chris Brewster Gould Evans Jim Holley Blue Springs Ryan Tull Rainen Companies Scott Allen, AICP Chris Brewster, AICP, JD INTRODUCTION Jim Holley, AICP, CFM Ryan Tull

HOW IS THIS PLAN IS DIFFERENT? Planning for places, not land uses A system for planning at different scales Incremental & strategic investments A different way to think about our city Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

THEMES: OUR BIG IDEAS The LINC Local Integrated Natural Connections Strong neighborhoods & great gathering places Relationships & innovation Vibrant downtown Revitalizing commercial corridors Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

VISION: WHAT WE VALUE Places Image Connections Investment Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

FRAMEWORKS: HOW TO THINK ABOUT OUR CITY Organizing elements Framework map Goals Targets Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PLACES Neighborhoods & Neighborhood Centers Integrate housing choices into neighborhoods & corridors Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CONNECTIONS Improve transportation choice for local trips Create transit-ready destinations Overcome physical barriers with strategic connections across corridors Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PLANNING SYSTEM Place types General land use categories Specific development types Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

SPECIFIC PLANS Sub-areas for more specific, strategic planning (Neighborhood Plans, Area Plans) Community Character Plan Land Use & Development Plan Strategies Development Concepts Imagery 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

GOAL AREA: HOUSING Facilitate the development of housing for all ages Develop a comprehensive housing plan tailored to our changing demographics Increase quantity and diversity of housing types Achieve Silver level in the Communities For All Ages program Imagery 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN

PUBLIC REALM + PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT Establish the Public Realm Street Networks / Types Enhance the Public Realm Open & Civic Space System / Types Relate to the Public Realm UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Building Types + Frontage Types

Neighborhood Natural Activity STREET TYPES Standard Activity Neighborhood Natural Table 407.020-2: Functional Class / Design Types Functional Class Arterial (A) Design Natural (NT) Standard (S) Activity (A) Neighborhood (NH) Collector (C) (minor or major) n n n n Local (L) n n n n n Standard UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

Preserve Trail Park Green Table 406.030-1: Open Space Systems - Context OPEN SPACE & CIVIC SPACE TYPES Standard Activity Neighborhood Natural Neighborhoods Gathering Places Preserve n n n n Þ Greenway n n n n n Þ Park n n n n n Þ Trail n n n n n n Þ Green n n n n n n Þ Square n n n n n Þ Plaza n n n n n Þ Pocket Park n n n n n n n Þ Community Garden n n n Þ Neighborhood Center Business Hub Distinct Destination Corridor Reinvestment Area Open Space Future Growth Area Plaza UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Square

Buffer Edge Yard & Setback Terrace Courtyard FRONTAGE TYPES Buffer Edge Yard & Setback Courtyard Terrace Frontage Plaza Streetscape Table 407.030-1: Permitted Frontage Types Buffer Edge Yard & Setback Courtyard Terrace Frontage Plaza Enhanced Streetscape Frontage Low-density Residential Districts RE n SF-12 n SF-7 n ± TF n ± ± Neighborhoods and Moderate-density Residential MF-10 q n ± ± MF-14 q n ± ± MF-18 q n ± ± N-L n n n N-O n n n Non-residential NB q q n q n SO q q n n n GB q q n n n RC q q n n LI n n n n HI n n n Frontage Plaza Enhanced Streetscape Frontage

Detached House - Estate Lot Detached House - Neighborhood Lot Detached House - Compact Lot BUILDING TYPES Form over Density Neighborhoods Not projects / subdivision Accessory Dwelling Unit Row House Apartment Walk-up Apartment Low Rise Apartment - Complex Live/Work

Table 7-2: Residential District Building Type & Development Standards Eligible Zoning Districts Lot Standards Development Standards Minimum Setbacks RE SF-12 SF-7 TF MF-10 MF-14 MF-18 N-L N-O Building Types n n n n Detached House - Estate Min. Size 1 ac.; 5 ac. RE Min. Width n n n Detached House - Suburban 8K s.f. 70 30% n n n n n n n Detached House - Neighborhood 6K s.f. 50 40% n n n n Detached House - Compact n n n n n n Duplex 3.5K 6K s.f. 10K / 5K s.f. per unit Buildin g Covera ge Front Interior Side Corner Side Rear 125 10% 35 25 25 50 35 60% 70 30% 25 50 10 35 10 35 25 50 9 20 25 5 10 25 5 10 25 7 20 25 Building Height 40 / 3 stories 35 / 2.5 stories 35 / 2.5 stories 30 / 2 stories 35 / 2.5 stories n n n n n Duplex - Compact 6K 10K / 3K s.f. per unit 50 60% 10 35 5 10 25 35 / 2.5 stories n n n n Row House 2K 4.5K s.f. per unit 18 36 per unit 70% 10 25 5 10 20 40 / 3 stories n Walk-up Apartment 6K 10K s.f. 50 100 70% 10 25 5 / 10 10 20 40 / 3 stories Mid-rise Apartment 10K 20K s.f. 80 200 70% 10 25 5 / 10 10 20 60 / 5 stories n Garden Apartment 10K s.f. / 1.5K s.f. per unit 70 40% 25 50 7 20 25 40 / 3 stories Live / Work See Non-residential Building Types in Table 4-3 Small Civic See Non-residential Building Types in Table 4-3

NEW BUILDING TYPES Detached House & Duplex Smaller Lots Row house Small Scale Apartments Accessory Units Live / Work Table 405.010-2: Residential District Permitted Building Types Detached House - Estate n n n n Detached House Large Lot n n n Detached House Neighborhood Lot RE SF-12 SF-7 TF MF-10 MF-14 MF-18 N-L N-O n n n n n n n Detached House Small Lot n n Detached Lot Compact Lot n n Duplex Standard Lot n n n n n n Duplex Neighborhood Lot n n n n n Rowhouse n n n n Apartment Walkup n Apartment Low-rise Apartment Mid-rise Apartment - Complex n n n Accessory Dwelling Unit n n n n n Live / Work Small Civic Building UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE New residential building types from downtown code made applicable to multi-family districts.

NEW DISTRICT Neighborhood Limited Neighborhood Open Table XX: Residential District Permitted Building Types Detached House - Estate n n n Detached House Large Lot n n RE SF-12 SF-7 TF MF-10 MF-14 MF-18 N-L N-O Detached House Neighborhood Lot n n n n n n n Detached House Small Lot q q q q n n Detached Lot Compact Lot ( q q q q n n Duplex Standard Lot n n n n n n Duplex Neighborhood Lot n n n n n Row House n n n n Apartment Walkup n n n n Apartment Low-rise n Apartment Mid-rise q q Apartment - Complex n n n Accessory Dwelling Unit n n Live / Work q Small Civic Building n= Permitted = Limited to specific location criteria in the Zoning District Standards q=conditional subject to discretionary review process or through planned development applications. Two new districts for mixed-density neighborhoods limited and open UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

INCREASED DENSITY Higher Density (5.1 units/acre) Provides a housing option within the community Affordable Designed to serve couples and single parents. Imagery VILLAS

SENIOR HOUSING 148 total units; 76 independent living, 40 assisted living and 23 memory units 3-stories Diverse housing options Located near major thoroughfare Located near shopping Located near medical services Imagery SENIOR HOUSING

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Integrated into traditional single family residential neighborhood Located on a planned major collector street Designed to have a two-story townhouse look Maintains open space Imagery MIXED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

MIXED USE: COMMERCIAL, ENTERTAINMENT, AND RESIDENTIAL Integrated mixed use neighborhood Located on a major arterial, near I-70 Includes 3-story plus multi-family residential Includes neighborhood serving commercial and recreation Imagery MIXED USE

COMMERCIAL Small neighborhood serving retail Street sensitive design Accessible Represents some of the give and take of retail design in suburban nieghborhood Imagery COMMERCIAL INTEGRATION

KEY FACTORS FOR ANALYZING A POTENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Attractiveness and Suitability Of The Site Supply and Demand Demographics Achievable Rents In Submarket Development Restrictions And Requirements Acquisition and Construction Costs Financing Sources Stakeholder Concerns and Support Issue Of Nimbyism with Respect to Multifamily, Density and Affordable Housing Deal Timing Imagery FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS

DEVELOPING AND REDEVELOPING SUBURBAN SITES OPPORTUNITIES Demand for Middle Market & Affordable Housing is High Demand for Seniors Housing is High Land Prices are Reasonable Suburban Cities Staffs Views on Multifamily, Affordable Housing and Mixed-use Have Changed Chance to Reimagine Suburbs CHALLENGES Rental Rates Not High Enough for 100% Market Rate Housing Stakeholder Priorities, Concerns & Timelines Make Securing Funding Difficult City Councils are Often Behind Staff on Views Site Planning within Someone Else s Master Plan Blending Principles of New Urbanism with Realities of Box Anchored Commercial

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT High Demand for Middle Market, Seniors and Affordable Housing will Continue Suburban Cities Views on Multifamily and Mixed-use will Continue to Evolve as they see High Quality Housing Being Built We will Continue to Look at Multifamily and Seniors Development Opportunities in Blue Springs and Similar Suburbs We will Continue to Pursue Development in Mixed-use Neighborhoods Imagery GOING FORWARD

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS THANK YOU!!! Scott Allen, AICP sallen@bluespringsgov.com Chris Brewster, AICP, JD chris.brewster@gouldevans.com Jim Holley, AICP, CFM jholley@bluespringsgov.com Ryan Tull ryan@rainencompanies.net Graham Smith, AICP graham.smith@gouldevans.com New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 2017