CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Similar documents
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDREW COHEN-CUTLER, ASSOCIATE PLANNER

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing.

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

In response to concerns raised by the speakers at the planning commission hearing on this matter, please note:

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

Agenda Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2005 FROM: CITY MANAGER

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Planning Commission Staff Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

2030 General Plan. December 6, 7 pm

RESOLUTION NO

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT OCTOBER 20, 2016

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

City of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS TO CONFORM WITH STATE LAW

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ADDENDUM AUGUST 14, Members of the Planning Commission

Second Reading and Adoption of Zone Text Amendment Ordinance 1/15/19

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Welcome to HPOZ 101! Topics include: What is an HPOZ? How to establish an HPOZ? How do HPOZs function? Myth Busters Things You Should Know

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

City of Calistoga Staff Report

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

PLAINFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA (530) FAX (530)

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Agenda Report DATE: APRIL 30,2007 TO: CITY COUNCIL CYNTHIA J. KURTZ, CITY MANAGER FROM:

Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda

ORDINANCE NO

Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission

ORDINANCE NO

Planning Commission Report

8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP# to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family dwelling on a vacant lot.

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 4.

Density Bonus Law Overview. January 5 th, 2016

Brainerd City Council Agenda Request

HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD BOARD AGENDA

ORDINANCE NO

PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

MINUTES. May 1, Chairman Smith called the City Plan Commission Meeting to order at 7 p.m.in the City Council Chambers.

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program

WHEREAS, Alma Lane Associates, LLC is the owner of property known and

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: March 16, 2011 Project Planner: Shannon Werneke

CITY COMMISSION REPORT (and Planning Board Report) For Meeting Scheduled for November 7, 2013 Vested Rights Special Permit Resolution

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Housing and Career Services Department PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TENANT PROTECTION ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 9.75, PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE

LYON COUNTY TITLE 15 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT CODE ZONING REGULATIONS CHAPTERS October 19, 2017 Ordinance Draft DRAFT

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.2 STAFF REPORT August 5, Staff Contact: Fred Buderi (707)

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING January 28, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

Zoning Administrator Agenda Report Meeting Date 6/12/2018

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

ZRTD , Glenn Drive. M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Project Manager, Planning and Zoning John Merrithew, Acting Director, Planning and Zoning

Planning Commission Staff Report October 6, 2011

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Berry/University Form Based Code and Urban Residential Development

1. Updating the findings for the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance ("Ordinance"); and

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047

Transcription:

Approved by City Manager: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: OCOTBER 14, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS ISIDRO FIGUEROA, PLANNER CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2013-1385 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2013-307 TO APPROVE FILE NO. 130000165, REQUEST FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE MAP AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR A 1.60 ACRE PARCEL IMPROVED WITH AN EXISTING TWO STORY, 13,611 SQUARE- FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ADJACENT TO LAS VIRGENES ROAD (PARCEL 2), AND A 9.34 ACRE PARCEL (PARCEL 1) DIRECTLY EAST (CURRENTLY IMPROVED WITH MAINTENANCE, GARAGE AND PUMP FACILITIES). THE PROJECT ALSO REQUESTS TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PARCEL 2 FROM PUBLIC FACILITIES-INSTITUTIONAL (PF-I) TO BUSINESS-LIMITED INTENSITY (B- LI), AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) TO COMMERCIAL, LIMITED (CL). THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING FOR PARCEL 1 WILL REMAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES-INSTITUTIONAL (PF-1) AND PUBLIC FACILITY (PF). THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 4232 LAS VIRGENES ROAD WITHIN THE PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) ZONING DISTRICT AND THE LAS VIRGENES ROAD SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY (SC). THE CITY'S STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND 15305 OF THE CALIFORNIA CEQA GUIDELINES. MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2013 DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution 2013-1385 and Ordinance 2013-307 to approve File No. 130000165 (Lot Line Adjustment, and Zone Map Amendment). REVIEW AUTHORITY: The City Council is reviewing this project pursuant to Calabasas Municipal Code Section (CMC) 17.76.030 ( and Zone Map Amendments), which stipulates that the City Council shall render an approval or disapproval. Please see Attachment A for City Council Resolution No. 2013-1385 and Attachment B for City Council Ordinance No. 2013-307 Pursuant to CMC Section 17.44.130 (Lot Line Adjustment), the Community Development Director shall hold a public hearing for lot line adjustments involving land area of more than five acres in size. However, CMC Section 17.60.020 allows the Director to refer any matter subject to a decision by the Director to the Planning Commission, so that the Commission may instead make the decision. Since the Amendment and Zone Change are approved or disapproved by the Council, the City Attorney has recommended that the matter of the Lot Line Adjustment be reviewed by the Council as well. BACKGROUND: The Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) previously occupied the existing vacant building from 1970 to 1996. Between 1996 and 2010, the LVMWD continuously leased the building for commercial office use only. However, the building has remained vacant since 2010. The LVMVD approached staff with a request to make exterior and interior improvements to the building site in order to resume leasing the building for commercial office use. Staff indicated to the LVMWD that leasing the building for commercial office use was not permitted under the Public Facility (PF) zone. The ongoing leasing of the building from 1996-2010 was considered a legal nonconforming use, and allowed to continue in conformance with the nonconforming regulations identified in the development code. The nonconforming use of the building lost its legal nonconforming status when the commercial office use was nonoperational for a continuous period of one year. Pursuant to CMC Section 17.72.030, when a nonconforming use of a conforming structure is discontinued for a continuous period of one year, it shall be presumed that the use has been abandoned. Further use of the site or structure shall comply with all the regulations of the applicable zoning district and all other applicable provisions of the development code. 2

Staff indicated to the LVMWD that approval of a Amendment and Zone Map Amendment by the City Council would be required in order to resume leasing of the building for commercial office use. Additionally, staff indicated that the exterior and interior improvements required entitlements that would be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The LVMWD decided to phase the project and seek approval of the exterior improvements first and then subsequently seek approval of the Amendment and Zone Map Amendment. On November 9, 2012 the applicant submitted a request for a Site Plan Review, Scenic Corridor Permit and a Sign Permit seeking approval to add a 74 sq.-ft. addition to accommodate a new elevator, landscape and parking lot improvements, demolish the existing monument sign, and construct a new monument sign in a new location. On February 21, 2013, the Planning Commission approved the Site Plan Review, Scenic Corridor Permit and a Sign Permit at a noticed public hearing. On February 13, 2013, the LVMWD submitted a request for a Amendment and Zone Map Amendment, and a Lot Line Adjustment. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment would reconfigure the two adjacent parcels to allow for a resulting 1.60 acre parcel improved with an existing two story, 13,611 squarefoot office building adjacent to Las Virgenes Road (Parcel 2), and a resulting 9.34 acre parcel (Parcel 1) directly east (currently improved with maintenance, garage and pump facilities). The project also requests to change the land use designation of the newly created 1.60-acre parcel (Parcel 2) from Public Facilities- Institutional (PF-I) to Business-Limited Intensity (B- LI), and change the zoning from Public Facility (PF) to Commercial, Limited (CL). The designation and zoning for the 9.34 acre parcel (Parcel 1) will remain Public Facilities-Institutional (PF-I) and Public Facility (PF) respectively. Please see Attachment E for site plan/ lot line map. On September 19, 2013, the Planning Commission reviewed the project at a noticed public hearing. At the hearing, no member of the public spoke in favor or against the project. After thorough review and discussion, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to adopt Resolution No. 2013-556 (see Attachment D) recommending to the City Council approval of File No. 130000165. Please see Attachment C to review the September 19, 2013 Planning Commission staff report and Attachment E for the September 19, 2013 Planning Commission minutes. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: The key issues related to this project are discussed below: A. Site Design/Building Layout: The project site is comprised of two parcels with a 3

total area of 10.94 acres. The total land area of Parcel 1 in its current configuration is approximately 5.76 acres and the total land area for Parcel 2 in its current configuration is 5.18 acres. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment would result in an approximate 1.60 acre parcel (Parcel 2) improved with a 13,611 square foot office building, surface parking, and landscaping. The land area of the resulting Parcel 1 would be compromised of approximately 9.34 acres improved with water conveyance infrastructure, maintenance and storage buildings, and a reservoir used by the LVMWD. The proposed boundary adjustment will not create any new parcels but instead reconfigure the existing Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment has been configured to allow Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 to conform to the minimum lot size, site coverage, pervious surface, setbacks and other development standards pursuant to each parcels respective zoning. Additionally, the proposed Lot Line Adjustment would adjust the boundary lines to eliminate buildings from being located across two properties as they currently do. Please see Attachment H for site photos. B. Parking and Circulation: There are no parking requirements within the PF zoning. There are currently 44 parking spaces available to serve the existing office building in Parcel 2. If the Amendment, and Zone Map Amendment are approved, the office building on Parcel 2 would be required to provide 55 parking spaces in accordance with the parking requirements identified in CMC Section 17.28.050 for commercial office use. The reconfiguration of Parcel 2 will provide a total of 64 parking spaces which exceeds the minimum parking requirements identified in CMC Section 17.28.050 for commercial use. Ingress and egress to Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 is provided by a driveway located adjacent to Las Virgenes Road. The Los Angeles County Fire Department reviewed the project through the Development Review Committee and provided procedural comments only. 4

C. Amendment/Zone Change: EXISTING ZONING/GP DESIGNATION Parcel 1 Public Facilities- Scenic Corridor (PF-SC) Public Facilities- Institutional (PF-I) Parcel 2 Public Facilities- Scenic Corridor (PF-SC) Public Facilities- Institutional (PF-I) PROPOSED ZONING/GP DESIGNATION Parcel 1 No Change No change Parcel 2 Commercial Limited-Scenic Corridor (CL-SC) Business-Limited Intensity (B-LI) The existing land use designation for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 is Public Facilities-Institutional (PF-I). Additionally, the existing zoning designation for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 is Public Facilities (PF). Please refer to Attachment G for proposed and Zoning land use designation maps. In order for the building on proposed Parcel 2 to be allowed to be leased for commercial office use, a General 5

Plan Amendment would have to be approved in order to change the existing land use designation from the existing Public Facility-Institutional to Business-Limited Intensity. Also, the zoning must change from Public Facilities to Commercial, Limited. Surrounding land uses to Parcel 2 are: an approved 78-unit residential project located within the Commercial-Business Limited zoning to the north; existing LVMWD facilities to the south and east boundaries of the project site; and multifamily residential across Las Virgenes Road to the west. The leasing of the vacant building located within proposed Parcel 2 for commercial office use is not an allowed use within the Public Facilities zone. The existing zoning must change from Public Facilities Scenic Corridor (PF-SC) zoning designation to Commercial, Limited Scenic Corridor (CL-SC) to allow for commercial office use. Please refer to Attachment G for the proposed Zoning Map. By reconfiguring Parcel 2 as proposed, the 1.60 acre parcel would far exceed the 5,000 square foot minimum lot size requirement for the CL zone. The existing building would conform to all required setbacks. The building s floor area ratio of 0.20 would be compliant with the maximum allowed for the CL zone, and the proposed site coverage of 15% would be below the maximum allowed of 72 %. Additionally, the 27% pervious surface provided on reconfigured Parcel 2 exceeds the 24% required by the zoning. CMC Section 17.28.050 requires that the project site provide 55 off-street parking spaces for the commercial office use and the project site will provide 64 parking spaces, which exceeds the off-street parking requirement. A Amendment from PF-I to B-LI for Parcel 2 must be approved to accommodate the proposed zone change. The project is consistent with the following policies: II-8, II-9; II-11; II-13; II-14, and IV-23. The General Plan Amendment will not eliminate any anticipated future housing in contradiction to the Housing Element; and traffic conditions and requirements will not conflict with the policies and provisions of the Circulation Element. Furthermore, the amendment will allow for the commercial office use that was previously ongoing for a period of 14 years prior to the building being vacant for the past three years. The allowance of commercial office use in the existing vacant building in Parcel 2 is consistent with one of the objectives found under the Community Structure section of the Land Use Element of the that states, Maintain a well-designed, high quality, and functional mix of open space, urban and rural residential, and supporting commercial and business park land uses which reflects local community values and integrates the resolution of other general plan issues into a cohesive pattern. Approving the Amendment would allow the existing building to be leased for office use, which provides the City with supporting commercial office use without going through new construction. The minor interior and exterior 6

improvements of the existing building previously approved by the Commission and the Lot Line Adjustment will conform to the City s stated policies and objectives for control of storm water runoff, control and management of light pollution, and adherence to policies concerning conservation of energy resources. REQUIRED FINDINGS: The required findings are contained in City Council Resolution No. 2013-1385 attached as Attachment A and Ordinance No. 2013-307 attached as Attachment B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(B)(3) and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is attached as Attachment I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: See conditions contained in resolution No. 2013-1385, attached as Attachment A. REQUESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013-1385 approving a Amendment and a Lot Line Adjustment associated with File No. 130000165; and approve a motion to introduce Ordinance No. 2013-307 approving a Zoning Map Amendment associated with File No. 130000165. ATTACHMENTS: A- Resolution 2013-1385 B- Ordinance 2013-307 C- Planning Commission Staff Report (September 19, 2013) D- Planning Commission Resolution 2013-556 E- Planning Commission Minutes (September 19, 2013) F- Site/Lot Line Adjustment Map Plan G- Proposed Land Use & Zoning Map H- Site Photos I- Notice of Exemption 7