Mortgage Market Institutions and Housing Market Outcomes

Similar documents
Negative Gearing and Welfare: A Quantitative Study of the Australian Housing Market

Houses Across Time and Space

Macro-prudential Policy in an Agent-Based Model of the UK Housing Market

Housing Price and Fundamentals in a Transition Economy: The Case of the Beijing Market

Renting Vs Buying a Home: A Matter Of Wealth Accumulation or of Geographic Stability?

On the user cost and homeownership

Do Family Wealth Shocks Affect Fertility Choices?

Negative Gearing Tax and Welfare: A Quantitative Study for the Australian Housing Market

Heterogeneity, Frictional Assignment and Home-ownership

Interest Rates and Fundamental Fluctuations in Home Values

Housing Price and Fundamentals in a Transition Economy: The Case of the Beijing Market. Bing Han, Lu Han, and Guozhong Zhu 1

Monika Piazzesi Stanford & NBER. EFG meeting Spring Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) EFG discussion EFG meeting Spring / 15

HOMEOWNERSHIP, GEOGRAPHIC MOBILITY AND MORTGAGE STRUCTURE

Implications of U.S. Tax Policy for House Prices, Rents, and Homeownership

Waiting for Affordable Housing in NYC

14.471: Fall 2012: Recitation 4: Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses?

Rental market underdevelopment in Central Europe: Micro (Survey) I and Macro (DSGE) perspective

The Effects of Local Risk on Homeownership *

Accounting for Changes in the Homeownership Rate

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY

Entry and Inefficiency in the Real Estate Brokerage Industry

Owner-Occupied Housing as a Hedge Against Rent Risk. Todd Sinai The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania and NBER. and

Houses across time and across place

Sorting based on amenities and income

Online Appendix "The Housing Market(s) of San Diego"

Reforming housing rental market in a life-cycle model

Consumption of Housing During the 2000s Boom: Evidence and Theory

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY JUNE 14, 2017

Testing Cost Inefficiency under Free Entry in the Real Estate Brokerage Industry

Hedonic Pricing Model Open Space and Residential Property Values

Neighborhood Externalities and Housing Price Dynamics

Department of Economics Working Paper Series

Arbitrage in Housing Markets

Implications of U.S. Tax Policy for House Prices, Rents, and Homeownership

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of ATLANTA

Search and Credit Frictions in the Housing Market

Arbitrage in Housing Markets

DATA APPENDIX. 1. Census Variables

How Do Foreclosures Exacerbate Housing Downturns?

Consumption of Housing During the 2000s Boom: Evidence and Theory

The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality: Evidence from San Francisco

Cyclical Housing Prices in Flatland

A Shortage of Short Sales: Explaining the Underutilization of a Foreclosure Alternative

Housing Appreciation and Marginal Land Supply in Monocentric Cities with Topography

Homeowner Balance Sheets and Monetary Policy

Risk Component Based Infrastructure Debt Valuation Analysis and Long-Term Investment

Can Owning a Home Hedge the Risk of Moving? Todd Sinai The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania and NBER. and

Knowing your Neighborhood: Asymmetric Information in Real Estate Markets

Real Estate Liquidity

Gray Zones: Slums and Urban Structure in Developing Countries

Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship

Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship

Consumption responses to house price heterogeneity PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE

Aggregation Bias and the Repeat Sales Price Index

Housing Price and Fundamentals in A Transition Economy: The Case of Beijing Market

House Price Shock and Changes in Inequality across Cities

A Simple Model of Housing Rental and Ownership with Policy Simulations

MODELLING HOUSE PRICES AND HOME OWNERSHIP. Ian Mulheirn and Nishaal Gooroochurn

Finance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.

Foreclosures and House Prices

Identifying the Benefits from Home Ownership: A Swedish Experiment

House Prices and Vacancies after Hurricane Katrina: Empirical Analysis of a Search & Matching Model

Homeownership in an Uncertain World with Substantial Transaction Costs

Run-up in the House Price-Rent Ratio: How Much Can Be Explained by Fundamentals? y

This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TESTING FOR INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES IN REAL ESTATE MARKETS. Pablo Kurlat Johannes Stroebel

The Eects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality: Evidence from San Francisco

Erik R. de Wit 1,3 Bas van der Klaauw 2,3

History Dependence in the Housing Market

WEEK 10: REGULATION & OUTCOMES HOUSING TCD M.SC.(EPS) RONAN LYONS EC8015 COMPETITION & REGULATION

Long-run Equilibrium and Short-Run Adjustment in U.S. Housing Markets

The Eects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality: Evidence from San Francisco

House Prices, Household Leverage, and Entrepreneurship

Housing Costs and Policies

Housing Busts and Household Mobility

A Factor Analysis of Housing Market Dynamics in the U.S. and the Regions

Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship

SINGAPORE HOUSING MARKET: AN ECONOMETRIC MODEL AND A HOUSING AFFORDABILITY INDEX GU JIAYING

Arrested Development: Theory and Evidence of Supply-Side Speculation in the Housing Market

The Welfare Impacts of a Conservation Easement

Real Estate Boom and Misallocation of Capital in China

Can Government Open More Doors for Borrowers?

A Welfare Analysis of Conservation Easement Tax Credits

THE BIPARTISAN HOUSING FINANCE REFORM ACT SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS

Endogenous Gentrification and Housing Price Dynamics

Hedonic Regression Models for Tokyo Condominium Sales

A Generalized Sharecropping Model of Retail Lease Contracting and Licensing Agreements

House Prices and Economic Growth

Foreclosures, House Prices, and the Real Economy*

Prices, Rents, and Homeownership: Three Essays on Housing Markets

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF INTEREST RATE ON HOUSING DEMAND

Economic Consequences of Housing Speculation

HOUSE PRICES IN AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL CITIES: A SUPPLY SIDE PROSPECTIVE

Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship

Working Paper. Revenue-Recycling and the Efficiency and Spatial Distributional Impacts of Development Taxes

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES PROPERTY TAXATION, ZONING, AND EFFICIENCY: A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS. Stephen Coate

The Financial Patterns of Distressed Commercial Properties and the Borrower Behavior. Jun Chen, Senior Director

An Examination of the Link between Urban Planning Policies and the High Cost of Housing and Labor

Trulia s Rent vs. Buy Report: Full Methodology

Metropolitan Land Values and Housing Productivity

Transcription:

Mortgage Market Institutions and Housing Market Outcomes Edward Kung UCLA May 2th, 215 Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 1 / 51

Introduction General framework for studying interactions between housing and mortgage markets Focal points of model: Institutional features of mortgage market, including long-term mortgage contracts Equilibrium relationship between housing demand and mortgage credit availability Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 2 / 51

Model Overview Housing demand Demand generated by incoming buyers Buyers have limited wealth Whether to buy a home / type of home affected by mortgage availability Housing supply Supply comes from existing owners who move Movers can either sell house or default In either case, a unit of supply is added to housing market House prices adjust so that housing market clears Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 3 / 51

Model Overview Lenders Risk neutral and competitive lenders Mortgage interest rate set so that expected return = opportunity cost of funds Because of default risk, interest rate depends on house price expectations and leverage ratio Equilibrium when all contracts earn zero net return over opportunity cost Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 4 / 51

Results Overview Model calibrated to data from Los Angeles, 23-21 Many salient features of the data are captured Counterfactuals studied: Impact of disappearing market for non-agency mortgages Figure Effectiveness of government responses Introducing shared appreciation mortgages General equilibrium effects are shown to be important Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 5 / 51

Related Literature Models of the housing and mortgage markets Ortalo-Magne and Rady (26); Campbell and Cocco (214); Favilukis et. al. (215); Landvoigt et. al. (215); Corbae and Quintin (215); Guren and McQuade (215) Empirical literature on interactions between housing and mortgages Himmelberg et. al. (25); Glaeser et. al. (21); Ferreira and Gyourko (211); Mian and Sufi (29); Favara and Imbs (215); Adelino et. al. (214); Kung (215); Hurst et. al. (215) Mortgage design Caplin et. al. (27); Shiller (28); Piskorski and Tchistyi (21); Mian and Sufi (214) Collateral equilibrium Kiyotaki and Moore (1997); Geanakoplos (1996); Geanakoplos and Zame (214) Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 6 / 51

Model (Preliminaries) Discrete time Housing market with two types of housing h =, 1 (vertical quality) Fixed stock µ of each type Price in state s t : p h (s t ) Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 7 / 51

Model (Mortgages) M mortgage types, including m = (no mortgage) Mortgage characterized by z t = (age t, rate t, balance t ) Type determines how z t evolves over time and translates to payments; also determines how much the lender can recover in a default Interest rate on new mortgage origination of type m collateralized by house type h: r m h (b, x it, s t ) Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 8 / 51

Model (Homeowners) Owns / occupies one housing unit Lives in housing unit until moving shock; λ probability each period Moving is terminal state; movers do not re-enter housing market Discussion Homeowners care about: Flow consumption of a numeraire good: u ( θ h c t ) Final wealth at the time of a move: βu (wt ) Homeowners have constant income; can save at risk-free rate rfr t but cannot borrow (except through mortgages) Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 9 / 51

Homeowner decision problem... Last period Enters Period λ Moves Sell w T = y i + w it + p h(s t) b it 1 λ Default w T = y i + w it c D Doesn t Move No refinance Consumption / savings Next period... Refinance Consumption / savings Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 1 / 51

Homeowner Bellman equation Homeowner that stays solves: V stay it = max u ( θ h c ) + δe [ (1 λ) V stay it+1 ] move + λvit+1 subject to: c + 1 1 + rfr t w = { y i + w it pay it y i + w it b it + b pay it c R if no refinance if refinance Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 11 / 51

Potential buyers Buyers are heterogeneous on income y i, initial wealth w i, and outside option v i Present value to buying house type h: V buy h (y i, w i, s t ) = max u ( θ h c ) + δe [ (1 λ) V stay it+1 ] move + λvit+1 subject to: c + 1 1 + rfr t w = y i + w i p h (s t ) + b pay it Buy house type h if: V buy h { } = max V buy, V buy 1, v i Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 12 / 51

Housing demand Housing demand is the integral of individual buyers demands: ˆ ˆ ˆ D h (s t ) = d h (y, w, v; s t ) Γ (y, w, v; s t ) dydwdv y w v Housing market clearing condition: D h (s t ) = λµ for h =, 1 Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 13 / 51

Lenders Lenders correctly anticipate homeowners default and refinance rules Π move it = τ it ψh m (z it, s t ) + (1 τ it ) b it Π stay it = ρ it b it + (1 ρ it ) Π norefi it Π norefi it = pay it + ( 1 1 + rfr t + a m ) E [ λπ move it+1 + (1 λ) Π stay ] it+1 a m is the opportunity cost of funds Can differ by mortgage type to reflect higher liquidity in agency market May be higher than rfrt to reflect better investment opportunities available to lenders than borrowers Mortgage market clearing condition: Π norefi it aget= b = Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 14 / 51

Equilibrium Equilibrium solved via fixed point iteration on three nests Equilibrium objects to solve for: ph (s t) the price of housing in each state (outer nest) r m h (b, x it, s t) the mortgage interest rate menu (middle nest) V stay, Π stay (inner nest) Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 15 / 51

Implementation (Mortgage Types) Two mortgage types: agency and non-agency: Table: Differences in agency and non-agency Agency Lender recovers full loan amount on default Non-Agency Lender recovers φ of collateral value on default Cost of funds a 1 Cost of funds a 2 Cannot exceed 8% of collateral value Payment cannot exceed 5% of income Cannot exceed 1% of collateral value Payment cannot exceed 5% of income Cannot exceed cll t Unavailable if mps t = Contracts are 3-year fixed-rate mortgages Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 16 / 51

Other Implementation Notes Aggregate state variables: risk-free rate conforming loan limit availability of non-agency mortgages unobserved demand shock expected growth or decline of demand shock Ruthless default and no refinancing No savings Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 17 / 51

Calibration Notes Choose parameters to simultaneously fit moments in the data Ownership durations identify λ Price paths identify vt and θ Mortgage interest rates identify a and ϕ Average LTVs identify parameters governing wealth distribution and β Growth of demand shocks identified by requiring consistency between guessed and implied parameters Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 18 / 51

Figure: Model Fit: House Prices 1.9 Low Valued House Price (Simulated) High Valued House Price (Simulated) Low Valued House Price (Data) High Valued House Price (Data).8.7 Price ($millions).6.5.4.3.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21

Table: Model Fit: LTVs of Home Buyers Real Data Simulated Data Year Low-Valued High-Valued Low-Valued High-Valued 23.844.756.882.794 24.849.76.884.816 25.857.76.867.873 26.884.779.82.837 27.842.723.795.86 28.755.617.726.661 29.725.68.698.629 21.723.598.698.629

Figure: Model Fit: Cumulative Default Rates Cumulative Default Rate.1.8.6.4.2 CDR (Simulated) CDR (Data) 24 Cohort Cumulative Default Rate.2.15.1.5 CDR (Simulated) CDR (Data) 25 Cohort 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21 Cumulative Default Rate.35.3.25.2.15.1.5 CDR (Simulated) CDR (Data) 26 Cohort Cumulative Default Rate.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 CDR (Simulated) CDR (Data) 27 Cohort 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21

Figure: Buyer Value Functions in 27 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers.4 Low valued housing High valued housing.4 Low valued housing High valued housing.35.35.3.3 Outside Option.25.2 Outside Option.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Housing Demand Profile in 27 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers.4 Low valued housing High valued housing.4 Low valued housing High valued housing.35.35.3.3 Outside Option.25.2 Outside Option.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Buyer Value Functions in 28 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers Low valued housing High valued housing Low valued housing High valued housing.25.25.2.2 Outside Option.15 Outside Option.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Housing Demand Profile in 28 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers Low valued housing High valued housing Low valued housing High valued housing.25.25.2.2 Outside Option.15 Outside Option.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 27 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers.4 No mtg Agency Non Agency.4 No mtg Agency Non Agency.35.35.3.3 Outside Option.25.2 Outside Option.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 28 (Baseline) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers No mtg Agency No mtg Agency.25.25.2.2 Outside Option.15 Outside Option.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

The Impact of Non-Agency Availability In the baseline, non-agency loans disappear in 28 Low wealth buyers are priced out of the housing market What if non-agency loans were made available in 28? Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 28 / 51

Figure: House Prices of Non-Agency Available 28+ 1.9 Low Valued House Price (Counterfactual) High Valued House Price (Counterfactual) Low Valued House Price (Baseline) High Valued House Price (Baseline).8.7 Price ($millions).6.5.4.3.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21

Figure: Housing Demand Profile in 28 (Counterfactual) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers Low valued housing High valued housing Low valued housing High valued housing.25.25.2.2 Outside Option.15 Outside Option.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 28 (Counterfactual) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers No mtg Agency Non Agency Agency Non Agency.25.25.2.2 Outside Option.15 Outside Option.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Mortgage Rates in 28 (Counterfactual) Low Valued Housing High Valued Housing.1 Non Agency Agency.1 Non Agency Agency.9.9.8.8.7.7.6.6 Rate.5 Rate.5.4.4.3.3.2.2.1.1.2.4.6.8 1 LTV.2.4.6.8 1 LTV

Figure: Mortgage Rates in 28 (Baseline) Low Valued Housing High Valued Housing.1 Non Agency Agency.1 Non Agency Agency.9.9.8.8.7.7.6.6 Rate.5 Rate.5.4.4.3.3.2.2.1.1.2.4.6.8 1 LTV.2.4.6.8 1 LTV

Figure: Sensitivity of Prices to Demand Shocks.7 Low Valued Housing Non Agency Available Non Agency Unavailable 1 High Valued Housing Non Agency Available Non Agency Unavailable.6.9.5.8.7.4 Price Price.6.3.5.2.4.1.3.2.4.6.8 v.2.2.4.6.8 v

Figure: Effectiveness of Government Response 1.9 Low Valued House Price (Counterfactual) High Valued House Price (Counterfactual) Low Valued House Price (Baseline) High Valued House Price (Baseline).8.7 Price ($millions).6.5.4.3.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21

Takeaways Availability of non-agency financing is an important driver of housing demand and house prices High leverage loans can reduce house-price volatility Allows more households with inelastic housing demand to afford homes Government policy was effective in manipulating house prices Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 36 / 51

Introducing Shared Appreciation Mortgages Introduce two types of shared-appreciation mortgages from 23 to 27 as a non-agency option FSAM: indexed to house prices on both up and downside PSAM: indexed to house prices on only downside Payments and balances go up or down proportionally with house prices Homeowners are never underwater Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 37 / 51

Figure: House Prices if PSAMs Available 23-27 1.9 Low Valued House Price (Counterfactual) High Valued House Price (Counterfactual) Low Valued House Price (Baseline) High Valued House Price (Baseline).8.7 Price ($millions).6.5.4.3.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 25 (PSAMs Available).5.45 Low Income Buyers No mtg Agency Non Agency SAM.5.45 High Income Buyers No mtg Agency Non Agency.4.4.35.35 Outside Option.3.25.2 Outside Option.3.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Interest Rates in 25 (PSAMs Available) Low Valued Housing High Valued Housing.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.9.9.8.8.7.7.6.6 Rate.5 Rate.5.4.4.3.3.2.2.1.1.2.4.6.8 1 LTV.2.4.6.8 1 LTV

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 27 (PSAMs Available) Low Income Buyers High Income Buyers.4 No mtg Agency Non Agency.4 No mtg Agency Non Agency.35.35.3.3 Outside Option.25.2 Outside Option.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Interest Rates in 25 (PSAMs Available) Low Valued Housing High Valued Housing.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.9.9.8.8.7.7.6.6 Rate.5 Rate.5.4.4.3.3.2.2.1.1.2.4.6.8 1 LTV.2.4.6.8 1 LTV

Figure: Cumulative Default Rates (PSAMs Available) Cumulative Default Rate.8.6.4.2 24 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) Cumulative Default Rate.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 25 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21 Cumulative Default Rate.35.3.25.2.15.1.5 26 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) Cumulative Default Rate.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 27 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21

Figure: House Prices if FSAMs Available 23-27 1.9 Low Valued House Price (Counterfactual) High Valued House Price (Counterfactual) Low Valued House Price (Baseline) High Valued House Price (Baseline).8.7 Price ($millions).6.5.4.3.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21

Figure: Mortgage Demand Profile in 25 (FSAMs Available).5.45 Low Income Buyers No mtg Agency SAM.5.45 High Income Buyers No mtg Agency SAM.4.4.35.35 Outside Option.3.25.2 Outside Option.3.25.2.15.15.1.1.5.5.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth.2.4.6.8 1 Initial Wealth

Figure: Interest Rates in 25 (FSAMs Available) Low Valued Housing High Valued Housing.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.1 SAM Non Agency Agency.9.9.8.8.7.7.6.6 Rate.5 Rate.5.4.4.3.3.2.2.1.1.2.4.6.8 1 LTV.2.4.6.8 1 LTV

Figure: Cumulative Default Rates (FSAMs Available) Cumulative Default Rate.8.6.4.2 24 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) Cumulative Default Rate.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 25 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21 Cumulative Default Rate.25.2.15.1.5 26 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) Cumulative Default Rate.2.15.1.5 27 Cohort CDR (Counterfactual) CDR (Baseline) 22 24 26 28 21 22 24 26 28 21

Takeaways SAMs can be welfare-enhancing Uptake can be positive even if they don t receive the liquidity benefits of the GSEs Uptake depends on expectations on house-price growth, contract design Defaults can go up if not everyone chooses a SAM Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 48 / 51

Figure: Agency and Non-Agency MBS Issuance (USD Billions) 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 1994 1996 1998 2 22 24 26 28 21 212 214 Agency MBS Non-Agency RMBS Back

Age profile of house value 25 homeowners Log(Housing Value) 11.8 12 12.2 12.4 12.6 3 4 5 6 7 Age High-school or less College or more Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 5 / 51

Evidence on within-market movers log house_value i = β + β 1 moved_from_within i + β 2 moved_from_outside i + X i β 3 + ɛ i (1) (2) (3) All ages Age<45 Age 45 Moved from within.47*.458*** -.488*** (.26) (.32) (.41) Moved from outside.15***.561*** -.379*** (.27) (.34) (.41) N 2,439,293 685,58 1,753,713 Back Edward Kung (UCLA) Mortgage Market Institutions May 2th, 215 51 / 51