KURSUS COORDINATED CADASTRAL SYSTEM (CCS) INSTITUT TANAH & UKUR NEGARA BEHRANG, PERAK METHODOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL DIGITAL CADASTRAL DATABASE (NDCDB) OLEH: PROF DR ABD MAJID BIN A KADIR & ABDULLAH HISAM OMAR Fakulti Kejuruteraan & Sains Geoinformasi Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Skudai, Johor. Email: majid@fksg.utm.my, a.hisham@fksg.utm.my 21 st OCTOBER 23 OVERVIEW ON PREVIOUS COORDINATED CADASTRAL SYSTEM RESEARCH PROJECTS PILOT STUDY : 1996 Pilot study has been conducted in Malaysia with the following objectives To determine the effectiveness of using Global Positioning System for cadastral control network densification To select most appropriate adjustment method for the large cadastral network FEASIBILITY STUDY: 1997-1999 Feasibility study has been carried out in the Melaka/Johor border with the following objectives: To carry out larger cadastral network adjustment To use Rectified Skew Orthomorphic (RSO) projection system in the cadastral network adjustment To use geocentric datum (WGS84) as a National Geodetic Datum To introduce GPS measurement for cadastral application The outcome of this study are as follows : RSO projection may be used to replace Cassini for cadastral mapping purposes. Least squares adjustment technique is suitable and practical to be used in the large cadastral network adjustment Potential use of geocentric datum has been realized A guideline for using GPS in Cadastral surveying is produced It has been realized from the previous studies that Coordinated Cadastral System could potentially be implemented in Peninsular Malaysia 1
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY Coordinated Cadastral System (CCS) a cadastral reform programme to improve the cadastral survey system. Implementation of CCS feasible, according to results of feasibility study. Long term benefits to be accrued from CCS implementation: Utilizing Whole to the Part methodology. Facilitate use of rapid data acquisition, storage, processing & management techniques. Improvement of the cadastral survey system. Provides common reference system. Facilitate data integration. CCS basis for / underpins a good LIS. CCS UNDERPINS A GOOD LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM (LIS) Coordinate based LIS facilitate data integration process in GIS Environment 2
CCS UNDERPINS A CCS UNDERPINS A GOOD GOOD LAND LAND INFORMATION INFORMATION SYSTEM SYSTEM (LIS) (LIS) Before CCS After CCS ELIPSOID MODIFIED EVEREST ELIPSOID WGS 84 Datum Origin: Kertau Datum Origin: Center of the Mass Data integration can be done globally Coordinated Cadastral System: System Methodology For The Development of National Digital Cadastral Database Database CCS UNDERPINS A CCS UNDERPINS A GOOD GOOD LAND LAND INFORMATION INFORMATION SYSTEM SYSTEM (LIS) (LIS) Before CCS Labour Intensive After CCS One man Show Coordinated Cadastral System: System Methodology For The Development of National Digital Cadastral Database Database 3
CCS UNDERPINS A GOOD LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM (LIS) Before CCS After CCS GPS GPS Network adjustment technique: Transit /Bowditch Low accuracy and suitable for individual lot Network adjustment technique: Least Squares High accuracy and rigorous method. CCS UNDERPINS A GOOD LAND INFORMATION SYSTEM (LIS) Before CCS After CCS Plotting coordinates are not adjusted properly Adjusted coordinates 4
STUDY FRAMEWORK IMPLEMENTATION OF CCS TECHNICAL ISSUES Development of Geocentric Based Cadastral Control Data Base (CCDB) Development of National Digital Cadastral Data Base (NDCDB) Integration of National Digital Cadastral Data Base (NDCDB) & National Digital Topography Data Base (NDTDB) INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Organizational Legal Economic Social Implementation of CCS TECHNICAL ISSUES MODULE A Development of Geocentric- Based CCDB CCDB MODULE C Cadastral & Topographic Intergration NDTDB SDCDB MODULE B Development of NDCDB AUTOMATED DATABASE CONVERSION SYSTEM NDCDB SDCDB - State Digital Cadastral Data Base NDCDB - National Digital Cadastral Data Base CCDB - Cadastral Control Data Base NDTDB - National Digital Topographic Data Base 5
COORDINATES MALAYSIAN PERCEPTION OF THE COORDINATED CADASTRE Coordinated Cadastre as a coordinate-based cadastral system with the coordinates being given legal significance. The prominance of measured bearing and distances are reduced whereby they are considered as only a means by which the final adjusted coordinates are derived. The emphasis of the concept is the earth-centered datum, a single projection system for the whole country and the application of least-square adjustment technique in the distribution of survey errors. BEARING & DISTANCE LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT PROJECTION SYSTEM DATUM MODULE B: Development of A National Digital Cadastral Database CCDB ADJUSTMENT DATA INTEGRITY CHECK DATA SELECTION QUALITY CONTROL TEMP NDCDB SDCDB Input Connection Lines TRANSFORM EDITING Automated Database Conversion System NDCDB CCDB : Cadastral Control Database SDCDB : State Digital Cadastral Database NDCDB : National Digital Cadastral Database 6
OBJECTIVES (Modified from original proposal) The study objectives of this module are: To assess and analyze the use of the existing State Digital Cadastral Database (DCDB) as the primary input to Coordinated Cadastral System; To develop Cadastral Control Infrastructure using GPS technology for both urban and rural areas; To develop Automated Database Conversion System for the development of National Digital Cadastral Database STUDY AREA 5 x 5 km Urban Area In Kuala Lumpur 4 x 4 km Rural & Semi Urban Area Covering Melaka & Johor States 7
Tmn. Eastern COORDINATED CADASTRAL SYSTEM PROJECT Study Area #1: Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur 5 X 5 km 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 Tmn P.Ramlee 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 31 32 33 Wilayah Persekutuan34 35 36 37 38 39 4 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 6 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 7 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 Bkt.Tunku 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 12 121 GPS Control Station Spacing ~5m Jln. Gurney U 27,. m T 48,. m COORDINATED CADASTRAL SYSTEM PROJECT Study Area #2: Melaka Johor 4 X 4 km U 27,. m T 54,. m Ulu Kemengkang, Kesang Bkt Serampang Kg Pt Payong Parit Bakar Parit Jawa & Seri Menanti U 2,. m T 48,. m GPS Control Station Spacing ~2.5 km U 2,. m T 54,. m 8
Cadastral Control Infrastructure Development PHASE MELAKA REMARKS JOHOR REMARKS Reconnaissance* Mac 21 131 of 132 stations have been identified Mac 21 89 of 132 stations have been identified Monumentation* Mac 21 Standard Traverse, Pipe and Cadastre mark Mac 21 Standard Traverse, Pipe and Cadastre mark GPS Field Observation * 19 Mac 7 April Jasin, Melaka Tengah, Alor Gajah 7 Apr 14 April Muar GPS Processing and Results* Results Delivered: 3/5/21 * Note: Geodesy Section, JUPEM Melaka and JUPEM Johor Cont GPS Field Observation For Study Area # 2 ( Melaka Johor) GPS Network Grid consists of Primary Grid (1 kmx 1 km) Secondary Grid (2.5 km x 2.5 km Primary Grid Secondary Grid Observation Technique Static Reference Stations: M331 (Tg.Keling, Melaka), GP13 ( Tebong, Melaka), GP16 ( Pagoh, Johor) Rapid Static : Reference Stations Primary Grid Points Observation Time Total of Stations GPS Processing Software Adjustment Software 9 minutes 23 Trimble Geomatic Office V1.1 Geolab 2.4c 15-3 minutes 197 Trimble Geomatic Office V1.1 Trimble Geomatic Office V1.1 9
GPS Network Grid For Study Area # 2: Melaka Primary Grid Secondary Grid 1
Cadastral Control Infrastructure For Study Area # 2 11
Cadastral Control Database (CCDB) Overlay and Identify Stages DCDB CCDB Identify GPS Control Stations in Cadastral Database (DCDB) 12
PREPARATION OF DATA INPUT & CONNECTION LINES DIGITAL CADASTRAL DATABASE FOR STUDY AREA # 1: WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR GPS.shp Wp1lot.shp Wp1bboundary.shp Lot.shp 13
Total of Connection Lines: 289 Total of Connection Lines: 315 14
CADASTRAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR STUDY AREA # 1: WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR Connection-line-b.shp Kl-connectionline e-a.shp GPS.shp Wp1lot.shp Wp1lotbboundary.shp Lot.hp Bdy.shp PREPARATION OF DATA INPUT: MELAKA Completed In-progress 15
Total of Connection Lines: 4951 PREPARATION OF DATA INPUT: JOHOR 16
AUTOMATED DATABASE CONVERSION SYSTEM 17
Data Selection Module Cont Selection Process Filtering Process Filtered Zone 18
Cont Log File: New and Current Point Keys Save to StarNet Format Samb Populasi-PDUK PDUK Original Boundary file ( Cassini coordinate only for selected boundary stones ) Interfacing program for repopulation of DCDB New attribute: Two new columns: RSO_EAST & RSO_North and Cassini coordinate 19
ADJUSTMENT OF TEST AREAS: i)melaka -Johor ii) Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Statistical Summary for Adjustment: WGS-MRT-RSO-CASSINI CASE 1 (Fixed GPS Control Point at 2.5 km Interval) GPS Control Station:9312653, 114385, 712653, 53PA3141, 23PA192, 5PA1315 MAX MIN MEAN RMS Bearing 1 54-2 21 Residual Distance (m).39 -.4.13 Stn.Coord Std.Deviations N (m).92.41.42 E (m).84.39.41 Statistical Summary for adjustment Block 4-42 Number of Stations : 4954 Error Factor : 1.729 (Standard error factor = 1.) Distance for max bearing residual : 73.919 m Distance for min bearing residual : 42.714 m 2
Error Ellipse for Adjustment: Local Cassini CASE 1 Ellipse Scale: 15 Statistical Summary for Adjustment: WGS-CASSINI (GEOCENTRIC) CASE 2 MAX MIN MEAN RMS (Fixed GPS Control Point at 2.5 km Interval) GPS Control Station:9312653, 114385, 712653, 53PA3141, 23PA192, 5PA1315 Bearing 1 56-1 59 Residual Distance (m).39 -.4.3 Stn.Coord Std.Deviations N (m).92.41 21.7.42 Statistical Summary for adjustment Block 4-42 E (m).84.39.41 Number of Stations : 4954 Error Factor : 1.729 (Standard error factor = 1.) Distance for max bearing residual : 73.919 m Distance for min bearing residual : 6.823 m 21
CASE 2 Error Ellipse for Adjustment: Geocentric Cassini Ellipse Scale: 15 Database COMBINED ADJUSTMENT RESULTS OF MELAKA CADASTRAL NETWORK Total of Adjusted Boundary Marks: 62411 Coordinated Cadastral System: System Methodology For The Development of National Digital Cadastral Database Database 22
Statistics of the Melaka CCS Adjustment Blk No. Blk 1-6 Blk 7-8 Blk 11-12 Blk 15-16 Blk 17 Blk 18 Blk 2-27 Blk 3 Blk 32-33 Blk 34-37 Blk 4-42 Blk 43 Blk 45 Blk 47 No. of Stn. 7643 3384 3741 5595 2728 3229 368 1546 1997 8139 4954 451 3698 334 No. of Obs. 2832 8318 117 16263 874 8228 987 444 5132 24251 1445 12699 9583 8388 No. of Unknowns 15258 6756 747 11178 5448 6452 7198 384 3978 16256 9896 91 7392 662 No. of Redundant Obs. 5574 1562 3537 585 2626 1776 2672 96 1154 7995 456 3689 2191 2326 No. of GPS Stn. 13 6 6 6 4 3 9 4 7 11 6 5 4 4 Error Factor 1.8 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 Note : Standard error factor is 1. Comparison Between Two Difference Cassini System BEARING RESIDUALS Blk 1-6 Blk 7-8 Blk 11-12 Blk 15-16 Blk 17 Blk 18 Blk 2-27 Blk 3 Blk 32-33 Blk 34-37 Blk 4-42 Blk 43 Blk 45 Blk 47 MAX 2 1 1 46 2 1 59 1 57 2 2 2 1 57 1 46 2 3 1 54 2 1 2 1 54 GEODETIC MIN -2 1-1 34-1 53-1 58-1 59-1 56-2 3-2 -1 57-1 59-2 -2 1-1 55-1 58 MEAN -1-1 -1-1 -1 1 RMS 22 14 17 16 2 2 21 2 2 22 21 25 28 24 MAX 2 1 42 1 56 2 1 1 57 1 54 1 59 1 57 1 44 2 1 1 56 1 59 1 59 1 52 GEOCENTRIC MIN -2 1-1 34-1 54 2-1 56-1 56-2 -2-1 57-2 1-1 59-2 1-1 55-1 57 MEAN 1 1 RMS 21 14 21 17 19 19 21 2 19 21 21 25 21 24 23
Comparison Between Two Difference Cassini System DISTANCE RESIDUALS Blk 1-6 Blk 7-8 Blk 11-12 Blk 15-16 Blk 17 Blk 18 Blk 2-27 Blk 3 Blk 32-33 Blk 34-37 Blk 4-42 Blk 43 Blk 45 Blk 47 MAX.4.33.4.4.38.36.39.4.4.37.39.4.39.38 GEODETIC MIN -.48 -.33 -.4 -.39 -.4 -.33 -.4 -.33 -.41 -.36 -.4 -.39 -.4 -.37 MEAN RMS.8.5.8.7.9.7.7.7.7.7.13.8.8.7 MAX.4.33.36.35.39.46. 4.4.4.4.39.4.39.38 GEOCENTRIC MIN.4 -.33 -.36.37 -.4.38 -.4 -.33 -.4 -.4 -.4 -.39 -.39 -.37 MEAN RMS.8.5.7.6.8.7.7.7.7.8.7.8.8.8 Comparison Between Two Difference Cassini System STATION COORDINATE STANDARD DEVIATIONS NORTH/SOUTH COMPONENT Blk 1-6 Blk 7-8 Blk 11-12 Blk 15-16 Blk 17 Blk 18 Blk 2-27 Blk 3 Blk 32-33 Blk 34-37 Blk 4-42 Blk 43 Blk 45 Blk 47 MAX.15.151.13.139.92.14.151.12.15.141.92.9.81.93 GEODETIC MIN MEAN.7.76.44.65.44.56.59.64.48.46.41.43.53.44 RMS.75.84.48.69.45.59.62.67.54.48.42.44.54.47 MAX.14.14.11.141.86.14.139.12.141.137.92.9.79.92 GEOCENTRIC MIN MEAN.75.75.42.65.39.56.55.64.48.46.41.42.53.44 RMS.83.83.46.69.4.59.57.67.53.49.42.44.54.47 24
Comparison Between Two Difference Cassini System STATION COORDINATE STANDARD DEVIATIONS EAST/WEST COMPONENT Blk 1-6 Blk 7-8 Blk 11-12 Blk 15-16 Blk 17 Blk 18 Blk 2-27 Blk 3 Blk 32-33 Blk 34-37 Blk 4-42 Blk 43 Blk 45 Blk47 MAX.139.148.14.148.84.95.123.131.124.133.84.113.18.11 GEODETIC MIN MEAN.7.76.47.72.42.5.61.56.46.47.39.49.63.46 RMS.63.86.5.76.43.54.63.59.5.49.41.53.65.5 MAX.138.147.11.152.79.95.147.131.112.132.84.112.16.11 GEOCENTRIC MIN MEAN.63.75.45.72.39.5.55.56.46.47.39.5.63.45 RMS.67.85.49.76.4.54.57.59.5.49.41.55.65.5 Statistical Summary For W.P.K.L Adjustments Results (Control Stations at 5 m spacing) 25
Error Ellipse for Block 1 K.L in Local Cassini System Error Ellipse for Block 1 K.L in Geocentric Cassini System Comparison of Adjustment Statistics Between 2.5 km and.5 km Control Spacing (Geocentric Case) 2.5 km GPS Control.5 km GPS Control MAX MIN MEAN RMS MAX MIN MEAN RMS Bearing 2 1-2 1 2 4 39 6 Distance (mm) 4-4 7 4-4 1 1 Std. Dev. N/S (mm) 147 53 56 21 1 1 11 Std. Dev. E/W (mm) 152 56 57 23 1 1 11 26
SUMMARY Data screening and cleaning is essential since outliers exist in the data input. Manual editing is needed in order to run the adjustment ~ time consuming, tedious and challenging task. Data selection and Adjustment process greatly depend on the cleanliness of the data input. For the implementation of CCS, the adjustment progresses coherently with Outliers encountered during adjustment process The availability of number of software license The adjustment results depend on several factors: I) Control station ii) Accuracy of the cadastral survey iii) Block size iv) Number of boundary mark v) Density of the cadastral lot Adjustment results show that the residuals and standard deviations for bearing, distance and coordinate are in tolerance. GPS station at.5km and 2.5km spacing are sufficient to be used in providing control for urban and rural cadastral networks, respectively. RECOMMENDATIONS To develop a comprehensive data integrity and management module in the existing Cadastral Management System comprising: Revision of DCDB development process especially during data entry. The creation of new layer in the DCDB for Cadastral Control and Connection Line To establish Cadastral Control Infrastructure with the following consideration: GPS control in a grid format for better network geometry during adjustment process. GPS station at.5km and 2.5 km spacing are sufficient to be used in providing control for urban and rural cadastral networks, repestively. To facilitate the current GPS technologies such as Real-Time Kinematic GPS and Virtual GPS reference System in the Cadastral Control Infrastructure development process To further refine the present Automated Database Conversion System To restructure boundary mark file in order to populate the DCDB with new adjusted survey accurate coordinates 27
IMPACT OF GDM2 ON CCS IMPLEMENTATION (Technical Views) Basic CCS Implementation Model for Peninsular Malaysia ( Modified Version) 28
Establishing the State Cadastral Control Infrastructure (CCI) & State Cadastral Control Database (Modified From Original Conceptual Model) GDM 2 Designing CCI Network Monumentatio n GPS Surveys Processing Geocentric Cassini / RSO Coordinates of Control Points & site identifications STATE Cadastral Control Database (CCDB) Development of A National Digital Cadastral Database (Modified From Original Conceptual Model) CCDB : Cadastral Control Database SDCDB : State Digital Cadastral Database NDCDB : National Digital Cadastral Database 29