ATTACHMENT 1 ZAB Page 1 of 33

Similar documents
The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

MEMORANDUM. C3A District Shoreland Overlay District 32,055 square feet / 0.74 acres. West Calhoun, adjacent to Cedar-Isles-Dean

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

published by title and summary as permitted by Section 508 of the Charter. The approved "Summary

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

M E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

U P L A N D S W A L K S U P P O R T I V E H O U S I N G

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Proposed Five-Story, 50-Unit Multiple-Family Building at 4856 El Camino Real

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

New Zoning Ordinance Program

Accessory Coach House

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013

th Avenue NW Early Design Guidance Meeting - SDCI # EDG Meeting

Submission 1 - April 21, 2015

Conditional Use Application for the proposed 222 South Bedford Apartment Building Demolition Permit and Rezoning of DR2 portion of site

Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing. Queens Court SPRC #1 October 17, 2016

EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED AREA VARIANCES REDEVELOPMENT OF 201 ELLICOTT STREET

ORDINANCE NO

serving retail on the ground floor street frontage with offices and housing above and behind. Purpose and Intent: To create a vibrant pedestrian

Multi-unit residential uses code

HILLS BEVERLY. Planning Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

8 Delanson Circle Wellesley, MA PROJECT NARRATIVE

Advisory Design Panel Report For the Meeting of February 27, 2019

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 10 CONDOMINIUMS AND A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN

Design and Access Statement Volume III Part 6 of 9 Plot A1. May 2018 Allies and Morrison

6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Preliminary Report

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

70 Parker Hill Avenue Development. 70 Parker Hill Avenue Mission Hill. Application for Small Project Review Submitted to the

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village)

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

MINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED:

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

City Avenue District Rezoning. Regional Center Area & Bala Cynwyd Retail District December 14, 2011 Public Hearing

5.1 Site Planning & Building Form

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

AMENDED ZONING BY-LAW ARTICLE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

SELLWOOD MORELAND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE 8210 SE 13th AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR STATION CHURCH

2012 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, California Government Code Section Project Submittal 1.C Applicant Statement October 26, 2018

Plan Dutch Village Road

EAGLE AVENUE FAMILY HOUSING 2437 Eagle Avenue, Alameda. Corner of Eagle Avenue and Everett Street

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

CHAPTER MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

The Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017

Community Affairs and Planning Committee Paul Allore, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning and Development Services

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

GENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE- DWELLING DEVELOPMENT

Urban Design Brief 6233, 6237, 6241 and 6245 Main Street, Stouffville Pace Savings and Credit Union June 15, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

25 St. Dennis Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

8150 SUNSET BOULEVARD 8150 SUNSET BLVD., LOS ANGELES, CA ALTERNATIVE 9 DRAWING SET MAY 13, 2016

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Urban Design Brief. 112 St. James Street. St. James Development Corp. December 5 th, 2018 Updated December 11 th, Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Using Analysis to Improve the Environment for Transit

HISTORIC PERKIOMEN BRIDGE HOTEL

From Policy to Reality

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS

for lots created after Nov. 10, 2004

1 Application Form 4

3.1 Existing Built Form

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

100 Ranleigh Ave - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

APPENDIX E PAGE 1 of 25 NOTE: ITALICS INDICATE ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS RM-9, RM-9A, RM-9N AND RM-9AN GUIDELINES DRAFT

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

Transcription:

Page of 33 Applicant Statement 60 Oxford Street Berkeley, CA 94709 Overview Site Location Site Zoning Current Use Proposed Use Site Area Total Proposed Units Total Parking Spaces 60-607 Oxford Street, 00-0 Cedar Street APN 058-83-00 and Lot 4 portion of APN 058-83-00-0 R3 Multiple-family residential Multiple-family residential; Religious Multiple-family residential (9% affordable); Religious.3 acres 37 (5.6 DU/acre) (.57 spaces/unit) Site Owner Developer Site Owner & Developer Relationship Architect All Souls Episcopal Parish (ASEP) Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA) ASEP & SAHA have entered into a Joint Development Agreement (executed May 07) pursuant to which SAHA intends to develop the site into affordable rental housing, and ASEP, current site owner, commits to donating the land via a long term lease. HKIT Architects Introduction Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA) specializes in building and managing affordable rental housing for a diverse group of individuals families, seniors, and individuals with special needs. Founded in 966, SAHA currently manages over,500 units across 60+ properties located in 9 cities throughout the Bay Area. As a Berkeley-based nonprofit affordable housing developer with decades of local experience, SAHA respects the unique qualities and characteristics of the Berkeley community, and has a proven track record of providing and maintaining high quality affordable housing stock. 60 Oxford Street presents a unique opportunity to build affordable senior housing in a desirable North Berkeley neighborhood by leveraging a valuable land donation from All Souls Episcopal Parish (ASEP), the adjacent church with whom SAHA is partnering. ASEP recognizes the opportunity to transform underutilized land in a highly desirable location to address the housing affordability crisis they see in their community. This partnership provides opportunities to both expand the supply of affordable housing within the City of Berkeley and serve as an example for other institutional landowners considering the development of affordable housing. Community Engagement and Design Process SAHA has worked closely with All Souls Episcopal Parish and a variety of neighborhood stakeholders to create a 60 Oxford Street

Page of 33 site plan and design that meet the needs of the proposed development s immediate neighbors, future residents and other local stakeholders. SAHA has engaged the community with mailing updates and convening two community-wide meetings jointly hosted with ASEP. In July 07, SAHA and ASEP held an initial community open house for the project, inviting nearby renters, owners, and other stakeholders to review an early design and site plan. Over the next few months, SAHA and ASEP consulted with interested neighbors to hear more feedback and answer questions about the development while working with HKIT Architects to refine design. Finally, in November 07, SAHA held a second community open house to present the revised development proposal to the broader community. Neighbor and local stakeholder feedback garnered through these open houses and small working group meetings has been critical to shaping this project. SAHA and ASEP were excited to hear from many who attended both Community Meetings reported that the revised design, presented in November 07, was much preferred over the previous version, especially with regard to the Oxford Street elevation. In addition to meeting with local community members, SAHA has shared proposed design and site plan iterations with the City of Berkeley Council and staff on multiple occasions, both meeting in person as well as discussing options electronically. While this project is not subject to formal design review, SAHA solicited additional feedback from the Design Review planning staff. While their suggestion of increasing setbacks or stepping down larger portions of the upper levels would compromise project feasibility, we have further developed the color and material treatment of the façade in an effort to reduce the scale and mass of the project, as described in more detail below. Color, material, and landscaping treatments are in progress and the design team will continue to refine these in an effort to address the design objective of reducing the building scale and mass. Proposed Development Summary 60 Oxford Street will provide 37 housing units. Thirty-four (34) of the units will be studios restricted to residents with incomes at or below 60% of area median income, and one () unit will be a non-income restricted manager s unit. Two three-bedroom units will be residential units for ASEP staff. In addition to living space, amenities at the property will include a community room, courtyard, upper floor outdoor terraces, indoor bicycle storage, community vegetable garden, and shared laundry equipment. ASEP will also utilize approximately 433 square feet on the second story for church administration. The property will be managed by a team of SAHA staff members who will provide management, maintenance and resident service coordination. Building & Lot Area Lot Area (.3 acres) 4,68 sq. ft. Total Building Area 6,35 sq. ft. Lot Coverage 45% 60 Oxford Street

Page 3 of 33 Unit Breakdown Unit Type Unit Count Percent Square Footage # Studios 34 9.9% 353 sq. ft. (average) # Two Bedroom Units.7% 695 sq. ft. # Three Bedroom Units 5.4% 47 sq. ft Total Units 37 Proposed Development Design Features Single five-story structure o Careful attention was paid to how the height might impact neighbors on all sides of the property o Lowest basement story is partially excavated into the slope of the hill to minimize building height o Setbacks were maximized along the Oxford Street frontage, where the total building height is the greatest due to the site s slope, to soften the structure s interfacing with the Oxford & Cedar intersection and the abutting neighbor property to the south of the development site. The corner terrace sets the upper story back, and four upper floors are setback along the southern edge of the Oxford frontage. There is an additional terrace on the southern edge of the Oxford wing in an attempt to soften the building s massing from the southern neighbors rear yards. o The upper story façade treatment uses a lighter color, a corner terrace, and a discontinuation of the bay windows to soften that story. Compatible architectural style o Style incorporates traditional 45-degree bay windows that both reference Bay Area architectural elements and maximize sunlight and Bay views on the Oxford façade o While specific colors have not yet been identified, the proposed color treatment aims to create a heavier building base, a medium body, and an even lighter capital to provide a sense of balance, reduce vertical emphasis, and soften the building s massing o Horizontal elements (such as the repetition of the Bay windows on Oxford, repetition of recessed windows on Cedar, and the belt courses that wraps around the corner) further de-emphasize the building height o Paneling of the bay windows serves to provide a texture that breaks up and softens the Oxford façade Corner Entrance o The corner entrance activates the intersection with pedestrian activity o Oxford façade treatment wraps around the corner structure to reduce emphasis at that location (and contributing to an overall lower building profile) per input from community meetings Visual separation of building to break up building mass o The building is visually separated into two sections: Smaller Cedar Street wing contains the building s community room and ASEP uses, and features recessed windows that reference the concrete blocks of the adjacent church structure to the east Larger affordable housing wing along Oxford Street features 45-degree bay windows to emphasize the horizontal nature of the building and maximize Bay views and natural light 60 Oxford Street 3

Page 4 of 33 for residents; the façade treatment wraps around the corner to reduce the emphasis of the structure at the Oxford and Cedar corner, an element that was important to many neighbors Driveway and Parking Design o The site is designed with a single garage entrance and exit on Oxford Street o Driveway and garage includes two lanes to reduce potential for traffic build-up o Excavation of garage into the hill minimizes parking visibility and maximizes ability to create offstreet parking, a common neighbor concern Courtyard Design Tailored to Varied Resident Activities o Courtyard includes a variety of features including open space and outdoor seating for both passive and active resident activities where residents may engage and connect with community o A paved labyrinth meditation design breaks up the courtyard floor such that it can be passively observed or actively used to foster engagement with and between residents o Raised garden beds at the courtyard s southern edge maximize sun expose and will foster community through gardening and increase resident access to fresh produce o Courtyard is tucked inside of the L-shaped building to provide community members protection for the busy intersection at Oxford and Cedar Street trees and Landscaping o Street trees will line the Cedar side of the proposed development to soften the height of the structure, in addition to planters and street trees on the building side of the public right-of-way o Landscaping on the upper floor terrace softens the building s corner elements o Streamlined building footprint to maximize openness of interior courtyard, per feedback from neighbors o Extensive design development occurred to allow the southern setback to be exclusively a landscaping strip, rather than an exit ramp, per the adjacent neighbor s request to maximize greenery Requested Development Incentives California Code Chapter 4.3 Density Bonuses and Other Incentives [Section 6595 6598] Open Space o The project proposes 5,93 square feet of open space instead of the required 7,400 square feet, and includes the space on grade, courtyard on podium, and 4 th floor terraces o Given that 9% of the units are studios for seniors and will be restricted to a maximum of two occupants, we are confident the proposed open space will be sufficient o The project includes an additional,6 square feet of interior community space, including a first floor community room and the fourth floor lounge Setback o The proposed design includes a setback exception of 6 - along the Cedar side of the property (where 0 is required) and 0 along rear yard (where 5 is required) 60 Oxford Street 4

Page 5 of 33 o o Height o o o o The rear setback exception occurs only underground and is driven by the need to accommodate sufficient underground parking space. At grade (the courtyard level) the rear setback meets the required 5. The proposed Cedar setback is between one and seven feet greater than the setback of existing conditions The average proposed building height of 5 stories (including one basement story partially excavated into Cedar Street s slope) ranges between 45 4 to 5 instead of the required 35 Height is comparable to other multi-family buildings on Oxford (including the apartment building directly north, which has a similar elevation) Building height is highest along Oxford Street, where the grade elevation is lowest and the height is mitigated by dropping the corner and providing a terrace. The increased height provides additional affordable housing units, allowing the building to be financially feasible (see application Section 4.D, Request for Incentives or Concessions) General Plan Alignment The proposed project aligns with the following General Plan policies: Policy H-: Extremely Low, Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Housing o Allow increases in density to promote production of below market rate housing in consistency with the State Housing Density Bonus law o City seeks to use programs such as the Housing Trust Fund to provide housing to people with low and extremely low incomes Policy H-: Transit Oriented New Construction o City seeks to encourage the construction of medium and high-density housing along transit corridors and in proximity to BART stations Policy H-7: Housing for Seniors o City seeks to support housing programs that increase seniors ability to stay in their neighborhoods and to provide funding for a range of senior housing and service types Policy H-6: Affordable Accessible Housing o City seeks to expand the supply of accessible, permanently affordable housing units, particularly to those with extremely low-income Policy H-8 Regional Housing Needs o City seeks to encourage housing production to meet local and regional housing needs Policy H-3 Public Participation o City seeks to encourage support of affordable housing and attain common goals by increasing awareness of the need of affordable housing Policy H-34 Mitigate Governmental Constraints o City seeks to regularly evaluate regulations and ordinances to identify and reduce unnecessary impediments to housing development, and particularly affordable housing projects 60 Oxford Street 5

Page 6 of 33 Housing Element Alignment Increasing Housing Opportunities for Seniors o As seniors age, incomes generally decrease and housing burdens increase, emphasizing the need for affordable housing for this age group o Berkeley s Baby boomer age group increased significantly between 000-00, making agerestricted housing stock a key component to housing the city s growing senior population o 34.6% of all senior-headed households in Berkeley earned less than 50% of area median income in 0 Energy efficiency o Berkeley aims to promote energy/water efficient and sustainable building methods and to locate projects near transit hubs and along major transportation corridors. Sustainability features included at this time include a solar-ready roof, passive onsite storm water management, drought tolerant native planting and water-conserving irrigations systems, high efficiency mechanical equipment, low-flow faucets and toilets, and Energy Star appliances in all units and common areas. Location near transit four Alameda County transit lines with headways of 30 minutes or less during peak travel times are within /3 mile of the site. Downtown Berkeley BART is less than mile away. The development will have ample long-term bicycle parking to promote active transport Building materials will be low VOC and formaldehyde-free where possible, and recycled and locally-sourced materials will be used. 60 Oxford Street 6

Page 7 of 33 Density Bonus Eligibility Statement 60 Oxford Street Berkeley, CA 94709 Requested Development Incentives California Code Chapter 4.3: Density Bonuses and Other Incentives [Section 6595] Eligibility Statement While the project does not seek to achieve a density higher than allowable per Berkeley code, the project does request three incentives/concessions to be financially viable. 60 Oxford Street will include 34 affordable units (9% of total units.) The project is thereby eligible for three incentives or concessions according to Section 6595. The schematic plans submitted with this application include a III.B.a BASE PROJECT PLAN that demonstrates only 6 total units could be constructed in the absence of these concessions. 60 Oxford Street is an affordable housing project that does not produce a rate of return for the applicant as with market rate developments, but the enclosed pro formas demonstrate the financial infeasibility of the scenarios in which these concessions are not possible. Unit Size Unit Count Percent Affordability Level Studio 56.75% Very Low-income ( 50% AMI) Studios 3 35.4% Low-income ( 60% AMI) -3 3 8.% unrestricted Total Units 37 Open Space o The project proposes 5,957 square feet of open space instead of the required 7,400 square feet, and includes the space on grade, courtyard on podium, and 4 th floor terraces o Given that 9% of the units are studios for seniors and will be restricted to a maximum of two occupants, we are confident the proposed open space will be sufficient o The project includes an additional,6 of interior community space, including a first floor community room and the fourth floor lounge Setback o The proposed design includes a setback exception of 6 - along the Cedar side of the property (where 0 is required) and 0 along rear yard (where 5 is required) o The rear setback exception occurs only underground and is driven by the need to accommodate sufficient underground parking space. At grade (the courtyard level) the rear setback meets the required 5. o The proposed Cedar setback is between one and seven feet greater than the setback of existing conditions Height 60 Oxford Street

Page 8 of 33 o o o o The average proposed building height of 5 stories (including one basement story partially excavated into Cedar Street s slope) ranges between 45 4 to 5 instead of the required 35 Height is comparable to other multi-family buildings on Oxford (including the apartment building directly north, which has a similar elevation) Building height is highest along Oxford Street, where the grade elevation is lowest and the height is mitigated by dropping the corner and providing a terrace. The increased height provides additional affordable housing units, allowing the building to be financially feasible (see application Section 4.D, Request for Incentives or Concessions) 60 Oxford Street

Page 9 of 33

Page 0 of 33

Page of 33

Page of 33

ATTACHMENT Page 3 of 33 4,68

Page 4 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\805_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt /5/08 :8: AM 89' - /8" OXFORD STREET A3.3 D G G Y H RAMP DN DN 67 66.39 65.44 65 64.58 DN 5' - 0" 0' - 0" APARTMENT ENTRY 64 65.5 DN CEDAR STREET LOBBY 00 650 SF MANAGER OFFICE 00 83 SF MAINTENANCE 050 83 SF 65 68.57 UP TRASH 0 53 SF 64 9' - 6" MAIL VAN 64 COMPUTER 030 SF BIKE STORAGE (4 BIKES) 040 94 SF ELEVATOR 9' - 6" UP 3 ELEC. ROM. 080 5 SF 64 64 A3.3 5 9' - 0" ADJACENT RESIDENCE 8' - 6" 8' - 0" 8' - 6" 4 5 PARKING 070 6675 SF 4' - 0" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" 6 7 8 9 0 8' - 6" 8' - 0" 8' - 6" 7 6 MACHINE RM. 060 70 SF 4' - 0" 8' - 6" 8' - 0" 8' - 6" 8 9 0 3 4 60 OXFORD ST. EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) 8' - 6" 8' - 0" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" 8' - 6" ELEC. RM. 090 49 SF 0' - 0" 90' - /8" (E) ADJACENT STRUCTURE TRUE NORTH 0 3 6 9 8 FEET BASEMENT SHEET NOTE PROPERTY LINES NEW LANDSCAPING 3 NEW STREET TREES IN EXISTING PLANTER STRIP 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE A.0 039 SN PM PM DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET /8" = '-0" COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

/5/08 :57:08 AM ATTACHMENT Page 5 of 33 60 OXFORD ST. 5' - 0" 03' - 5" A3.3 6' - 7" 4 EET R T S R A D E C 4 EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) S S G 3 G STORAGE 5 88 SF UNISEX 3 64 SF ' - 0" E-CORRIDOR 30 35 SF 5' - 0" 9' - 0" OXFORD STREET TV COMMUNITY ROOM 50 738 SF CONFERENCE ROOM 5 33 SF DN ELEVATOR UP COVERED ARCADE 45' - 9" W-CORRIDOR 00 463 SF 05 334 SF 04 390 SF DN H 07 333 SF 3 A3.3 06 348 SF 6 BERKELEY, CA 94709 55' - 5/8" GARAGE ENTRY BELOW ST FLOOR SHEET NOTE 08 348 SF 09 369 SF 4 W W/ W D D D/D LAUNDRY 0 07 SF JC 3 SF UP W JOB NO. 039 DRAWN SN CHECKED PM JOB CAPTAIN PM ISSUE 7 TRASH 94 SF G BAY WINDOW PROJECTING OVER LINE PROPERTY LINE 3 FLOW-THROUGH PLANTERS 4 PARKING (BELOW GRADE) 5 (E) STAIR & RAMP TO REMAIN 6 RAISED PLANTER 7 RESIDENT GARDENING RAISED PLANTERS 8 SECOND EXIT FOR COURTYARD 9 NEW LANDSCAPING DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET G D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\805_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt 60 OXFORD STREET 3 Y D 89' - /8" 03 333 SF UNISEX 33 64 SF EXISTING STAIRS SERVICE OFFICE 3 0 SF ALL SOULS ENTRANCE 7' - " 0 3 SF 5 7' - 8 /" APARTMENT ENTRY BELOW ' - 7 /8" 3 RA MP 4 50' - 3" 9 8 0 9 56' - 3" 3 ST FLOOR PLAN ADJACENT RESIDENCE (-STORY) TRUE NORTH FEET * CHURCH FLOOR PLAN IS NOT TO SCALE. SEE SURVEY DRAWINGS FOR THE EXISITNG SITE CONDITION. DRAWING TITLE 0 3 6 9 8 0 MAINTENACE GATE 4' FENCE AT THE EDGE OF PODIUM LABYRINTH - PRINTED PATTERN ON UNIT PAVERS 3 4' GATE 4 NEW STREET TREES IN EXISTING PLANTER STRIP SCALE /8" = '-0" A. COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

ATTACHMENT Page 6 of 33 : st FL. OPEN SPACE 3RD FL.: 8 SF OPEN SPACE 4TH FL.: 556 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 593 SF

/3/08 5:06:5 PM ATTACHMENT Page 7 of 33 60 OXFORD ST. 5' - 0" 03' - 5" 6' - 7" 0' - 0" A3.3 E-CORRIDOR 30 SF 03 333 SF OFFICE AISLE 50 398 SF DN ELEVATOR OFFICE 4A 5 0 SF UP COPY 5' - 0" 9' - 0" ' - 0" 4' - 0" OFFICE 5A 56 67 SF W-CORRIDOR 00 509 SF CHURCH ADMINISTRATION A3.3 07 333 SF 60 OXFORD STREET LINE 89' - /8" 05 333 SF 04 399 SF OFFICE 3A 55 8 SF 34' - 0 /" OFFICE A 54 66 SF 3' - 7/8" 0 373 SF 0 345 SF OFFICE A 5 60 SF UNISEX 53 59 SF 7' - 6" ' - 0" EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) 06 359 SF 55' - 5/8" BERKELEY, CA 94709 COURTYARD BELOW 08 359 SF 09 369 SF DRAWN SN CHECKED PM JOB CAPTAIN PM DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 0 359 SF UP 039 ISSUE TRASH 94 SF D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\80_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt JOB NO. ND FLOOR SHEET NOTE 5' - 0" 56' - 3" 47' - " 6' - 7" 0' - 0" DRAWING TITLE BAY WINDOW PROJECTING OVER LINE PROPERTY LINES ND FLOOR PLAN TRUE NORTH FEET 0 3 6 9 8 SCALE /8" = '-0" A. COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

Page 8 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\80_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt /3/08 5:09:0 PM 89' - /8" A3.3 5' - 0" 9' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" ' - 0" 9' - 0" 5' - 0" 30 345 SF 303 333 SF 305 333 SF 307 333 SF 309 369 SF ' - 0" TRASH 3 94 SF UP DN ' - 0" W-CORRIDOR 300 509 SF 56' - 3" A3.3 ELEVATOR 30 373 SF 3BR E-CORRIDOR 350 330 47 SF SF DN UP TERRACE 35 8 SF 304 47' - " 399 SF 306 359 SF 308 359 SF 30 359 SF 03' - 5" 6' - 7" 4' - 0" ' - 0" 5' - 0" 9' - 0" 55' - 5/8" 60 OXFORD ST. EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) LINE 34' - 0 /" 6' - 7" 3RD FLOOR SHEET NOTE BAY WINDOW PROJECTING OVER LINE PROPERTY LINES TRUE NORTH 0 3 6 9 8 FEET 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE 3RD FLOOR PLAN SCALE A.3 039 SN PM PM DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET /8" = '-0" COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

Page 9 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\80507_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt 5/7/08 :0:3 PM 89' - /8" A3.3 5' - 0" BAY WINDOW BELOW TERRACE 40 97 SF 403 33 SF 405 36 SF BR MANAGER 407 695 SF TRASH 4 94 SF DN LOUNGE 4 9 SF W-CORRIDOR 400 5' - 0" 56' - 3" A3.3 ELEVATOR E-CORRIDOR 430 SF DN UP 40 374 SF 404 400 SF 406 347 SF 408 346 SF TERRACE 40 77 SF 03' - 5" 6' - 7" LINE BAY WINDOW BELOW 55' - 5/8" 47' - " 3BR 450 47 SF TERRACE 45 8 SF 60 OXFORD ST. EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) LINE 6' - 7" 34' - 0 /" TRUE NORTH 0 3 6 9 8 FEET 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE 4TH FLOOR PLAN SCALE A.4 039 SN PM PM DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET /8" = '-0" COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

5 : SLOPE ATTACHMENT Page 0 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\8046_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt 4/6/08 4:0:8 PM G D H G Y RAMP DN DN DN A3.3 DN D.S. TERRACE BELOW 5 : SLOPE D.S. 3/8" : ' - 0" G 5 : SLOPE ELEVATOR OVERRUN 5 : SLOPE D.S. 9' - " A3.3 3/8" : ' - 0" 5 : SLOPE STAIR TO ROOF 3.00 35.00 ADJACENT RESIDENCE 3/8" : ' - 0" 96.5 SF 6.50 SF 0' - 6" 7' - 0" 3/8" : ' - 0" 5 : SLOPE TERRACE BELOW 5 : SLOPE 3/8" : ' - 0" 5 : SLOPE 9' - 6" D.S. 3/8" : ' - 0" D.S. 3/8" : ' - 0" 5 : SLOPE D.S. AREA OF ROOF PROJECTION AVERAGE BUILDING FLOOR AREA 3/8" : ' - 0" 56 s.f. 6,93 s.f. PERCENTAGE OF ROOF PROJECTION 3.96 % TO ROOF AREA 60 OXFORD ST. EXISTING CHURCH TO REMAIN (NO WORK) 5 : SLOPE S S G D.S. (E) CHURCH TRUE NORTH PLANTER FEET 0 3 6 9 8 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE ROOF PLAN SCALE A.5 039 SN PM PM DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION /8" = '-0" COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

ATTACHMENT Page of 33

ATTACHMENT Page of 33

Page 3 of 33 D:\REVIT MODEL\039_A_local_HC.rvt /0/08 4:47:00 PM BUILDING SECTION /8" = '-0" BUILDING SECTION /8" = '-0" W-CORRIDOR 400 505 SF 30 359 SF 0 359 SF JC LAUNDRY 0 3 SF 07 SF BR MANAGER W-CORRIDOR 407 400 695 SF 505 SF W-CORRIDOR 307 300 333 SF 509 SF W-CORRIDOR 07 00 333 SF 509 SF W-CORRIDOR 07 00 333 SF 463 SF A3.3 408 346 SF 308 359 SF 08 359 SF 08 348 SF A3.3 406 347 SF 306 359 SF 06 359 SF 06 348 SF PARKING 070 6675 SF 406 347 SF 306 359 SF 06 359 SF 06 348 SF PARKING 070 6675 SF 404 400 SF 304 399 SF 04 399 SF 04 390 SF E-CORRIDOR 430 SF E-CORRIDOR 330 SF E-CORRIDOR 30 SF E-CORRIDOR 30 35 SF LOBBY 00 650 SF 40 374 SF 30 373 SF 0 373 SF SERVICE OFFICE 3 0 SF BIKE STORAGE (4 BIKES) 040 94 SF 9' - 0" 0' - 0" 0' - 0" 0' - 0" ' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 3' - 0" TOP OF PLATE 35' - 0" FLOOR 4 30 FLOOR 3 9 FLOOR 8 FLOOR 7 BASEMENT 64' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 3' - 0" TOP OF PLATE 35' - 0" FLOOR 4 30 FLOOR 3 9 FLOOR 8 FLOOR 7 BASEMENT 64' - 0" 0 3 6 9 8 FEET 0 3 6 9 8 FEET 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DATE DRAWING TITLE BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE A3.3 039 Author Checker Approver /8" = '-0" DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

4/6/08 4::46 PM ATTACHMENT Page 4 of 33. VIEW AT CORNER CEDAR & OXFORD STREET (BEFORE) 60 OXFORD STREET. VIEW AT CORNER CEDAR & OXFORD STREET (AFTER) BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. 039 DRAWN Author CHECKED Checker JOB CAPTAIN Approver ISSUE D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\8046_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION DRAWING TITLE PHOTO SIMULATIONS KEY PLAN SCALE 3. VIEW ALONG OXFORD STREET A3.4 COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

4/6/08 3:46:05 PM ATTACHMENT Page 5 of 33 60 OXFORD STREET. VIEW AT CORNER OXFORD AND CEDAR STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. 039 DRAWN Author CHECKED Checker JOB CAPTAIN Approver ISSUE D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\8046_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION DRAWING TITLE RENDERING KEY PLAN SCALE. VIEW ALONG CEDAR STREET A3.5 COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

4/6/08 3:57:04 PM ATTACHMENT Page 6 of 33 STRIP ELEVATION ALONG OXFORD STREET 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. 039 DRAWN Author CHECKED Checker JOB CAPTAIN Approver ISSUE D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\8046_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION DRAWING TITLE STRIP ELEVATION ALONG CEDAR STREET STREET STRIP ELEVATIONS SCALE A3.6 COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

Page 7 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\80507_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt 5/7/08 :7:4 AM JUNE 7:8 AM JUNE :00 PM JUNE 5: PM PROPOSED BUILDING JUNE 7:8 AM JUNE :00 PM JUNE 5: PM EXISTING BUILDING 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE SHADOW STUDY SCALE A4.0 039 Author Checker Approver DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

Page 8 of 33 D:\Revit Projects\039_All Souls Episcopal Church\80507_All Souls_VB_Local.rvt 5/7/08 :8:4 AM DECEMBER 9: AM DECEMBER :00 PM DECEMBER :54 PM PROPOSED BUILDING DECEMBER 9: AM DECEMBER :00 PM DECEMBER :54 PM EXISTING BUILDING 60 OXFORD STREET BERKELEY, CA 94709 JOB NO. DRAWN CHECKED JOB CAPTAIN ISSUE DRAWING TITLE SHADOW STUDY SCALE A4. 039 Author Checker Approver DATE DESCRIPTION 0/09/08 ENTITLEMENT SET 4/30/08 ENTITLEMENT REVISION COPYRIGHT 06 HKIT ARCHITECTS

Page 9 of 33

Page 30 of 33

Page 3 of 33

Page 3 of 33

Page 33 of 33