Agenda Committee of Adjustment AUGUST 9, 2011 9:00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4 TH FLOOR CITY HALL MEMBERS: STAFF: Bruce Reed, Chair Parm S. Chahal Jaipaul Massey-Singh Richard Nurse Frank Turner Thor Plaxton, Development Planner Paul Aldunate, Development Planner Ross Campbell, Zoning Officer Kathy Ash, Manager, Land Development Services Elizabeth Corazzola, Manager, Zoning Services Jeanie Myers, Acting Secretary-Treasurer ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Minutes of meeting held July 19, 2011 DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST: WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS: (1) NEW CONSENT APPLICATIONS B11-037 DANIELS LR CORPORATION PT. LOT 10, CONC. 9 ND E/S OF MCVEAN DR, SOUTH OF CASTLEMORE RD The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever approx. 4,857 sq. m (1.2 acres) from a parcel of land currently having a total area of approx. 71,363 sq. m (17.63 acres). 2011 08 09 Page 1 of 11
The effect of the application is to provide for a lot addition to the adjacent lands to the south, owned by Trinison Management Corporation, to facilitate the completion of future residential lots within a subdivision. (2) B11-038 ROBERT & BONNIE KERR PT. LOTS 62 & 63, PLAN CH-8 90 COLONEL BERTRAM ROAD WARD 2 The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approx. 0.35 ha (0.86 acres). The effect of the application is to sever a parcel of land having a frontage of approx. 40.2m (131.89 ft), a depth of approx. 44m (144.36 ft) and an area of approx. 0.18 ha (0.044 acres) to provide for a lot addition to the adjacent lands to the east, (Draft Plan of Subdivision 21T-99018B) to facilitate two (2) future residential lots. RELATED MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION A11-180 (3) B11-039 SABRO DEVELOPMENTS INC. PT. LOT 14, CONC. 4 WHS W/S OF CREDITVIEW ROAD SOUTH OF WANLESS DRIVE The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approx. 40.1 ha (99.09 acres). The effect of the application is to create a parcel of land having a frontage on Creditview Road of approx. 184.4m (605 ft), a depth of approx. 211.5m (693 ft) and an area of approx. 3.38 ha (8.35 acres) to be used as a future senior elementary school site. (4) B11-040 2183321 ONTARIO LIMITED LOT 37, PLAN 43M-1627 172 BUFFORD DRIVE WARD 4 The purpose of the application is to request consent to an easement over Lot 37, Plan 43M-1627. The effect of the application is to create a private sanitary sewer easement having an area of approx. 48 square metres and legally described as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on 2011 08 09 Page 2 of 11
reference Plan 43R-33976, in favour of the adjacent property to the south, municipally know as 48 McLaughlin Road. (5) B11-041 2183321 ONTARIO LIMITED LOT 38, PLAN 43M-1627 170 BUFFORD DRIVE WARD 4 The purpose of the application is to request consent to an easement over Lot 38, Plan 43M-1627. The effect of the application is to create a private sanitary sewer easement having an area of approx. 47 square metres and legally described as Parts 4 and 5 on Reference Plan 43R-33976, in favour of the adjacent property to the south, municipally know as 48 McLaughlin Road. (6) DEFERRED CONSENT APPLICATIONS B11-034 FRANK AND MARY LORBER LOT 9, PLAN 406 68/70 MARYSFIELD DRIVE The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approx. 11,282.71 sq. m (1.128ha). The effect of the application is to create a new lot having a frontage of 52.28m (171.52 ft), a depth of approx. 97.75m (320.70 ft) and an area of approx. 4,044.19 sq. m (0.40 ha). It is proposed that the new lot be used for future residential purposes (one single family dwelling). RELATED MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS A11-154 & A11-155 (7) NEW MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS A11-175 BRIAN KAUTZ & THERESA LOT 35, PLAN 43M-1722 MAPE-KAUTZ 64 SPOTTED OWL CRESCENT WARD 2 The applicants are requesting the following variance: 2011 08 09 Page 3 of 11
1. To allow a deck encroachment of 3.78m (12.40 ft) resulting in a rear yard setback of 3.72m (12.20 ft) whereas the by-law permits a deck encroachment of 1.8m (5.90 ft) resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.7m (18.70 ft). (8) A11-176 LDASK MBC CORPORATION PT. LOT 10, CONC. 1 WHS 60 GILLINGHAM DRIVE WARD 5 1. To allow a Commercial, Technical or Recreational School whereas the by-law for the property does not permit the proposed use. (9) A11-177 MONTEREY PARK HOLDING CORP BLOCKS C & X, PLAN 977 1-3 GATEWAY BOULEVARD WARD 8 1. To allow a Commercial, Technical or Recreational School whereas the by-law for the property does not permit the proposed use. (10) A11-178 KANEFF PROPERTIES LIMITED LOT 62, PLAN 43M-1839 186 COASTLINE DRIVE The applicant is seeking permission for the following variances: 1. To allow a lot width of 11.5m (37.73 ft) whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 12.1m (39.70 ft); 2. To allow for a maximum cumulative garage door width of 5.0m (16.40 ft) whereas the by-law permits a maximum cumulative garage door width of 4.6m (15 ft); 3. To allow a maximum interior garage width of 5.6m (18.37 ft) whereas the bylaw permits a maximum interior garage width of 5.2m (17 ft). 2011 08 09 Page 4 of 11
(11) A11-179 PREETINDER & GURVINDER BASRA PT. LOT 50, PLAN M-73 PT. 5, PLAN 43R-5163 66 MANITOU CRESCENT WARD 7 The applicants are seeking permission for the following variances: 1. To permit a lot coverage of 42% whereas the by-law allows a maximum lot coverage of 33.3%; 2. To permit a 0.35m (1.15 ft) interior side yard setback to an accessory structure (shed) whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft) side yard setback; 3. To permit a 0.35m (1.15 ft) rear yard setback to an accessory structure (shed) whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft) rear year setback. (12) A11-180 ROBERT & BONNIE KERR PT. LOTS 62 & 63, PLAN CH-8 90 COLONEL BERTRAM ROAD WARD 2 The applicants are requesting the following variances related to the "retained" parcel in conjunction with Consent Application B11-038: 1. To permit a lot having a minimum area of 0.16 ha whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.40 ha; 2. To permit a lot having a minimum width of 40.0m whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 45.0m; 3. To permit a front yard setback of 6.0m whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 12.0m; 4. To permit an interior side yard setback of 2.5m whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5m; 5. To permit a rear yard setback of 7.5m whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 15.0m; 2011 08 09 Page 5 of 11
6. To permit an accessory structure in an interior side yard 4.3m from the side lot line whereas the by-law allows an accessory structure only in the rear yard and no closer than 1.2m to the nearest lot line on a lot in an Agriculture Zone where the lot area is 2 ha or less. RELATED CONSENT APPLICATION B11-038 (13) A11-181 SUKHWINDER KAUR DHALIWAL LOT 6, PLAN M-508 12 NUFFIELD STREET WARD 7 The applicant is seeking permission for the following variances: 1. To allow an 11.67 sq. m (125.62 sq. ft) accessory structure (shed) whereas the by-law allows an accessory structure at a maximum size of 10.0 sq. m (107.64 sq. ft); 2. To allow a driveway having a width of 7.32m (24 ft) whereas the by-law permits a maximum width of 6.71 (22 ft); 3. To allow a 0 metre landscape strip adjacent to a side lot line whereas the bylaw requires a minimum of 0.6m (2 ft) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line. (14) A11-182 JOAO BOTELHO, LUIS BRUM PT. LOT 2, PLAN M-142 & SANDRA BRUM PT. 5, PLAN 43R-4519 8 LOCUSTWOOD COURT WARD 1 The applicants are seeking the following variance: 1. To allow a parking space in a driveway having a depth of 4.42m whereas the by-law requires that an angled parking space shall be a rectangular area measuring not less than 2.70m in width and 5.40m in length. 2011 08 09 Page 6 of 11
(15) A11-183 BRIAN CHAN LOTS 13 & 20, PLAN TOR 6 60 VICTORIA STREET The applicant is seeking the following variances: 1. To allow a lot width (frontage) of 10.08 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 30 metres; 2. To allow a building height of 9.65 metres whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 8.70 metres. (16) A11-184 KRISHNA BANSAL PEEL CONDOMINIUM PLAN 233, LEVEL 1, UNIT 10 8 STRATHEARN AVE, UNIT 10A WARD 8 1. To allow a law office in Unit 10A whereas the by-law only permits a law office in Units 11 and 12 as shown on Schedule C Section 2649. (17) A11-185 DEMOCRAT CASTLEFIELD LIMITED PT. LOT 8, CONC. 10 ND LOT 1L, DRAFT PLAN 21T-07001B (formerly) 9499 THE GORE RD. The applicant is seeking the following variances: 1. To allow a single detached dwelling whereas the by-law permits only a semidetached dwelling; 2. To allow an interior side yard setback of 0.65m (2.13 ft) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft). 2011 08 09 Page 7 of 11
(18) A11-186 DEMOCRAT CASTLEFIELD LIMITED PT. LOT 8, CONC. 10 ND LOT 1R, DRAFT PLAN 21T-07001B (formerly) 9499 THE GORE RD. The applicant is seeking the following variances: 1. To allow a single detached dwelling whereas the by-law permits only a semidetached dwelling; 2. To allow an interior side yard setback of 0.65m (2.13 ft) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft). (19) A11-187 TRASENT HOLDINGS INC. PT. LOT 6, CONC. 3 WHS BLOCK 116, UNITS 1-8 DRAFT PLAN 21T-04009B TEAL CREST CIRCLE 1. To allow a minimum dwelling unit width of 5.33 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum dwelling unit width of 6.0 metres. (20) A11-188 TRASENT HOLDINGS INC. PT. LOT 6, CONC. 3 WHS BLOCK 115, UNITS 2-7 DRAFT PLAN 21T-04009B TEAL CREST CIRCLE 1. To allow a minimum dwelling unit width of 5.33 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum dwelling unit width of 6.0 metres. 2011 08 09 Page 8 of 11
(21) A11-189 TRASENT HOLDINGS INC. PT. LOT 6, CONC. 3 WHS BLOCK 110, UNITS 1-6 DRAFT PLAN 21T-04009B TEAL CREST CIRCLE 1. To allow a minimum dwelling unit width of 5.33 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum dwelling unit width of 6.0 metres. (22) A11-190 TRASENT HOLDINGS INC. PT. LOT 6, CONC. 3 WHS BLOCK 109, UNITS 1-6 DRAFT PLAN 21T-04009B TEAL CREST CIRCLE 1. To allow a minimum dwelling unit width of 5.33 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum dwelling unit width of 6.0 metres. (23) DEFERRED MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS A11-154 FRANK & MARY LORBER LOT 9, PLAN 406 68/70 MARYSFIELD DRIVE The applicants are seeking the following variances related to the retained parcel in conjunction with Consent Application B11-034: 1. To permit a lot having a minimum area of 7,238.52 sq. m (0.72 ha) whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.8 ha; 2. To permit a lot having a minimum width (frontage) of 13.5 m whereas the bylaw requires a minimum lot width of 45m; 2011 08 09 Page 9 of 11
3. To permit a rear yard setback of 12m whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 15m. RELATED CONSENT APPLICATION B11-034 (24) A11-155 FRANK AND MARY LORBER LOT 9, PLAN 406 68/70 MARYSFIELD DRIVE The applicants are seeking the following variances related to the severed parcel in conjunction with Consent Application B11-034: 1. To permit a lot having a minimum area of 4,044.19 sq. m (0.4 ha) whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.8 ha. RELATED CONSENT APPLICATION B11-034 (25) A11-158 TORAB LIMITED BLOCK 10, PLAN 43M-772 14 ABACUS ROAD 1. To allow 1 parking space per 30 square metres of office gross commercial floor area; whereas the by-law requires 1 parking space per 25 square metres of office gross commercial floor area. (26) A11-174 CARDILLO CAPITAL CORPORATION PT. BLOCK M, PLAN 518 PT. 2, PLAN 43R-8245 40B HANSEN ROAD SOUTH WARD 3 The applicant is seeking permission for the following variances associated with a proposed addition: 1. To allow office uses whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use; 2. To allow a landscape open space strip having a minimum width of 4.5m (14.76 ft) along the entire front lot line whereas the by-law requires a 2011 08 09 Page 10 of 11
minimum landscape open space strip of 6.0m (19.68 ft) along the entire front lot line, except where a driveway is located; 3. To allow a minimum driving aisle width of 6.0 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum driving aisle width of 6.6 metres; 4. To allow a parking lot for use by others whereas the by-law does not allow the proposed use; 5. To allow a banquet hall whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use; 6. To allow 170 parking spaces whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 300 parking spaces to accommodate the proposed uses. 2011 08 09 Page 11 of 11