American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Similar documents
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

LEVEL 1 DEVELOPER FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY for RINCON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

HOUSING ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

housing plan May 18, 2009

Residential Demographic Multipliers

Housing Element Amendment. Borough of High Bridge

APPENDIX A. Market Study Standards and Requirements

Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions

IHS Regional Housing Market Segmentation Analysis

HOUSINGSPOTLIGHT. The Shrinking Supply of Affordable Housing

Young-Adult Housing Demand Continues to Slide, But Young Homeowners Experience Vastly Improved Affordability

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN MAINE: TAKING STOCK. Henry O. Pollakowski. Housing Affordability Initiative MIT Center for Real Estate

Demographic and Housing Trends

The recent report which was released by real estate website Zillow show that Los

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

V2 = ( V1 - v1 ) V2 = V1 + ( v2 - ) (v2 - v1) is the net inventory change between the two time periods, and the rate of net inventory change is

FY 2013 Fair Market Rent Documentation System

What s Next for Commercial Real Estate Leveraging Technology and Local Analytics to Grow Your Commercial Real Estate Business

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

Data and Methodology: Location Affordability Index Version 2.0

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

III. Housing Profile and Analysis

Housing affordability in England and Wales: 2018

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 7.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 2,348 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 93 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 6.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 14 %

State of the Nation s Housing 2008: A Preview

2017 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Joint Center for Housing Studies. Harvard University

HOME Survey. Housing Opportunities and Market Experience. June National Association of REALTORS Research Group

November An updated analysis of the overall housing needs of the City of Aberdeen. Prepared by: Community Partners Research, Inc.

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

Housing Characteristics

A Model to Calculate the Supply of Affordable Housing in Polk County

Aspiring Home Buyers Profile

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 8.2 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,408 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 26 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

2006 Census Housing Series: Issue 9 Inuit Households in Canada

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.1 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,308 2, mi. SMALLER THAN 86 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 6.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 2,122 8, mi. LARGER THAN 74 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 6.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,555 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 71 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

The Impact of Using. Market-Value to Replacement-Cost. Ratios on Housing Insurance in Toledo Neighborhoods

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,260 8, mi. SMALLER THAN 32 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 14.2 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,748 11, mi. LARGER THAN 22 %

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 5.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 3, mi. SMALLER THAN 80 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,200 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.0 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,208 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 42 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 4.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,404 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 0 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 18 % This report provides an in-depth

Congressional District Report for the 115th Congress

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,626 13, mi. LARGER THAN 30 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,088 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 37 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 7.6 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,202 43, mi. SMALLER THAN 16 % This report provides an in-depth

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITIES: THE NUMBERS

86M 4.2% Executive Summary. Valuation Whitepaper. The purposes of this paper are threefold: At a Glance. Median absolute prediction error (MdAPE)

Housing Trends in the 1990s: The Effects on Rent Inflation and Its Measurement in the CPI *

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,440 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 11 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Housing & Community Engagement Study Session

Comparative Study on Affordable Housing Policies of Six Major Chinese Cities. Xiang Cai

canadian housing at a glance

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,448 87, mi. LARGER THAN 15 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,392 9, mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Ashland, Oregon Rental Needs Analysis. May Prepared for: City of Ashland

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,300 12, mi. SMALLER THAN 65 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Rural Housing Challenges in Tennessee: Socio-economic Drivers, Problems and Opportunities

Post-Katrina housing affordability challenges continue in 2008, worsening among Orleans Parish very low income renters

7224 Nall Ave Prairie Village, KS 66208

DIRECTIVE # This Directive Supersedes Directive # and #92-003

Estimating National Levels of Home Improvement and Repair Spending by Rental Property Owners

Terms of Reference for Town of Caledon Housing Study

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

METRO VANCOUVER LEVEL HOUSING DATA TABLE JUNE, 2016

Description of Methodology to Benchmark Existing Home Sales, 2011

Prepared For: Pennsylvania Utility Law Project (PULP) Harry Geller, Executive Director Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report

2011 ASSESSMENT RATIO REPORT

To: Property Appraisers, Taxing Authorities and Interested Parties From: James McAdams Date: June 5, 2012 Bulletin: PTO 12-04

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Elk Grove Residential Assessment Narrative April 16th, 2019

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership

Fannin Central Appraisal District Annual Appraisal Report

Range Method (Gage Studies Variables)

America s Rental Housing

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Evanston Residential Assessment Narrative Updated: April 8 th, 2019

Explanation of the Analysis Format

3 RENTAL HOUSING STOCK

City of Exeter Housing Element

Billing Code DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR-6129-N-01]

DELTA COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 2014 ANNUAL APPRAISAL REPORT

State of the Nation s Housing 2011: A Preview

Milton Apartments OFFERING MEMORANDUM MILTON, WA OFFERING MEMORANDUM PRESENTED BY: KW COMMERCIAL 1100 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 275 Seattle, WA 98109

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

Transcription:

DP04 SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year s Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section. Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section. Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population s Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties. Subject HOUSING OCCUPANCY Occupied housing units 13,345 +/-222 71.9% +/-1.2 Vacant housing units 5,222 +/-218 28.1% +/-1.2 Homeowner vacancy rate 2.2 +/-0.8 (X) (X) Rental vacancy rate 0.9 +/-0.7 (X) (X) UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1-unit, detached 14,319 +/-200 77.1% +/-1.0 1-unit, attached 353 +/-98 1.9% +/-0.5 2 units 209 +/-80 1.1% +/-0.4 3 or 4 units 261 +/-103 1.4% +/-0.6 5 to 9 units 296 +/-98 1.6% +/-0.5 10 to 19 units 345 +/-93 1.9% +/-0.5 20 or more units 772 +/-125 4.2% +/-0.7 Mobile home 2,010 +/-164 10.8% +/-0.9 Boat, RV, van, etc. 2 +/-3 0.0% +/-0.1 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT Built 2005 or later 923 +/-153 5.0% +/-0.8 Built 2000 to 2004 2,072 +/-161 11.2% +/-0.9 Built 1990 to 1999 2,596 +/-188 14.0% +/-1.0 Built 1980 to 1989 2,232 +/-155 12.0% +/-0.8 Built 1970 to 1979 3,912 +/-200 21.1% +/-1.1 Built 1960 to 1969 1,640 +/-159 8.8% +/-0.9 Built 1950 to 1959 1,391 +/-172 7.5% +/-0.9 Built 1940 to 1949 1,092 +/-169 5.9% +/-0.9 Built 1939 or earlier 2,709 +/-206 14.6% +/-1.1 ROOMS 1 room 159 +/-75 0.9% +/-0.4 2 rooms 472 +/-118 2.5% +/-0.6 3 rooms 1,490 +/-178 8.0% +/-1.0 4 rooms 2,845 +/-222 15.3% +/-1.2 1 of 5 04/06/2012

5 rooms 3,889 +/-255 20.9% +/-1.3 6 rooms 2,789 +/-197 15.0% +/-1.1 7 rooms 2,366 +/-191 12.7% +/-1.0 8 rooms 1,692 +/-177 9.1% +/-1.0 9 rooms or more 2,865 +/-206 15.4% +/-1.1 Median rooms 5.7 +/-0.2 (X) (X) BEDROOMS No bedroom 169 +/-74 0.9% +/-0.4 1 bedroom 1,505 +/-173 8.1% +/-0.9 2 bedrooms 5,317 +/-279 28.6% +/-1.5 3 bedrooms 7,048 +/-264 38.0% +/-1.4 4 bedrooms 3,337 +/-224 18.0% +/-1.2 5 or more bedrooms 1,191 +/-142 6.4% +/-0.8 HOUSING TENURE Owner-occupied 10,567 +/-217 79.2% +/-1.3 Renter-occupied 2,778 +/-190 20.8% +/-1.3 Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.48 +/-0.04 (X) (X) Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.02 +/-0.11 (X) (X) YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Moved in 2005 or later 3,797 +/-226 28.5% +/-1.6 Moved in 2000 to 2004 3,158 +/-209 23.7% +/-1.5 Moved in 1990 to 1999 3,147 +/-208 23.6% +/-1.4 Moved in 1980 to 1989 1,467 +/-123 11.0% +/-0.9 Moved in 1970 to 1979 966 +/-95 7.2% +/-0.7 Moved in 1969 or earlier 810 +/-96 6.1% +/-0.7 VEHICLES AVAILABLE No vehicles available 848 +/-145 6.4% +/-1.0 1 vehicle available 3,660 +/-238 27.4% +/-1.7 2 vehicles available 5,196 +/-199 38.9% +/-1.4 3 or more vehicles available 3,641 +/-171 27.3% +/-1.3 HOUSE HEATING FUEL Utility gas 3,198 +/-221 24.0% +/-1.7 Bottled, tank, or LP gas 3,571 +/-169 26.8% +/-1.2 Electricity 3,946 +/-214 29.6% +/-1.4 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 1,219 +/-132 9.1% +/-0.9 Coal or coke 3 +/-4 0.0% +/-0.1 Wood 1,272 +/-116 9.5% +/-0.9 Solar energy 2 +/-5 0.0% +/-0.1 Other fuel 94 +/-35 0.7% +/-0.3 No fuel used 40 +/-28 0.3% +/-0.2 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Lacking complete plumbing facilities 84 +/-38 0.6% +/-0.3 Lacking complete kitchen facilities 92 +/-33 0.7% +/-0.2 No telephone service available 407 +/-93 3.0% +/-0.7 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM 1.00 or less 13,202 +/-219 98.9% +/-0.3 1.01 to 1.50 124 +/-43 0.9% +/-0.3 1.51 or more 19 +/-13 0.1% +/-0.1 VALUE Owner-occupied units 10,567 +/-217 10,567 (X) Less than $50,000 933 +/-117 8.8% +/-1.1 2 of 5 04/06/2012

$50,000 to $99,999 1,547 +/-140 14.6% +/-1.3 $100,000 to $149,999 1,968 +/-145 18.6% +/-1.4 $150,000 to $199,999 1,894 +/-155 17.9% +/-1.4 $200,000 to $299,999 2,162 +/-150 20.5% +/-1.4 $300,000 to $499,999 1,500 +/-128 14.2% +/-1.1 $500,000 to $999,999 478 +/-81 4.5% +/-0.8 $1,000,000 or more 85 +/-28 0.8% +/-0.3 Median (dollars) 166,800 +/-2,895 (X) (X) MORTGAGE STATUS Owner-occupied units 10,567 +/-217 10,567 (X) Housing units with a mortgage 6,357 +/-205 60.2% +/-1.7 Housing units without a mortgage 4,210 +/-205 39.8% +/-1.7 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC) Housing units with a mortgage 6,357 +/-205 6,357 (X) Less than $300 9 +/-7 0.1% +/-0.1 $300 to $499 212 +/-53 3.3% +/-0.8 $500 to $699 534 +/-88 8.4% +/-1.4 $700 to $999 1,263 +/-134 19.9% +/-2.0 $1,000 to $1,499 2,383 +/-139 37.5% +/-2.0 $1,500 to $1,999 1,034 +/-122 16.3% +/-1.8 $2,000 or more 922 +/-102 14.5% +/-1.5 Median (dollars) 1,214 +/-27 (X) (X) Housing units without a mortgage 4,210 +/-205 4,210 (X) Less than $100 40 +/-15 1.0% +/-0.4 $100 to $199 342 +/-65 8.1% +/-1.5 $200 to $299 939 +/-104 22.3% +/-2.2 $300 to $399 1,075 +/-109 25.5% +/-2.3 $400 or more 1,814 +/-135 43.1% +/-2.4 Median (dollars) 370 +/-10 (X) (X) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI) Housing units with a mortgage (excluding units where 6,343 +/-204 6,343 (X) SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 20.0 percent 2,239 +/-165 35.3% +/-2.5 20.0 to 24.9 percent 1,073 +/-126 16.9% +/-1.9 25.0 to 29.9 percent 951 +/-124 15.0% +/-1.9 30.0 to 34.9 percent 578 +/-108 9.1% +/-1.7 35.0 percent or more 1,502 +/-163 23.7% +/-2.4 Not computed 14 +/-13 (X) (X) Housing unit without a mortgage (excluding units 4,184 +/-204 4,184 (X) where SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 10.0 percent 1,668 +/-128 39.9% +/-2.5 10.0 to 14.9 percent 861 +/-110 20.6% +/-2.4 15.0 to 19.9 percent 555 +/-94 13.3% +/-2.2 20.0 to 24.9 percent 303 +/-46 7.2% +/-1.1 25.0 to 29.9 percent 220 +/-63 5.3% +/-1.5 30.0 to 34.9 percent 96 +/-39 2.3% +/-0.9 35.0 percent or more 481 +/-80 11.5% +/-1.7 Not computed 26 +/-14 (X) (X) GROSS RENT Occupied units paying rent 2,497 +/-177 2,497 (X) Less than $200 77 +/-44 3.1% +/-1.8 $200 to $299 292 +/-97 11.7% +/-3.8 $300 to $499 636 +/-144 25.5% +/-5.5 $500 to $749 945 +/-156 37.8% +/-5.4 $750 to $999 271 +/-75 10.9% +/-2.9 $1,000 to $1,499 214 +/-78 8.6% +/-3.1 $1,500 or more 62 +/-38 2.5% +/-1.5 Median (dollars) 550 +/-47 (X) (X) No rent paid 281 +/-57 (X) (X) 3 of 5 04/06/2012

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI) Occupied units paying rent (excluding units where 2,494 +/-178 2,494 (X) GRAPI cannot be computed) Less than 15.0 percent 303 +/-104 12.1% +/-4.1 15.0 to 19.9 percent 310 +/-95 12.4% +/-3.6 20.0 to 24.9 percent 386 +/-93 15.5% +/-3.7 25.0 to 29.9 percent 314 +/-96 12.6% +/-3.9 30.0 to 34.9 percent 241 +/-84 9.7% +/-3.2 35.0 percent or more 940 +/-135 37.7% +/-5.0 Not computed 284 +/-58 (X) (X) Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables. The median gross rent excludes no cash renters. In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units with a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI is computed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values. In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units without a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI is computed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values. In prior years, the universe included all renter-occupied units. It is now restricted to include only those units where GRAPI is computed, that is, gross rent and household Income are valid values. The 2009 and 2010 plumbing data for Puerto Rico will not be shown. Research indicates that the questions on plumbing facilities that were introduced in 2008 in the stateside American Community Survey and the 2008 Puerto Rico Community Survey may not have been appropriate for Puerto Rico. While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities. s of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey Explanation of Symbols: 1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available. 4 of 5 04/06/2012