SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Similar documents
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

LEVEL 1 DEVELOPER FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY for RINCON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

HOUSING ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

housing plan May 18, 2009

IHS Regional Housing Market Segmentation Analysis

Housing Element Amendment. Borough of High Bridge

HOUSINGSPOTLIGHT. The Shrinking Supply of Affordable Housing

FY 2013 Fair Market Rent Documentation System

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN MAINE: TAKING STOCK. Henry O. Pollakowski. Housing Affordability Initiative MIT Center for Real Estate

Residential Demographic Multipliers

APPENDIX A. Market Study Standards and Requirements

Demographic and Housing Trends

The recent report which was released by real estate website Zillow show that Los

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

Young-Adult Housing Demand Continues to Slide, But Young Homeowners Experience Vastly Improved Affordability

What s Next for Commercial Real Estate Leveraging Technology and Local Analytics to Grow Your Commercial Real Estate Business

HOME Survey. Housing Opportunities and Market Experience. June National Association of REALTORS Research Group

Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions

Data and Methodology: Location Affordability Index Version 2.0

A Model to Calculate the Supply of Affordable Housing in Polk County

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

III. Housing Profile and Analysis

Housing affordability in England and Wales: 2018

V2 = ( V1 - v1 ) V2 = V1 + ( v2 - ) (v2 - v1) is the net inventory change between the two time periods, and the rate of net inventory change is

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 7.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 2,348 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 93 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

State of the Nation s Housing 2008: A Preview

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 6.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 14 %

2017 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

86M 4.2% Executive Summary. Valuation Whitepaper. The purposes of this paper are threefold: At a Glance. Median absolute prediction error (MdAPE)

Housing Characteristics

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

DIRECTIVE # This Directive Supersedes Directive # and #92-003

Estimating National Levels of Home Improvement and Repair Spending by Rental Property Owners

Aspiring Home Buyers Profile

2006 Census Housing Series: Issue 9 Inuit Households in Canada

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 8.2 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,408 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 26 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.1 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,308 2, mi. SMALLER THAN 86 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 6.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 2,122 8, mi. LARGER THAN 74 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 6.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,555 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 71 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

The Impact of Using. Market-Value to Replacement-Cost. Ratios on Housing Insurance in Toledo Neighborhoods

Explanation of the Analysis Format

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,260 8, mi. SMALLER THAN 32 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 14.2 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,748 11, mi. LARGER THAN 22 %

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 5.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 3, mi. SMALLER THAN 80 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,200 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership

Congressional District Report for the 115th Congress

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.0 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,208 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 42 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 4.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,404 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 0 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 18 % This report provides an in-depth

HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITIES: THE NUMBERS

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,626 13, mi. LARGER THAN 30 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,088 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 37 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 7.6 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,202 43, mi. SMALLER THAN 16 % This report provides an in-depth

Joint Center for Housing Studies. Harvard University

November An updated analysis of the overall housing needs of the City of Aberdeen. Prepared by: Community Partners Research, Inc.

Housing Trends in the 1990s: The Effects on Rent Inflation and Its Measurement in the CPI *

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,440 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 11 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Housing & Community Engagement Study Session

Comparative Study on Affordable Housing Policies of Six Major Chinese Cities. Xiang Cai

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,448 87, mi. LARGER THAN 15 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

canadian housing at a glance

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,392 9, mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,300 12, mi. SMALLER THAN 65 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Ashland, Oregon Rental Needs Analysis. May Prepared for: City of Ashland

Rural Housing Challenges in Tennessee: Socio-economic Drivers, Problems and Opportunities

Post-Katrina housing affordability challenges continue in 2008, worsening among Orleans Parish very low income renters

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

Terms of Reference for Town of Caledon Housing Study

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Description of Methodology to Benchmark Existing Home Sales, 2011

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters

To: Property Appraisers, Taxing Authorities and Interested Parties From: James McAdams Date: June 5, 2012 Bulletin: PTO 12-04

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Elk Grove Residential Assessment Narrative April 16th, 2019

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

America s Rental Housing

Range Method (Gage Studies Variables)

Rental Housing Finance Survey* *and a few observations about gubment data. Rich Levy US Census Bureau Washington, DC April 2014

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Evanston Residential Assessment Narrative Updated: April 8 th, 2019

3 RENTAL HOUSING STOCK

City of Exeter Housing Element

State of the Nation s Housing 2011: A Preview

MONROE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Trends in Affordable Home Ownership in Calgary

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

The Housing Bubble in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area

A STUDY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S APARTMENT RENTAL MARKET 2000 TO 2015: THE ROLE OF MILLENNIALS

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Market Absorption of Apartments

Florida REALTORS Commercial Real Estate Lending Study. Market Enhancement Group, Inc.

7224 Nall Ave Prairie Village, KS 66208

Transcription:

DP04 SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section. Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section. Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties. HOUSING OCCUPANCY Subject Occupied housing units 25,421 +/-510 92.4% +/-1.1 Vacant housing units 2,097 +/-321 7.6% +/-1.1 Homeowner vacancy rate 2.7 +/-1.1 (X) (X) Rental vacancy rate 5.2 +/-1.7 (X) (X) UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1-unit, detached 18,432 +/-504 67.0% +/-1.4 1-unit, attached 1,263 +/-185 4.6% +/-0.7 2 units 710 +/-144 2.6% +/-0.5 3 or 4 units 2,576 +/-239 9.4% +/-0.9 5 to 9 units 1,333 +/-214 4.8% +/-0.8 10 to 19 units 1,535 +/-253 5.6% +/-0.9 20 or more units 1,604 +/-227 5.8% +/-0.8 Mobile home 65 +/-70 0.2% +/-0.3 Boat, RV, van, etc. 0 +/-27 0.0% +/-0.1 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT Built 2010 or later 38 +/-43 0.1% +/-0.2 Built 2000 to 2009 521 +/-146 1.9% +/-0.5 Built 1990 to 1999 848 +/-168 3.1% +/-0.6 Built 1980 to 1989 1,656 +/-236 6.0% +/-0.8 Built 1970 to 1979 3,744 +/-291 13.6% +/-1.1 Built 1960 to 1969 6,600 +/-405 24.0% +/-1.3 Built 1950 to 1959 8,993 +/-413 32.7% +/-1.4 Built 1940 to 1949 3,477 +/-289 12.6% +/-1.0 Built 1939 or earlier 1,641 +/-188 6.0% +/-0.7 ROOMS 1 room 579 +/-151 2.1% +/-0.5 2 rooms 218 +/-69 0.8% +/-0.3 1 of 5 01/02/2014

3 rooms 2,254 +/-267 8.2% +/-0.9 4 rooms 3,915 +/-330 14.2% +/-1.2 5 rooms 5,798 +/-382 21.1% +/-1.3 6 rooms 5,392 +/-336 19.6% +/-1.2 7 rooms 3,770 +/-372 13.7% +/-1.3 8 rooms 2,508 +/-240 9.1% +/-0.9 9 rooms or more 3,084 +/-301 11.2% +/-1.1 Median rooms 5.7 +/-0.1 (X) (X) BEDROOMS No bedroom 609 +/-149 2.2% +/-0.5 1 bedroom 2,935 +/-256 10.7% +/-0.9 2 bedrooms 7,318 +/-505 26.6% +/-1.6 3 bedrooms 12,033 +/-476 43.7% +/-1.6 4 bedrooms 4,084 +/-326 14.8% +/-1.2 5 or more bedrooms 539 +/-129 2.0% +/-0.5 HOUSING TENURE Owner-occupied 15,945 +/-524 62.7% +/-1.4 Renter-occupied 9,476 +/-372 37.3% +/-1.4 Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.30 +/-0.05 (X) (X) Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.00 +/-0.08 (X) (X) YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Moved in 2010 or later 2,874 +/-339 11.3% +/-1.3 Moved in 2000 to 2009 12,258 +/-493 48.2% +/-1.6 Moved in 1990 to 1999 4,475 +/-279 17.6% +/-1.1 Moved in 1980 to 1989 2,137 +/-190 8.4% +/-0.7 Moved in 1970 to 1979 1,874 +/-232 7.4% +/-0.9 Moved in 1969 or earlier 1,803 +/-183 7.1% +/-0.7 VEHICLES AVAILABLE No vehicles available 1,577 +/-213 6.2% +/-0.8 1 vehicle available 10,258 +/-556 40.4% +/-1.8 2 vehicles available 10,094 +/-504 39.7% +/-2.0 3 or more vehicles available 3,492 +/-331 13.7% +/-1.3 HOUSE HEATING FUEL Utility gas 20,721 +/-547 81.5% +/-1.3 Bottled, tank, or LP gas 234 +/-89 0.9% +/-0.3 Electricity 4,203 +/-324 16.5% +/-1.3 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 79 +/-46 0.3% +/-0.2 Coal or coke 0 +/-27 0.0% +/-0.1 Wood 53 +/-37 0.2% +/-0.1 Solar energy 0 +/-27 0.0% +/-0.1 Other fuel 86 +/-72 0.3% +/-0.3 No fuel used 45 +/-28 0.2% +/-0.1 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Lacking complete plumbing facilities 58 +/-61 0.2% +/-0.2 Lacking complete kitchen facilities 116 +/-70 0.5% +/-0.3 No telephone service available 494 +/-113 1.9% +/-0.4 2 of 5 01/02/2014

OCCUPANTS PER ROOM 1.00 or less 25,227 +/-519 99.2% +/-0.3 1.01 to 1.50 84 +/-52 0.3% +/-0.2 1.51 or more 110 +/-63 0.4% +/-0.2 VALUE Owner-occupied units 15,945 +/-524 15,945 (X) Less than $50,000 369 +/-99 2.3% +/-0.6 $50,000 to $99,999 3,406 +/-276 21.4% +/-1.5 $100,000 to $149,999 6,213 +/-369 39.0% +/-1.9 $150,000 to $199,999 3,480 +/-290 21.8% +/-1.8 $200,000 to $299,999 1,372 +/-174 8.6% +/-1.1 $300,000 to $499,999 700 +/-172 4.4% +/-1.0 $500,000 to $999,999 329 +/-132 2.1% +/-0.8 $1,000,000 or more 76 +/-44 0.5% +/-0.3 Median (dollars) 133,100 +/-2,097 (X) (X) MORTGAGE STATUS Owner-occupied units 15,945 +/-524 15,945 (X) Housing units with a mortgage 10,696 +/-415 67.1% +/-1.5 Housing units without a mortgage 5,249 +/-307 32.9% +/-1.5 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC) Housing units with a mortgage 10,696 +/-415 10,696 (X) Less than $300 8 +/-12 0.1% +/-0.1 $300 to $499 184 +/-84 1.7% +/-0.8 $500 to $699 579 +/-140 5.4% +/-1.3 $700 to $999 1,809 +/-233 16.9% +/-1.9 $1,000 to $1,499 4,744 +/-297 44.4% +/-2.6 $1,500 to $1,999 2,286 +/-248 21.4% +/-2.1 $2,000 or more 1,086 +/-167 10.2% +/-1.5 Median (dollars) 1,302 +/-26 (X) (X) Housing units without a mortgage 5,249 +/-307 5,249 (X) Less than $100 14 +/-21 0.3% +/-0.4 $100 to $199 80 +/-58 1.5% +/-1.1 $200 to $299 413 +/-109 7.9% +/-2.1 $300 to $399 884 +/-149 16.8% +/-2.8 $400 or more 3,858 +/-308 73.5% +/-3.4 Median (dollars) 487 +/-13 (X) (X) SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI) Housing units with a mortgage (excluding units where 10,666 +/-413 10,666 (X) SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 20.0 percent 4,414 +/-343 41.4% +/-2.7 20.0 to 24.9 percent 1,995 +/-228 18.7% +/-2.1 25.0 to 29.9 percent 1,300 +/-175 12.2% +/-1.6 30.0 to 34.9 percent 925 +/-141 8.7% +/-1.3 35.0 percent or more 2,032 +/-257 19.1% +/-2.2 Not computed 30 +/-26 (X) (X) Housing unit without a mortgage (excluding units 5,215 +/-304 5,215 (X) where SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 10.0 percent 1,928 +/-230 37.0% +/-3.5 10.0 to 14.9 percent 1,122 +/-183 21.5% +/-3.1 15.0 to 19.9 percent 890 +/-133 17.1% +/-2.5 3 of 5 01/02/2014

20.0 to 24.9 percent 378 +/-98 7.2% +/-1.9 25.0 to 29.9 percent 350 +/-94 6.7% +/-1.7 30.0 to 34.9 percent 126 +/-56 2.4% +/-1.1 35.0 percent or more 421 +/-110 8.1% +/-2.0 Not computed 34 +/-27 (X) (X) GROSS RENT Occupied units paying rent 9,114 +/-361 9,114 (X) Less than $200 122 +/-73 1.3% +/-0.8 $200 to $299 117 +/-78 1.3% +/-0.9 $300 to $499 1,270 +/-205 13.9% +/-2.2 $500 to $749 3,281 +/-312 36.0% +/-2.9 $750 to $999 2,484 +/-235 27.3% +/-2.5 $1,000 to $1,499 1,489 +/-252 16.3% +/-2.6 $1,500 or more 351 +/-124 3.9% +/-1.3 Median (dollars) 731 +/-21 (X) (X) No rent paid 362 +/-113 (X) (X) GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI) Occupied units paying rent (excluding units where 8,952 +/-357 8,952 (X) GRAPI cannot be computed) Less than 15.0 percent 1,084 +/-217 12.1% +/-2.4 15.0 to 19.9 percent 1,368 +/-220 15.3% +/-2.3 20.0 to 24.9 percent 1,185 +/-208 13.2% +/-2.1 25.0 to 29.9 percent 1,043 +/-176 11.7% +/-2.1 30.0 to 34.9 percent 762 +/-186 8.5% +/-2.0 35.0 percent or more 3,510 +/-321 39.2% +/-3.3 Not computed 524 +/-146 (X) (X) Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables. The median gross rent excludes no cash renters. In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units with a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI is computed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values. In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units without a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI is computed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values. In prior years, the universe included all renter-occupied units. It is now restricted to include only those units where GRAPI is computed, that is, gross rent and household Income are valid values. The 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 plumbing data for Puerto Rico will not be shown. Research indicates that the questions on plumbing facilities that were introduced in 2008 in the stateside American Community Survey and the 2008 Puerto Rico Community Survey may not have been appropriate for Puerto Rico. Median calculations for base table sourcing VAL, MHC, SMOC, and TAX should exclude zero values. Telephone service data are not available for certain geographic areas due to problems with data collection. See Errata Note #93 for details. 4 of 5 01/02/2014

While the 2008-2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities. Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2012 American Community Survey Explanation of Symbols: 1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.