American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Similar documents
SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

LEVEL 1 DEVELOPER FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY for RINCON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

HOUSING ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

HOUSINGSPOTLIGHT. The Shrinking Supply of Affordable Housing

housing plan May 18, 2009

Housing Element Amendment. Borough of High Bridge

Residential Demographic Multipliers

HOME Survey. Housing Opportunities and Market Experience. June National Association of REALTORS Research Group

APPENDIX A. Market Study Standards and Requirements

What s Next for Commercial Real Estate Leveraging Technology and Local Analytics to Grow Your Commercial Real Estate Business

IHS Regional Housing Market Segmentation Analysis

HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN MAINE: TAKING STOCK. Henry O. Pollakowski. Housing Affordability Initiative MIT Center for Real Estate

Demographic and Housing Trends

The recent report which was released by real estate website Zillow show that Los

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

Young-Adult Housing Demand Continues to Slide, But Young Homeowners Experience Vastly Improved Affordability

FY 2013 Fair Market Rent Documentation System

Data and Methodology: Location Affordability Index Version 2.0

Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

A Model to Calculate the Supply of Affordable Housing in Polk County

Housing affordability in England and Wales: 2018

III. Housing Profile and Analysis

V2 = ( V1 - v1 ) V2 = V1 + ( v2 - ) (v2 - v1) is the net inventory change between the two time periods, and the rate of net inventory change is

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 7.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 2,348 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 93 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

State of the Nation s Housing 2008: A Preview

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 6.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 14 %

2017 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

November An updated analysis of the overall housing needs of the City of Aberdeen. Prepared by: Community Partners Research, Inc.

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

canadian housing at a glance

Housing Characteristics

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Aspiring Home Buyers Profile

Ashland, Oregon Rental Needs Analysis. May Prepared for: City of Ashland

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 8.2 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,408 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 26 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.1 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,308 2, mi. SMALLER THAN 86 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Evanston Residential Assessment Narrative Updated: April 8 th, 2019

State of the Nation s Housing 2011: A Preview

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 6.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 2,122 8, mi. LARGER THAN 74 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 6.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,555 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 71 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,260 8, mi. SMALLER THAN 32 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 14.2 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,748 11, mi. LARGER THAN 22 %

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 5.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 3, mi. SMALLER THAN 80 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,200 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters

Congressional District Report for the 115th Congress

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.0 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,208 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 42 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 4.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,404 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 0 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 18 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,626 13, mi. LARGER THAN 30 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Joint Center for Housing Studies. Harvard University

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,088 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 37 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 7.6 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,202 43, mi. SMALLER THAN 16 % This report provides an in-depth

Housing Trends in the 1990s: The Effects on Rent Inflation and Its Measurement in the CPI *

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,440 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 11 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

Housing & Community Engagement Study Session

US Economic Indicators: Homeowners Equity

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,448 87, mi. LARGER THAN 15 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,392 9, mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,300 12, mi. SMALLER THAN 65 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Post-Katrina housing affordability challenges continue in 2008, worsening among Orleans Parish very low income renters

Rural Housing Challenges in Tennessee: Socio-economic Drivers, Problems and Opportunities

Terms of Reference for Town of Caledon Housing Study

Estimating National Levels of Home Improvement and Repair Spending by Rental Property Owners

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

2006 Census Housing Series: Issue 9 Inuit Households in Canada

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership

The Impact of Using. Market-Value to Replacement-Cost. Ratios on Housing Insurance in Toledo Neighborhoods

Cook County Assessor s Office: 2019 North Triad Assessment. Elk Grove Residential Assessment Narrative April 16th, 2019

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

86M 4.2% Executive Summary. Valuation Whitepaper. The purposes of this paper are threefold: At a Glance. Median absolute prediction error (MdAPE)

Comparative Study on Affordable Housing Policies of Six Major Chinese Cities. Xiang Cai

Range Method (Gage Studies Variables)

New affordable housing production hits record low in 2014

HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITIES: THE NUMBERS

America s Rental Housing

Explanation of the Analysis Format

Rental Housing Finance Survey* *and a few observations about gubment data. Rich Levy US Census Bureau Washington, DC April 2014

3 RENTAL HOUSING STOCK

City of Exeter Housing Element

MONROE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

7224 Nall Ave Prairie Village, KS 66208

A STUDY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S APARTMENT RENTAL MARKET 2000 TO 2015: THE ROLE OF MILLENNIALS

Market Absorption of Apartments

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY

Recent Home Buyer and Seller Profiles. November 3, 2017 National Association of REALTORS Research Division

The Housing Bubble in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area

2015 Housing Report. kelowna.ca. April Water Street Kelowna, BC V1Y 1J4 TEL FAX

Housing as an Investment Greater Toronto Area

Transcription:

DP04 SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Note: This is a modified view of the original table. Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section. Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section. Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you. Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties. A processing error was found in the Year Structure Built estimates since data year 2008. For more information, please see the errata note #110. Subject South Dakota -- Urban South Dakota -- Rural HOUSING OCCUPANCY Vacant housing units 14,385 +/-1,026 27,085 +/-738 Homeowner vacancy rate 1.6 +/-0.3 1.5 +/-0.2 Rental vacancy rate 5.3 +/-0.7 6.1 +/-0.7 UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1-unit, detached 123,500 +/-1,403 133,166 +/-973 1-unit, attached 10,417 +/-660 2,258 +/-228 2 units 5,031 +/-468 1,265 +/-164 3 or 4 units 9,546 +/-648 2,964 +/-220 5 to 9 units 10,787 +/-608 3,391 +/-204 10 to 19 units 12,737 +/-775 2,264 +/-249 20 or more units 20,373 +/-819 1,741 +/-259 Mobile home 14,396 +/-627 18,358 +/-618 Boat, RV, van, etc. 65 +/-71 69 +/-30 YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT Built 2014 or later 319 +/-113 226 +/-67 Built 2010 to 2013 5,559 +/-533 3,510 +/-308 Built 2000 to 2009 34,528 +/-994 23,216 +/-672 Built 1990 to 1999 28,374 +/-922 20,052 +/-734 Built 1980 to 1989 22,932 +/-1,007 15,076 +/-570 Built 1970 to 1979 36,355 +/-1,186 26,871 +/-749 1 of 5 12/08/2016

Built 1960 to 1969 19,704 +/-919 12,808 +/-493 Built 1950 to 1959 20,840 +/-901 13,466 +/-486 Built 1940 to 1949 11,016 +/-752 8,317 +/-351 Built 1939 or earlier 27,225 +/-879 41,934 +/-888 ROOMS 1 room 3,299 +/-503 2,057 +/-245 2 rooms 6,760 +/-603 2,623 +/-242 3 rooms 21,039 +/-1,039 9,193 +/-372 4 rooms 37,784 +/-1,341 22,291 +/-652 5 rooms 34,462 +/-1,188 31,255 +/-698 6 rooms 27,788 +/-1,022 27,541 +/-698 7 rooms 24,649 +/-932 22,380 +/-724 8 rooms 20,254 +/-806 19,249 +/-555 9 rooms or more 30,817 +/-972 28,887 +/-796 Median rooms 5.5 +/-0.1 6.1 +/-0.2 BEDROOMS No bedroom 3,703 +/-509 2,215 +/-255 1 bedroom 24,829 +/-1,039 10,693 +/-380 2 bedrooms 62,430 +/-1,508 41,009 +/-770 3 bedrooms 65,745 +/-1,442 62,545 +/-1,055 4 bedrooms 37,346 +/-1,076 34,502 +/-786 5 or more bedrooms 12,799 +/-647 14,512 +/-606 HOUSING TENURE Owner-occupied 117,203 +/-1,568 108,016 +/-1,071 Renter-occupied 75,264 +/-1,408 30,375 +/-808 Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.55 +/-0.02 2.52 +/-0.02 Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.12 +/-0.03 2.58 +/-0.06 YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Moved in 2015 or later 3,986 +/-457 1,344 +/-180 Moved in 2010 to 2014 71,275 +/-1,745 31,099 +/-804 Moved in 2000 to 2009 70,104 +/-1,438 49,482 +/-975 Moved in 1990 to 1999 24,734 +/-972 25,718 +/-575 Moved in 1980 to 1989 10,625 +/-560 13,341 +/-479 Moved in 1979 and earlier 11,743 +/-540 17,407 +/-508 VEHICLES AVAILABLE No vehicles available 11,661 +/-731 5,074 +/-273 1 vehicle available 64,506 +/-1,413 30,206 +/-729 2 vehicles available 74,355 +/-1,478 49,006 +/-950 3 or more vehicles available 41,945 +/-1,233 54,105 +/-756 HOUSE HEATING FUEL Utility gas 129,364 +/-1,496 29,518 +/-627 Bottled, tank, or LP gas 6,154 +/-409 47,653 +/-873 Electricity 51,200 +/-1,338 44,835 +/-908 Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 1,205 +/-230 7,067 +/-294 Coal or coke 69 +/-56 180 +/-62 Wood 848 +/-187 5,289 +/-348 2 of 5 12/08/2016

Solar energy 64 +/-48 120 +/-60 Other fuel 2,374 +/-350 2,861 +/-235 No fuel used 1,189 +/-228 868 +/-115 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Lacking complete plumbing facilities 798 +/-208 1,147 +/-164 Lacking complete kitchen facilities 1,647 +/-298 1,554 +/-162 No telephone service available 6,216 +/-464 2,922 +/-231 OCCUPANTS PER ROOM 1.00 or less 188,310 +/-1,412 134,924 +/-1,170 1.01 to 1.50 2,925 +/-387 2,513 +/-227 1.51 or more 1,232 +/-237 954 +/-120 VALUE Owner-occupied units 117,203 +/-1,568 108,016 +/-1,071 Less than $50,000 12,142 +/-577 22,434 +/-580 $50,000 to $99,999 17,276 +/-686 22,738 +/-569 $100,000 to $149,999 30,291 +/-1,127 16,130 +/-497 $150,000 to $199,999 26,886 +/-1,026 13,560 +/-481 $200,000 to $299,999 19,259 +/-804 17,610 +/-733 $300,000 to $499,999 9,173 +/-663 10,833 +/-504 $500,000 to $999,999 1,701 +/-254 3,630 +/-305 $1,000,000 or more 475 +/-151 1,081 +/-130 Median (dollars) 148,300 +/-1,326 122,400 +/-1,702 MORTGAGE STATUS Owner-occupied units 117,203 +/-1,568 108,016 +/-1,071 Housing units with a mortgage 76,503 +/-1,439 51,734 +/-936 Housing units without a mortgage 40,700 +/-1,156 56,282 +/-852 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC) Housing units with a mortgage 76,503 +/-1,439 51,734 +/-936 Less than $500 1,494 +/-211 1,783 +/-160 $500 to $999 21,233 +/-840 15,934 +/-516 $1,000 to $1,499 32,430 +/-1,068 17,072 +/-642 $1,500 to $1,999 13,219 +/-832 8,940 +/-482 $2,000 to $2,499 4,659 +/-438 4,342 +/-324 $2,500 to $2,999 1,652 +/-291 2,040 +/-229 $3,000 or more 1,816 +/-294 1,623 +/-199 Median (dollars) 1,207 +/-10 1,216 +/-13 Housing units without a mortgage 40,700 +/-1,156 56,282 +/-852 Less than $250 4,289 +/-406 8,181 +/-421 $250 to $399 12,254 +/-643 16,852 +/-433 $400 to $599 17,093 +/-785 18,658 +/-526 $600 to $799 4,915 +/-378 7,658 +/-351 $800 to $999 1,238 +/-213 3,145 +/-244 $1,000 or more 911 +/-183 1,788 +/-170 Median (dollars) 437 +/-5 429 +/-4 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI) Housing units with a mortgage (excluding units where 76,286 +/-1,442 51,615 +/-937 SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 20.0 percent 35,528 +/-1,086 25,419 +/-635 20.0 to 24.9 percent 14,665 +/-847 8,381 +/-451 25.0 to 29.9 percent 9,334 +/-641 5,217 +/-302 3 of 5 12/08/2016

30.0 to 34.9 percent 4,940 +/-421 3,324 +/-315 35.0 percent or more 11,819 +/-772 9,274 +/-490 Not computed 217 +/-106 119 +/-43 Housing unit without a mortgage (excluding units 40,364 +/-1,173 55,720 +/-856 where SMOCAPI cannot be computed) Less than 10.0 percent 18,571 +/-864 26,423 +/-565 10.0 to 14.9 percent 8,489 +/-538 10,786 +/-403 15.0 to 19.9 percent 5,028 +/-417 5,958 +/-262 20.0 to 24.9 percent 2,680 +/-327 3,557 +/-234 25.0 to 29.9 percent 1,672 +/-310 2,253 +/-203 30.0 to 34.9 percent 889 +/-172 1,591 +/-220 35.0 percent or more 3,035 +/-334 5,152 +/-310 Not computed 336 +/-100 562 +/-109 GROSS RENT Occupied units paying rent 72,442 +/-1,418 24,604 +/-747 Less than $500 17,197 +/-834 10,033 +/-478 $500 to $999 43,129 +/-1,298 12,274 +/-480 $1,000 to $1,499 10,022 +/-589 1,797 +/-226 $1,500 to $1,999 1,302 +/-291 301 +/-87 $2,000 to $2,499 302 +/-122 124 +/-49 $2,500 to $2,999 308 +/-131 48 +/-25 $3,000 or more 182 +/-99 27 +/-21 Median (dollars) 684 +/-9 563 +/-12 No rent paid 2,822 +/-359 5,771 +/-321 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI) Occupied units paying rent (excluding units where 71,576 +/-1,414 24,278 +/-749 GRAPI cannot be computed) Less than 15.0 percent 10,672 +/-712 6,344 +/-372 15.0 to 19.9 percent 11,027 +/-718 4,124 +/-320 20.0 to 24.9 percent 10,420 +/-763 3,087 +/-220 25.0 to 29.9 percent 8,897 +/-636 2,372 +/-224 30.0 to 34.9 percent 6,378 +/-614 1,701 +/-160 35.0 percent or more 24,182 +/-952 6,650 +/-389 Not computed 3,688 +/-441 6,097 +/-334 Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables. Households not paying cash rent are excluded from the calculation of median gross rent. Telephone service data are not available for certain geographic areas due to problems with data collection. See Errata Note #93 for details. While the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the February 2013 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities. Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 4 of 5 12/08/2016

2010 data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Explanation of Symbols: 1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.