Planning Commission Agenda Item

Similar documents
CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA

It is recommended that the Development Committee take the following actions:

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016

2. Approval of Minutes Approval of the minutes of the March 2, 2016, May 4, 2016, July 6, 2016 meeting.

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing.

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

City of Placerville Planning Commission STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Report

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

Secondary Dwelling Unit

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

VOTE: The motion passed on a voice call vote of 5-0.

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

BEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report

PA Conditional Use Permit for Kumon Learning Center at 1027 San Pablo Ave.

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Chapter COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

VILLAGE BOARD STAFF REPORT

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

City of Escondido Zoning Administrator

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Sub Major Tenant Building Signage (7,000 to 34,999 square feet)

CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY

Community Development Department Staff Report. FILE NUMBER: GPA 06-01, ZC 06-01, SPR 06-03, TPM (Boundary Line Adjustment) John Wagener

VILLAGE OF HOWARD PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Dave Wiese, Executive Director of Community Development

Accessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING

For Sale Kraft Premises, 3C Common Marsh Lane, Lords Meadow Industrial Estate, Crediton, Devon, EX17 1HJ

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Planning Commission. Alice McCurdy, Deputy Director Development Review Division

Planning Commission Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Supplemental Agenda Report

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT OCTOBER 20, 2016

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

Chair to close public hearing. Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/18/ Days: 10/17/2017

Kieran Boughan. San Francisco Architect RESIDENTIAL

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

Planning Commission Report

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDREW COHEN-CUTLER, ASSOCIATE PLANNER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

PLANNING APPLICATION FORM RESIDENTIAL

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Legislative Department Seattle City Council Memorandum

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1.

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

ALTON TOWN CENTER SIGN PROGRAM DECEMBER 2017

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System

Second Reading and Adoption of Zone Text Amendment Ordinance 1/15/19

Plan ning Commission Report

City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department STAFF REPORT

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

December 12, AGENCY/Zoning Division 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2 nd Floor Oakland, California

November 1, 2017 Planning Commission Work Meeting Agenda

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "RESIDENTIAL ZONES"

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

For Sale Price: $9,999, W. Elk Ave. Glendale, CA 91204

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Chapter ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added by O N.S.; effective )

Transcription:

Planning Commission Agenda Item Planning Commission Meeting Date: January 10, 2018 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Cody Graybehl, Assistant Planner c_graybehl@ci.lompoc.ca.us SUBJECT: Development Plan Review DR 17-06 Sobhani Industrial Warehouse AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 A request from Morris Sobhani, property owner, for Planning Commission consideration of a proposal to construct a 15,000 square foot building intended to be used for storage, production, and operation of commercial industrial businesses. The project site is 0.90 acres and is located at 424 Commerce Court (APN: 093-450-008) in the Business Park (BP) Zoning district. This action is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Scope of Review The Planning Commission is being asked to consider: If the project meets the property development standards for the Business Park (BP) Zoning District; If the proposal is consistent with the Architectural Review Guidelines; If the required Findings of Fact in the Resolution can be made; and If the Conditions of Approval are appropriate for the project. Planning Commission Action 1. Adopt Resolution No. 873 (18) approving Development Plan (DR 17-06) for the Sobhani Industrial Warehouse, based upon the Findings of Fact in the Resolution and subject to the attached draft Conditions of Approval; or 2. Provide alternative direction.

Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 Site Data 1. Property Owner: Morris Sobhani 2. Site Location: 424 Commerce Court 3. Assessor s Parcel Number: 093-450-008 4. Site Zoning: Business Park 5. General Plan Designation: Business Park 6. Site Use: Vacant 7. Surrounding Uses/Zoning: North - Raytheon Business Park/BP South - A Storage Place/BP East - A Storage Place & RV Storage/BP West - R.A.R.E. Electric Business Park & Compound Fitness Gym/BP 8. Site Area: 39,325 Square Feet/0.90 acres Conformance with General Plan The General Plan Land Use designation for this property is Business Park (BP) and the stated purpose is: To provide areas for clean and attractive planned industrial centers on large, integrated parcels of land upon which all activities are conducted indoors (Lompoc 2030 General Plan, Land Use Element, Table LU-1). The project proposes to construct a wine production and storage building. Production and storage (with inside storage only) are permitted industrial land uses in this district and consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation. Conformance with Zoning Ordinance The zoning for the site is Business Park (BP). The purpose of this zone is: To provide for planned industrial complexes in appropriate areas with sound development standards. The intent is to have primary users share common building complexes with common sign programs, building architecture, utility networks, and landscape areas in compatibly planned developments (Lompoc Municipal Code Section 17.064.010). The project, as proposed, is consistent with the zoning for the proposed wine production and storage uses which is appropriate for the area and meets the development standards identified in Table 1 below. N

Planning Commission Staff Report Page 3 Table 1: Business Park (BP) District Development Standards Category Development Standard Proposed Maximum Height 35 feet 26 feet, 3 inches Minimum Front Yard 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard 5 feet 52 feet Minimum Side Yard Minimum Parking 5 feet 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. for the first 5,000 sq. ft., then 1 space per 3,000 sq. ft. thereafter (wine production, storage) & 1 space per 350 sq. ft. (wine sales, office) 69 feet, 11 inches (East) 5 feet (West) 14 spaces required 37 spaces Minimum Loading 1 space, measuring 12 feet by 35 feet 1 space south of building, measuring 12 feet by 35 feet Site Plan The project site is currently vacant, located to the east of the R.A.R.E. Electric Business Park & Compound fitness gym. As shown on the attached site plan (Attachment 2), the project would construct a 15,000 square foot wine production and storage building that includes parking and landscaping. The one story industrial building fronts Commerce Court with access from Commerce Court. The building would contain up to seven (7) prospective tenants. Drought tolerant landscaping is proposed along the North, East and West sides of the building frontage and includes shrubs, vines and trees. The parking spaces to the East of the building frontage are screened from Commerce Court by shrubs. Parking & Circulation Required parking is based on two prospective uses including wine production and storage as well as wine sales and office uses. Based on these two uses, fourteen (14) parking stalls are required and thirty seven (37) parking stalls are provided as proposed. Therefore, the number of proposed spaces provides adequate parking for the proposed uses. If different industrial uses are proposed in the future, then approval of such use changes shall be contingent upon a demonstration of adequate parking for all uses at the site. For example, a parking deficiency would result from a use conversion from wine production and storage to wine tasting exclusively. Wine tasting is an allowed accessory use that can occupy up to fifteen (15%) percent of the building floor area. In order to occupy more space, a Minor Use Permit would be required in order to address potential parking shortages prior to approval of such a use change.

Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 Signage The applicant is not requesting review of signage by the Planning Commission at this time. A Sign Program requires approval by the Commission for any parcel with four or more businesses or tenant spaces, regardless of whether the tenant spaces are occupied. At this time, only two (2) tenant spaces within the proposed building would be created. Therefore, signage will only be reviewed at the staff level for compliance with the City s Sign Regulations (COA P56). Architectural Review Guidelines The proposed building is complimentary to other surrounding industrial buildings in the area. The bulk of the building is comprised of insulated steel wall panels. The exterior panels would be a slate gray in color and the base of the building would be architecturally treated with four a (4) foot high natural gray concrete split-face block wainscoting adding an element of texture to the building facade. As recommended by staff (COA P52), the front of the building facing Commerce Court will include a pop-out element around the entrance to provide architectural detailing/massing and also to create a sense of entry. The doors and trim would be charcoal gray in color creating contrast from the exterior wall panels. The pitched roof and awning(s) will be painted a rustic red in color. Each of these architectural elements and associated colors can be seen on the attached elevation drawings shown in attachment 2. In addition, two trellises with landscaping (such as vines) are proposed to be located along the east building elevation in order to soften and break up the single wall plane. Staff has reviewed the proposed building elevations and with a condition of approval to improve the front façade, the project meets the City s Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff Review A Development Review Board (DRB) meeting was held for this project on December 19, 2017. The applicant met with staff to discuss the proposal and draft Conditions of Approval were formulated. The Development Review Board (DRB) has developed a series of standard Conditions of Approval (COA) to advise applicants of possible requirements during the development review process. Project specific conditions are included from staff after reviewing the conceptual plans for Planning Commission consideration. A complete plan check occurs after construction plans have been submitted to the Building Division for building permits. Please note that not all COA included with the Planning Commission Resolution for the project may be applicable. If the applicant has questions and/or concerns regarding specific conditions, he/she should contact the department/division that is recommending the condition. DRB members do not attend the Planning Commission meeting and Planning staff cannot answer specific questions regarding conditions recommended by other departments/divisions. As conditioned, the project meets the Development Standards of the zoning ordinance and therefore the DRB recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 873(18), approving the Development Plan (DR 17-06) based upon the Findings of Fact in the Resolution and subject to the attached draft Conditions of Approval.

Planning Commission Staff Report Page 5 Environmental Determination The project is categorically exempt from review pursuant to Section 15332, In-fill Development Projects, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Notice of Exemption will be filed for the project following the Planning Commission action. Noticing On December 31, 2017: 1) Notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Lompoc Record; On December 22, 2017: 2) Notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet by US mail; 3) Notice was posted on the City website; 4) The project site was posted by City staff. Appeal Rights Any person has the right to appeal the Planning Commission action to the City Council within ten days of the action. Contact a Planning Division staff member for the required appeal form; the fee is $257.80. Attachments 1. Draft Resolution No. 873(18) approving DR 17-06 and Conditions of Approval 2. Site/Landscape Plan and Building Elevations Staff Report has been reviewed and approved for submission to the Planning Commission Teresa Gallavan Economic Development Director / Assistant City Manager Date Brian Halvorson Planning Manager Date G:\COMDEV\Staff reports-pc\dr\2018\dr 17-06 - Sobhani Industrial Warehouse.docx