RFQ Questions and Answers Mercer Island Commuter Parking & Town Center Mixed-Use Project

Similar documents
RFQ Questions and Answers Mercer Island Commuter Parking & Town Center Mixed-Use Project

Housing Commission Report

Fifth & Walnut Parking Garage Redevelopment Competitive Proposal Review. Council Work Session Friday, March 24, 2017

Town of Mooresville, NC Request for Proposals Public/Private Partnership Mixed Use Development Opportunity

City of Peachtree City. Annexation Review Process

Jackson/Pettigrew Street Development Update. City Council Work Session October 5, 2017

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

174 North King Street Workforce Housing Development Downtown Jackson, Wyoming

CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

IN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP, ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL HUNTERDON COUNTY ) ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Request for Proposals for the Development of the Downtown Vision

Standing Committee on City Finance and Services

Application for Conditional Use Permit CITY OF VALDOSTA PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OFFICE USE ONLY

HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Request for Proposal Commercial Real Estate Brokerage Services

Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

PUD, HPUD, OSC Rezoning & Conceptual Plan Application (Planned Unit Development, Haggerty Road Planned Unit Development, Open Space Community)

TORRES MARTINEZ DESERT CAHUILLA INDIANS. Physical Address Martinez Road P.O Box 1160 Thermal Ca

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Issue Date: Friday, January 26, Submission Deadline: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. CST OVERVIEW:

PART ONE - GENERAL INFORMATION

Missouri Housing Development Commission

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY US HIGHWAY 281 NORTH AT FM 1863 BULVERDE, TEXAS

Washington County CDBG/HOME Application for Funds

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

The Lawrenceville Community Land Trust: A Scattered Site, Single- Family, For- Sale Housing Development Lawrenceville Corporation

Uniform Act for CDBG-DR

New Zoning Ordinance Program

County Lot C Redevelopment

Investment Opportunity

Government Operations/ Courts Relocation Opportunities Analysis Advisory Services Update

River North (RiNo) Overlays.

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA NOVEMBER 1, 2016, 2016 MEETING

Town Center Joint Commission Public Hearing #1: January 20, 2016

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

APPLICATION FOR AN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE To Be Entitled:

COMMUNITY MEETING REPORT Petitioner: Sweetgrass Residential Partners, LLC Rezoning Petition No

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP # TOC17-001

DISTRICT OF SICAMOUS REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST MAIN STREET REDEVELOPMENT

TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY MANAGED SENIOR HOUSING

Robert Street Gateway, West St. Paul, Minnesota. A Premier Development Opportunity at the Gateway to West St. Paul and Dakota County

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following diagram depicts the maximum allowable building height in a +3 zone.

APPLICATION PACKET SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HOUSING OPTION REVIEW

FOR SALE Historic Frank Lloyd Wright Service Station Asking $380,000 Own A Piece of History

Term: Sixty (60) years commencing October 1, Approximately 24,258 sq. ft.

Proposed Development at Ajax Plaza Windcorp Grand Harwood Place Ltd.

Request for Proposal RFP To Acquire and Develop 2203 Marine Drive, nd Street West Vancouver, BC

RAINBOW DUNES CENTRE. For Sale, Lease or Joint Venture. Las Vegas Redevelopment Opportunity ±7.64 ACRES/ ±106, 400 SF.

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Table of Contents. 1. Introduction. 2. Scope of Work. 3. Schedule. 4. Proposal Requirements. 5. Evaluation/Selection

DATE: March 21, 2017 Mayor and City Council Mark McNeill, City Administrator Letter of Intent Village at Mendota Heights Parcels COMMENT:

70 Parker Hill Avenue Development. 70 Parker Hill Avenue Mission Hill. Application for Small Project Review Submitted to the

CALL FOR OFFERS / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

12. STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED SUMMARY. Date: September 21, Toronto Public Library Board. To: City Librarian. From:

Request for Proposal(RFP) for Planning Services

HARLEM AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Virginia Hospital Center Expansion

NARRATIVE (GUIDELINES)

County of Kern HOME Program Housing Developer Pre-Application

CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BED AND BREAKFAST

Paper copies & an electronic copy (pdf) of the following drawings or plans: 1 full size scalable certified survey and 1 (11 x 17) copy

M E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director

Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

Request for Proposals Eagle Place formerly the Baltic Mill Site

Results of the Request for Proposals to Develop and Operate Affordable Rental Housing at 200 Madison Avenue

Request for Proposals

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

Subject: Addendum No. 2 Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI) for Development of Brooklyn College School of Business.

Planning Department. March 7, Brian Ray Ray Design Development 724 Lake Davis Drive Orlando, FL 32806

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA Housing Authority of the City of West Point, Georgia

Request for Qualifications Construction of Multi-Family Housing at the Mill Avenue and State Street Intersection Union Grove, Wisconsin 5/20/15

Implementation Tools for Local Government

APPLICATION PACKET SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HOUSING OPTION REVIEW

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ACTION PLAN

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

UNIFIED FUNDING 2017 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

REAL ESTATE MARKET STUDY SERVICES

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

Real Estate Development and Reuse

SOLAR MASSACHUSETTS RENEWABLE TARGET PROGRAM (225 CMR 20.00) GUIDELINE

Charter Township of Garfield Grand Traverse County

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA. Meeting Date: November 18, Item Number: 8.D.5. Subject: Summary of Information:

8 TH STREET UPDATE & NEXT STEPS. January 6, 2016 Regroup meeting of PAB and LDC Economic Development Working Group

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

EIA Model Test 7: R-O to R-O

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

INVITATION to BID Sale of Condominiums Owned by TSC at Fort Brown Villas I and II

2018 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

Affordable Housing Plan

1. Question: In regards to the facilities are they all Monday thru Friday cleaning? Any facilities Saturday and or Sunday cleaning?

SMOKY LAKE COUNTY. Alberta Provincial Statutes

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS #840 FOR LONG TERM LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS GLADDING BUILDINGS 205 AND 211 THAMES STREET, BRISTOL, RHODE ISLAND

Transcription:

RFQ Questions and Answers Mercer Island Commuter Parking & Town Center Mixed-Use Project Updated 9/17/2018 The following Qs and As include questions asked of the City by interested parties following the September 11, 2018 RFQ Pre-submission Conference and Tour #1. This list will be updated as new questions are received and answered up to the October 5, 2018, 4pm submittal deadline. QUESTIONS RECEIVED from 9/11 through 9/17/2018 Site Details 1. When does the City anticipate closing on the Tully s site? Is the Purchase and Sale Agreement available for review? The City is scheduled to close on the property in February 2019; however, the seller has the option to extend closing for an additional six months. Yes, the Purchase and Sale Agreement is available on the City s website (June 5, 2018 City Council meeting at Agenda Bill 5434). Site Details Explanation of A and B Areas 2. Explain A2 on the map A2 represents land that is owned by WSDOT and serves as an I-90 greenbelt. The City and WSDOT are discussing the terms by which the City may purchase this additional land for development below and above ground. 3. Can you Confirm that Parcel A1 (32.6K SF) is inclusive of the approximately 3.0K SF in A2? Should proposer assume A2 is available for development? What is process / timing of city control of this parcel? Area A1 (32,600 SF) includes Area A2. A2 represents land that is owned by WSDOT. The City and WSDOT are discussing the terms in which the City may purchase this additional land for development below and above ground. Timing of a potential acquisition is not yet known but respondents should consider this area as available for planning purposes. 4. Would the B areas be allowed to have a stairway or some other daylight vertical structure? All B Areas are identified for below ground development only; however, the City will explore with WSDOT (the owner of the property) about the possibility for pedestrian access on these sites. 1

5. Can areas B1 through B3 count towards the required open space? The City may count some of areas B1 and B3 towards the required public open space, depending on the design and integration into onsite public open space areas. It is unlikely that areas B1 and B3 will fully satisfy public open space requirements; these areas cannot be used for the private open space requirement. Site Details Environmental 6. Is Phase 2 of the environmental available? A Phase 2 is not available at this time. The City is currently working on a Phase 2 investigation and will share the results of this investigation with the selected development team. 7. Has the contamination migrated off-site? The City is currently working on a Phase 2 investigation and will share the results of this investigation with the selected development team. 8. Is the City paying for the remediation? How will the clean-up of the site be performed? Although the Phase 2 investigation is not completed, the City is aware that a gasoline station operated on the Tully s property for a very long time and caused contamination on the property. As the Phase 2 environmental site investigation is completed, the City will also engage in negotiations with the prior owner/operator known to have contaminated the site, BP/ARCO, in efforts to obtain recovery of site remediation costs. The likely scenario is that the contaminated soils will be removed as part of the development of the property. Site Details City Development Code 9. Which sides of the property do the daylight plane requirements affect? What are the street façade locations? Freeway? 80th? 27th? Sunset? The south and northwest sides of the property are affected by the daylight plane requirements in the Mercer Island Town Center Code (MICC 19.11.030). SE 27th Street and that portion of Sunset Highway where it intersects the property on the NW corner of the site are block frontages that require the upper level (daylight plane) setback. Daylight plane setbacks are not required from the north or east portions of the site. 10. Would the option of live/work units satisfy the commercial component of the mixed-use building? No. The required commercial component needs to be retail, restaurant, or personal services (MICC 19.11.020(B)). 2

11. Can required parking (i.e. non-commuter parking) be reduced for affordable units? Parking for residential units may be reduced (to less than 1 stall per unit) through a sitespecific parking analysis. For the purposes of responding to the RFQ, a summary of the highlevel basis for the anticipated reduction would be appropriate. The City will seek to ensure that the commuter parking will not become de facto residential parking. 12. What is process for the P to TC rezone? Can you provide a more detailed timeline of key milestones to get to Q4 2018 decision? Does the city want proposers to assume site will be developed as TC? The Planning Commission recommended on September 5 that the City Council rezone all of the land in parcels A1 and A2 and north of the former Tully s property from PI to TC. The City anticipates that the City Council will review this recommendation on October 2 and October 16, and approve the rezone on November 20. The City anticipates that proposers will assume all of the land within parcels A1 and A2 will be developed as TC. Site Details Utilities and Built Environment 13. Will there be a survey for the site? A survey will be completed and provided to the selected development team but none is available at this time. The City has provided approximate dimensions for each of the above and below ground areas available for development at http://www.mercergov.org/rfp.asp. 14. What utilities are under the site? Where are the utilities located? The City s GIS reflects the location and presence of water, stormwater, and sewer facilities on / near the site. WSDOT has indicated that CenturyLink telecommunications may also be present. Approximate mapped location of utilities are available on the City s GIS (see: RFQ Site Utilities PDF at http://www.mercergov.org/rfp.asp) 15. The WSDOT wall what s holding it? WSDOT has indicated that all of the retaining walls along the subject site are cantilever walls and no tiebacks are present. 16. Where do we ask fire department access questions? What is the fire hose length on the city s fire response vehicles? The City s Fire Marshal and Development Services department will be partnering to address Fire Department access questions. Site specific fire design requirements will be addressed once a partner has been selected. 17. Can you relocate the vegetation and artwork? Is the site subject to tree removal regulations? Yes - Within reason and subject to an approved design, vegetation and art work may be relocated. 3

City Incentives 18. How much will ST contribute? What is the City s financial contribution? In addition to the land, the City will be contributing approximately $2 million from the Sound Transit Settlement Agreement Funds towards parking costs. 19. Can the City provide additional details or timeline on Priority Permitting? The City views this project as a community priority and as such will endeavor to expedite its regulatory process and anticipates committing to review timeframes as part of a binding agreement between the City and the selected development team to provide an added level of certainty and predictability. 20. Can you provide additional details of the support the City Council can provide? Does the city anticipate community support or resistance? RFQ respondents are encouraged to review the City s website (past agenda bills, Council video s, etc.) to gain an understanding of the importance and support for this project. Notwithstanding this recommendation, the City is of the belief that the community is very supportive of additional parking and a development that enhances the Town Center. General 21. Will this project be subject to prevailing wages? Will the project be subject to public open bid process? It is likely that prevailing wages will need to be provided on the public component of the commuter parking facility. The City is currently researching this matter and will respond further once a determination is made. 22. What will be the ownership structure for the project? The City contemplates owning/controlling the commuter parking spaces to be built by the selected development team, and the developer would own and operate the mixed-use development. 23. Is affordable housing required? Define affordability or workforce housing? To build a five-story building in Town Center, affordable housing is required. To comply with Town Center affordability requirements (MICC 19.11.040) and build a five-story building, the affordable housing must be either affordable at: A) 60% of median income for rental units; or B) 90% of median income for ownership housing. The City works with A Regional Coalition Housing (ARCH) to establish specific rental / sale rates for affordable units. 4

24. Will proposals be given greater preference if more than 100 parking stalls are provided? Is shared parking allowed? RFQ respondents that are able to demonstrate the ability to build more commuter public parking will be given preference over other respondents that demonstrate the ability to deliver fewer commuter public parking spaces. Shared parking between commuter public parking spaces (outside of transit ridership hours Monday thru Friday) and other uses is anticipated. 25. Can more than the minimum required amount of affordable housing units be provided? Yes. 26. Can housing units be provided that are affordable to less than 60 percent of median income? Yes. 27. Is the list of preferences weighted? Individual preferences identified in the RFQ have not been assigned a specific weight; however, they are listed in order of importance. - - - - - - - - - - End of Q&A 9/17/2018 5