Housing Market in Crisis Period the Example of Poznan

Similar documents
Sales of residential properties illustrated with the City of Kalisz

House Price Cycles the Case of Poland

The impact of the global financial crisis on selected aspects of the local residential property market in Poland

Single Family Sales Maine: Units

Housing and Property Market in Lithuania

Luxury Residences Report First Half 2017

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS )

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DYNAMICS OF REAL ESTATE MARKET PRICE OF APARTMENTS IN TÂRGU MUREŞ

DEVELOPMENT OF THE DWELLING CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MARKET DURING THE LAST DECADE

ARLA Members Survey of the Private Rented Sector

The Seattle MD Apartment Market Report

Büromarktüberblick. Market Overview. Big 7 3rd quarter

Abu Dhabi Real Estate Market Overview Q1_2017

The Corcoran Report 4Q16 MANHATTAN

REGIONAL. Rental Housing in San Joaquin County

KTI St. Petersburg Property Barometer: Real estate market professionals concluded the year 2011

Year to Date (thru June)

Manhattan Rental Market Report August 2013 mns.com

ARLA Members Survey of the Private Rented Sector

The effect of atrium façade design on daylighting in atrium and its adjoining spaces

820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

3 November rd QUARTER FNB SEGMENT HOUSE PRICE REVIEW. Affordability of housing

Luxury Residences Report 2nd Half 2016

Market Insights & Strategy Global Markets

Is there a conspicuous consumption effect in Bucharest housing market?

ON THE HAZARDS OF INFERRING HOUSING PRICE TRENDS USING MEAN/MEDIAN PRICES

1 February FNB House Price Index - Real and Nominal Growth

EVALUATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES - NOVELTIES WITHIN THE COST APPROACH

CITI HABITATS. Manhattan Residential Sales Market Report

Determinants of residential property valuation

HOUSING AND PROPERTY MARKET IN LITHUANIA CONTENTS

Brooklyn Rental Market Report August 2015 mns.com

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET COMMENTARY

Real Estate Development for a changing user market - the Dutch context

Housing Indicators in Tennessee

The Uneven Housing Recovery

FEBRUARY 2019 Harrisonburg & Rockingham County Real Estate Market Report

Research. A Capital Value production. An analysis of the Dutch residential (investment) market 2017

The Coldwell Banker Carlson Real Estate Market Report

BALTIC REVIEW 2016 Real Estate Markets of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

RESEARCH BRIEF TURKISH HOUSING MARKET: PRICE BUBBLE SEPTEMBER 2014 SUMMARY. A Cushman & Wakefield Research Publication OVERVIEW

Economy. Denmark Market Report Q Weak economic growth. Annual real GDP growth

Document under Separate Cover Refer to LPS State of Housing

Brokers Forum Report

STATISTICAL REFLECTIONS

Queens Rental Market Report November 2015 mns.com

What if Single-Family Homes House Multiple Households? APAColorado 2017 State Conference Telluride October 2017

PREMISES FOR BUILDNG A LAND BANK BY DEVELOPERS

New Plymouth District Council 1 of 23

Hamilton s Housing Market and Economy

April 2015, Volume 24 Issue 4. Q Round Up

Construction Investment Cools In Lead Up To General Election

MARKET AREA UPDATE Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Cycle Monitor Real Estate Market Cycles Third Quarter 2017 Analysis

Dan Immergluck 1. October 12, 2015

Housebuilding Market Report - UK

The Corcoran Report 3Q17 MANHATTAN

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2017

1 Q M A NH AT TA N M A R K E T R E P O R T

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015

DETACHED MULTI-UNIT APPROVALS

San Francisco Bay Area to Napa County Housing and Economic Outlook

First Steps and Further Steps: Creation of Property Market Estonia Case Study

Quarterly Housing Market Update

ARLA Survey of Residential Investment Landlords

Manhattan Rental Market Report November 2014 mns.com

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

MANHATTAN MARKET REPORT. 2nd Quarter 2017 RESALE

Condos or Single Family Homes?

Smoothed Weighted National Housing Index (base = January 2008)

Connecticut First Nine Months Housing Report 2014

Property Barometer Q2 2012

CAAR Market Report 2010 First Quarter Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

Goodson & Red team and Tõnu Toompark present: Tallinn Property Market Q3 Tallinn property and rental market review

Abu Dhabi Real Estate Market Overview Q3_2017

Atyrau Market View Residential

INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE REPORT. School of Business. April 2018

Residential Planning & The NPPF

Characteristics of Recent Home Buyers

A Historical Perspective on Illinois Farmland Sales

HOUSING MARKET REPORT BERLIN 2018: NO END IN SIGHT TO PRICE UPTREND. - Asking rents for apartments rise 8.8 percent to 9.79 per sq m and month in 2017

Young-Adult Housing Demand Continues to Slide, But Young Homeowners Experience Vastly Improved Affordability

THE ANNUAL SPRING REAL

PERSPECTIVE. Private Residential (Landed) Market Review & Outlook. Prices continued to decline 2Q 2015

MARCH 2019 Harrisonburg & Rockingham County Real Estate Market Report

DATA FOR FEBRUARY Published March 20, Sales are up +19.6% month-over-month. The year-over-year comparison is down -7.3%.

Trends in Housing Occupancy

Contents SEPTEMBER 2009

MNB-RICS Commercial Property Market Survey 2017 H2

Riga office centre overview

Seattle Housing Market Overview January 2019

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, June 2012

Brooklyn Rental Market Report September 2015 mns.com

HOUSING MARKET OUTLOOK: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA AND SURROUNDING AREA

Brooklyn Rental Market Report October 2014 mns.com

Summary of Report by the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export in Québec: Survival Rate of Co-operatives in Québec, 2008 edition

August 2015 Washington, DC Market Trends Report Limited supply, high demand continue pushing prices to record highs

PRIME RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET REPORT RESEARCH. Saint Petersburg HIGHLIGHTS

Brooklyn Rental Market Report July 2015 mns.com

Transcription:

33 Henryk Gawron Housing Market in Crisis Period the Example of Poznan, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 4, No 1, 2011, pp. 33-43. Housing Market in Crisis Period the Example of Poznan Prof. Henryk Gawron Department of Investment and Real Estate Faculty of Management Poznań University of Economics henryk.gawron@ue.poznan.pl Scientific Papers Journal of International Studies Foundation of International Studies, 2011 CSR, 2011 Abstract. The aim of the paper is to depict the situation on the housing market in Poznan during and after the crisis that hit the market in 2007. The author showed price tendencies for flats both on primary and secondary markets. The study carried out showed that housing structure and sales offer differed in particular city districts in certain crisis phases. Submitted: October 2011 1 st revision: November, 2011 Accepted: November, 2011 Keywords: housing market, house prices, property market, Poland, Poznan JEL classification: E32, R33, P2. Introduction The housing market is the most essential segment of property market, and its development is determined by a range of social, economic, legal and cultural factors (Gawron, 2007). The Polish housing market picked up substantially under the system transformation. The centrally planned economy left a severe housing shortage. At the same time, the existing inefficient system of housing construction collapsed, triggering the need to create a new, market-based system. The phasing out of generous government subsidies resulted in financing housing construction mainly from personal resources and bank mortgages (Bryx, 2007). As a result, housing construction volume decreased. Concurrently, one could observe remarkable progress in the fields of technology and finishing materials. Customers expectations for the housing standard increased considerably, leading to a great increase of housing construction costs and flats prices. Therefore, new housing construction in Poland has been developing quite slowly in the last 20 years. The boom on the housing market in Poland was fuelled mainly by the rally on the so called secondary market. In the light of a severe housing shortage, prices of flats both on primary and secondary markets increased consistently, especially in big cities. Yet the biggest boom surfaced in the Polish housing market during the years 2005 2007 (Gawron, 2011), and a number of political and socioeconomic factors contributed to its creation. As a result, prices of flats soared by 100 120%. However, such a sudden increase in prices of flats could not last too long and 2007 heralded a property crisis. Explaining the manifold reasons of the crisis still needs further in-depth research. Undoubtedly, one could observe falling demand and fluctuating prices of flats since the second half of 2007. The main incentives to write the paper were the following questions: What were the phases of crisis on the housing market?

34 How was the crisis changing housing offer (especially the one available on the secondary market)? How were housing stock structure and offer prices changing in big cities? The author tried to answer the aforementioned questions by looking at the changes within housing offer structure on the secondary housing market in Poznan in the years 2007-2010. More than 10 000 housing offers have been studied, as well as statistically evaluated and analysed. The statistical material and findings are presented below. Changes of offer structure on the Poznań secondary housing market in the years 2007-2010 In the first years of XXI century, offer prices of flats on the secondary market in Poznan were growing consistently. The tendency may be depicted as follows see Chart 1. Chart 1. Price tendency for flats [per 1 sq.m. in PLN] in the years 2001-2010 After a rapid price boom starting in 2006, crisis hit the Poznan housing market in the middle of 2007. It led to many and various changes within the housing offer on the secondary market. Prices were subject to manifold changes from the second half of 2007 until the end of 2010, as demonstrated on Chart 2 beneath:

35 Chart 1. Price tendency for flats [per 1 sq.m. in PL] in the period VIII.2007 XII.2010 Chart 2 illustrates dynamics of average offer price of flats (per square metre). The prices were affected by many factors and yet the analysis denies the common notion that their level dropped substantially. Therefore, in order to identify tendencies that occurred on the property market during the crisis period, one needs to conduct an in-depth analysis. Surveys carried out among property brokers show that new flats constituted a considerable share of sales offers available at that time. The flats were mainly purchased before the analysed period with a purpose of reselling them for profit. Due to the share of these new and expensive flats in the offer, the fall of average housing prices level on the secondary market was cushioned. Brokers tried to adjust their housing offer to market participants ever changing needs, and it is a known fact that in the times of crisis people are more interested in small and medium flats. Changes in structure of housing offer with respect to size of flats are demonstrated below (Chart 3):

36 Chart 3. Structure of housing offers in the years 2007-2010 For the reason mentioned above, one could observe a marked increase in share of small and medium-sized flats in the housing offer in the first months of the crisis. After that, bigger flats came back on the market. Prices of flats of different size varied significantly during the crisis period. At first, prices of the smallest flats showed a slightly downward trend, but it soon reversed along with the growing demand for this kind of flats and their limited supply (see Chart 4).

37 Chart 4. Price tendency for flats up to 35 sq.m. Offer prices of flats between 36-50 sq.m. displayed a similar tendency, as shown beneath (Chart 5): Chart 5. Price tendency for flats 36 50 sq.m. University of Economics Prices of flats sized 51-65 sq.m. that formed the biggest group within the housing offer remained fairly stable, except of the several-months period of decline in 2009. The tendency

38 was as follows (see Chart 6): Chart 6. Price tendency for flats 51-65 sq.m. There was a great variety of offers of flats between 66 and 80 sq.m. Despite or thanks to this diversity, the average offer prices within the group remained quite stable, as demonstrated on Chart 7. Chart 7. Price tendency for flats 66-80 sq.m. The most considerable changes during the crisis period occurred within the group of

39 big flats. At first, the owners struggled to maintain the relatively high price level of their properties, yet after some time the prices plummeted due to the low demand (see Chart 8). Chart 8. Price tendency for flats bigger than 80 sq.m. Was it possible to predict the average price changes of flats located in different areas of Poznan? The study showed that housing structure and sales offer differed in the analysed districts in certain periods of time. This is why clear price tendencies could not be distinguished. The average price of flats showed a growing tendency in some districts, while it displayed a falling tendency in other areas. The results are presented below (Charts 9-12): Chart 9. Price tendency for flats in the city centre

40 Chart 10. Price tendency for flats in Jezyce district Chart 11. Price tendency for flats in Rataje district

41 Chart 12. Price tendency for flats in Wilda district The charts presented above show that average prices of flats on the secondary market displayed contradictory tendencies in particular city districts. The prices fell in the city centre and Jeżyce district, yet they grew slightly in other districts e.g. Wilda and Rataje, where new flats appeared in the housing offer more and more often. Primary housing market in Poznan in the years 2007-2010 Along with the falling average price of flats on the secondary market, the primary market also suffered a downturn. It is noteworthy that the average price of 1 sq.m. of new flat was approximately 8 800 PLN in the middle of 2007, while it dropped to 6 230 PLN at the end of 2010. In other words, the average price of a new flat fell by 40%. Chart 13 shows the price tendency for 1 sq.m. of new flat in Poznan in the years 2005-2010.

42 Chart 13. Price tendency for new flats in Poznan in the years 2005-2010 The average price of a new flat was affected both by the overall situation on the market, growing number of unsold flats, and change in standard and localization of flats. Therefore, the price tendency for flats [1 sq.m.] in particular districts of Poznan in the years 2005-2010 may be illustrated as follows (see Chart 14): Chart 14. Price tendency for new flats [1 sq.m.] in some of the city districts in the years 2005-2010.

43 Summary Observing prices of flats on the secondary market in Poznan, one may reach several conclusions. First of all, the crisis brought falling demand for flats and it decreased property brokers turnover by approximately 30%. Prices of flats showed a downward trend. Brokers tried to tailor their offer to prospective customers more and more diversified expectations. These steps resulted in various periodic changes in the structure of housing offer on the Poznan secondary market. Despite the almost 4-year crisis period on the housing market in Poznań, there is little sign of an upturn or growing demand for flats. References Bryx Marek (2007), Uwagi o polityce mieszkaniowej w Polsce początku XXI wieku, in: Bryx Marek (edit.), Gospodarka, inwestycje, nieruchomości, podatki, Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warsaw. Gawron Henryk (2007), Opłacalność inwestowania na rynku nieruchomości, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań. Gawron Henryk (2011), Tendencies and forecast of the polish property market development research possibilities and directions, in: Gawron H (edit.), Tendencies and forecast of the polish property market development, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.