The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

Similar documents
1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

2200 FIFTH STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 31, Berkeley Way UC Press Building

652 Lockhaven Drive, Pacifica, CA Shattuck Avenue, B100 Berkeley, CA 94704

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner Church Divinity School of the Pacific, 2451 Ridge Rd., Berkeley, 94709

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Downtown Zoning: Downtown Mixed Use (Core)/ Arts District Overlay C-DMU/ADO

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

D. Applicant: Muhammad A. Nadhiri, Axis Development Group, 580 California Street, 16 th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

CAN TRADITIONAL ZONING ACHIEVE OUR GOALS FOR DOWNTOWN ANN ARBOR?

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

MEETING OF: June 3, Tom Beil, Goring and Straja Architects

3.1 Existing Built Form

8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP# to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family dwelling on a vacant lot.

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

The Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017

Wilson Bridge Corridor Zoning. Department of Planning & Building

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

LINVILL, C P PINK, D A EDWARDS, B P MITCHELL, L P KAHN, C P JENSON, K P CLARKE, T P

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner: Guy Supawit, on the behalf of Wat Mongkolratanaram, 1911 Russell Street, Berkeley CA

A DJUSTMENTS. B. Permits Requested Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law:

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS

Chair to close public hearing. Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/18/ Days: 10/17/2017

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Single-Family Residential Zoning: R-1H, Single-Family Residential, Hillside District

MINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED:

Advisory Design Panel Report For the Meeting of February 27, 2019

Allowing for a 3 off-street parking stall reduction.

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Proposed Five-Story, 50-Unit Multiple-Family Building at 4856 El Camino Real

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

Durant Ave., Berkeley

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections

STAFF DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT

TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM ORDINANCE NO

6 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS

Potential Building 6-Storey (Allowable) 50' Shoulder ALEXANDER STREET. Evelyne Saller Centre Main Entrance. Rodan Lodge Entry Porch

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

th Avenue NW Early Design Guidance Meeting - SDCI # EDG Meeting

Infill & Other Residential Design Review

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

Peter Street and 357 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CHAPTER MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential

MEMORANDUM. B4S-2 Downtown Service District DP Downtown Parking Overlay District 42,390 square feet / 0.97 acres. DMNA; adjacent to North Loop

ncd zoning overlay regulations

Cambridge Planning Board Zoning Submission Overview 7/25/2017

International Village By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

KENECT DENVER 2136 LAWRENCE OPTIONAL CONCEPT REVIEW ARAPAHOE SQUARE DESIGN ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 20, 2018

SELLWOOD MORELAND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE 8210 SE 13th AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR STATION CHURCH

Shattuck Avenue

MARKET & OCTAVIA AREA PLAN FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord.

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

1950 ADDISON. Berkeley, CA December 17, Design Reivew. Westwood BayRock Addison, L.P. c/o BayRock Multifamily, LLC

3005 Bloor Street West and 14 Humbervale Boulevard - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Rigoberto Calocarivas, Multicultural Institute, 1920 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710

Bethesda Downtown Design Advisory Panel Submission Form

Plan Dutch Village Road

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

Accessory Coach House

Planning Commission June 25, Lincoln Boulevard

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

MEMORANDUM. C3A District Shoreland Overlay District 32,055 square feet / 0.74 acres. West Calhoun, adjacent to Cedar-Isles-Dean

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

1615 EDGEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 180 ORLANDO, FL T: /F: Memorandum

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Transcription:

D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002 to demolish an existing one-story commercial building and allow construction of a new seven-story mixed use building with 66 dwelling units, ground-floor commercial space, and underground parking. I. Introduction This project is located on the south side of Addison Street, between Milvia Street and Shattuck Avenue. This parcel is located in the C-DMU, Commercial Mixed Use, zoning district, in the area. The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken. This project was before the Design Review Committee (DRC) for Preliminary Design Review in December 2016 were it was continued. The summary from that meeting is further below in this report for your reference. It is returning to the DRC for Continued Preliminary Design Review. II. Background The proposed project is the construction of a new seven-floor mixed-use building. The ground floor would contain one ground floor commercial space, as well as the residential entry, a garage entrance and parking lift system, and required circulation space. The parking would be for both the residents as well as for the commercial tenant. The upper six floors would contain 66 residential units. The roof would feature a large roof terrace for the residents use, space for solar panels, a stair and mechanical housing, and a decorative cupola. The project would provide dense downtown housing close to employment, transportation, shopping, and entertainment. The design will feature sustainable and durable 2120 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.7410 TDD: 510.981.7474 Fax: 510.981.7420

2072 ADDISON STREET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Page 2 of 9 July 20, 2017 materials and building assemblies, consistent with Berkeley s Green policies and requirements for new building in the Mixed-Use Zoning District. III. Project Setting A. Neighborhood/Area Description: This site is located within, and is surrounded by, the C-DMU Mixed Use Commercial zoning district, area. The project is adjacent to commercial and office buildings on the east and west. The Jazz School and Berkeley Repertory Theater are directly across the street on Addison, and Freight and Salvage Coffee House is a few buildings west of the subject site. The project site is currently used as a 24 Hour Fitness gym. See Table 1 below for more detailed Land Use Information. Figure 1: Vicinity Map 2072 Addison Street Note: double hatching represents sites with Historic Resources

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 2072 ADDISON July 20, 2017 Page 3 of 9 Table 1: Land Use Information Location Existing Use Zoning District General Plan Designation Subject Property 24 Hour Fitness C-DMU Surrounding North The Jazz School, Berkeley C-DMU Properties Repertory Theater South Commercial, mixed use C-DMU East Revival Bar and Kitchen, C-DMU mixed use West Commercial, office C-DMU

2072 ADDISON STREET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Page 4 of 9 July 20, 2017 Table 2: Development Standards Standards for 2072 Addison Street BMC Sections 23E.68.070-080 Existing Proposed Permitted/ Required Lot Area (sq. ft.) 10,230 10,230 Not regulated Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Total Floor Area 10,230 61,452 Not regulated Commercial Floor Area 10,230 1,500 +/- Not regulated Residential Floor Area 0 56,810 Not regulated Floor Area Ratio 1 6 Not regulated Dwelling Units Building Height Building Setbacks (ft.) Total 0 66 Not regulated Affordable N/A 0 20% of total units @ moderate income Maximum (ft.) 21 75 75 w/use Permit Maximum (ft.) w/ roof equipment rooms & architectural elements N/A 92 75+ w/aup Stories (above ground) 1 7 Not regulated Front 0 0 0 Rear 0 0 5 min. Left Side 0 0 Right Side 0 0 Usable Open Space (sq. ft.) 0 5,342 Privately-Owned Public Open Space (sq. ft.) 0 0 Parking Commercial (auto) 0 7 Residential (auto) 0 22 5 min. @ 65 ft. from frontage 5 min. @ 65 ft. from frontage 80 per dwelling unit 1 per 50 commercial floor area 1.5 spaces per 1K sq. ft. of commercial area 1 space per 3 dwelling units Motorcycle 0 0 Not regulated Bicycle 0 Will comply 1 per 2K sq. ft. of commercial floor area

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 2072 ADDISON July 20, 2017 Page 5 of 9 IV. Project Description A. Requested Use Permits This development proposal is subject to Use Permit approval by the Zoning Adjustments Board in accordance with multiple provisions of the Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC). At this time, staff has identified the following permit requirements: Use Permit under BMC Section 23C.08.050 Paragraph A to demolish a commercial building Administrative Use Permit under BMC Section 23E.04.020 Paragraph C to construct rooftop equipment and rooms greater than district height limit Use Permit under BMC Section 23E.68.030 to construct a mixed use building Use Permit under BMC Section 23E.68.070 Paragraph A to construct a building greater than 60 feet in average height Use Permit under BMC Section 23E.68.070 Paragraph B to reduce required building setbacks B. Density Bonus Information This development proposal does not include below-market rate housing and it will be subject to the City s Affordable Housing Mitigation Fee Ordinance if approved. C. CEQA Determination: Anticipated categorical exemption under 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines ( In-Fill Development Projects ). V. Design Review Guidelines Following are several key guidelines in the Design Guidelines which relate closely to this project. Frontages, Setbacks, and Heights Maintain a continuous zero-setback build-to-line at the ground floor at the edge of all streets where commercial and higher levels of activity is anticipated. Consider massing alternatives that would reduce shadow impacts on streets and relate new construction to the scale of nearby buildings, such as use of upper-story setbacks. Maintain and reinforce s historic street-wall at the property line. Upper floor setbacks are desirable above 60 feet. Consider how the building s form and orientation can take advantage of sun and shade to appropriately heat and cool the building. Respect the height of neighboring buildings, and provide a sense of continuity and enclosure which avoids abrupt changes in height. Open Spaces Provide new open spaces which are deliberately planned, designed, and located to be usable.

2072 ADDISON STREET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Page 6 of 9 July 20, 2017 Configure new buildings so they enframe and define open spaces, and so building inhabitants face and observe the open spaces. Use drought-tolerant plants that require little or no irrigation, and avoid plants that require pesticides or high levels of maintenance, such as is recommended in the Bay-Friendly Basics Landscape Checklist. Consider using landscaping to cool open spaces and building air intake manifolds. Consider ways to re-use rainwater for landscape irrigation, or cooling fountains or water walls. Retain rainwater to promote infiltration and slow site run-off. Encourage green roofs, especially green roofs that can also be used as outdoor amenities by building residents. BUILDING DESIGN Facades Reflect and reinforce the scale, massing, proportions, rhythm and attention to detailing which are established by the facades of Landmark and Significant buildings. Except for recessed entries, a majority of the storefront should be at the property line, and other recessed portions should not detract from streetwall continuity. Incorporate elements which break up façade planes and create a visual play of light and shadow. Avoid long, uninterrupted horizontal surfaces. Consider the use of bay windows, balconies and architectural projections. Vertical divisions of ground and upper floors should be consistent. Generally maintain a cornice that projects horizontally between the ground floor (and its mezzanines) and upper stories. Architecturally distinguish the ground floor from the upper façade, to form a visual base for the building. Create an intimate scale for the pedestrian environment. Architecturally distinguish the upper façade from the top of the façade to provide a visual termination for the building. Generally maintain a cornice that projects horizontally at the top of the 5 th floor, or near the top of the buildings that are less tall. Maintain the typical rhythm of structural bays and enframed storefronts of 15-30 feet spacing at ground level, in order to enhance visual continuity with existing buildings and pedestrian scale. Curtain walls, if used, should be designed with rhythm, patterns and modulation to be visually interesting. Articulate side and rear facades in the manner compatible with the design of the front façade. Avoid large blank wall surfaces on side and rear facades which are visible from public areas. Include architectural features such as awnings, canopies, and recessed entries that can protect pedestrians from inclement weather. Window should comprise 25-50% of upper facades visible from public areas, and should reflect the rhythm, scale, proportion, and detailing of upper windows of Landmark and Significant buildings.

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 2072 ADDISON July 20, 2017 Page 7 of 9 Roof Forms Generally accompany windows with light shelves, overhangs or deep recesses to shade the window during the summer which providing solar access into the building during the winter. Photovoltaic panels should either be integrated within the overall composition of facades, such as by serving as awnings or light shelves, or they should be screened from view. Frame windows and use light shelves and other articulation to emulate the rhythm, scale, and reveal (shadow) or traditional buildings. Consider the design of rooftops that may be viewed from above. Reduce glare and make rooftop equipment more attractive. Provide a termination to the top of the building in a way that complements and enhances the character of the building and the. Materials Use high quality, durable materials which enhance the building and convey a sense of permanence. Materials should be compatible with those used on nearby Landmark and Significant buildings, and should have a similar level of detailing Use high-quality detailing for new and replacement materials. Use materials which are easily cleaned, and will not be permanently damaged by graffiti. The street frontage for this project is designated as required public serving frontage (refer to figure 43 in the 2012 Guidelines) At least one publicly-accessible street-level entrance to be provided for every 40 feet along a street facing frontage. Any remainder exceeding 30 feet shall also have a publicly-accessible street-level entrance. No two entrances shall be separated by more than 50 feet. Clear glass shall comprise at least 60% of the street facing façade where it is between 3 feet and 8 feet above elevation of adjacent sidewalk The design of the ground floor shall be visually open to pedestrians such that the design should enable the main activities of the proposed use to be carried out towards the front of the space. A complete set of the downtown design guidelines can be found online at: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/contentdisplay.aspx?id=14260 VI. Issues and Analysis A. Changes Since Previous Submittal: Neighborhood Context / Building Height Proposed building is now seven stories as the mezzanine level in the previous submittal is now a full floor of residential units.

2072 ADDISON STREET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Page 8 of 9 July 20, 2017 This project site is within the Plan Area and in a vibrant active area with varied building heights. It is in the Arts Overlay District and changes to the garage entrance are in response to the existing art plaques located in the Public Right-ofway in front of this site. The street frontage for this project is also designated as required public serving frontage. See above for specific requirements located in the Design Guidelines. Garage Entrance / Ground Floor Changes Applicant has met with Civic Arts Staff to go over any restrictions associated with the art plaques in the Public Right-of-way in front of this parcel on Addison. In response to that feedback, the applicant redesigned the ground floor plan so that the garage entrance is located in the middle of the façade with only minimal shifting of some of the plaques required. Setbacks / Massing Proposed massing still has a strong street wall presence at the property line on Addison Street with arched recessed entrances for the main residential lobby and the commercial space. Two windows facing east, in upper recesses on the top two residential floors add interest and scale as seen from Shattuck. Encroachments/ Bay Design North elevation has been simplified with two similar bays spaced equally from the center on the Addison façade. An encroachment permit from Public Works is required for the proposed encroachment. Materials Exterior materials proposed still feature stamped metal siding, as well as a concrete base and decorative cornices. The applicant will bring details and material samples to the meeting. Open Space Design Open space for the residents is still located on the roof and now has increased seating area in the northeast corner where the previous submittal had shown a sloped roof. Proposed seating areas are shown on the roof plan, Sheet A2.03. The applicant does reference specific palm trees in attached letter. Bike Parking is located on the ground level at the end of the entrance lobby, near the elevators. B. Issues for Discussion: Massing / Bay Design Ground Floor / Garage Entrance Design Façade Design Materials Open Space VII. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee discuss the issues outlined above and give the applicant feedback on the building details and material palette for the next review. Attachments: 1. Project Plans, received July 7, 2017 2. Applicant Response Letter, received July 7, 2017

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE 2072 ADDISON July 20, 2017 Page 9 of 9 Staff Planner: Anne Burns, aburns@ci.berkeley.ca.us, (510) 981-7410