l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-

Similar documents
1. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-Dade

1. In this action, the Property Appraiser appeals a decision of the Miami-Dade

Plaintiff, ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TI{E llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

1. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami-Dade

l. This is an action to contest the decision of the Osceola County Value 2. The plaintiff, Katrina Scarborough, is the duly elected Osceola County

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

2. This action is brought pursuant to Florida Statute $ Plaintiff, ATLANTIC AVE DEVELOPMENT LLC, is a Florida Limited Liability

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

L This is an action brurght pursuant to Sections l94.l7l and (2), Florida Statutes,

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

1. This action arises out of the denial for the Tax Years 2016 and 2017 by the St. Lucie. Filing # E-Filed 04124/2017 ll:04:01 PM COMPLAINT

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :37:26 PM 18-CA-9531

1". This is an actibn to contest an ad valorem tax assessments for the tax year. limited liability company and SOUTHEASTERN.

1. This is an action for statutory relief. This Court has jurisdiction pursuantto Florida

1. This is an action to contest ad valorem tax assessments for the tax year. Plaintiff, WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

1. The Plaintiff, IA LODGING ORLANDO DOWNTOWN, LLC (hereinafter. 2. The Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to transact -1-

1. The Plaintiff, LAKE V/ALES RETIREMENT CENTER, [NC., (hereinafter

. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

1. The Plaintifl, FGHP FUNDING WEST LP (hereinafter "Plaintiffl'), owns real

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :55:18 PM

1.1 This is an action for injunctive relief and declaratory relief within the

1. The Plaintiff, PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, [NC., 2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

L This is an action brought pursuant to Sections and (2), Florida Statutes'

2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

1. This is an action to contest ad valorem tax assessments pursuant to Section

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 09/28/ :42:23 PM

Courthouse News Service

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :48:54 PM

1. As of January L,20L4,legaI title to the Subject Property was vested in The

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

1.1 This is an action for injunctive relief and declaratory relief within the

Filing # E-Filed 06/17/ :41:16 AM

Defendants. I. 1. This is an action for a declaratory judgement and to challenge the removal

IN THE FLORIDA FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

FINANCIAL GEOFFREY L. CARPENTER; BRICKELL 53,{ INC.; 54445, INC.; FORBES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN A. HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

1. Ptaintifl Andrew A. Greenstein, in his capacity as Trustee of the Andrew. 2. Defendant CAREY BAKER is sued in his official capacrty as Lake County

1. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the partial removal

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF. Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the

ALACHUA COUNTY VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. Process and Procedures 2007

CERTIFICATE TO ROLL. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Property Appraiser in

Filing # E-Filed 06/16/ :40:09 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.

RECErVED FOR FlUNG AMERICAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC.

l. This is an action for declaratory relief, contesting the legality and validity of the

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. vs. DCA CASE NO. 1D08-515

DRAFT- SUBJECT TO REVISIONS BEFORE FILING

Title: Ronald J. Schultz, Citrus County Property Appraiser. Jun 03, 1994 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D ) REALTY INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

vs. COMPLAINT GENERAL JURI SDICTION DTVISION Plaintiff,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION DIVISION:

CITY OF AUSTIN S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs.

CERTIFICATE TO ROLL. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Property Appraiser in and for BROWARD

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Public comments workshop 1

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-91 (Lower Tribunal Case Nos. 3D08-944; )

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

Plaintiff, CASE NO. : COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF

UNIFORM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARDS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011

CASE NO. 1D Elliott Messer and Thomas M. Findley of Messer, Caparello & Self, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 93,802. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida.

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 06/17/ :34:36 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. CASE NO. 4D

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2007

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion

ARIZONA TAX COURT TX /18/2006 HONORABLE MARK W. ARMSTRONG

How to Sue Your Landlord in Texas

COMMISSION AGENDA ;. 1<1. 1./ t1 llc

Time and Costs Are Increasing for Counties to Complete the Value Adjustment Board Process

Citrus County Property Appraiser TRIM Frequently Asked Questions

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Transcription:

Filing # 75429003 E-Filed 0712412018 02:21:30 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I lth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASENO. 20r8-024994-CA-01 PEDRO J. GARCIA, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County, Florida, Plaintiff, VS NEWPORT MIAMI BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A Florida not for profit corporation; FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., a Florida profit corporation; NEWPORT OPERATING CORPORATION, a Florida profit corporation; WESTGATE MIAMI BEACH, LTD., a Florida limited partnership; and LEON M. BIEGALSKI, as Executive Director of the State of Florida Department ofrevenue, COMPLAINT Defendants Plaintiff, PEDRO J. GARCIA, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County, Florida, (the "Property Appraiser") sues the above-captioned Defendants (the Taxpayers"), and LEON M. BIEGALSKI, as Executive Director of the State of Florida Department of Revenue (the "Department"), and alleges: l. In this action, the Property Appraiser seeks to reverse a decision of the Miami- Dade County Value Adjustment Board ("VAB") that reduced the Property Appraiser's assessments of market values for 2017 ad valorem taxation purposes of those certain condominium units owned, operated, or managed by the Taxpayers, which are more fully described inthe Schedule of Subject Units attached hereto as "Exhibit,A.."

JURISDICTION. VENUE. PARTIES 2. This Court has exclusive jurisdiction of this equitable action pursuant to sections 194.036(lXa) and (b), and 194.171of the Florida Statutes (2016). 3. The real property at issue is a hotel-condominium building located at 16701 Collins Avenue, Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160 (the "subject Property"). Each individual unit within the Subject Property (each a "subject Unit") is subject to the challenged ad valorem tax assessments. Each Subject Unit is identified by unit number and corresponding tax folio number inthe Schedule of Subject Units attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 4. Venue is proper because the Subject Property is located in Miami-Dade County. 5. The Property Appraiser is the duly-elected appraiser for Miami-Dade County, Florida and is a proper plaintiff in this action under section 194.181(1Xb), Florida Statutes. 6. As of January l,2ol7,the Taxpayers were the legal titleholders of record of the Subject Units assessed under the tax folios listed in in the attached Schedule of Subject Units. Thus, the Taxpayers are the proper defendants herein under section 194.181(2), Florida Statutes. 7. The Department is responsible for overall supervision of the assessments and collection of ad valorem taxes and is named as a defendant in accordance with section 194.181(5), Florida Statutes, because the tax assessments are contested on the grounds that they are contrary to the laws and Constitution of the State of Florida. 8. This action is timely filed and all conditions precedent have been met. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The Subject Property is a hotel-condominium located on Collins Avenue in Sunny Isles Beach and is known as the Newport Beachside Hotel & Resort. 10. The Property Appraiser assessed each Subject Unit and the aggregate assessment for the market value for tax year 2077 was $68,63 1,460. 11. The Property Appraiser's assessment of market value for each Subject Unit is set forth in the attached Schedule of Subiect Units.., -L' c

12. To arrive at the Subject Property's assessments for 2017, the Property Appraiser applied professionally accepted appraisal practices, including the sales comparison, cost, and income approaches to real property valuation, while simultaneously considering the criteria set forth in sections 193.017,193.023, and 192.037, Florida Statutes. 13. Applying this methodology, the Property Appraiser examined recent sales of comparable properties, construction costs, and the Subject Property's location and condition, among other factors. 14. The Taxpayers filed a petition with the VAB seeking to reduce the Property Appraiser's assessment of each Subject Unit's market value for tax year 2017. 15. After a hearing on the VAB petitions held on February 27,2018, Special Magistrate Pedro M. Alvarez recommended that the Subject Units' aggregate market value be reduced substantially. 16. The VAB adopted the Special Magistrate's recommendations. Consequently, the Property Appraiser's aggregate assessment of the Subject Units for tax year 2017 was reduced to s26,660,250. 17. The VAB's reduced assessment of market value for each individual Subject Unit is set forth in the attached Schedule of Subject Units. 18. The VAB's reductions represent an average decrease of sixty one percent (61%) frorn the Property Appraiser's assessments. Each reduction exceeds the variance thresholds set forth in section 194.036(1Xb). 19. The market values adopted by the VAB were unlawful given that they are below each Subject Unit's true 'Just value." 20. The VAB's unlawful reductions will negatively impact the Subject Units' assessed values not only in tax year 2017, but also in subsequent years as a result of the assessment cap contained in Article VII, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution of 1968, and its implementing statutes, including 193.155, 193.1554, and 193.1555 of the Florida Statutes. -3-

21. Therefore, the VAB's adjusted assessments of the Subject Units for taxyeat 2017 violate Florida statutory and constitutional law, including without limitation, sections 193.155, 193.1554, and 193.1555 of the Florida Statutes, and Article VII, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution. WHEREFORE, the Property Appraiser respectfully requests that this Court enter an order: a, b c. d. e f. finding that the Property Appraiser's market value assessments for the contested tax year were determined by an appraisal methodology that complies with the criteria ofsection 193.01 I and professionally accepted appraisal practices; finding that the VAB's adjusted assessments do not represent the just values of the Subject Units; and are arbitrarily based on appraisal practices that are different from the appraisal practices generally applied by the Property Appraiser to comparable property within Miami-Dade County; reinstating and certifying the Property Appraiser's assessments for tax year 2017; directing the Department to approve the Property Appraiser's assessments for tax year 2017; directing the Tax Collector to issue revised tax bills for the deficiency, if any, in outstanding taxes and interest for tax year 2017 in accordance with S 194.192, Florida Statutes; awarding all of the Property Appraiser's costs pursuant to $ 194.192, Fla. Stat.; and g. granting such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516, undersigned counsel hereby designates his/her prirnary and secondary e-mail addresses for purposes of e-mail service as follows: Primary e-mail address: Mastrucc@miamidade.gov Secondary e-mail address: Wilma.Morillo@miamidade.gov -4-

Respectfully submitted, ABIGAIL PRICE.WILLIAMS Miami-Dade County AttorneY Stephen P. Clark Center, Suite 2810 l l l Northwest First Street Miami, Florida 33128-1993 By: -I Mo..strucci Michael J. Mastrucci Assistant County AttorneY Florida Bar No. 86130 Email : Mastrucc@miarnidade. gov Telephone: (305) 375-5151 Facsimile: (305) 375-5634 -5-